This work aims to describe the main scales used in comprehensive geriatric assessment through a narrative analysis detailing their clinical application in relation to their advantages and disadvantages in terms of their psychometric properties (mental assessment) and biases in their application. The scales selected were: Barthel Index, Katz Index, Lawton and Brody Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clock Test, Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Social Resources Scale.
We conducted a rapid systematic review of reviews in MEDLINE (PubMed) up to January 2021, reporting findings using PRISMA, 2020. MeSH language, keywords, and the Boolean operators AND and OR were used to construct the reproducible search strategy.
Thirty-one works were selected that met the eligibility criteria: 18 systematic reviews, 12 literature reviews, and one scoping review. Multiple versions were found for some of the scales and biases in their interpretation were observed. Short, easy-to-administer questionnaires are recommended and cut-off points should be defined by formal education.
Comprehensive geriatric assessment scales are inexpensive, effective, and useful instruments for identifying problems and potential problems in the elderly. They should be easy to apply, not extensive, valid for multiple cultures and different levels of formal education, and applicable to individuals with different degrees of disability. It is recommended that health professionals be instructed in their use to avoid biases in the interpretation of the results.

A total of 60% of people with a spinal cord injury are completely dependent on a wheelchair. There is a wide variety of instruments that assess wheelchair skills, but they are not specific for this population. OBJECTIVE: To identify, assess, compare and summarize the psychometric properties of instruments that assess wheelchair skills in persons with a spinal cord injury. A systematic review was conducted and observational instruments were included that assessed wheelchair skills in persons with spinal cord injury. Eleven articles were identified that evaluated eight instruments. Most of them reported activities according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Reliability was the most frequently evaluated psychometric property. The Queensland Evaluation of Wheelchair Skills and the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit had the best degrees of confidence in the evidence, and their application could guide the selection of pertinent therapeutic strategies. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020161430.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on validated tools for measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in psoriasis in Spain. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the tools and describe the results of their practical application.
METHODS: Systematic review of studies validating or using instruments for assessing PROs in Spanish patients with psoriasis. Literature searches were performed in international (PubMed/Medline) and Spanish (Medes, Ibecs) databases. We also searched databases of instruments for measuring PROs (BiblioPRO, PROQOLID). The review included studies published in English or Spanish up to January 9, 2017. We also checked the reference lists of the key publications identified. The quality of the questionnaires was evaluated based on their psychometric properties (construct, transcultural adaptation, reliability, validity, feasibility, and sensitivity to change).
RESULTS: Eighteen publications were included. Six articles described the validation of Spanish versions of 5 PROs tools: 4 health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires specific to psoriasis and dermatologic diseases and 1 questionnaire specific to satisfaction with treatment. Our assessment of the HRQoL tools\' psychometric properties showed that the PSO-LIFE questionnaire received the highest scores, although specific properties varied from instrument to instrument. The 12 remaining articles were observational studies that used the validated instruments. In use, these tools detected the high impact of psoriasis on HRQoL, especially in young female patients with severe disease.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified 5 specific instruments validated in Spain for scoring PROs in patients with psoriasis. The tools\' psychometric properties vary, and it is essential to understand their strengths and weaknesses when selecting the right one for each situation. In use, these questionnaires are able to detect the high impact of psoriasis on patients\' HRQoL. PROs provide useful information to complement routine clinical findings in psoriasis and may contribute to improving disease management.