{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Description and clinical application of comprehensive geriatric assessment scales: A rapid systematic review of reviews.
{Author}: Casanova-Muñoz V;Hernández-Ruiz Á;Durantez-Fernández C;López-Mongil R;Niño-Martín V;
{Journal}: Rev Clin Esp (Barc)
{Volume}: 222
{Issue}: 7
{Year}: Aug-Sep 2022
暂无{DOI}: 10.1016/j.rceng.2022.01.002
{Abstract}: This work aims to describe the main scales used in comprehensive geriatric assessment through a narrative analysis detailing their clinical application in relation to their advantages and disadvantages in terms of their psychometric properties (mental assessment) and biases in their application. The scales selected were: Barthel Index, Katz Index, Lawton and Brody Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clock Test, Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Social Resources Scale.<BR>We conducted a rapid systematic review of reviews in MEDLINE (PubMed) up to January 2021, reporting findings using PRISMA, 2020. MeSH language, keywords, and the Boolean operators AND and OR were used to construct the reproducible search strategy.<BR>Thirty-one works were selected that met the eligibility criteria: 18 systematic reviews, 12 literature reviews, and one scoping review. Multiple versions were found for some of the scales and biases in their interpretation were observed. Short, easy-to-administer questionnaires are recommended and cut-off points should be defined by formal education.<BR>Comprehensive geriatric assessment scales are inexpensive, effective, and useful instruments for identifying problems and potential problems in the elderly. They should be easy to apply, not extensive, valid for multiple cultures and different levels of formal education, and applicable to individuals with different degrees of disability. It is recommended that health professionals be instructed in their use to avoid biases in the interpretation of the results.