race/ethnicity

种族 / 民族
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇系统的文献综述研究了白人父母对白人儿童的伦理-种族社会化(ERS)的程度和性质,与白人父母ERS相关的因素,和白人父母的孩子结局。它遵循了系统审查和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。该评论包括2000年1月至2021年6月之间出版的43部英语作品,并在PsycINFO中引用。PubMed,WebofScience,或社会学抽象。这表明白人父母参与了ERS,采用许多相同的策略,在研究中确定与有色人种的父母以及确定为特定于白人家庭的策略。审查揭示了与ERS相关的儿童和父母因素以及ERS的儿童结局,包括种族态度。与有色人种ERS的父母相比,白人父母倾向于教授优势策略,让孩子们保持他们的特权。我们为实践和未来的研究提供建议。
    This systematic review of the literature examined the extent and nature of white parent\'s ethic-racial socialization (ERS) of white children, the factors associated with white parents\' ERS, and the child outcomes of white parents\' ERS. It followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review included 43 English-language works published between January 2000 and June 2021 and referenced in PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, or Sociological Abstracts. It showed that white parents are engaged in ERS, employing many of the same strategies identified in research with parents of color as well as strategies identified as specific to white families. The review revealed child and parent factors related to ERS and child outcomes of ERS, including racial attitudes. In contrast with parents of color\'s ERS, white parents\' ERS tends to teach strategies of advantage, preparing children to maintain their privilege. We offer recommendations for practice and future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在出生/性别群体中分配的种族/族裔和性别群体经历了与物质相关的不成比例的伤害。专注于减少与物质有关的伤害而不需要禁欲是一种有希望的方法。目标:此元流行病学系统评价的目的是研究已发表的非禁欲干预药物使用干预措施研究中出生时的种族/族裔和性别分配。方法:我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)标准的首选报告项目,于2022年5月26日系统地检索了数据库(PubMed和PsycINFO)。如果文章有资格被列入:1)以英语报告,2)的主要目标是调查非禁欲包容性干预措施,以解决药物使用问题,3)使用人类受试者,和4)仅包括18岁或以上的成年人。两名编码人员筛选了初始文章,并评估了全文文章的资格标准。第三位共识评分员审查了所有编码差异。对于剩余的全长文章,独立评估者提取了与研究目标相关的信息。结果:搜索策略产生了5,759条记录。235条包括在内。只有73篇文章(31.1%)充分报道了出生时的种族/族裔和性别,只有7篇文章(3.0%)报道了亚组分析,这些亚组分析检查了各个成组的治疗效果.9篇文章(3.8%)在讨论中提到了关于出生/性别时分配的种族/族裔和性别的包容性和多样性,4篇文章(1.7%)广泛提到了局限性缺乏多样性。
    Background: Minoritized racial/ethnic and sex assigned at birth/gender groups experience disproportionate substance-related harm. Focusing on reducing substance-related harm without requiring abstinence is a promising approach.Objectives: The purpose of this meta-epidemiologic systematic review was to examine inclusion of racial/ethnic and sex assigned at birth/gender in published studies of nonabstinence-inclusive interventions for substance use.Methods: We systematically searched databases (PubMed and PsycINFO) on May 26, 2022 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they: 1) reported in English language, 2) had a primary goal of investigating a nonabstinence-inclusive intervention to address substance use, 3) used human subjects, and 4) only included adults aged 18 or older. Two coders screened initial articles and assessed eligibility criteria of full text articles. A third consensus rater reviewed all coding discrepancies. For the remaining full-length articles, an independent rater extracted information relevant to study goalsResults: The search strategy yielded 5,759 records. 235 included articles remained. Only 73 articles (31.1%) fully reported on both racial/ethnic and sex assigned at birth/gender, and only seven articles (3.0%) reported subgroup analyses examining treatment efficacy across minoritized groups. Nine articles (3.8%) mentioned inclusion and diversity regarding both racial/ethnic and sex assigned at birth/gender in their discussion and four articles (1.7%) broadly mentioned a lack of diversity in their limitationsConclusion: Findings highlight that little is known about nonabstinence-inclusive interventions to address substance use for individuals from minoritized racial/ethnic and sex assigned at birth/gender groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:公共卫生的重点是越来越多的痴呆症患者(PwD),和非药物干预(NPI)可能会提供支持。我们试图合成PwD中测试的NPI类型,并探索样品特征。
    方法:本研究为范围研究文献综述。使用搜索词“非药物干预”和“痴呆症”确定符合条件的文章。
    结果:共纳入36篇。社会心理NPI被实施得最多(n=24),基于音乐的干预被发现是最有效的。性别,种族,和种族没有一致的报道(分别为n=30,n=24和n=6).白人普华永道的代表性更高,只有62.5%的研究包括黑人参与者,25%包括西班牙裔/拉丁裔参与者。在更多的研究中(n=20),女性占样本的大多数(>50%)。
    结论:研究结果表明,未来的研究需要有意改善样本的多样性,特别是关于包括被认定为黑人或西班牙裔/拉丁裔的人。
    BACKGROUND: A public health priority is the increasing number of people with dementia (PwD), and nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) might offer support. We sought to synthesize types of NPIs tested among PwD and explore sample characteristics.
    METHODS: This study was a scoping literature review. Eligible articles were identified using the search terms \"nonpharmacological intervention\" and \"dementia\".
    RESULTS: 36 articles were included. Psychosocial NPIs were implemented the most (n=24) and music-based interventions were found to be the most effective. Gender, race, and ethnicity were not consistently reported (n=30, n=24, and n=6, respectively). White PwD had higher representation, with only 62.5% of studies including Black participants and 25% including Hispanic/Latino participants. Women made up a majority (>50%) of the sample in a greater number of studies (n=20).
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that future studies need to be intentional about improving diversity of the sample, particularly with respect to including persons identifying as Black or Hispanic/Latino.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:健康的社会决定因素,影响医疗保健的获取,患者结果,和人口水平的疾病负担,有助于边缘化患者群体经历的健康差距。
    目的:评估神经外科健康差异研究的前景。
    方法:Embase,Ovid-MEDLINE,Scopus,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,和ProQuest学位论文数据库被查询有关健康差异的原始研究,的结果,或美国神经外科手术后的术后管理
    结果:在筛选的883项研究中,其中196人,其中144人是神经外科附属作者。从2010年开始,神经外科差异手稿的数量显着增加,2010年之前只有10份手稿。3.1%的手稿使用了前瞻性方法,63.8%的手稿使用了国家注册管理机构的数据。分析的差异是种族/族裔(79.6%),经济/社会经济(53.6%),性别(18.9%),和残疾人(0.5%),40.1%的人分析多重/交叉差异。96.9%的手稿处于差异研究的第一阶段(检测)阶段,在第二阶段(理解)的论文很少,在第三阶段(减少)没有论文。脊柱是评估的最普遍的亚专科(34.2%),其次是神经肿瘤学(19.9%),脑血管(16.3%),儿科(10.7%),功能性(9.2%),一般神经外科(5.1%),和外伤(4.1%)。有神经外科背景的资深作者占论文的79.2%,其中93%是学术会员。
    结论:尽管最近十年来神经外科差异研究有所增加,大多数研究仅限于发现差异,而没有了解或评估减少差异的干预措施.未来的神经外科差异研究应纳入后两个因素,以减少差异并改善所有患者的预后。
    The social determinants of health, which influence healthcare access, patient outcomes, and population-level burden of disease, contribute to health disparities experienced by marginalized patient populations. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the landscape of health disparities research within neurosurgery.
    Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations databases were queried for original research on health disparities regarding access to, outcomes of, and/or postoperative management after neurosurgical procedures in the United States.
    Of 883 studies screened, 196 were included, of which 144 had a neurosurgery-affiliated author. We found a significant increase in the number of neurosurgical disparities reports beginning in 2010, with only 10 studies reported before 2010. Of the included studies, 3.1% used prospective methods and 63.8% used data from national registries. The disparities analyzed were racial/ethnic (79.6%), economic/socioeconomic (53.6%), gender (18.9%), and disabled populations (0.5%), with 40.1% analyzing multiple or intersecting disparities. Of the included reports, 96.9% were in phase 1 (detecting phase of disparities research), with a few studies in phase 2 (understanding phase), and none in phase 3 (reducing phase). The spine was the most prevalent subspecialty evaluated (34.2%), followed by neuro-oncology (19.9%), cerebrovascular (16.3%), pediatrics (10.7%), functional (9.2%), general neurosurgery (5.1%), and trauma (4.1%). Senior authors with a neurosurgical affiliation accounted for 79.2% of the reports, 93% of whom were academically affiliated.
    Although a recent increase has occurred in neurosurgical disparities research within the past decade, most studies were limited to the detection of disparities without understanding or evaluating any interventions for a reduction in disparities. Future research in neurosurgical disparities should incorporate the latter 2 factors to reduce disparities and improve outcomes for all patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    荟萃分析调查了种族和民族与COVID-19结果之间的关联。然而,这些关联的存在是不确定的,量级,和证据水平。我们,因此,旨在合成,量化、并对美国种族和族裔和COVID-19结局的证据强度进行分级。
    在这篇综述中,我们搜索了四个数据库(Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane系统评价数据库,和Epistemonikos)从数据库开始到2022年4月。每个荟萃分析的方法学质量都是使用多重系统评价来评估的,版本2(AMSTAR-2)。根据既定标准,种族和族裔与结果之间关联的证据强度被认为令人信服,高度暗示性,暗示,弱,或不重要。研究方案在PROSPERO注册,CRD4202236805。
    在筛选的880条记录中,我们选择了七个荟萃分析进行证据综合,与42个协会进行了审查。总的来说,42个关联中有10个具有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。两个协会高度暗示,两个是暗示性的,两个人很虚弱,而其余32个关联无统计学意义.与白人相比,黑人个体感染COVID-19的风险更高(风险比,2.08,95%置信区间(CI),1.60-2.71),这得到了高度暗示性的证据的支持;根据敏感性分析的保守估计,这种联系仍然具有启发性。在感染COVID-19的人群中,西班牙裔个体比非西班牙裔白人个体住院的风险更高(赔率比,2.08,95%CI,1.60-2.70),敏感性分析后仍有高度暗示性的证据。
    与白人相比,黑人和西班牙裔人群感染COVID-19和住院的风险更高。这些种族和民族与COVID-19结局的关联在住院前阶段更为明显。在这一阶段应该更多地考虑解决健康不平等问题。
    Meta-analyses have investigated associations between race and ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes. However, there is uncertainty about these associations\' existence, magnitude, and level of evidence. We, therefore, aimed to synthesize, quantify, and grade the strength of evidence of race and ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes in the US.
    In this umbrella review, we searched four databases (Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Epistemonikos) from database inception to April 2022. The methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR-2). The strength of evidence of the associations between race and ethnicity with outcomes was ranked according to established criteria as convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or non-significant. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022336805.
    Of 880 records screened, we selected seven meta-analyses for evidence synthesis, with 42 associations examined. Overall, 10 of 42 associations were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). Two associations were highly suggestive, two were suggestive, and two were weak, whereas the remaining 32 associations were non-significant. The risk of COVID-19 infection was higher in Black individuals compared to White individuals (risk ratio, 2.08, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.60-2.71), which was supported by highly suggestive evidence; with the conservative estimates from the sensitivity analyses, this association remained suggestive. Among those infected with COVID-19, Hispanic individuals had a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization than non-Hispanic White individuals (odds ratio, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.60-2.70) with highly suggestive evidence which remained after sensitivity analyses.
    Individuals of Black and Hispanic groups had a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization compared to their White counterparts. These associations of race and ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes existed more obviously in the pre-hospitalization stage. More consideration should be given in this stage for addressing health inequity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:针对1型糖尿病(T1D)青少年血糖健康的心理社会干预措施是有希望的。尽管如此,T1D治疗和结局的差异在种族/种族少数民族(REM)青年中普遍存在,缺乏系统评价,以研究将REM青年纳入社会心理干预措施。因此,本系统综述审查了文献,以确定将REM青年伴T1D纳入心理社会干预措施.
    方法:根据PRISMA指南对2011年至2022年间患有T1D的青年(<19岁)进行了系统的文献综述,PsycINFO,CINAHL,MedLineJPP的目录,CPPP,和糖尿病护理也进行了审查。最后一次搜索日期是2022年4月26日。使用QualSyst评级系统检查研究的偏倚风险。
    结果:24项研究符合纳入标准,共有3,117名参与者。研究利用了各种心理干预措施(例如,CBT,MI,行为模式)。17项研究报告了参与者的种族/民族,11项研究包括>20%的REM青年。
    结论:一项研究检查了干预措施对REM青年的影响,或者该干预措施是否减少了现有的种族/民族差异。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
    Psychosocial interventions targeting glycemic health in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have been promising. Nonetheless, disparities in T1D treatment and outcomes are pervasive among racially/ethnically minoritized (REM) youth and a systematic review examining the inclusion of REM youth in psychosocial interventions is lacking. Therefore, the present systematic review examined the literature to determine the inclusion of REM youth with T1D in psychosocial interventions.
    A systematic literature review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines for psychosocial intervention studies of youth (<19 years) with T1D between 2011 and 2022 using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and MedLine. Tables of contents for JPP, CPPP, and Diabetes Care were also reviewed. The date last searched was April 26, 2022. Studies were examined for risk of bias using the QualSyst rating system.
    Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 3,117 participants. Studies utilized various psychological interventions (e.g., CBT, MI, behavioral modalities). Seventeen studies reported participants\' race/ethnicity and eleven studies included >20% REM youth.
    One study examined the impact of interventions on REM youth or whether the intervention reduces existing racial/ethnic disparities. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    文化和社会因素极大地影响了向痴呆症患者提供的护理。这项范围审查旨在绘制有关文化和社会因素对非洲裔美国痴呆症患者护理人员提供护理服务的影响的新证据。特别是在COVID-19大流行期间。使用系统的范围审查方法,我们确定了21项关于影响护理服务的文化和社会因素的研究.搜索包括EMBASE,CINAHL,Cochrane系统评价数据库,JBI证据综合,和认识论。对数据的叙述性综合显示,文化和社会因素极大地影响了痴呆症和COVID-19患者在护理提供中的非裔美国人照顾者,他们认为照顾是一种责任,而不仅仅是一份工作。这些照顾者还受到他们的种族身份和信仰的指导,将家庭价值观和文化融入护理中。非裔美国人的照顾者表现出同情心和弹性护理自我认知。支持非裔美国人护理人员提供富有同情心的护理需要了解社会和文化因素,这些因素促使他们致力于在大流行环境中为痴呆症老年人提供优质护理。
    Cultural and social factors significantly influence the care provided to persons with dementia. This scoping review aimed to map emerging evidence on the influence of cultural and social factors on care delivery among Africa American caregivers of persons with dementia, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a systematic scoping review approach, we identified 21 studies on cultural and social factors influencing care delivery. The search included EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBI Evidence Synthesis, and Epistemonicos. A narrative synthesis of the data revealed that cultural and social factors greatly influence African American caregivers of persons with dementia and COVID-19 in care delivery, who perceive caregiving as a responsibility and not just a job. These caregivers are additionally guided by their racial identity and faith beliefs, integrating family values and culture into caregiving. African American caregivers showed compassion and resilient care selfperceptions. Supporting compassionate care delivery by African American caregivers requires an understanding of the social and cultural factors which drive their commitment to quality care for older adults with dementia in a pandemic environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    黑人妇女不成比例地受到心血管疾病的影响,心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率负担过重。此外,美国的种族化结构塑造了黑人女性的心血管疾病研究和医疗保健服务。鉴于无可争议的证据表明医疗保健服务的差异,研究,和心血管结果,迫切需要制定和实施有效和可持续的解决方案,以促进黑人妇女的心血管健康平等,同时考虑她们的种族多样性,原产地,和文化适应。应实施创新和文化定制的策略,考虑到健康的社会决定因素的不同影响以及塑造其寻求健康行为的独特挑战。以患者为中心的框架,涉及临床医生之间的合作,卫生保健系统,专业社团,政府机构需要改善黑人女性的心血管疾病。现在是实现所有黑人女性健康公平的时候了。
    Black women are disproportionately affected by cardiovascular disease with an excess burden of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition, the racialized structure of the United States shapes cardiovascular disease research and health care delivery for Black women. Given the indisputable evidence of the disparities in health care delivery, research, and cardiovascular outcomes, there is an urgent need to develop and implement effective and sustainable solutions to advance cardiovascular health equity for Black women while considering their ethnic diversity, regions of origin, and acculturation. Innovative and culturally tailored strategies that consider the differential impact of social determinants of health and the unique challenges that shape their health-seeking behaviors should be implemented. A patient-centered framework that involves collaboration among clinicians, health care systems, professional societies, and government agencies is required to improve cardiovascular outcomes for Black women. The time is \"now\" to achieve health equity for all Black women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电子尼古丁递送系统(ENDS)的使用增加和使用后的不当处置构成了公众健康和环境正义(EJ)的关注,如果使用患病率在少数民族和社会经济地位低(SES)的人(广义上称为“EJ人群”)。这篇综述综合了有关使用流行的人口统计学模式的文献,易感性,广告曝光,并访问ENDS,并从EJ种群中的ENDS推断环境烟草暴露(ETE)。使用ENDS相关术语搜索了七个电子数据库。我们纳入了2017年至2020年5月发表的描述ENDS使用率的研究,对ENDS使用的敏感性,广告曝光,并通过种族进入终点,种族,或SES。数据综合基于ETE随着高使用率而增加的假设,易感性可能会影响未来的使用,广告曝光和访问可能会影响使用中的人口统计学差异。我们确定了32项描述使用患病率的研究,易感性,广告曝光,或按种族/族裔或SES进入vape商店和其他烟草零售店。我们发现在非西班牙裔白人中使用ENDS的患病率更高,并且SES的使用模式不确定。易于使用的模式,广告曝光,和访问也是混合的,在低SES青年中观察到略高的结局。然而,关于广告曝光的证据基础是有限的,具有有限的泛化性。我们的发现表明EJ人群中ENDS使用率较低。虽然这表明这些群体中潜在的ETE较低,易感性的混合结果,广告曝光,低SES组之间对ENDS的访问可能会影响将来的ENDS使用和ETE。阻止ENDS吸收的教育运动应针对EJ青年。还需要采取旨在管理EJ社区中的vape商店存在和监控目标广告的举措。
    Increased use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and improper disposal after use pose a public health and an environmental justice (EJ) concern if use prevalence is disproportionately high among minorities and people of low socioeconomic status (SES) (broadly termed \"EJ populations\" for the purposes of this review). This review synthesizes literature on demographic patterns of use prevalence, susceptibility, advertisement exposure, and access to ENDS, and extrapolates environmental tobacco exposure (ETE) from ENDS among EJ populations. Seven electronic databases were searched using ENDS-related terms. We included studies published between 2017 and May 2020 that described ENDS use prevalence, susceptibility to ENDS use, advertisement exposure, and access to ENDS by race, ethnicity, or SES. Data synthesis was based on the assumptions that ETE increases with high use prevalence, susceptibility may influence future use, and advertisement exposure and access may impact demographic differences in use. We identified 32 studies describing use prevalence, susceptibility, advertisement exposure, or access to vape shops and other tobacco retail outlets by race/ethnicity or SES. We found higher prevalence of ENDS use among non-Hispanic Whites and inconclusive use patterns by SES. Patterns of susceptibility to use, advertisement exposure, and access were also mixed, with slightly higher outcomes observed among low SES youth. However, the evidence base on advertisement exposure was limited, with limited generalizability. Our findings indicate low prevalence of ENDS use among EJ populations. While this suggests low potential ETE among these groups, mixed outcomes on susceptibility, advertisement exposure, and access to ENDS among low SES groups may affect future ENDS use and ETE. Educational campaigns that discourage ENDS uptake should target EJ youth. Initiatives aimed at managing vape shop presence in EJ communities and monitoring targeted advertisement are also needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    这项研究的目的是进行系统评价与荟萃分析,以确定成人类风湿关节炎(RA)的代表性按性别,种族,在美国进行的运动随机对照试验(RCT)中的种族。在美国对≥18岁的RA成年人进行≥4周的运动RCT是合格的。通过搜索六个电子数据库来检索研究,交叉引用和搜索临床试验注册。双重,独立,进行研究选择和数据抽象。主要结果是根据性别和种族/民族在每项研究中参与者的比例。在应用双反正弦变换后,使用逆方差异质性(IVhet)模型对结果进行荟萃分析。在筛选的1030篇独特文章中,纳入了代表353例RA参与者的5个随机对照试验.汇总的参与者患病率女性为83%(95%CI=73%至92%),男性为17%(95%CI=8%至27%)。根据美国目前的患病率估计,女性比例过高,男性比例不足约为7.4%。对种族和族裔的定性检查表明,种族/族裔少数群体的代表性不足。在基于美国的随机对照运动干预研究中,男性RA缺乏代表性。其他基于美国的随机对照运动试验,包括更多地纳入和报告参与者的种族/族裔组成,也是需要的。要点•这项对美国研究进行荟萃分析的系统评价发现,在研究运动对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的影响的随机对照试验中,男性的代表性不足。•根据种族/民族进行的定性检查发现,在基于美国的RA成人随机对照运动研究中,选定的种族/少数民族缺乏报告和代表性不足。•这项研究强调需要在RA成人中进行更多的美国随机对照试验,以更好地代表美国的RA人群。
    The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the representation of adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to sex, race, and ethnicity in exercise randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in the USA. Exercise RCTs ≥ 4 weeks conducted in the USA in adults ≥ 18 years with RA were eligible. Studies were retrieved by searching six electronic databases, cross-referencing and searching a clinical trials registry. Dual, independent, study selection and data abstraction were conducted. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants in each study according to sex as well as race/ethnicity. Results were pooled meta-analytically using the inverse-variance heterogeneity (IVhet) model after applying the double-arcsine transformation. Of the 1030 unique articles screened, five RCTs representing 353 participants with RA were included. The pooled participant prevalence was 83% (95% CI = 73 to 92%) for women and 17% (95% CI = 8 to 27%) for men, suggesting an over-representation of women and an under-representation of men by approximately 7.4% based on current prevalence US estimates for each. Qualitative examination for race and ethnicity demonstrated an under-representation of racial/ethnic minority groups. There is a lack of representation of men with RA in US-based randomized controlled exercise intervention studies. Additional US-based randomized controlled exercise trials, including greater inclusion and reporting of the racial/ethnic composition of participants, are also needed. Key Points • This systematic review with meta-analysis of US studies found an under-representation of men in randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise in those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). • Qualitative examination according to race/ethnicity found both a lack of reporting as well as under-representation of selected racial/ethnic minorities in US-based randomized controlled exercise studies among adults with RA. • This study highlights the need for additional US-based randomized controlled trials of exercise in adults with RA that better represent the RA population in the USA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号