restenosis

再狭窄
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物涂层球囊(DCB)技术被开发用于将抗增殖药物递送至血管壁而不留下任何永久性假体或耐用聚合物。没有异物可以减少非常晚的支架失败的风险,提高进行搭桥手术的能力,减少长期双重抗血小板治疗的需要,可能减少相关的出血并发症。DCB技术,像生物可吸收的支架,预计将是一种治疗方法,有助于“不留任何东西”的策略。尽管新一代药物洗脱支架是现代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中最常见的治疗策略,DCB的使用在日本稳步增长。目前,DCB仅适用于支架内再狭窄或小血管病变(<3.0mm)的治疗,但较大血管(≥3.0mm)的潜在扩张可能会加快其在更广泛的病变或阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者中的使用。日本心血管干预和治疗学协会(CVIT)的工作组被召集来描述关于DCB的专家共识。本文件旨在总结其概念,目前的临床证据,可能的适应症,技术考虑,和未来的前景。
    Drug-coated balloon (DCB) technology was developed to deliver the antiproliferative drugs to the vessel wall without leaving any permanent prosthesis or durable polymers. The absence of foreign material can reduce the risk of very late stent failure, improve the ability to perform bypass-graft surgery, and reduce the need for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy, potentially reducing associated bleeding complications. The DCB technology, like the bioresorbable scaffolds, is expected to be a therapeutic approach that facilitates the \"leave nothing behind\" strategy. Although newer generation drug-eluting stents are the most common therapeutic strategy in modern percutaneous coronary interventions, the use of DCB is steadily increasing in Japan. Currently, the DCB is only indicated for treatment of in-stent restenosis or small vessel lesions (< 3.0 mm), but potential expansion for larger vessels (≥ 3.0 mm) may hasten its use in a wider range of lesions or patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. The task force of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) was convened to describe the expert consensus on DCBs. This document aims to summarize its concept, current clinical evidence, possible indications, technical considerations, and future perspectives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外周动脉疾病包括不同的临床表现,从脑血管疾病到下肢动脉疾病,从亚临床到致残症状和事件。根据临床表现,病人的一般情况,病变的解剖位置和扩展,除了最好的药物治疗外,还可能需要进行血运重建。2017年欧洲心脏病学会指南与欧洲血管外科学会合作解决了血运重建的适应症。虽然大多数病例适合血管内或外科血运重建,保持长期的通畅往往是具有挑战性的。早期和晚期手术并发症,但本地和远程复发也经常导致血运重建失败。监测的基本原理是建议准确实施预防策略,以避免其他心血管事件和疾病进展,并避免症状复发和需要重新进行血运重建。结合血管病史和体格检查,双工超声扫描是识别血管重建失败的关键成像技术。其他非侵入性检查(脚踝和脚趾肱指数,计算机断层扫描,磁共振成像)可以定期优化特定设置的监视。目前,最佳血运重建监测方案尚未明确,缺乏针对血运重建后长期结果的系统评价.我们已经系统地回顾了有关血运重建后随访的文献,并建议将此共识文件作为对近期围手术期以后血运重建患者最佳监测指南的补充。
    Peripheral arterial diseases comprise different clinical presentations, from cerebrovascular disease down to lower extremity artery disease, from subclinical to disabling symptoms and events. According to clinical presentation, the patient\'s general condition, anatomical location and extension of lesions, revascularisation may be needed in addition to best medical treatment. The 2017 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery have addressed the indications for revascularisation. While most cases are amenable to either endovascular or surgical revascularisation, maintaining long-term patency is often challenging. Early and late procedural complications, but also local and remote recurrences frequently lead to revascularisation failure. The rationale for surveillance is to propose the accurate implementation of preventive strategies to avoid other cardiovascular events and disease progression and avoid recurrence of symptoms and the need for redo revascularisation. Combined with vascular history and physical examination, duplex ultrasound scanning is the pivotal imaging technique for identifying revascularisation failures. Other non-invasive examinations (ankle and toe brachial index, computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) at regular intervals can optimise surveillance in specific settings. Currently, optimal revascularisation surveillance programmes are not well defined and systematic reviews addressing long-term results after revascularisation are lacking. We have systematically reviewed the literature addressing follow-up after revascularisation and we propose this consensus document as a complement to the recent guidelines for optimal surveillance of revascularised patients beyond the perioperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外周动脉疾病包括不同的临床表现,从脑血管疾病到下肢动脉疾病,从亚临床到致残症状和事件。根据临床表现,病人的一般情况,病变的解剖位置和扩展,除了最好的药物治疗外,还可能需要进行血运重建。2017年欧洲心脏病学会指南与欧洲血管外科学会合作解决了血运重建的适应症。虽然大多数病例适合血管内或外科血运重建,保持长期的通畅往往是具有挑战性的。早期和晚期手术并发症,但本地和远程复发也经常导致血运重建失败。监测的基本原理是建议准确实施预防策略,以避免其他心血管事件和疾病进展,并避免症状复发和需要重新进行血运重建。结合血管病史和体格检查,双工超声扫描是识别血管重建失败的关键成像技术。其他非侵入性检查(脚踝和脚趾肱指数,计算机断层扫描,磁共振成像)可以定期优化特定设置的监视。目前,最佳血运重建监测方案尚未明确,缺乏针对血运重建后长期结果的系统评价.我们已经系统地回顾了有关血运重建后随访的文献,并建议将此共识文件作为对近期围手术期以后血运重建患者最佳监测指南的补充。
    Peripheral arterial diseases comprise different clinical presentations, from cerebrovascular disease down to lower extremity artery disease, from subclinical to disabling symptoms and events. According to clinical presentation, the patient\'s general condition, anatomical location and extension of lesions, revascularisation may be needed in addition to best medical treatment. The 2017 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery have addressed the indications for revascularisation. While most cases are amenable to either endovascular or surgical revascularisation, maintaining long-term patency is often challenging. Early and late procedural complications, but also local and remote recurrences frequently lead to revascularisation failure. The rationale for surveillance is to propose the accurate implementation of preventive strategies to avoid other cardiovascular events and disease progression and avoid recurrence of symptoms and the need for redo revascularisation. Combined with vascular history and physical examination, duplex ultrasound scanning is the pivotal imaging technique for identifying revascularisation failures. Other non-invasive examinations (ankle and toe brachial index, computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) at regular intervals can optimise surveillance in specific settings. Currently, optimal revascularisation surveillance programmes are not well defined and systematic reviews addressing long-term results after revascularisation are lacking. We have systematically reviewed the literature addressing follow-up after revascularisation and we propose this consensus document as a complement to the recent guidelines for optimal surveillance of revascularised patients beyond the perioperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate factors associated with restenosis after endovascular therapy comparing TASC (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus) II classes A to C with class D femoropopliteal (FP) lesions.
    BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the determinants of restenosis for TASC II class D lesions are the same as those for TASC II classes A to C FP lesions.
    METHODS: We studied 2,400 limbs from 1,889 consecutive patients (73 ± 17 years of age; 31% women; 30% critical limb ischemia) who underwent successful endovascular therapy for de novo FP lesions. Predictors for restenosis in TASC II classes A to C and class D lesions were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
    RESULTS: The 5-year primary patency rate was 50% in TASC II classes A to C and 34% in TASC II class D lesions, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, restenosis had a significant interaction with sex and renal failure (both p < 0.01). Female sex was a significant risk factor for restenosis in TASC II class D lesions (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.80, p < 0.001) but not TASC II classes A to C lesions (adjusted HR: 1.10, p = 0.352). Conversely, renal insufficiency was a significant risk factor for restenosis in TASC II classes A to C lesions (adjusted HR: 1.43, p < 0.001) but not TASC II class D lesions (adjusted HR: 0.79, p = 0.129). Diabetes mellitus, no stent use, chronic total occlusion, and poor below-the-knee runoff were shared risk factors for restenosis between TASC II classes A to C and class D lesions (all p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: For de novo FP lesions, diabetes, no stent use, chronic total occlusion, and poor below-the-knee runoff were shared restenosis predictors for TASC II classes A to C and class D lesions, whereas renal failure was a predictor for TASC II classes A to C lesions and female sex for TASC II class D lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号