restenosis

再狭窄
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:中成药对预防冠状动脉再狭窄有疗效。然而,不同CPM之间的相对疗效尚未得到充分研究。方法:从包括PubMed在内的电子数据库中搜索随机临床试验,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Embase,CNKI,VIP,万方,SinoMed,中国临床试验注册中心,和ClinicalTrials.gov.进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以分析CPMs在预防血管造影再狭窄方面的功效,复发性心绞痛,急性心肌梗死,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变血运重建。结果:这项网络荟萃分析包括47项试验,5,077名患者评估了11项干预措施。关于血管造影再狭窄,CPM(血脂康胶囊除外)联合标准治疗(Std)疗效优于单纯Std,冠心舒通胶囊加用Std可使血管造影再狭窄的风险降低76%(相对风险0.24,95%置信区间0.11-0.45,证据的确定性非常低至中等),最有可能是最好的干预措施。复方丹参滴丸联合性病在缓解心绞痛复发方面优于其他干预措施。与单独使用Std相比,可以将风险降低83%(RR0.17,95%CI0.04-0.51,非常低至中等的证据确定性)。在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急性心肌梗死中,与Std单独相比,丹红注射液加Std具有显着效果(RR0.11,95%CI0.00-0.69,非常低至中等的证据确定性),可能是最佳治疗方法。与单独使用Std相比,川芎秦片加Std是最有效的治疗方法,可将靶病变血运重建减少90%(RR0.10,95%CI0.00-0.60,非常低至中等的证据确定性)。结论:CPM联合Std可降低经皮冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄的风险。然而,由于显著的数据限制,我们应谨慎解释结果.
    Background: Chinese patent medicines (CMPs) have curative effectiveness in preventing coronary restenosis. However, the relative efficacy between different CPMs has not been sufficiently investigated. Methods: Randomized clinical trials were searched from electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, VIP, WanFang, SinoMed, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to analyze CPMs\' efficacy in preventing angiographic restenosis, recurrence angina, acute myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. Results: This network meta-analysis included 47 trials with 5,077 patients evaluating 11 interventions. Regarding angiographic restenosis, the efficacy of CPMs (except Xuezhikang capsule) combined with standard treatment (Std) was superior to Std alone, and Guanxin Shutong capsule plus Std reduced the risk of angiographic restenosis by 76% (relative risk 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.45, and very low to moderate certainty of evidence), most likely the best intervention. Fufang Danshen dripping pill combined with Std showed superiority over other interventions for relieving recurrence angina, which can reduce the risk by 83% (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.51, very low to moderate certainty of evidence) compared to Std alone. In acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with Std alone, Danhong injection plus Std displayed a significant effect (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.00-0.69, very low to moderate certainty of evidence) and was the best treatment probably. Chuanxiongqin tablet plus Std was the most effective treatment for reducing target lesion revascularization by 90% (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.00-0.60, very low to moderate certainty of evidence) compared with Std alone. Conclusion: The results indicated that CPMs combined with Std reduced the risk of coronary restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to significant data limitations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:关于球囊扩张支架(BES)和自膨式支架(SES)治疗颅内动脉狭窄的比较数据有限。
    方法:我们进行了系统评价,以确定比较有症状的颅内动脉狭窄患者的SES和BES的研究。数据是从通过PubMed搜索发现的相关研究中提取的,Scopus,和WebofScience,直到2010年1月1日至2023年9月28日。采用随机效应荟萃分析进行统计汇总,以比较术后狭窄的发生率/严重程度,技术上的成功,30天中风和/或死亡,累积临床终点,和再狭窄率。
    结果:共纳入20项研究。术后狭窄的标准化平均差异(SMD)(%)显着降低(SMD:-0.52,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.79至-0.24,p<.001,10项研究涉及1515例患者)。30天中风和/或死亡的几率显着降低(优势比[OR]0.68,95%CI:0.50-0.94,p=0.019,15项研究涉及2431名患者),随访的累积临床终点无显著降低(OR0.64,95%CI:0.30-1.37,p=.250,10项研究涉及947例患者)。随访期间再狭窄的几率显着降低(OR0.50,95%CI:0.31-0.80,p=.004,13项研究涉及1115例患者)。
    结论:与SES相比,BES与术后30天卒中和/或死亡率较低相关,随访和治疗有症状的颅内动脉狭窄期间再狭窄发生率较低。
    OBJECTIVE: There are limited data regarding the comparison of balloon expandable stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that compared SES and BES in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Data were extracted from relevant studies found through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until from January 1, 2010 to September 28, 2023. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the rates/severity of postprocedure stenosis, technical success, 30-day stroke and/or death, cumulative clinical endpoints, and restenosis rates.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for postprocedure stenosis (%) was significantly lower (SMD: -0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.79 to -0.24, p < .001, 10 studies involving 1515 patients) with BES. The odds for 30-day stroke and/or death were significantly lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94, p = .019, 15 studies involving 2431 patients), and cumulative clinical endpoints on follow-up were nonsignificantly lower (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.37, p = .250, 10 studies involving 947 patients) with BES. The odds for restenosis during follow-up were significantly lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, p = .004, 13 studies involving 1115 patients) with BES.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SES, BES were associated with lower rates of postprocedure 30-day stroke and/or death with lower rates of restenosis during follow up and the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    有确凿的证据表明球囊肺动脉瓣成形术(BPV)后和随访时立即缓解肺动脉瓣阻塞。在更严重的PS病例和老年受试者中可以看到漏斗状梗阻的发展。在BPV后约10%的患者中观察到PS的复发。发现复发的原因是球囊/瓣环比率小于1.2,并且BPV后即刻肺动脉瓣峰值梯度大于30mmHg。通过使用比最初使用的更大的气球重复BPV,可以成功解决复发性狭窄。长期结果显示,梗阻继续缓解,但是随着肺功能不全的发展,有些病人需要更换肺动脉瓣。结论是,BPV是管理瓣膜PS的首选治疗方法,用于BPV的球囊/环比率应降至1.2至1.25。还建议在长期随访中制定预防/减少肺功能不全的策略。
    There is conclusive evidence for relief of pulmonary valve obstruction immediately after balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty (BPV) and at follow-up. Development of infundibular obstruction is seen in more severe PS cases and in older subjects. Reappearance of PS was observed in approximately 10 % of patients following BPV. The reasons for recurrence were found to be balloon/annulus ratio less than 1.2 and immediate post-BPV pulmonary valve peak gradients greater than 30 mmHg. Recurrent stenosis is successfully addressed by repeating BPV with lager balloons than used initially. Long-term results revealed continue relief of obstruction, but with development of pulmonary insufficiency, some patients requiring replacement of the pulmonary valve. It was concluded that BPV is the treatment of choice in the management valvar PS and that balloon/annuls ratio used for BPV should be lowered to 1.2 to 1.25. It was also suggested that strategies should be developed to prevent/reduce pulmonary insufficiency at long-term follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    再狭窄是冠状动脉和外周动脉血运重建治疗的重要并发症,有时需要反复干预。由于多个变量和因素的相互作用,确定何时会发生再狭窄非常困难。标准的临床和多普勒超声扫描监测随访是临床医生监测干预结果的唯一工具。然而,实施有效的监测计划受到医疗保健系统限制的阻碍,患者合并症,和合规。根据患者在特定时期内发生再狭窄的风险对患者进行分类的预测模型将允许开发量身定制的监测,预防方案,和有效的临床工作流程。这篇综述旨在:(1)总结冠状动脉和外周动脉再狭窄预测模型的最新技术;(2)比较它们在预测能力方面的表现;(3)为可能改进的预测模型提供展望。
    我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,通过访问PubMed/MEDLINE数据库进行了全面的文献综述。搜索策略由关键词的组合组成,并包括1993年1月至2023年4月发表的针对再狭窄预测模型的研究。一位作者独立筛选了标题和摘要,并检查了资格。其他作者独立确认并讨论了任何分歧。对已发表文献的搜索确定了22项研究,提供了两种观点-临床和生物力学工程-关于再狭窄,并包括不同的方法。预测因子,和研究设计。我们比较了预测模型在辨别和校准方面的性能。我们报告了模拟再闭塞进展的模型的性能,通过与临床图像的比较进行评估。
    临床观点研究仅考虑常规收集的患者信息作为再狭窄预测因子。我们的综述显示,采用传统统计学(n=14)的临床模型仅表现出适度的预测能力。当采用机器学习算法(n=4)时,后者改善。当与再狭窄相关的血液动力学描述符与有限的临床风险因素融合时,生物力学工程观点的逻辑回归模型(n=2)显示出增强的预测能力。模拟再狭窄进展的生物力学工程研究(n=2)能够捕获其演变,但计算昂贵,并且在特定随访中缺乏个体患者的风险评分。
    再狭窄预测模型,仅基于常规临床风险因素并使用经典统计数据,不能充分预测再狭窄的发生。通过采用机器学习技术并结合有关生物力学工程分析产生的血管血液动力学的关键信息,可以潜在地建立具有增强预测能力的风险分层模型。
    UNASSIGNED: Restenosis is a significant complication of revascularization treatments in coronary and peripheral arteries, sometimes necessitating repeated intervention. Establishing when restenosis will happen is extremely difficult due to the interplay of multiple variables and factors. Standard clinical and Doppler ultrasound scans surveillance follow-ups are the only tools clinicians can rely on to monitor intervention outcomes. However, implementing efficient surveillance programs is hindered by health care system limitations, patients\' comorbidities, and compliance. Predictive models classifying patients according to their risk of developing restenosis over a specific period will allow the development of tailored surveillance, prevention programs, and efficient clinical workflows. This review aims to: (1) summarize the state-of-the-art in predictive models for restenosis in coronary and peripheral arteries; (2) compare their performance in terms of predictive power; and (3) provide an outlook for potentially improved predictive models.
    UNASSIGNED: We carried out a comprehensive literature review by accessing the PubMed/MEDLINE database according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search strategy consisted of a combination of keywords and included studies focusing on predictive models of restenosis published between January 1993 and April 2023. One author independently screened titles and abstracts and checked for eligibility. The rest of the authors independently confirmed and discussed in case of any disagreement. The search of published literature identified 22 studies providing two perspectives-clinical and biomechanical engineering-on restenosis and comprising distinct methodologies, predictors, and study designs. We compared predictive models\' performance on discrimination and calibration aspects. We reported the performance of models simulating reocclusion progression, evaluated by comparison with clinical images.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical perspective studies consider only routinely collected patient information as restenosis predictors. Our review reveals that clinical models adopting traditional statistics (n = 14) exhibit only modest predictive power. The latter improves when machine learning algorithms (n = 4) are employed. The logistic regression models of the biomechanical engineering perspective (n = 2) show enhanced predictive power when hemodynamic descriptors linked to restenosis are fused with a limited set of clinical risk factors. Biomechanical engineering studies simulating restenosis progression (n = 2) are able to capture its evolution but are computationally expensive and lack risk scoring for individual patients at specific follow-ups.
    UNASSIGNED: Restenosis predictive models, based solely on routine clinical risk factors and using classical statistics, inadequately predict the occurrence of restenosis. Risk stratification models with increased predictive power can be potentially built by adopting machine learning techniques and incorporating critical information regarding vessel hemodynamics arising from biomechanical engineering analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先天性上呼吸道阻塞(CCA)是一种罕见的原因,然而,它是鼻子最常见的先天性异常。虽然单侧疾病可能无法诊断,双边CCA可能危及生命,尤其是新生儿。某些CCA可能与其他先天性异常有关,这导致在诊断评估期间进行系统的筛查。诊断很容易。然而,手术治疗仍有争议。
    我们进行了一项回顾性研究,收集了超过42个月的CCA管理数据。我们报告了我们系列的流行病学方面和结果,并讨论了管理问题。
    我们使用内窥镜技术操作了22个choanae。手术当天双侧CCA患者的年龄为8至21天(平均11.7±2.6天)。他们的出生体重范围为2.9至4.5公斤(平均3.4+/_0.5公斤),他们的胎龄从30到41周不等。新生儿双侧CCA修复手术时间为75~110min(平均90min+/_11.5min)。我们对所有没有支架或丝裂霉素C应用的患者进行了独家鼻内镜检查。我们对自发解决的与轻微pal穿孔有关的术后并发症表示遗憾。
    由于新生儿在出生后的第一个月只依赖鼻腔呼吸,双边CCA是紧急情况。鼻内内镜管理是主要程序。目前,手术步骤是标准化的。然而,如何预防术后粘连和再狭窄仍存在争议。术后护理的主流是细致入微,频繁鼻腔盐水冲洗,定期去除地壳,和预防由于反流或感染引起的炎症。
    UNASSIGNED: Congenital Choanal Artesia (CCA) is a rare cause of upper airway obstruction, yet it is the most common congenital anomaly of the nose. While the unilateral condition could be undiagnosed, bilateral CCA may be life-threatening, especially for newborns. Some CCA may be associated with other congenital abnormalities, which leads to a systematic screening during the diagnostic assessment. The diagnosis is easy. However, surgical management is still controversial.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective study gathering data on management of CCA over 42 months. We reported epidemiological aspects and results of our series, and discussed management issues.
    UNASSIGNED: We operated 22 choanae using the endoscopic technique. The age of bilateral CCA patients on the day of surgery ranged from 8 to 21 days (mean 11.7+/_ 2.6 days). Their birth weight ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 kg (mean 3.4 +/_ 0.5 kg), and their gestational age ranged from 30 to 41 weeks. Surgery duration for neonatal bilateral CCA repair ranged from 75 to 110 min (mean 90 min +/_ 11.5 min). We performed an exclusive endonasal endoscopic approach for all patients with no stenting or mitomycin C application. We deplore one post operative complication related to minor palatal perforation resolved spontaneously.
    UNASSIGNED: Since newborns solely depend on nasal breathing during the first month of life, bilateral CCA is an emergency. Endonasal endoscopic management is the primary procedure. Currently, surgery steps are standardized. However, how to prevent post-operative synechiae and restenosis is still controversial. The mainstream is meticulous post-operative nursing with frequent endonasal saline irrigation, regular removal of crust, and prevention of inflammation due to reflux or infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:血管内支架置入术已成为有症状的椎动脉起源狭窄(VAOS)患者的有效治疗方法,但严重再狭窄的发生率令人担忧。单独使用药物涂层球囊(DCB)进行血管成形术是VAOS的潜在治疗方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估DCB血管成形术对VAOS的实用性。
    方法:对Medline(PubMed)的系统搜索,Embase,CNKI,和Cochrane数据库,用于在2022年6月15日之前以英文和中文发表的DCB血管成形术治疗VAOS的研究。使用标准化方法提取数据。再狭窄的发生率,技术上的成功,使用Freeman-Tukey双反正弦转换和随机或固定效应模型汇集随访期间的围手术期并发症。进行异质性和发表偏倚测试。
    结果:本综述和荟萃分析共纳入7项研究,包含159例患者。DCB组治疗前椎动脉狭窄率为70.0%~86.3%,中位随访时间为6.0~14.1个月。合并的再狭窄发生率为11.9%(95%CI:3.4%-23.4%;I2=59%,在随访期间p=0.02)。合并技术成功率为96.6%(95%CI:91.4%-99.7%;I2=37%,p=0.14)。围手术期并发症发生率为2.9%(95%CI:0.3%-6.9%;I2=0%,p=0.64)。根据漏斗图和Egger的测试,没有发表偏倚的证据.
    结论:本综述和荟萃分析表明,DCB血管成形术可能是治疗VAOS的潜在方法。然而,需要包括大量代表性VAOS患者样本的随机研究来验证我们的发现.
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular stenting has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with symptomatic vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS), but the incidence of severe restenosis is concerning. Angioplasty alone with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a potential treatment for VAOS. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the utility of DCB angioplasty for VAOS.
    METHODS: A systematic search of the Medline (PubMed), Embase, CNKI, and Cochrane databases for studies on the treatment of VAOS by DCB angioplasty published in English and Chinese before June 15, 2022 was conducted. Data were extracted using standardized methods. The incidence rates of restenosis, technical success, and perioperative complication in the follow-up period were pooled using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with random or fixed-effect models. Tests for heterogeneity and publication bias were performed.
    RESULTS: A total of seven studies containing 159 patients were included in this review and meta-analysis. The pre-treatment stenosis rate of the vertebral artery in the DCB group ranged from 70.0 % to 86.3 %, and the median follow-up time ranged from 6.0 to 14.1 months. The pooled restenosis incidence was 11.9 % (95 % CI: 3.4 %-23.4 %; I2 = 59 %, p = 0.02) during the follow-up period. The pooled technical success rate was 96.6 % (95 % CI: 91.4 %-99.7 %; I2 = 37 %, p = 0.14). The overall perioperative complication rate was 2.9 % (95 % CI: 0.3 %-6.9 %; I2 = 0 %, p = 0.64). According to the funnel diagram and Egger\'s test, there was no evidence of publication bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested in this review and meta-analysis that angioplasty with DCB may be a potential treatment for VAOS. However, randomized studies including a large representative sample of VAOS patients are needed to validate our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    未经授权:局部液体药物(LLD)输送装置最近已成为治疗外周动脉疾病的一种新方法。本系统综述旨在确定和评估最常用的输送装置的临床实用性。
    UNASSIGNED:使用医学受试者标题为“药物递送”的术语进行了系统审查,\"\"液体,\"\"本地,PubMed中的“和”心血管疾病“,谷歌学者,还有Scopus.
    UNASSIGNED:确定了四种常用的输送装置,包括(1)牛蛙微输液装置,(2)ClearWayRX导管,(3)封堵灌注导管,和(4)有针对性的可调节药物管理。所有这些都已显示成功地将液体治疗剂递送到靶病变中,并且在临床前和临床试验中表现出有利的安全性和功效概况。LLD设备能够用单个设备治疗很长或多个病变,提供更经济的选择。LLD临床研究中的安全性也是有利的,考虑到最近对晶体紫杉醇涂层装置的不良事件的关注。
    UNASSIGNED:有明确的临床证据支持局部液体输送治疗闭塞性动脉疾病的概念。
    结论:在介入心脏病学和血管干预领域的最新创新中,“不留任何东西”策略一直处于最前沿。尽管药物涂层球囊已经克服了与普通的旧球囊血管成形术和外周支架相关的局限性,最近的安全问题和成本考虑影响了他们的使用。在这次审查中,介绍了各种液体药物输送装置,在临床前和临床环境中展示他们的能力和成功。这些创新的液体输送装置,能够靶向递送,并且能够重新用于多个治疗部位,可以为当前未满足的临床需求提供解决方案。
    Local Liquid drug (LLD) delivery devices have recently emerged as a novel approach to treat peripheral arterial disease. This systemic review aims to identify and evaluate the clinical utility of the most commonly used delivery devices.
    A systemic review was performed using the Medical Subjects Heading terms of \"drug delivery,\" \"liquid,\" \"local,\" and \"cardiovascular disease\" in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus.
    Four commonly used delivery devices were identified, including (1) the Bullfrog Micro-Infusion Device, (2) the ClearWay RX Catheter, (3) the Occlusion Perfusion Catheter, and (4) the Targeted Adjustable Pharmaceutical Administration. All have shown to successfully deliver liquid therapeutic into the target lesion and have exhibited favorable safety and efficacy profiles in preclinical and clinical trials. The LLD devices have the ability to treat very long or multiple lesions with a single device, providing a more economical option. The safety profile in LLD clinical studies is also favorable in view of recent concerns regarding adverse events with crystalline-paclitaxel-coated devices.
    There is clear clinical evidence to support the concept of local liquid delivery to treat occlusive arterial disease.
    The \'leave nothing behind\' strategy has been at the forefront of the most recent innovations in the field of interventional cardiology and vascular interventions. Although drug coated balloons have overcome limitations associated with plain old balloon angioplasty and peripheral stents, recent safety concerns and cost considerations have impacted their usage. In this review, various liquid drug delivery devices are presented, showcasing their capabilities and success in both preclinical and clinical settings. These innovative liquid delivery devices, capable of targeted delivery and their ability to be re-used for multiple treatment sites, may provide solutions for current unmet clinical needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:进行系统评价,以确定评估服用氯吡格雷的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者CYP2C19多态性与临床结局之间关联的研究。
    方法:我们系统地搜索了OvidEMBASE,PubMed,和WebofScience从1997年11月(开始)到2020年9月。我们纳入观察性研究,评估CYP2C19多态性与PAD患者氯吡格雷的有效性和安全性相关。我们从符合条件的研究中提取相关信息详细信息(例如,研究类型,患者群体,研究结果)。我们使用非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具来评估纳入观察性研究的偏倚风险。
    结果:感兴趣的结果是氯吡格雷的有效性和安全性。有效性结果包括临床无效(例如,再狭窄)。安全性结果包括与使用氯吡格雷相关的出血和死亡。我们确定了四项观察性研究,样本量从50到278不等。研究的结果和比较组各不相同。三项研究(75%)的总体偏倚风险较低。所有纳入的研究表明,携带CYP2C19功能丧失(LOF)等位基因与氯吡格雷临床疗效和安全性降低显著相关。
    结论:我们的系统评价显示CYP2C19LOF等位基因与氯吡格雷功能降低之间存在关联。在服用氯吡格雷的PAD患者中使用CYP2C19检测可能有助于改善临床结果。然而,基于有限的证据,有必要在PAD患者中进行随机临床试验,以检验氯吡格雷的有效性和安全性结局.
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to identify studies that assessed the association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients who took clopidogrel.
    METHODS: We systematically searched Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science from November 1997 (inception) to September 2020. We included observational studies evaluating how CYP2C19 polymorphism is associated with clopidogrel\'s effectiveness and safety among patients with PAD. We extracted relevant information details from eligible studies (e.g., study type, patient population, study outcomes). We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool to assess the risk of bias for included observational studies.
    RESULTS: The outcomes of interest were the effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel. The effectiveness outcomes included clinical ineffectiveness (e.g., restenosis). The safety outcomes included bleeding and death related to the use of clopidogrel. We identified four observational studies with a sample size ranging from 50 to 278. Outcomes and comparison groups of the studies varied. Three studies (75%) had an overall low risk of bias. All included studies demonstrated that carrying CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) alleles was significantly associated with reduced clinical effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review showed an association between CYP2C19 LOF alleles and reduced functions of clopidogrel. The use of CYP2C19 testing in PAD patients prescribed clopidogrel may help improve the clinical outcomes. However, based on the limited evidence, there is a need for randomized clinical trials in PAD patients to test both the effectiveness and safety outcomes of clopidogrel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    内膜增生(IH)发生在相当多的血管重建的情况下,通过支架或球囊血管成形术,静脉旁路移植术,和动静脉透析通道。它由血管介入期间的内皮损伤触发,并导致血管再狭窄,对患者具有危及生命的后果。迄今为止,临床上用于IH预防的药物-紫杉醇和rapalog药物-一直主要关注IH发展的血管平滑肌细胞(VSMC)增殖途径。局限性,如内皮毒性和不适当的药物施用时机,刺激了对控制IH的新的和有效的药理学方法的寻找。在这份最新的审查中,我们提出了IH发展的途径,专注于参与IH的关键事件和参与者。随后,我们讨论了不同的药物和药物组合干扰这些途径的基础上,对外周循环IH模型在动物研究中的作用,或临床报告。这些报告是通过广泛搜索Pubmed,Embase,和谷歌学者,搜索方程基于围绕IH的五个概念及其各种组合组成。为了改善血管介入治疗结果,需要重新考虑常规治疗方法来预防IH。探索作用于IH发展的不同病理生理途径的药物和药物组合的局部应用有可能提供有效和安全的再狭窄预防。
    Intimal hyperplasia (IH) occurs in a considerable number of cases of blood vessel reconstruction by stenting or balloon angioplasty, venous bypass grafting, and arteriovenous dialysis accesses. It is triggered by endothelial injury during the vascular intervention and leads to vessel restenosis with life-threatening consequences for patients. To date, the drugs used for IH prevention in clinics-paclitaxel and rapalog drugs-have been focusing primarily on the vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation pathway of IH development. Limitations, such as endothelial toxicity and inappropriate drug administration timing, have spurred the search for new and efficient pharmacological approaches to control IH. In this state-of-the-art review, we present the pathways of IH development, focusing on the key events and actors involved in IH. Subsequently, we discuss different drugs and drug combinations interfering with these pathways based on their effect on peripheral circulation IH models in animal studies, or on clinical reports. The reports were obtained through an extensive search of peer-reviewed publications in Pubmed, Embase, and Google Scholar, with search equations composed based on five concepts around IH and their various combinations. To improve vascular intervention outcomes, rethinking of conventional therapeutic approaches to IH prevention is needed. Exploring local application of drugs and drug combinations acting on different pathophysiological pathways of IH development has the potential to provide effective and safe restenosis prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号