Retroperitoneal liposarcoma during pregnancy is rare and poses significant diagnostic challenges, even for experienced specialists. We present a case report of a 27-year-old female patient, 15 weeks pregnant, who was admitted to the hospital due to a massive retroperitoneal liposarcoma. The patient underwent surgical resection of the tumor. Postoperative pathology confirmed a diagnosis of well-differentiated liposarcoma. Although liposarcoma during pregnancy is rare and challenging to diagnose, CT or MRI plays a crucial role in its detection. The recurrence rate depends on the pathological stage, histological grade, and ability to resect the tumor.

Tumors originating from soft tissues are uncommon, among these tumors, liposarcomas are the most frequent. These tumors remain asymptomatic for a long time, and only revealing themselves when they reach an important size. In such cases, treatment is difficult, requiring extensive surgery procedures that can excise several adjacent structures, potentially completed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Despite successful treatment, the recurrence rate remains very high. We report the case of a giant liposarcoma requiring a monobloc extensive resection involving the removal of the tumor, left kidney, left adrenal gland, and a portion of the posterior abdominal wall.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are benign usually encapsulated nerve sheath tumors derived from the Schwann cells, and affecting single or multiple nerves. The tumors commonly arise from the cranial nerves as acoustic neurinomas but they are extremely rare in the pelvis and the retroperitoneal area. Retroperitoneal pelvic schwannomas often present with non-specific symptoms leading to misdiagnosis and prolonged morbidity.
METHODS: We report the case of a 59-year-old woman presenting with a feeling of heaviness in the lower abdomen who was found to have a retroperitoneal pelvic schwannoma originating from the right femoral nerve. She had a history of two resections of peripheral schwannomas at four different sites of limbs. After conducting magnetic resonance imaging, this pelvic schwannoma was misdiagnosed as a gynecological malignancy. The tumor was successfully removed by laparoscopic surgery. Pathological analysis of the mass revealed a benign schwannoma of the femoral nerve sheath with demonstrating strong, diffuse positivity for S-100 protein.
CONCLUSIONS: Although retroperitoneal pelvic schwannoma is rare, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses, especially in patients with a history of neurogenic mass or the presence of neurogenic mass elsewhere.

Schwannoma, typically a non-cancerous tumor originating from Schwann cells, seldom occurs in the retroperitoneal area. Its clinical manifestation varies, often remaining asymptomatic for an extended period until it enlarges, exerting pressure on neighboring organs. This article presents a unique instance of retroperitoneal pelvic schwannoma in a 75-year-old woman, initially presenting with unusual lower back discomfort. Imaging was used to characterize the tumor, and anatomopathological examination established the preoperative diagnosis of pelvic schwannoma and its benign nature. The clinical, imaging, and anatomopathological aspects of this pelvic schwannoma case are elucidated herein.

BACKGROUND: Liposarcomas represent ~9.8-16% of soft tissue sarcomas, with the extremities and retroperitoneum being the primary sites of occurrence. While liposarcoma in the inguinal region is uncommon, few reported cases originate from the retroperitoneum and protrude into the scrotum through the inguinal canal. Here, we present a case of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma with prolapse from the left inguinal canal into the scrotum following hernia repair with a mesh plug.
METHODS: A 55-year-old male patient underwent a CT scan for a suspected recurrent inguinal hernia, which revealed a sizeable adipose-dense tumor by the left kidney extruded through the left inguinal canal surrounding the scrotum. The patient had undergone mesh plug repair for a left inguinal hernia at another hospital one year ago and noticed ipsilateral inguinal swelling after the hernia repair. The patient was referred to our hospital. The tumor resection was completed with combined resection of potentially involved organs: left side colon, left kidney, and left adrenal gland. Also, complete excision of the tumor was accomplished through surgical resection of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal, the mesh plug, and the tumor extending into the scrotum. Given the nearly complete absence of the inguinal canal\'s posterior wall and the anterior wall\'s torn state, sutures were employed to close the external obturator tenosynovitis. Additionally, the inguinal ligament was closed using a tension-free incision technique. Only a mesh was subsequently placed. The resected tumor measured 47 × 30 × 15 cm and 7.5 kg in weight. After surgical resection, a retroperitoneal liposarcoma diagnosis was established. After 2 years and 6 months following the surgical resection, no recurrence has been observed for either liposarcoma or inguinal hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: The previous inguinal hernia in this case must be a prolapse of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Thus, it is recommended to conduct a preoperative examination, which should include a CT scan, since the presence of a fatty mass within the hernia may indicate the presence of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Even if a preoperative diagnosis cannot be made, a long-term prognosis can be expected if the retroperitoneal liposarcoma can be completely resected at reoperation.

Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancies are extremely rare; only a few cases having been reported. Here, we report laparoscopic removal of an asymptomatic retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy from a 29-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital for a suspected ectopic pregnancy. Transvaginal ultrasound did not reveal a gestational sac in the uterus or pelvic cavity. However, abdominal contrast-enhanced computer tomography showed a gestational sac between the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. On laparoscopy, the gestational sac was confirmed to be in this retroperitoneal location and successfully removed with minimal bleeding. Histopathologic examination revealed chorionic villi surrounded by lymphatic tissue, suggesting lymphatic spread of the retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy. In summary, contrast-enhanced computer tomography is very useful for locating the site of pregnancy in women suspected of having a retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy. Timely diagnosis of a retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy before bleeding occurs can enable their safe laparoscopic removal.

Anastomosing hemangioma is a rare and benign subtype of capillary hemangioma, a soft tissue tumor. It tends to be asymptomatic, causes abdominal pain and hematuria, and is more common in the genitourinary tract. It can be confused with paragangliomas or ectopic pheochromocytomas. Pathology shares characteristics with angiosarcoma, particularly in well-differentiated areas. Diagnosis without a surgical specimen is difficult and is based on clinical characteristics, laboratories, and imaging behavior similar to hemangiomas in other locations. When in doubt, a diagnosis can be supported by a percutaneous biopsy. The prognosis is good, without relapses or metastases. Early identification with follow-up can avoid surgical interventions.

Retroperitoneal chyloma is a rare entity that presents with non-specific symptoms. Although benign, it can cause complications due to the mass effect. In this case report, we present the case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with a complaint of left-sided colicky abdominal pain and mild dysuria for one year. On physical examination, there was only mild abdominal tenderness. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a thick-walled cystic retroperitoneal mass with a small amount of fat in the superior part and a displaced left hydronephrotic kidney. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the findings and also revealed a fat-fluid level in the cyst. A laparotomy was performed, and the cystic mass, containing milky fluid, was excised. Histopathology showed a pseudocyst with chronic inflammation and a xanthomatous reaction, with no evidence of infection or malignancy. The patient recovered without complications and has not had a recurrence so far. Retroperitoneal chyloma is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. A definitive diagnosis is usually made only after surgery and a histopathological examination. The treatment of choice is a complete excision. Other approaches, such as marsupialization or drainage, will likely result in a recurrence. However, surgery in the retroperitoneal space is associated with a risk of injury to major vessels or organs. In conclusion, retroperitoneal chyloma is a rare entity that is best treated by complete excision. For small lesions, a wait-and-watch approach may be advisable.

Retroperitoneal cavernous hemangioma, a rare vascular tumor, has only 30 PubMed cases. Preoperative diagnostic criteria are unclear and often present asymptomatically until complications such as rupture or compression arise. We present a 73-year-old with chronic abdominal pain and a giant retroperitoneal tumor. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an irregular space-occupying mass in the retroperitoneum, suggesting a retroperitoneal chronic expanding hematoma. Total surgical resection confirmed the diagnosis as retroperitoneal cavernous hemangioma.

BACKGROUND: Myelolipoma, a benign tumor characterized by mature fat cells and hematopoietic cells, is predominantly found in the adrenal glands, accounting for 6-16 % of all adrenal tumors. These tumors are often asymptomatic and discovered incidentally during imaging. We present a rare case of concurrent adrenal and extra-adrenal myelolipomas, contributing to the limited research in this area.
METHODS: A 65-year-old female with a history of Steven-Johnson syndrome presented with epigastric pain, initially diagnosed with emphysematous cholecystitis. Imaging revealed unexpected lesions near the left kidney. During surgery for presumed cholecystitis, significant hemorrhaging occurred following an attempted biopsy of the left adrenal lesion. This complication necessitated a complete adrenalectomy. Pathological examination confirmed the presence of myelolipomas in the left adrenal gland, para-aortic, and left para-iliac regions.
CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous occurrence of adrenal and extra-adrenal myelolipomas is exceptionally rare, posing diagnostic and management challenges. This case highlights the complexity of managing patients with multiple comorbidities and the critical importance of differentiating myelolipomas from other fat-containing retroperitoneal masses. The incidental discovery of these tumors and their potential for significant intraoperative complications, as seen in our case, underscores the need for careful surgical planning and thorough preoperative assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the diagnostic challenges and management complexities in patients with incidental findings of myelolipoma, particularly when accompanied by significant medical histories. The occurrence of unexpected intraoperative complications highlights the importance of cautious decision-making in surgical interventions. This report provides valuable insights into the unpredictable nature of medical practice and the management of rare pathologies.