The introduction of genomic testing into prenatal care has come at a rapid pace and has been met with significant clinical and ethical challenges, specifically when dealing with incidental findings. We present the case of a couple in their first pregnancy who were referred to our institution with isolated fetal cataracts on morphology scan. After an unremarkable infectious disease workup and microarray on an amniocentesis sample, the couple opted for fetal whole-exome sequencing to investigate the cataracts further. This investigation did not find any cause for the cataracts but yielded an incidental finding of a de novo pathogenic variant in the SCN1A gene unrelated to the cataracts. Pathogenic variants in the SCN1A gene are strongly associated with severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, or Dravet syndrome. After extensive genetic counseling, the couple decided to terminate the pregnancy at 28 weeks\' gestation based on this finding. This case highlights some of the important clinical and ethical considerations in prenatal genetic diagnosis, particularly in the group of patients in which there is no phenotypic evidence in-utero of the incidental finding. The case demonstrates the value of frameworks and guidelines to guide management decisions for both clinicians and patients.

Laterality defects include morphological anomalies with impaired left-right asymmetry induction, such as dextrocardia, situs inversus abdominis, situs inversus totalis and situs ambiguus. The different arrangement of major organs is called heterotaxy. We describe for the first time a fetus with situs viscerum inversus and azygos continuation of the inferior vena cava, due to previously unreported variants in compound heterozygosity in the CFAP53 gene, whose product is implied in cilial motility. Prenatal trio exome sequencing was performed with turn-around time during the pregnancy. The fetuses with laterality defects are suitable candidates for prenatal exome sequencing due to the emerging high diagnostic rate of this group of morphological anomalies. A timely molecular diagnosis plays a fundamental role in genetic counseling, regarding couple decisions on the ongoing pregnancy, providing recurrence risks, and in predicting possible respiratory complications due to ciliary dyskinesia.

Non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) has multiple genetic etiologies diagnosable by exome sequencing (ES). We evaluated the yield of prenatal ES for NIHF, and the contribution of additional clinical findings and history. Systematic review was performed with PROSPERO tag 232951 using CINAHL, PubMed, and Ovid MEDLINE from January 1, 2000 through December 1, 2021. Selected studies performed ES to augment standard prenatal diagnostic approaches. Cases meeting a strict NIHF phenotype were tabulated with structured data imputed from papers or requested from authors. Genetic variants and diagnostic outcomes were harmonized across studies using current ACMG and ClinGen variant classification guidelines. Thirty-one studies reporting 445 NIHF cases had a 37% (95% CI: 32%-41%) diagnostic rate. There was no significant difference between isolated NIHF and NIHF with fetal malformations or between recurrent and simplex cases. Diagnostic rate was higher for consanguineous than non-consanguineous cases. Disease categories included RASopathies (24%), neuromuscular (21%), metabolic (17%), lymphatic (13%), other syndromes (9%), cardiovascular (5%), hematologic (2%), skeletal (2%), and other categories (7%). Inheritance patterns included recessive (55%), dominant (41%), and X-linked (4%). ES should be considered in the diagnostic workup of NIHF with and without associated ultrasound findings regardless of history of recurrence or consanguinity.

The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future.