retrospective chart review

回顾性图表审查
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不良儿童经历(ACE)在普通人群中非常普遍,他们对身心健康的终身影响是深远的。在评估ACE时,至关重要的是要考虑的途径和方式,通过它一个人内化事件作为一个不利的经验和其对其生物的影响,心理,和社会功能。然而,ACEs的常规评估是不充分的,因为它们没有全面评估不良事件的来源及其对个体影响的途径和模式.
    这项研究开发了ACE的原始量表,该量表通过回顾性医学图表对事件的来源及其对个体的影响的途径和模式进行了分类。我们还使用该量表调查了536例精神疾病患者的ACE(抑郁症,双相情感障碍,和精神分裂症)。
    该量表由28个项目组成,其信度和效度是足够的。我们还发现,45.9%的患者至少有一次ACE,所有疾病的范围为43.5%至51.5%。来自同龄人的心理创伤(欺凌)是最常见的原因,占27.2%。
    我们开发了一种基于回顾性图表审查的ACE评估工具,该工具可以检查ACE事件的来源及其对个体影响的途径和模式。无论精神疾病的类型如何,ACE的频率都很高,水平创伤(欺凌受害)和垂直创伤(父母虐待)一样频繁。
    UNASSIGNED: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are highly prevalent in the general population, and their lifelong impact on physical and mental health is profound. In assessing ACEs, it is vital to consider the pathways and modalities by which an individual internalizes events as an adverse experience and its effects on their biological, psychological, and social function. However, conventional assessments of ACEs are inadequate in that they do not comprehensively assess the source of the adverse event and the pathway and mode of its impact on the individual.
    UNASSIGNED: This study developed an original scale for ACEs that classifies the source of the event and the pathway and mode of its impact on the individual from a retrospective review of medical charts. We also used this scale to investigate the ACEs in 536 patients with psychiatric disorders (depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia).
    UNASSIGNED: This scale consisted of 28 items, and its reliability and validity were sufficient. We also found that 45.9% of the patients studied had at least one ACE, ranging from 43.5% to 51.5% for all disorders. Psychological trauma (bullying) from peers was the most common cause at 27.2%.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a retrospective chart review-based assessment tool for ACEs which enables the examination of the source of the events of ACEs and the pathways and modalities of their impact on the individual. The frequency of ACEs is high regardless of the type of psychiatric disorder, and horizontal trauma (bullying victimization) is as frequent as vertical trauma (parental maltreatment).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术患者安全是卫生系统的关键质量问题。医疗保健获得的不良事件(AE)损害了安全性和质量;因此,他们的报告和监测是患者安全的优先事项.尽管管理数据集是监测不良事件发生率的潜在有效工具,人们仍然担心他们的数据的准确性。需要进行图表审查验证研究,以探索行政数据为研究和卫生政策提供信息的潜力。本审查旨在通过图表审查来概述用于验证行政数据中不良事件发生率的方法方法和策略。方法本综述是根据JoannaBriggs研究所的范围审查方法框架进行的。通过数据库搜索,确定了1054个来源,导入Covidence,并根据纳入标准进行筛选。包括通过图表审查验证行政数据中不良事件发生率的文章。数据被提取,导出到MicrosoftExcel,安排在一张图表中,并以表格和描述性格式呈现。结果共纳入56个研究。然而,大多数来源报告了手术不良事件,还探索了其他医学专业。所有研究都使用图表综述,然而,很少有人同意研究设计的术语。使用了各种方法和抽样策略。一些研究使用了全局触发工具,两阶段图表审查方法,而其他人则使用替代的单一-,两阶段或不清楚的方法。来源使用标记图表的样本(n=24),标记图和随机图(n=11)和随机图(n=21)。大多数研究报告不良事件发生率的准确性较差或中等。一些研究报告了不良事件记录的良好准确性,这突出了将管理数据用于研究目的的潜力。结论本综述强调了管理数据提供不良事件发生率信息并提高患者安全和医疗质量的潜力。尽管如此,需要进一步的工作来确保行政数据的准确性。所采取的方法论方法的变化,所使用的抽样技术表明对最佳实践缺乏共识,因此,需要进一步澄清和达成共识,以制定更系统的图表审查方法。
    Patient safety is a key quality issue for health systems. Healthcare acquired adverse events (AEs) compromise safety and quality; therefore, their reporting and monitoring is a patient safety priority. Although administrative datasets are potentially efficient tools for monitoring rates of AEs, concerns remain over the accuracy of their data. Chart review validation studies are required to explore the potential of administrative data to inform research and health policy. This review aims to present an overview of the methodological approaches and strategies used to validate rates of AEs in administrative data through chart review. This review was conducted in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews. Through database searches, 1054 sources were identified, imported into Covidence, and screened against the inclusion criteria. Articles that validated rates of AEs in administrative data through chart review were included. Data were extracted, exported to Microsoft Excel, arranged into a charting table, and presented in a tabular and descriptive format. Fifty-six studies were included. Most sources reported on surgical AEs; however, other medical specialties were also explored. Chart reviews were used in all studies; however, few agreed on terminology for the study design. Various methodological approaches and sampling strategies were used. Some studies used the Global Trigger Tool, a two-stage chart review method, whilst others used alternative single-, two-stage, or unclear approaches. The sources used samples of flagged charts (n = 24), flagged and random charts (n = 11), and random charts (n = 21). Most studies reported poor or moderate accuracy of AE rates. Some studies reported good accuracy of AE recording which highlights the potential of using administrative data for research purposes. This review highlights the potential for administrative data to provide information on AE rates and improve patient safety and healthcare quality. Nonetheless, further work is warranted to ensure that administrative data are accurate. The variation of methodological approaches taken, and sampling techniques used demonstrate a lack of consensus on best practice; therefore, further clarity and consensus are necessary to develop a more systematic approach to chart reviewing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:增加获得全面的家庭或基于社区的医疗保健服务以及紧急家庭访问的公共卫生策略旨在减少急诊科的人满为患。然而,迄今为止,关于家庭保健服务和急诊科用途之间关联的科学证据令人惊讶地不足和有争议。本回顾性研究确定了接受公共资助的家庭护理服务的患者急诊就诊的危险因素。
    方法:个人人口统计和医疗信息,看护者特征,收集了2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日在台湾南部地区医院接受综合家庭护理服务的108例患者的医疗记录和结构化问卷,以及与家庭护理服务和急诊科就诊相关的行为.在使用初步单变量分析筛选潜在预测变量后,采用最佳子集选择方法进行多变量逻辑回归,以确定最佳决定因素组合,从而预测计划外的急诊科室使用情况.
    结果:最佳子集选择回归分析显示Charlson合并症指数(比值比(OR)=1.33,95%CI=1.05至1.70),男性护理人员(OR=0.18,95%CI=0.05至0.66),引入家庭护理服务的持续时间(OR=0.97,95%CI=0.95至1.00),专职护士的工作经验(OR=0.89,95%CI=0.79~0.99)和入组前过去一年内使用急诊科的次数(OR=1.54,95%CI=1.14~2.10)是计划外急诊就诊的重要决定因素.
    结论:目前的证据可能有助于政府机构提出支持性政策,以改善对综合家庭护理资源的获取,并促进适当的护理建议,以减少接受家庭护理服务的患者的计划外或非紧急急诊就诊。
    BACKGROUND: The public health strategy of increasing access to comprehensive home or community-based healthcare services and emergency home visits is intent on reducing the overcrowding of emergency departments. However, scientific evidence regarding the association between home-based healthcare services and emergency department uses is surprisingly insufficient and controversial so far. The present retrospective study identified the risk factors for emergency department visits among patients receiving publicly-funded homecare services.
    METHODS: The personal demographic and medical information, caregiver characteristics, and behaviours related to homecare services and emergency department visits from the medical records and structured questionnaires of 108 patients who were recipients of integrated homecare services in a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were collected. After screening the potential predictor variables using the preliminary univariate analyses, the multivariate logistic regression with best subset selection approach was conducted to identify best combination of determinants to predict unplanned emergency department utilizations.
    RESULTS: Best subset selection regression analysis showed Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio (OR)=1.33, 95% CI=1.05 to 1.70), male caregiver (OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.05 to 0.66), duration of introducing homecare services (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95 to 1.00), working experience of dedicated nurses (OR=0.89, 95% CI=0.79 to 0.99) and number of emergency department utilizations within previous past year before enrollment (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.14 to 2.10) as significant determinants for unplanned emergency department visits.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence may help government agencies propose supportive policies to improve access to integrated homecare resources and promote appropriate care recommendations to reduce unplanned or nonurgent emergency department visits among patients receiving homecare services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏有关针对神经性疼痛的韩国药物治疗(KMT)的证据。我们旨在确定综合KMT在带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)患者中的作用。我们回顾性分析了2021年8月至2022年7月在庆熙大学韩国医院接受KMT治疗的PHN患者的电子病历。我们评估了包括KMT在内的针灸的效果,药物穿刺,草药,拔罐,并使用数值评定量表(NRS)对疼痛强度进行艾灸,简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ),医院焦虑和抑郁量表-焦虑(HADS-A),医院焦虑和抑郁量表-抑郁(HADS-D),每日睡眠干扰量表(DSIS),疲劳严重程度量表(FSS),和EuroQol-5D。在53例PHN患者中,13包括在内。1周内最严重疼痛的NRS评分从基线时的6.54±0.64下降至8周时的3.85±0.63(降低41%,p<0.01),而1周的平均疼痛从基线时的4.93±0.67下降到8周时的3.08±0.46(减少37%,p<0.01)。从基线到8周,SF-MPQ显著降低,HADS-A,FSS,和EuroQol-5D得分。KMT后未报告不良事件。因此,KMT可能是PHN患者的有效治疗选择。
    Evidence regarding Korean medicine treatment (KMT) for neuropathic pain is lacking. We aimed to identify the effects of integrative KMT in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of patients with PHN who received KMT at Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital between August 2021 and July 2022. We evaluated the effects of KMT-comprising acupuncture, pharmacopuncture, herbal medicine, cupping, and moxibustion-on pain intensity using the numerical rating scale (NRS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D), Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and EuroQol-5D. Among 53 patients with PHN, 13 were included. The NRS score for worst pain over 1 week decreased from 6.54 ± 0.64 at baseline to 3.85 ± 0.63 at 8 weeks (41% reduction, p < 0.01), while that for average pain over 1 week decreased from 4.93 ± 0.67 at baseline to 3.08 ± 0.46 at 8 weeks (37% reduction, p < 0.01). From baseline to 8 weeks, there were significant reductions in the SF-MPQ, HADS-A, FSS, and EuroQol-5D scores. No adverse events were reported after KMT. Therefore, KMT may be an effective treatment option for patients with PHN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景亚临床甲状腺功能减退症是妊娠期常见的内分泌紊乱,与不良母婴结局相关。这项研究旨在评估2020年至2022年期间到我院就诊的孕妇中亚临床甲状腺功能减退症的频率。方法采用方便抽样对589例孕妇进行回顾性分析。仅包括接受甲状腺功能测试且无已知甲状腺疾病的女性。年龄数据,体重状态,流产史,不孕史,月经周期规律性,甲状腺功能,并收集甲状腺疾病的症状。使用描述性统计来分析数据。结果参与者的平均年龄为24.8±3.7岁。在参与者中,270人(45.9%)体重正常,199人(33.8%)超重,120例(20.4%)肥胖.69名女性(11.7%)报告了流产史,而37名女性(6.3%)有不孕症史。499名妇女(84.7%)的月经周期正常,90名妇女(15.3%)的月经周期不规则。结果显示,517名(87.7%)女性甲状腺功能正常,47(7.9%)患有甲状腺功能减退症,25例(4.2%)患有甲状腺功能亢进。在47例甲状腺功能减退症患者中,32(68.08%)患有亚临床甲状腺功能减退症,15(31.91%)患有明显的甲状腺功能减退症。结论本研究强调了孕妇亚临床甲状腺功能减退症的发生率。这些发现强调了妊娠期甲状腺功能检测的重要性。
    Background Subclinical hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disorder during pregnancy, associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of subclinical hypothyroidism among pregnant women who presented to our hospital between 2020 and 2022. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on 589 pregnant women using convenience sampling. Only women who underwent thyroid function testing and had no known thyroid disease were included. Data on age, weight status, history of miscarriage, history of infertility, menstrual cycle regularity, thyroid function, and symptoms of thyroid diseases were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results The mean age of the participants was 24.8 ± 3.7 years. Among the participants, 270 (45.9%) had a normal weight, 199 (33.8%) were overweight, and 120 (20.4%) were obese. A history of miscarriage was reported by 69 women (11.7%) while 37 women (6.3%) had a history of infertility. The menstrual cycle was regular in 499 women (84.7%) and irregular in 90 women (15.3%). The results showed that 517 (87.7%) women were euthyroid, 47 (7.9%) had hypothyroidism, and 25 (4.2%) had hyperthyroidism. Of the 47 patients with hypothyroidism, 32 (68.08%) had subclinical hypothyroidism and 15 (31.91%) had overt hypothyroidism. Conclusion This study highlights the frequency of subclinical hypothyroidism among pregnant women. The findings underscore the importance of thyroid function testing during pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种罕见的疾病,其特征是不可预测的,复发性皮下或粘膜下肿胀。没有有效的治疗,HAE会对患者的生活质量产生负面影响。HAE的管理包括按需治疗发作和短期和长期预防(LTP)以防止发作。较新的疗法可能在管理HAE方面更具耐受性和有效性;然而,由于雄激素等疗法相对容易获得,并且对某些患者进行了充分的疾病控制,因此在一些国家仍然广泛使用。这项研究评估了这些特征,治疗模式,临床结果,以及一个多国HAE患者队列的医疗资源利用情况,重点了解推荐或停止可用疗法的原因。
    方法:在6个国家的12个中心进行了回顾性分析,纳入了首次临床就诊时年龄≥12岁的1型或2型HAE患者的数据。使用多变量Poisson回归模型评估LTP使用率与发作率之间的关系。数据收集时间为2018年3月至2019年7月。
    结果:收集了225例患者的数据(62.7%为女性,86.2%白色,90.2%的1型);64.4%的患者在2014年之前或期间首次访问该中心。各国的治疗模式各不相同。总的来说,85.8%的患者进行了按需治疗,53.8%的患者进行了LTP,最常见的是雄激素达那唑(53.7%的患者使用LTP)。29.8%的患者使用血浆衍生的C1抑制剂(Cinryze®)治疗LTP。与未接受任何LTP的患者相比,接受LTP的患者的HAE发作率明显较低(发生率比(95%置信区间)0.90(0.84-0.96))。雄激素是最常见的停药治疗(51.3%),耐受性低被认为是停药的最常见原因(50.0%)。
    结论:总体而言,这项研究的结果支持使用LTP预防HAE发作;与没有LTP相比,使用LTP观察到较低的发作率.然而,使用的LTP类型因国家而异,对特定治疗的耐受性和可及性在管理决策中发挥着重要作用。
    BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by unpredictable, recurring subcutaneous or submucosal swelling. Without effective therapy, HAE can negatively impact patients\' quality of life. Management of HAE includes on-demand treatment of attacks and short- and long-term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent attacks. Newer therapies may be more tolerable and effective in managing HAE; however, therapies such as androgens are still widely used in some countries owing to their relative ease of access and adequate disease control for some patients. This study evaluated the characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization of a multinational cohort of patients with HAE, with a focus on understanding reasons for recommending or discontinuing available therapies.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at 12 centers in six countries and included data from patients with HAE type 1 or 2 who were ≥ 12 years of age at their first clinical visit. The relationship between LTP use and attack rates was evaluated using a multivariable Poisson regression model. Data were collected between March 2018 and July 2019.
    RESULTS: Data from 225 patients were collected (62.7% female, 86.2% White, 90.2% type 1); 64.4% of patients had their first HAE-related visit to the center prior to or during 2014. Treatment patterns varied between countries. Overall, 85.8% of patients were prescribed on-demand treatment and 53.8% were prescribed LTP, most commonly the androgen danazol (53.7% of patients who used LTP). Plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (Cinryze®) was used by 29.8% of patients for LTP. Patients who received LTP had a significantly lower rate of HAE attacks than patients who did not receive any LTP (incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.90 (0.84-0.96)). Androgens were the most commonly discontinued therapy (51.3%), with low tolerability cited as the most frequent reason for discontinuation (50.0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings from this study support the use of LTP in the prevention of HAE attacks; a lower rate of attacks was observed with LTP compared with no LTP. However, the type of LTP used varied between countries, with tolerability and accessibility to specific treatments playing important roles in management decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,临床专家在姑息镇静(PS)的实践中遇到了挑战。观察到患者病情迅速恶化,而与其他晚期患者相比,开始PS的适应症似乎有所不同。目前尚不清楚这些COVID患者的PS临床轨迹与PS的常规临床实践有多大差异。
    目的:描述PS在COVID患者与非COVID患者中的临床实践。
    方法:对荷兰三级医疗中心的数据进行回顾性分析。包括20年3月至21年1月住院期间死于PS的成年患者的图表。
    结果:在研究期间,73例患者接受PS,其中25例(34%)感染了COVID。据报道,难治性呼吸困难是84%的COVID患者开始PS的主要指征,而另一组为33%(p<0.001)。COVID组PS的中位持续时间明显缩短(5.8vs.17.1h,p<0.01)。起始剂量没有发现差异,但COVID组的咪达唑仑平均每小时剂量较高(4.2mg/hrvs.2.4mg/hr,p<0.001)。COVID患者的开始PS和首次药物调整之间的时间间隔似乎更短(1.5vs.2.9h,p=0.08)。
    结论:COVID患者的PS特征是在轨迹的所有阶段都迅速临床恶化。这表现在较早的剂量调整和较高的每小时剂量的咪达唑仑。建议在这些患者中及时评估疗效。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical experts experienced challenges in the practice of palliative sedation (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid deterioration in patients\' situation was observed while the indications for starting PS seemed to differ compared to other terminal patients. It is unclear to which extent clinical trajectories of PS differ for these COVID patients compared to regular clinical practice of PS.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical practice of PS in patients with COVID versus non-COVID patients.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from a Dutch tertiary medical centre was performed. Charts of adult patients who died with PS during hospitalisation between March \'20 and January \'21 were included.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 73 patients received PS and of those 25 (34%) had a COVID infection. Refractory dyspnoea was reported as primary indication for starting PS in 84% of patients with COVID compared to 33% in the other group (p < 0.001). Median duration of PS was significantly shorter in the COVID group (5.8 vs. 17.1 h, p < 0.01). No differences were found for starting dosages, but median hourly dose of midazolam was higher in the COVID group (4.2 mg/hr vs. 2.4 mg/hr, p < 0.001). Time interval between start PS and first medication adjustments seemed to be shorter in COVID patients (1.5 vs. 2.9 h, p = 0.08).
    CONCLUSIONS: PS in COVID patients is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration in all phases of the trajectory. What is manifested by earlier dose adjustments and higher hourly doses of midazolam. Timely evaluation of efficacy is recommended in those patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)被广泛用作缓解率不同的重度抑郁症(MDD)的有效治疗方法。与更好的治疗结果相关的因素仍然很少。这项自然主义的回顾性图表审查希望为转诊至rTMS的患者提供易于获得和可测量的预测因素。
    方法:协议参数,药物,额定刻度,rTMS协议,我们对2013年至2019年间在圣博尼法斯医院接受rTMS治疗的196例MDD患者的治疗结果进行了回顾.使用Logistic回归和边际效应来评估反应的不同预测变量(汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Ham-D)减少50%或更多)和缓解(末节时Ham-D≤7)。
    结果:HamD在10个疗程时预测缓解,10个疗程的Sheehan残疾量表(SDS)可预测对rTMS的反应。Ham-D,SDS,和贝克焦虑量表通过贝克焦虑量表20个疗程预测缓解和反应。高频rTMS对低频有相似的反应和缓解率,但对间歇性Theta爆发刺激的反应率更高,缓解率没有差异。反应的阳性预测因素是年龄较低和安非他酮的使用。阴性预测因素是抗精神病药,抗惊厥药,或使用苯二氮卓类药物。为了缓解,抗精神病药或抗惊厥药的使用是阴性预测因子;安非他酮的使用和较高的静息运动阈值是阳性预测因子.通过基线HamD测量的抑郁严重程度与不同的治疗成功概率无关。
    OBJECTIVE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely utilized as an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with varying response rates. Factors associated with better treatment outcome remain scarce. This naturalistic retrospective chart review hopes to shed light on easily obtainable and measurable predictive factors for patients referred to rTMS.
    METHODS: Protocol parameters, medication, rated scales, rTMS protocols, and treatment outcomes were reviewed for 196 patients with MDD who received rTMS at Saint Boniface Hospital between 2013 and 2019. Logistic regression and marginal effects were used to assess the different predictor variables for response (50% reduction or more on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D)) and remission (Ham-D of ≤7 by the last session).
    RESULTS: HamD at 10 sessions was predictive of remission, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at 10 sessions was predictive of response to rTMS. Ham-D, SDS, and Beck Anxiety Inventory were predictive of remission and response by Beck Anxiety Inventory 20 sessions. High frequency rTMS had a similar response and remission rate to low frequency, but higher response rate to intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation with no difference in remission rate. Positive predictive factors of response were lower age and bupropion use. Negative predictive factors were antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, or benzodiazepine use. For remission, antipsychotics or anticonvulsants use were negative predictors; bupropion use and higher resting motor threshold were positive predictors. Severity of depression as measured by baseline HamD was not associated with different probabilities of treatment success.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有报道说药房学员有好处(例如,药学学生,药房居民)在医院环境中,在农村初级保健中,对这些受训人员的影响进行了有限的研究。探索药学学员在受监督的协作农村初级保健环境中执业的潜在益处和影响,进行了回顾性图表审查.药物治疗问题(DTP)使用欧洲药学监护网络(PCNEV9)系统进行分类。使用Overhage和Lukes(1999)开发的经过验证的工具来衡量估值。超过16周的兼职,药房受训人员(n=3)在153名患者的相遇中确定了366个DTPs。DTP的最常见原因与患者转移和教育需求有关。由受训人员在监督下直接进行的药物水平干预占总干预措施的13.1%。需要开处方者授权的干预措施的接受率为83.25%,比以前在城市初级保健机构中发现的接受率高出25%。大约一半(51%)的药学学员提出和提出的干预措施被归类为重要或非常重要,表明这些受训人员为农村社区居民提供的药房服务增加了重要价值。这项研究表明,药房学员可以成为有效的资源,并在合作的农村初级保健团队环境中为患者护理做出有意义的贡献。
    Despite reported benefits of pharmacy trainees (e.g., pharmacy students, pharmacy residents) in hospital settings, limited research on the impact of these trainees has been conducted in rural primary care. To explore the potential benefits and impact of pharmacy trainees practicing in a supervised collaborative rural primary care setting, a retrospective chart review was conducted. Drug therapy problems (DTPs) were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE V9) system. Valuation was measured using a validated tool developed by Overhage and Lukes (1999). Over 16 weeks on a part-time basis, pharmacy trainees (n = 3) identified 366 DTPs during 153 patient encounters. The most common causes for DTPs were related to patient transfers and the need for education. Drug level interventions carried out directly by trainees under supervision accounted for 13.1% of total interventions. Interventions that required prescriber authorization had an acceptance rate of 83.25%, 25% higher than previous acceptance rates found in urban primary care settings. About half (51%) of the interventions proposed and made by pharmacy trainees were classified as significant or very significant, suggesting these trainees added significant value to the pharmacy service provided to rural community residents. This study suggests that pharmacy trainees can be effective resources and contribute meaningfully to patient care in a collaborative rural primary care team setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号