BACKGROUND: Hazardous alcohol use and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are highly prevalent among clients in mental health services, yet significant gaps remain in the adequate assessment of alcohol use and provision of appropriate alcohol interventions. The aim of this study was to conduct an exploration of (i) alcohol intervention elements used in mental health services and (ii) professionals\' reported barriers and facilitators in identifying and intervening with hazardous alcohol use and AUD.
METHODS: Qualitative data were obtained by conducting semi-structured interviews among a purposive sample of 18 professionals from 13 different Dutch mental health services organizations (i.e., five integrated mental health organizations with addiction services, five mental health organizations without addiction services, and three addiction services organizations without mental health services). Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Identified alcohol intervention elements included conducting assessments, brief interventions, treatment, referrals of clients, collaborations with other parties, and providing information to professionals. Professionals mentioned nine barriers and facilitators in the identification and intervention with hazardous alcohol use and AUD, including three aspects of professionals\' behavior (i.e., professionals\' agenda setting, knowledge and skills, and attitudes), actions related to identification and intervening, client contact, collaboration with other parties, and three factors in a wider context (i.e., organizational characteristics, organizational resources, and governmental aspects).
CONCLUSIONS: Although diverse alcohol intervention elements are available in Dutch mental health services, it remains unclear to what extent these are routinely implemented. To better address hazardous alcohol use and AUD in mental health services, efforts should focus on enhancing alcohol training, improving collaboration with addiction services, providing appropriate tools, and facilitating support through organizational and governmental measures.

BACKGROUND: Video telehealth offers a mechanism to help Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients overcome health care access barriers; however, many veterans lack a suitable device and sufficient internet connectivity. To address disparities in technology access, VHA established a Connected Device Program that offers veterans loaned video-capable tablets and internet service. In 2020, VHA introduced a national Digital Divide Consult to facilitate and standardize referrals for this resource.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the reach and impact of VHA\'s Connected Device Program, leveraging Digital Divide Consult data to determine whether resources are supporting veterans with health care needs and access barriers.
METHODS: We examined the reach of VHA\'s Connected Device Program using national secondary data from VHA\'s electronic health records among 119,926 tablet recipients who received a tablet (April 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023) and 683,219 veterans from the general VHA population. We assessed changes in tablet recipients\' demographic and clinical characteristics before and after implementation of the Digital Divide Consult compared with the general VHA population. We examined the impact of tablets and the consult on adoption of telehealth (ie, video visit use and number of visits) adjusting for differences between tablet recipients and the general VHA population. Finally, we evaluated consult implementation by assessing the use of video-based services by tablet referral reason.
RESULTS: Common reasons for tablet referral included mental health diagnoses (50,367/79,230, 63.9%), distance from a VHA facility >30 miles (17,228/79,230, 21.7%), and social isolation (16,161/79,230, 20.4%). Moreover, 63.0% (49,925/79,230) of individuals who received a tablet after implementation of the Digital Divide Consult had a video visit in the first 6 months of tablet receipt. Some consult reasons were associated with a higher-than-average percentage of video telehealth use, including enrollment in evidence-based mental health programs (74.8% [830/1100] with video use), living >30 miles from a VHA facility (68.3% [10,557/17,228] with video use), and having a mental health diagnosis (68.1% [34,301/50,367] with video use). Tablet recipients had nearly 3 times the likelihood of having a video visit within a month once provided a tablet compared to the general VHA population, with an adjusted risk ratio of 2.95 (95% CI 2.91-2.99) before consult implementation and 2.73 (95% CI 2.70-2.76) after consult implementation. Analyses of telehealth adoption suggested that veterans receiving tablets for mental health care and evidence-based programs have higher rates of video visits, while those who are homebound or receiving tablets for hospice have higher rates of nonuse.
CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation of VHA\'s Connected Device Program suggests that tablets are facilitating video-based care among veterans with complex needs. Standardization of referrals through the Digital Divide Consult has created opportunities to identify groups of tablet recipients with lower telehealth adoption rates who might benefit from a targeted intervention.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To analyze factors associated with delayed initiation of breast cancer treatment at an oncology referral center in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais state, between 2010 and 2019.
METHODS: This was a cohort study using data from the Hospital-based Cancer Registry. The probability of not starting treatment within 60 days, in accordance with Brazilian law, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier, method and its association with the factors studied was assessed using the Cox model, presenting hazard ratios (HR) and respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
RESULTS: Among the 911 participants, the probability of delayed treatment initiation was 18.8% (95%CI 16.4;21.5). Those who underwent treatment at a health service other than the one where the cancer was diagnosed had a significantly higher risk (HR: 3.49; 95%CI 3.00;4.07).
CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a diagnosis and treatment at the same institution may help reduce waiting time to initiate cancer treatment.
RESULTS: The probability of study participants not initiating treatment within 60 days was 18.8%. Undergoing treatment at a healthcare service other than the one where the diagnosis was made was the main factor associated with delay.
UNASSIGNED: Organizing healthcare services based on strategies that optimize referral flows and avoid transitions of care, can be crucial in reducing the time to initiation of breast cancer treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to improve the workflows at the different stages of health care to ensure timely initiation of oncological treatment.

BACKGROUND: Exercise Referral Schemes (ERSs) have been implemented across Western nations to stimulate an increase in adult physical activity but evidence of their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is equivocal. Poor ERS uptake and adherence can have a negative impact on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and, if patterned by socio-demographic factors, can also introduce or widen health inequalities. Different modes of ERS delivery have the potential to reduce costs and enhance uptake and adherence. The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of different programmes of ERS delivery on scheme uptake and adherence. Secondary aims were to examine the effect of socio-demographic factors on scheme uptake and adherence, and the impact of delivery mode on the expected resource and corresponding costs of delivering core parts of the programme.
METHODS: This was an observational cohort study with cost analysis. Routine monitoring data covering a three-year period (2019-2021) from one large UK ERS (number of patients = 28,917) were analysed. During this period three different programmes of delivery were operated in succession: standard (all sessions delivered face-to-face at a designated physical location), hybrid (sessions initially delivered face-to-face and then switched to remote delivery in response to the Covid-19 pandemic), and modified (sessions delivered face-to-face, remotely, or a combination of the two, as determined on a case-by-case basis according to Covid-19 risk and personal preferences). Multi-level binary logistic and linear regression were performed to examine the effect of programme of delivery and socio-demographic characteristics on uptake and adherence. Cost data were sourced from regional-level coordinators and through NERS audits supplied by national-level NERS managers and summarised using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: There was no effect of programme of delivery on scheme uptake. In comparison to those on the standard programme (who attended a mean of 23.1 exercise sessions) those on the modified programme had higher adherence (mean attendance of 25.7 sessions) while those on the hybrid programme had lower adherence (mean attendance of 19.4 sessions). Being older, or coming from an area of lower deprivation, increased the likelihood of uptake and adherence. Being female increased the chance of uptake but was associated with lower adherence. Patients referred to the programme from secondary care were more likely to take up the programme than those referred from primary care for prevention purposes, however their attendance at exercise sessions was lower. The estimated cost per person for face-to-face delivery of a typical 16-week cycle of the scheme was £65.42. The same cycle of the scheme delivered virtually (outside of a pandemic context) was estimated to cost £201.71 per person.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes new evidence concerning the effect of programme of delivery on ERS uptake and adherence and strengthens existing evidence concerning the effect of socio-economic factors. The findings direct the attention of ERS providers towards specific patient sub-groups who, if inequalities are to be addressed, require additional intervention to support uptake and adherence. At a time when providers may be considering alternative programmes of delivery, these findings challenge expectations that implementing virtual delivery will necessarily lead to cost savings.

OBJECTIVE: Inpatient subspecialty consultation is often medically necessary but in some cases may represent overuse. While pediatric consultation patterns have been described using observational data, qualitative methods may generate knowledge about contextual determinants of consultation behavior. Our objective was to understand how pediatric hospitalists make decisions about subspecialty consultation.
METHODS: This qualitative study took place at a large academic children\'s hospital as part of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN → qual). We conducted semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of previously identified high-consulting (top quartile) and low-consulting (bottom quartile) pediatric hospitalists. Interviews were conducted virtually, and audio recordings were transcribed. Two analysts coded transcripts using an integrated approach and established high interrater reliability (κ > 0.75). We organized findings using the Social Ecological Model.
RESULTS: Participants (n = 12) included high-(n = 6) and low-(n = 6) consulting hospitalists. Our respondents identified considerations including patient characteristics, confidence in their own competence and that of their team, and perceived helpfulness of consultants. Participants viewed consultation requests as being strongly influenced by a desire to maintain relationships with families. Specific to this context, the hospital\'s elite reputation was believed to influence families to expect consultations. Other considerations included medicolegal risk, clinical pathways, and availability of secure text messaging to facilitate informal \"curbside\" conversations with subspecialists.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making around pediatric subspecialty consultation is complex and influenced by factors unrelated to a patient\'s clinical need. Efforts to reduce low-value consultation must account for the social and organizational dynamics that promote consultation.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the diabetes most common microvascular complications. It is very prevalent in Sub-Saharan Africa due to a combination of causes, including rising diabetes prevalence, limited healthcare resources, and a lack of access to competent medical care. However, just a few studies have been undertaken in the study area. Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara region referral hospitals, in 2022. By using a systematic random sampling technique, a total of 627 respondents were included. The data was entered into EPI Data version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25 for further analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between the dependent and predictor variables. The association between predictor variables and the dependent variable was determined using multivariate logistic regression [p value < 0.05, 95% confidence interval]. The overall prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy among the study participants was 48.2% (95% CI; 44.2, 52.1). Aged between 40 and 60 years (AOR = 4:27; 95% CI 2.62, 6.94), and 60 years and older (AOR = 4:47; 95% CI 2.40, 8.35), participants who have lived alone (AOR = 2:14; 95% CI 1.21, 3.79), patients with comorbidity (AOR = 1:83; 95% CI 1.22, 2.76), and being physically inactive (AOR = 1:69; 95% CI 1.14, 2.49) were significantly associated with Diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was high among diabetic patients. Healthcare providers should prioritize regular screening and early intervention for individuals at higher risk, particularly those aged 40 and above, those living alone, patients with comorbid conditions, and those who are physically inactive. Implementing community-based support programs, encouraging physical activity, and providing comprehensive management plans for diabetes and associated comorbidities can help mitigate the risk and improve the quality of life for these patients.

BACKGROUND: The increasing interest in teledentistry since the COVID-19 pandemic warrants an evaluation of dentists\' willingness to adopt it. This study aimed to develop a questionnaire to assess dentist\'s intention to use teledentistry and the associated factors.
METHODS: A literature search was used to identify items for the questionnaire. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) was adopted as framework. A Delphi panel was constituted of researchers with relevant publications and the International Association of Dental Research e-Oral Health Network members. Three Delphi consultations were conducted to establish consensus on items. Consensus was set at 80% agreement and content validity ratio (CVR), reaffirmed iteratively.
RESULTS: Nineteen out of 25 (76%) invited experts participated in the first round, 17 in the second and 15 in the third. The preliminary questionnaire had 81 items in three sections, reduced to 66, 45 and 33 items in the first, second and third rounds. After revision, the final version comprised eight items assessing dentists\' backgrounds in Sect. 1, seven items identifying teledentistry uses in Sect. 2, and 17 items assessing intention to use teledentistry and its determinants in seven dimensions in Sect. 3. The initial CVR was 0.45, which increased to 0.80 at the end of the third round.
CONCLUSIONS: A survey tool was developed to assess the acceptance of teledentistry, and its determinants based on the UTAUT2 framework through consensus among teledentistry experts. The tool had excellent validity and needs further evaluation of its psychometric properties.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and symptom type on general practitioners\' (GP\'s) symptom attribution and clinical decision-making in relation to lung cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Vignette survey with a 2×2 mixed factorial design.
METHODS: A nationwide online survey exploring clinical decision-making in primary care.
METHODS: 109 GPs based in the United Kingdom (UK) who were registered as responders on Dynata (an online survey platform).
METHODS: GPs were presented with four vignettes which described a patient aged 75 with a smoking history presenting with worsening symptoms (either general or respiratory) and with or without a pre-existing diagnosis of COPD.
METHODS: GPs indicated the three most likely diagnoses (free-text) and selected four management approaches (20 pre-coded options). Attribution of symptoms to lung cancer and referral for urgent chest X-ray were primary outcomes. Alternative diagnoses and management approaches were explored as secondary outcomes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was used, including random intercepts for individual GPs.
RESULTS: 422 vignettes were completed. There was no evidence for COPD status as a predictor of lung cancer attribution (OR=1.1, 95% CI=0.5-2.4, p=0.914). There was no evidence for COPD status as a predictor of urgent chest X-ray referral (OR=0.6, 95% CI=0.3-1.2, p=0.12) or as a predictor when in combination with symptom type (OR=0.9, 95% CI=0.5-1.8, p=0.767).
CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer was identified as a possible diagnosis for persistent respiratory by only one out of five GPs, irrespective of the patients\' COPD status. Increasing awareness among GPs of the link between COPD and lung cancer may increase the propensity for performing chest X-rays and referral for diagnostic testing for symptomatic patients.

Background: There is a lack of randomized controlled trials focusing on orthopedic telemedicine (TM). The objective of this research was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and pattern of TM consultations of low-risk orthopedic patients performed by general practitioners (GPs) with those of face-to-face evaluations by orthopedists at an emergency department (ED). Methods: This randomized, single-center study was conducted between October 2021 and November 2022 on patients at an ED. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, low back pain, extremity contusion, ankle sprain, or neck pain. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 for TM consultations by generalist physicians with subsequent face-to-face orthopedic evaluations (TM-ED group) or face-to-face evaluations by orthopedic physicians (ED group). Primary outcomes were syndromic diagnosis, physical examination, and tests ordered. Secondary analysis included a satisfaction survey. Results: A total of 99 patients were enrolled; mean age was 41 ± 10.1 years, and 62.6% were female. The most common conditions were foot contusion (28.3%), ankle sprain (27.3%), hand contusion (19.2%), low back pain (19.2%), and neck pain (6.1%). Syndromic diagnosis showed no difference between groups (p = 0.231). In the TM-ED group (n = 51), self-examination demonstrated moderate to good agreement with face-to-face evaluations in several areas. Both groups showed similar tests practices. Patient satisfaction was higher in the TM-ED group across multiple measures. Conclusion: TM consultations for low-risk orthopedic patients by GPs are not inferior to face-to-face specialist evaluations at the ED. Virtual assessments are associated with higher patient satisfaction. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04981002.