polymyxin B

多粘菌素 B
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些队列研究探讨了多粘菌素B(PMB)与其他抗生素治疗医院感染的效果和安全性,产生不一致的结果。本系统评价旨在探讨PMB的有效性和安全性,并将其与其他抗生素进行比较。
    在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,和WebofScience,搜索特定术语以确定定量队列研究或RCT,这些研究或RCT比较了PMB与其他抗生素的疗效和安全性.采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估观察性研究偏倚的风险。使用95%置信区间的赔率比进行结果评估。我们使用I2检验评估异质性。
    共22项观察性试验纳入分析。与对照组相比,PMB组的死亡率更高(比值比:1.84,95%CI:1.36-2.50,p<0.00001,I2=73%)。while,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组表现出明显的优势,死亡率较低,尽管仍表现出较高的异质性(比值比2.73,95%置信区间1.59-4.69;p=0.0003;I2=53%)。此外,与粘菌素组相比,PMB组的肾毒性率较低,但结果具有高度异质性(比值比0.58,95%CI0.36~0.93;p=0.02;I2=73%).
    在医院感染患者中,PMB在死亡率方面并不优于其他抗生素,特别是与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦相比。然而,与粘菌素相比,PMB在肾毒性方面表现出优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Some cohort studies have explored the effects and safety of polymyxin B (PMB) in comparison to other antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial infections, yielding inconsistent results. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of PMB and compared it with other antibiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, searching specific terms to identify quantitative cohort studies or RCTs that compared the effects of PMB with other antibiotics in terms of their efficacy and safety. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was conducted to evaluate the risk of bias of observational studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used for outcome assessment. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I 2 test.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 22 observational trials were included in the analysis. The PMB group had a higher mortality rate compared to the control group (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p<0.00001, I 2 = 73%). while, the ceftazidime-avibactam group demonstrated a distinct advantage with lower mortality rates, despite still exhibiting high heterogeneity (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.59-4.69; p = 0.0003; I 2 = 53%). Additionally, the PMB group had a lower nephrotoxicity rate compared to the colistin group but exhibited high heterogeneity in the results (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; p = 0.02; I 2 = 73%).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with nosocomial infections, PMB is not superior to other antibiotics in terms of mortality, specifically when compared to ceftazidime-avibactam. However, PMB demonstrated an advantage in terms of nephrotoxicity compared to colistin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微生物生物膜的形成创造了一个持久和抵抗的环境,微生物可以在其中生存,导致抗生素耐药性和慢性炎症性疾病。越来越多,生物膜是由多重耐药微生物引起的,which,加上有效抗生素供应的减少,正在推动寻找新的抗生素疗法。在这方面,抗菌肽(AMP)短,疏水,和两亲性肽,显示出对抗多药耐药细菌和生物膜形成的活性。它们还具有广谱活性和多种作用机制。在这次全面审查中,收集了150份出版物(从2020年1月到2023年9月),并使用搜索词“多肽抗生素剂”进行了分类,\'抗菌肽\',和“生物膜”。在此期间,研究了广泛的天然和合成AMP,其中LL-37,多粘菌素B,GH12和Nisin是最常被引用的。此外,尽管研究了许多微生物,金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌最为流行。出版物还考虑了AMP组合以及AMP递送系统在增加AMP功效方面的潜在作用,包括纳米颗粒递送。关于AMP抗性的出版物相对较少。这份全面的综述告知和指导研究人员关于AMP研究的最新进展,提供了有希望的证据表明AMPs作为有效的抗微生物剂的作用。
    Microbial biofilm formation creates a persistent and resistant environment in which microorganisms can survive, contributing to antibiotic resistance and chronic inflammatory diseases. Increasingly, biofilms are caused by multi-drug resistant microorganisms, which, coupled with a diminishing supply of effective antibiotics, is driving the search for new antibiotic therapies. In this respect, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are short, hydrophobic, and amphipathic peptides that show activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria and biofilm formation. They also possess broad-spectrum activity and diverse mechanisms of action. In this comprehensive review, 150 publications (from January 2020 to September 2023) were collected and categorized using the search terms \'polypeptide antibiotic agent\', \'antimicrobial peptide\', and \'biofilm\'. During this period, a wide range of natural and synthetic AMPs were studied, of which LL-37, polymyxin B, GH12, and Nisin were the most frequently cited. Furthermore, although many microbes were studied, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most popular. Publications also considered AMP combinations and the potential role of AMP delivery systems in increasing the efficacy of AMPs, including nanoparticle delivery. Relatively few publications focused on AMP resistance. This comprehensive review informs and guides researchers about the latest developments in AMP research, presenting promising evidence of the role of AMPs as effective antimicrobial agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:尽管已在临床上用于治疗感染,多粘菌素B(PMB)的治疗范围有限,伴随着其药代动力学的相当大的患者间差异和急性肾损伤的频繁发生,严重阻碍了它的广泛应用。最近对PMB群体药代动力学的研究提供了有价值的见解。本研究旨在回顾相关文献,为临床个体化管理奠定理论基础。
    方法:遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,从数据库开始到2023年3月,在PubMed和EMBASE数据库系统中搜索了PMB的Pop-PK研究。
    结果:迄今为止,总共进行了22项基于人群的研究,涵盖六个不同国家的756个科目。在这些研究中招募的人群包括感染多重耐药细菌的严重感染者,肾功能不同的患者,那些患有囊性纤维化的人,肾或肺移植受者,接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)或连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)的患者,以及肥胖或儿科人群。在这些研究中,七个人采用了一个隔间模型,典型间隙(CL)和容积(Vc)的范围为1.18-2.5L/h和12.09-47.2L,分别。15项研究采用了两室模型,根据中央隔间的间隙(CL)和容积(Vc)的范围,外围隔室的体积(Vp),室间间隙(Q)为1.27-8.65L/h,5.47-38.6L,4.52-174.69L,和1.34-24.3L/h,分别。这些研究中确定的主要协变量包括肌酐清除率和体重,而其他考虑的协变量是CRRT,白蛋白,年龄,和SOFA分数。在19项研究中进行了内部评估,只有一项研究使用独立的外部数据集进行外部验证。
    结论:我们得出的结论是,小样本量,缺乏多中心合作,和患者同质性是导致当前研究结果差异的主要原因.此外,大多数研究仅限于内部评估,这限制了模型知情的精确给药策略的实施。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite being clinically utilized for the treatment of infections, the limited therapeutic range of polymyxin B (PMB), along with considerable interpatient variability in its pharmacokinetics and frequent occurrence of acute kidney injury, has significantly hindered its widespread utilization. Recent research on the population pharmacokinetics of PMB has provided valuable insights. This study aims to review relevant literature to establish a theoretical foundation for individualized clinical management.
    METHODS: Follow PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, Pop-PK studies of PMB were searched in PubMed and EMBASE database systems from the inception of the database until March 2023.
    RESULTS: To date, a total of 22 population-based studies have been conducted, encompassing 756 subjects across six different countries. The recruited population in these studies consisted of critically infected individuals with multidrug-resistant bacteria, patients with varying renal functions, those with cystic fibrosis, kidney or lung transplant recipients, patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), as well as individuals with obesity or pediatric populations. Among these studies, seven employed a one-compartmental model, with the range of typical clearance (CL) and volume (Vc) being 1.18-2.5L /h and 12.09-47.2 L, respectively. Fifteen studies employed a two-compartmental model, with the ranges of the clearance (CL) and volume of the central compartment (Vc), the volume of the peripheral compartment (Vp), and the intercompartment clearance (Q) were 1.27-8.65 L/h, 5.47-38.6 L, 4.52-174.69 L, and 1.34-24.3 L/h, respectively. Primary covariates identified in these studies included creatinine clearance and body weight, while other covariates considered were CRRT, albumin, age, and SOFA scores. Internal evaluation was conducted in 19 studies, with only one study being externally validated using an independent external dataset.
    CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that small sample sizes, lack of multicentre collaboration, and patient homogeneity are the primary reasons for the discrepancies in the results of the current studies. In addition, most of the studies limited in the internal evaluation, which confined the implementation of model-informed precision dosing strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    临床,耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)脑膜炎极难治愈,病死率高。鞘内注射多粘菌素B是治疗CRPA颅内感染的有效抗感染手段。然而,由于多粘菌素B对儿童的潜在药物毒性,这种治疗方案在儿科很少有报道.
    一名5岁男性患者被诊断为爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒诱导的噬血细胞综合征(HPS),尽管有抗菌和化疗方案,但仍持续发热超过一个月。住院期间,病人表现为无意识,眼球震颤,和肌无力.脑脊液(CSF)分析显示白细胞计数和蛋白质水平升高。痰和血培养,以及CSF的宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS),确定CRPA。静脉和鞘内注射多粘菌素B可使温度正常化,并改善意识障碍和眼球震颤。随后的脑脊液分析结果正常,而多粘菌素B治疗没有肾毒性或神经毒性。
    对CRPA引起的脑膜炎患儿鞘内注射多粘菌素B是一种有效的治疗方法,没有明显的不良事件。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinically, Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) meningitis is extremely difficult to cure and has a high mortality rate. Intrathecal injection of polymyxins B is suggested to be an effective anti-infective means to treat intracranial infection with CRPA. However, due to the potential drug toxicity of polymyxin B in children, this regimen has rarely been reported in pediatrics.
    UNASSIGNED: A 5-year-old male patient diagnosed with Epstein-Barr virus-induced hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) exhibited persistent fever for over a month despite antibacterial and chemotherapy regimens. During hospitalization, the patient presented with unconsciousness, nystagmus, and myasthenia. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis indicated elevated leukocyte counts and protein levels. Sputum and blood cultures, as well as metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of CSF, identified CRPA. Intravenous and intrathecal polymyxin B administration resulted in temperature normalization and amelioration of consciousness disturbances and nystagmus. Subsequent CSF analysis yielded normal results, while polymyxin B treatment exhibited no nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: Intrathecal injection of polymyxin B in children with meningitis caused by CRPA is an effective treatment without remarkable adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:布鲁氏菌病的治疗具有高复发率和耐药性。我们的研究通过系统评价和荟萃分析研究了三联抗生素治疗和双联抗生素治疗布鲁氏菌病的疗效和副作用的差异。
    方法:我们检索了4个英文电子数据库和2个中文电子数据库,以获取截至2022年9月发表的关于使用三联抗生素与双联抗生素治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机对照试验和队列研究。总体结果指标为治疗失败率,复发率,总体治疗失败率,和副作用率。使用相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(95%CIs)作为汇总统计。使用固定效果模型来组合总体效果大小。
    结果:荟萃分析包括15项研究,包括11项随机对照试验和4项队列研究。在3个总体结果指标(治疗失败率(RR0.42;95%CI0.30至0.59异质性P=0.29,I2=15%)的比较中,三联抗生素的疗效优于双联抗生素。复发率(RR0.29;95%CI0.18至0.45异质性P=0.88,I2=0%),和总体治疗失败率(RR0.37;95%CI0.28至0.48异质性P=0.35,I2=9%)。使用三联抗生素治疗的布鲁氏菌病患者的副作用发生率与使用双联抗生素治疗的布鲁氏菌病患者的副作用发生率没有显着差异(RR0.85;95%CI0.67至1.06异质性P=0.1,I2=35%)。敏感性分析显示出可靠的结果,Peter检验显示没有发表偏倚。研究类型的亚组分析结果,毒品,布鲁氏菌病的类型与总体结果指标基本一致,表明整体结果的可靠性和稳健性。
    结论:在布鲁氏菌病的治疗中,三联抗生素疗效优于双联抗生素,且不增加副作用的发生率。
    The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes.
    The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I2 = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I2 = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I2 = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I2 = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter\'s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results.
    In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)是一种神经退行性疾病,由于脊髓α运动神经元的变性,导致近端肢体和躯干的进行性和对称性肌肉无力和萎缩。儿童分为1-3型,从重度到轻度,根据发病时间和运动能力。1型儿童是最严重的,不能独立坐着,经历了一系列的呼吸问题,例如通气不足,咳嗽减少,还有痰充血.呼吸衰竭很容易并发呼吸道感染,是SMA患儿死亡的主要原因。大多数1型儿童在2岁内死亡。1型SMA儿童通常需要住院治疗下呼吸道感染和有创呼吸机辅助通气在严重的情况下。由于反复住院,这些儿童经常感染耐药细菌,需要长时间住院,需要有创通气。在本文中,我们报告一例小儿脊髓性肌萎缩合并广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的雾化联合静脉多粘菌素B,希望为广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎患儿的治疗提供参考。
    Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease that results in progressive and symmetric muscle weakness and atrophy of the proximal limbs and trunk due to degeneration of spinal alpha-motor neurons. Children are classified into types 1-3, from severe to mild, according to the time of onset and motor ability. Children with type 1 are the most severe, are unable to sit independently, and experience a series of respiratory problems, such as hypoventilation, reduced cough, and sputum congestion. Respiratory failure is easily complicated by respiratory infections and is a major cause of death in children with SMA. Most type 1 children die within 2 years of age. Type 1 children with SMA usually require hospitalization for lower respiratory tract infections and invasive ventilator-assisted ventilation in severe cases. These children are frequently infected with drug-resistant bacteria due to repeated hospitalizations and require long hospital stays requiring invasive ventilation. In this paper, we report a case of nebulization combined with intravenous polymyxin B in a child with spinal muscular atrophy with extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia, hoping to provide a reference for the treatment of children with extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    这项综合审查的目的是确定在再生牙髓治疗之前进行的消毒程序是否对根管中的生物膜去除有效。这项研究是基于PubMed,拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献(丁香花)和科学电子图书馆在线(SciELO)数据库。选择了四篇文章;其中一项研究是体内研究,其他研究是离体研究。研究了不同的消毒程序,主要以使用肛门内药物为特征,突出双重抗生素糊剂,三重抗生素糊剂和氢氧化钙糊剂。通过使用荧光技术和菌落形成单位计数来评估对粪肠球菌和多物种生物膜的消毒能力,7到21天双重抗生素糊剂和三重抗生素糊剂表现出优异的抗生物膜活性,与显示有限消毒的CH糊剂不同,即使与不同的抗菌剂相关。三联抗生素糊剂是对抗生物膜最有效的药物。
    The aim of this integrative review was to identify whether the disinfection procedures performed prior to regenerative endodontic treatment were effective on biofilm removal from the root canals. The research was based on PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (Lilacs) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) databases. Four articles were selected; one of the studies was in vivo and the others ex vivo. Different disinfection procedures were studied, characterised mainly by the use of intracanal medication, highlighting the double antibiotic paste, triple antibiotic paste and calcium hydroxide paste. Disinfection ability was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis and multispecies biofilms by using the fluorescence technique and colony forming unit counting, for 7 to 21 days. Double antibiotic paste and triple antibiotic paste demonstrated excellent antibiofilm activity, unlike CH paste that showed limited disinfection, even when associated with different antimicrobial agents. Triple antibiotic paste was the most effective medication against biofilm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本综述的目的是比较粘菌素单一疗法和联合疗法治疗多药耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染的有效性。
    PubMed,科克伦图书馆。
    在这篇系统综述中,我们纳入了所有回顾性和前瞻性研究以及随机对照试验(RCTs),这些试验比较了静脉多粘菌素单药治疗和联合治疗与任何其他抗生素治疗多药耐药感染的疗效.排除了5名或5名以下患者使用吸入型多粘菌素的研究。主要结果是30天全因死亡率,如果在30天未报告,我们提取并记录了最接近的时间点。粗结果率和调整后的效果估计值均用于死亡率。
    使用的搜索字符串为\"(粘菌素或多粘菌素)和(肠杆菌科或克雷伯菌属或不动杆菌或大肠杆菌或假单胞菌属)和(随机或前瞻性或回顾性或队列或观察性或盲)。“39项研究纳入我们的分析,其中6项RCTs纳入其中,9项研究使用碳青霉烯作为辅助抗生素。由两名作者独立筛选和审查每项研究的资格,并在Excel表格上推断数据。
    多粘菌素单药与多粘菌素单药治疗的Meta分析多药耐药感染的联合治疗产生的比值比(OR)为0.81(95%置信区间[CI]:0.65-1.01),异质性最小(I2=40%),而在包括碳青霉烯作为联合治疗的研究中,对该比较的汇总分析得出的OR为0.64(CI:0.40~1.03;I2=62%).同样,RCT的汇总分析得出的OR为0.82(95%CI:0.58~1.16,I2=22%).所有这些均无统计学意义。然而,与多粘菌素单药治疗相比,多粘菌素联合治疗在多药耐药感染中更有效.当使用碳青霉烯类抗生素代替任何其他抗生素作为联合药物时,有效性更加明显,在许多使用多粘菌素联合治疗的体外研究中更是如此。
    虽然在统计上不显著,与单药治疗相比,使用多粘菌素联合治疗多药耐药革兰阴性杆菌(GNB)感染是谨慎的,优先使用碳青霉烯作为辅助药物与多粘菌素一起使用.
    SamalS,米什拉SB,PatraSK,RathA,短跑A,NayakB,etal.多粘菌素单一疗法与联合疗法治疗多药耐药感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。印度J暴击医疗中心2021年;25(2):199-206。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of Colistin monotherapy and combination therapy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Cochrane Library.
    UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review, we included all retrospective and prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravenous polymyxin monotherapy and combination therapy with any other antibiotic for treating multidrug-resistant infections. Studies using inhaled polymyxins with 5 or less than 5 patients were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality and if not reported at day 30 we extracted and documented the closest time point. Both crude outcome rates and adjusted effect estimates were extracted for mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Search string used was \"(Colistin OR polymyxin) AND (Enterobacteriaceae OR Klebsiella OR Acinetobacter OR Escherichia coli OR Pseudomonas) AND (random OR prospective OR retrospective OR cohort OR observational OR blind).\" Thirty-nine studies were included in our analysis; out of which 6 RCTs were included and 9 studies used carbapenem as the adjunctive antibiotic. Each study was screened and reviewed for eligibility independently by two authors and data extrapolated on an Excel sheet.
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis of polymyxin monotherapy vs. combination therapy in multidrug-resistant infections yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.01) with minimal heterogeneity (I 2 = 40%), whereas pooled analysis of this comparison in studies that included carbapenem as combination therapy yielded an OR of 0.64 (CI: 0.40-1.03; I 2 = 62%). Likewise, the pooled analysis of the RCTs yielded an OR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.16, I 2 = 22%). All these showed no statistical significance. However, it was seen that polymyxin combination therapy was more effective in multidrug-resistant infections compared to polymyxin monotherapy. The effectiveness was more glaring when carbapenems were used as the combination drug instead of any other antibiotic and more so in many in vitro studies that used polymyxin combination therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Although statistically insignificant, it would be prudent to use polymyxin combination therapy to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infection over monotherapy with preference to use carbapenem as the adjunct alongside polymyxins.
    UNASSIGNED: Samal S, Mishra SB, Patra SK, Rath A, Dash A, Nayak B, et al. Polymyxin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):199-206.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Polymyxins are last-resort antibiotics re-emerged to treat infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, polymyxin-associated nephrotoxicity has become the main safety concern. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors using studies conducted based on the validated RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Function and End-stage renal disease) criteria of acute kidney damage. Literature search was carried out through visiting legitimate databases and indexing services including PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid®), EMBASE (Ovid®), and Scopus to retrieve relevant studies. Following screening and eligibility evaluation, relevant data were extracted from included studies and analyzed using STATA 15.0 and Rev-Man 5.3. Inverse variance method with random effects pooling model was used for the analysis of outcome measures at 95% confidence interval. Besides, meta-regression, meta-influence, and publication bias analyses were conducted. A total of 48 studies involving 6,199 adult patients aged ≥ 18 years were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity was found to be 45% (95% CI: 41- 49%; I2 = 92.52%). Stratifying with RIFLE severity scales, pooled estimates of polymyxin-treated patients identified as \'risk\', \'injury\' and \'failure\' were 17% (95% CI: 14-20%), 13% (95% CI: 11-15%), and 10% (95% CI: 9-11%), respectively. Besides, the pooled incidence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was about 48% (95% CI: 42-54%), whereas that of polymyxin B was 38% (95% CI: 32-44%). Likewise, colistin had 37% increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity compared to the polymyxin B treated cohorts (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.67; I2 = 57%). Older age (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), daily dose (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96), underlying diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.25-2.63), and concomitant nephrotoxic drugs (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.79-3.00) were independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity. Patients with high serum albumin level were less likely (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.85] to experience nephrotoxicity compared to those with low albumin level. Despite the resurgence of these antibiotics for the chemotherapy of MDR/XDR-Gram-negative superbugs, the high incidence of nephrotoxicity has become a contemporary clinical concern. Being elderly, high daily dose, having underlying diseases such as diabetes, and use of concomitant nephrotoxic drugs were independent predictors of nephrotoxicity. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be done to these patients to outweigh the potential benefits of polymyxin therapy from its risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) against sepsis or septic shock.
    We searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes we included in this review were mortality at the longest follow-up available and serious adverse events associated with treatments. We used the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool to evaluate risk of bias. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed to assess the conclusion reached in our research.
    Thirteen studies including 1163 patients were identified. Use of PMX-HP could reduce overall mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.91, P = 0.01]. An interesting finding was that the mortality of patients in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores <25 group (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78, P < 0.0001) and sepsis group (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.72, P = 0.0003) significantly decreased after PMX-HP treatment. The result also showed that PMX-HP could reduce endotoxin levels [Standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.53, 95% CI -2.92- -0.13, P = 0.03] and improve mean arterial pressure (SMD 1.07, 95% CI 0.14-2.01, P = 0.02). Serious adverse events between the PMX-HP group and standard therapy group were not significantly different (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.97-4.80, I2 = 0%, P = 0.06). However, TSA did not provide conclusive evidence and more high quality RCTs were required.
    Using PMX-HP to treat patients with less severe sepsis can reduce overall mortality and is safe. Treatment efficacy may benefit from the reduction of endotoxin level and the improvement of hemodynamics. More high quality RCTs are required to further evaluate the clinical role of PMX-HP against severe sepsis or septic shock.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号