BACKGROUND: Peer review (PR) of palliative-intent radiation plans is an important but understudied component of quality assurance. This retrospective review aims to improve our understanding of palliative PR by examining the characteristics of reviewed plans and peer feedback along with the associated time burden of two different types of PR processes.
METHODS: This single-institution, quality assurance project assessed palliative PR between 2018 and 2020. Initially, the PR involved a multi-disciplinary team PR. Subsequently, it transitioned to independent PR by a single physician. Characteristics of reviewed plans and feedback on PR were captured and abstracted. Time requirements of PR were based on self-reported estimates and attendance records.
RESULTS: A total of 1942 cases were reviewed, representing 85.7% (1942/2266) of all palliative-intent plans between 2018 and 2020. A total of 41.1% (n=799) were simple (2D/3D) radiation plans while 56.0% (n=1087) were complex (volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or tomotherapy) plans. Approximately one-third (30.4%, n=590) of all plans were stereotactic treatments. The rate of any peer feedback was 2.3% (n=45), while the rate of a specific recommended or implemented change was 1.2% (n=24) and 0.9% (n=18), respectively. PR before the start of treatment was associated with more frequent recommended (p=0.005) and implemented changes (p=0.008). Most other factors, including plan complexity and use of stereotactic radiation, were not predictive in this analysis. Comparing the independent versus team PR approach, there was no significant difference in recommended or implemented changes. The mean±standard deviation (SD) staff time required per plan reviewed was 36±6 and 37±6 minutes, including 21±6 and 10±6 minutes of physician time, for team and independent PR, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the high frequency of complex and stereotactic radiation in the palliative setting, along with the importance of timely PR and the potential benefit of reviewing even simple, 2D/3D radiation plans. Additionally, from a process perspective, our work showed that independent PR may require less dedicated physician time.

OBJECTIVE: Correct commissioning of treatment planning systems (TPSs) is important for reducing treatment failure events. There is currently no comprehensive and robust methodology available for TPS commissioning in modern brachytherapy. This review aimed to develop a comprehensive template for commissioning modern 3D-image-based brachytherapy TPSs for high dose rate (HDR) gynaecological applications.
METHODS: The literature relevant to TPS commissioning, including both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, as well as guidelines by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) were searched, studied and appraised. The applied relevant EBRT TPS commissioning tests were applied to brachytherapy. The developed template aimed to cover all dosimetric and non-dosimetric issues.
RESULTS: The essential commissioning items could be categorized into six parts: geometry, dose calculation, plan evaluation tools, plan optimization, TPS output, and end-to-end verification. The final template consists of 43 items. This paper presents the purpose and role of each test, as well as tolerance limits, to facilitate the use of the template.
CONCLUSIONS: The information and recommendations available in a collection of publications over many years have been reviewed in order to develop a comprehensive template for commissioning complex modern 3D-image-based brachytherapy TPSs for HDR gynaecological applications. The up-to-date and concise information contained in the template can aid brachytherapy physicists during TPS commissioning as well as devising a regular quality assurance program and allocation of time and resources.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a popular approach in brain research over the past 20 years. It offers a noninvasive method to probe the brain and uses blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes to access brain function. However, the BOLD signal only represents a small fraction of the total MR signal. System instability and various noise have a strong impact on the BOLD signal. Additionally, fMRI applies fast imaging technique to record brain cognitive process over time, requiring high temporal stability of MR scanners. Furthermore, data acquisition, image quality, processing, and statistical analysis methods also have a great effect on the results of fMRI studies. Quality assurance (QA) programs for fMRI can test the stability of MR scanners, evaluate the quality of fMRI and help to find errors during fMRI scanning, thereby greatly enhancing the success rate of fMRI. In this review, we focus on previous studies which developed QA programs and methods in SCI/SCIE citation peer-reviewed publications over the last 20 years, including topics on existing fMRI QA programs, QA phantoms, image QA metrics, quality evaluation of existing preprocessing pipelines and fMRI statistical analysis methods. The summarized studies were classified into four categories: QA of fMRI systems, QA of fMRI data, quality evaluation of data processing pipelines and statistical methods and QA of task-related fMRI. Summary tables and figures of QA programs and metrics have been developed based on the comprehensive review of the literature.