postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)

体位性心动过速综合征 (壶)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在确定与年龄匹配的健康对照组相比,体位性心动过速综合征(POTS)患者是否存在性功能障碍。方法:利用在线COMPASS-31评估自主神经障碍症状的严重程度,贝克的抑郁症清单第二版(BDII),女性性功能(FSF)和国际安装功能指数(IIEF)问卷,我们通过一项横断面病例对照研究,将POTS患者的性功能评分与性别和年龄相匹配的健康对照者的评分进行了比较.结果:共有160名妇女患有POTS,平均年龄30.2±7.9(范围21-50岁),FSF得分低于62名健康年龄匹配的女性对照。29名平均年龄为30.1±6.0(范围21-47)的POTS男性患者的IIEF评分显着低于27名健康年龄匹配的男性对照组。女性POTS患者在欲望子领域的得分明显较低,唤醒,和满意,而男性POTS患者在勃起和高潮功能方面得分明显较低,欲望,满意度高于健康对照组。性功能障碍的预测因素是女性抑郁和男性年龄。自主神经症状的严重程度与女性性功能障碍有关,但是这种效果在控制抑郁症后消失了。结论:与健康对照组相比,患有POTS的女性和男性都有明显的性功能障碍,作为全面患者护理的一部分,在诊断和治疗方法中需要考虑这一点。
    Background: We aimed to determine whether patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) have sexual dysfunction compared to age-matched healthy controls. Methods: Utilizing online COMPASS-31 to evaluate dysautonomia symptom severity, Beck\'s Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDII), Female Sexual Function (FSF), and International Index of Erection Function (IIEF) questionnaires, we compared sexual function scores in patients with POTS to scores obtained from sex- and age-matched healthy controls via a cross-sectional case-control study. Results: A total of 160 women with POTS, mean age 30.2 ± 7.9 (range 21-50 years), had lower FSF scores than 62 healthy age-matched female controls. IIEF scores in 29 male patients with POTS with a mean age of 30.1 ± 6.0 (range 21-47) were significantly lower than in 27 healthy age-matched male controls. Female POTS patients had significantly lower scores in the sub-domains of desire, arousal, and satisfaction, while male POTS patients had significantly lower scores in erectile and orgasmic function, desire, and satisfaction than healthy controls. Predictive factors of sexual dysfunction were depression in women and age in men. The severity of autonomic symptoms correlated with sexual dysfunction in women, but this effect disappeared after controlling for depression. Conclusions: Compared to healthy controls, women and men with POTS have significant sexual dysfunction, which needs to be considered in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches as part of comprehensive patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了假定的自身免疫性体位性心动过速综合征(POTS)对静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)的反应。
    背景:POTS可能与自身免疫性疾病有关,血清自身抗体,或最近的感染。未控制的病例研究表明IVIG对治疗自身免疫POTS有益。以前没有进行过随机对照试验。
    方法:这项单中心随机对照试验比较了IVIG和静脉白蛋白输注。白蛋白比较器确保盲化和控制体积膨胀的影响。符合条件的POTS患者的COMPASS-31总加权评分≥40,符合提示自身免疫的预定标准。超过12周,参与者接受了8次输液(每次0.4gm/kg).每周进行四次输液,然后每隔一周进行四次输液。主要结果指标是最终输注后2周COMPASS-31的改善。
    结果:共有50名参与者同意;30名符合纳入标准并接受研究药物(16名IVIG和14名白蛋白;29名女性)。组基线特征匹配良好;27名参与者完成了治疗方案。COMPASS-31的变化在组间没有差异(中位数变化[IQR];IVIG:-5.5[-23.3,2.5]与白蛋白:-10.6[-14.1,-4.7];p值=0.629)。IVIG组有较高的反应率(46.7%对38.5%),但这没有统计学意义。不良事件是常见的,但通常是轻度的,治疗组之间没有差异。
    结论:这项在POTS中使用IVIG的小型随机对照试验发现,与白蛋白输注相比,反应没有统计学差异。两组均显示出可能与体积膨胀或其他影响有关的改善,从而掩盖了组差异。这些发现为POTS未来免疫调节临床试验的发展提供了依据。
    This study assesses response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in presumed autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
    POTS may be associated with autoimmune disorders, serum autoantibodies, or recent infection. Uncontrolled case studies suggest that IVIG is beneficial for treating autoimmune POTS. No previous randomized controlled trials have been conducted.
    This single-site randomized controlled trial compared IVIG with intravenous albumin infusions. Albumin comparator ensured blinding and control for effects of volume expansion. Eligible patients with POTS had COMPASS-31 total weighted score ≥ 40 and met predetermined criteria suggesting autoimmunity. Over 12 weeks, participants received eight infusions (0.4 gm/kg each). Four infusions were given weekly followed by four infusions every other week. Primary outcome measure was improvement in COMPASS-31 2 weeks after final infusion.
    A total of 50 participants consented; 30 met inclusion criteria and received study drug (16 IVIG and 14 albumin; 29 female). Group baseline characteristics were well matched; 27 participants completed treatment protocol. Change in COMPASS-31 did not differ between groups (median change [IQR]; IVIG: -5.5 [-23.3, 2.5] versus albumin: -10.6 [-14.1, -4.7]; p-value = 0.629). The IVIG group had a higher response rate (46.7% versus 38.5%), but this was not statistically significant. Adverse events were common but usually mild and did not differ between treatment groups.
    This small randomized controlled trial of IVIG in POTS found no statistical difference in response compared with albumin infusion. Both groups showed improvement possibly related to volume expansion or other effects obscuring group differences. These findings inform development of future immunomodulatory clinical trials in POTS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号