Age significantly affects the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after radical excision (RE), and local excision (LE) is an alternative surgical procedure to RE. To compare the survival prognosis in different age groups of LE versus RE for rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by LE or RE from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the SEER database. The primary outcomes are 5-year OS and CSS. A total of 11,170 patients were eventually included, and there were 490 patients in LE and RE groups, respectively, after 1:1 propensity score matching. The 5-year OS and CSS after LE were significantly better in < 50 years and 50-66 years groups than in > 66 years group (5-year OS: 95.70% vs 88.40% vs 67.00%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS: 95.70% vs 96.30% vs 82.60%, P < 0.001). No statistical significance was found for the differences in 5-year OS and CSS between LE and RE in < 50, 50-66, and > 66 years group (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed age > 66 years, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated (Grade III/IV), and tumor size 3 to 5 cm was independent risk factors for 5-year OS after LE; age > 66 years, perineural invasion, and tumor size 3 to 5 cm were the 5-year CSS independent risk factors for after LE. We found that the survival prognosis of younger rectal cancer patients treated with LE was significantly better than older (> 66 years) patients, and the survival prognosis of rectal cancer patients in the three age groups was similar between LE and RE.

BACKGROUND: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare digestive disease that originates in mesenchymal tissues and has malignant tendencies. At present, no standard treatment has been developed, and surgical approaches and the resection scope for rectal GISTs are controversial.
METHODS: The clinical, surgical, pathological and prognosis data of patients with primary rectal GIST in our center from January 2008 to January 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into the radical excision (RE) and local resection (LR) groups.
RESULTS: A total of 537 GIST cases were collected, and 64 patients with primary rectal GIST were included in this study, including 25 cases in the RE group and 39 cases in the LR group. Tumor size (p = 0.013), distance from the anus (p = 0.038), National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria (p = 0.001), preoperative adjuvant therapy (p = 0.016), postoperative adjuvant therapy (p = 0.028), blood loss (p = 0.048), operative time (p = 0.020) and the duration of hospitalization (p = 0.021) were statistically different between these 2 groups. The mean overall follow-up time was 46 months (range, 1-122 months). Disease recurrence was observed in 12 patients. No statistical differences were observed in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (93.3% vs 92.6%, p = 0.952) or overall survival (OS) (90.0% vs 91.6%, p = 0.832) between the RE group and the LR group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that LR has a similar prognosis to that of RE with respect to DFS and OS. For appropriate cases, LR has the advantages of a short operative time, less bleeding, and a quick recovery. Especially when combined with neoadjuvant therapy, LR can also achieve better perioperative efficacy. Therefore, LR is an effective method for resection of rectal GISTs and warrants clinical endorsement.

OBJECTIVE: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT) are rare neoplasms of central nervous system but require proper evaluation and management to ensure a good outcome. This study was carried out to evaluate the functional outcome of IMSCT following surgery and to decipher the factors affecting optimal outcome of these cases.
METHODS: A prospective clinical study was carried out at a tertiary care center from 2003 to 2012. Forty three patients with intramedullary tumors diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging were included. Their clinical details, neurological findings and demographic data were recorded. The patients were then subjected to surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. The patients were followedup clinically and radiologically, and all parameters examined and recorded.
RESULTS: Sensory and motor impairment was present preoperatively in majority of patients (n = 39 and n = 38, 90.7% and 88.4%, respectively). Gross total excision was performed in 30 cases (69.76%). The most common histological diagnosis was ependymoma (n = 21, 48.8%). Postoperatively 32 patients (74.4%) were in McCormick functional Grade I or II improving from 13 cases (30.2%) in Grade I or II preoperatively. Fifteen of 17 patients in Medical Research Council (MRC) Grade III and 10 out of 12 patients in Grade MRC IV improved. No mortality was recorded during the entire period of follow-up (mean: 22, range: 3-96 months). Eight patients (18.6%) had recurrence till the last follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative neurological grade was the most important predictor of functional outcome. Gross tumor excision was the best surgical modality to improve event free survival. High-grade tumors had higher rates of recurrence but no effect on functional outcome.