This article is an English translation of the 4th Finnish Current Care Guideline for diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. This guideline is based on systematic literature reviews and expert opinions with Finland\'s geographical and operational healthcare environment in mind.

The standardization of variant curation criteria is essential for accurate interpretation of genetic results and clinical care of patients. The variant curation guidelines developed by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) in 2015 are widely used but are not gene specific. To address this issue, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEP) have been tasked with developing gene-specific variant curation guidelines. The Glaucoma VCEP was created to develop rule specifications for genes associated with primary glaucoma, including myocilin (MYOC), the most common cause of Mendelian glaucoma. Of the 28 ACMG/AMP criteria, the Glaucoma VCEP adapted 15 rules to MYOC and determined 13 rules not applicable. Key specifications included determining minor allele frequency thresholds, developing an approach to counting probands and segregations, and reviewing functional assays. The rules were piloted on 81 variants and led to a change in classification in 40% of those that were classified in ClinVar, with functional evidence influencing the classification of 18 variants. The standardized variant curation guidelines for MYOC provide a framework for the consistent application of the rules between laboratories, to improve MYOC genetic testing in the management of glaucoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the prescribing habits of glaucoma specialists and of general ophthalmologists, and reveal the conformance with European Glaucoma Society (EGS) guidelines in the medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: Patients receiving medical treatment for POAG/OHT in the glaucoma clinic comprised the \"naive group.\" Patients having a diagnosis and a treatment for POAG/OHT initiated in another center before presentation comprised the second group and were named as \"treatment initiated elsewhere\" (TIEW). All patients were retrospectively evaluated from the patients\' charts. The outcome measures included the percentage of eyes treated with monotherapy, the molecule groups preferred, and the change in prescription trends over the years in both groups. Results: Seventy-two subjects were included in the naive group and 135 subjects in TIEW group. The rate of monotherapy was 76% and 36% in both groups, respectively. The molecule number was significantly higher in the TIEW group compared with naive group (1.98 ± 0.89 vs. 1.28 ± 0.56, P < 0.001). Until 2003, beta blockers, and in the 2003-2008 period, prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) were the mostly prescribed drugs in glaucoma clinic. From 2009, the rate of PGAs declined, with PGAs being replaced by combination drugs and alfa-2 agonists. Conclusions: Overtreatment rate was high among patients receiving a diagnosis and a treatment by general ophthalmologists, whereas glaucoma specialists were found to conform with EGS guidelines. A shift toward polypharmacy was observed from 2000 to 2017. The common guidelines to evaluate and treat glaucoma need to be adopted by the general ophthalmologists in their real-life practice.