point-of-care ultrasound

点护理超声
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:来自多个专业背景的临床医生在临床实践中越来越多地使用即时超声。执行超声是一项复杂的技能,需要培训以确保能力和患者安全。卫生专业中缺乏熟练的培训师来满足这种不断增长的教育需求。超声医师在护理点超声中教育其他卫生专业人员的作用尚未得到很好的定义。超声医师可以跨专业提供超声教育,如果配备了适当的临床知识和教育技能。
    方法:进行了Delphi共识研究,以定义知识,超声医师向澳大利亚和新西兰的其他卫生专业人员教授护理点超声所需的技能和属性。在领导力中具有主题专业知识的卫生专业人员,促进,并邀请超声医师提供超声教育。
    结果:第一轮调查中有72名专家参与者,第二轮49人。参与者包括医生,超声波检查者,和其他卫生专业人员。就专业间教授超声的超声医师的31项能力项目达成共识,与会者达成了超过94%的协议。
    结论:这项共识研究定义了以下知识:超声医师在定点护理超声教育中的能力所需的技能和态度。这是为从事这一新兴领域的超声医师开发培训途径的重要一步。
    BACKGROUND: Clinicians from multiple professional backgrounds are increasingly using point-of-care ultrasound in clinical practice. Performing ultrasound is a complex skill, and training is required to ensure competency and patient safety. There is a lack of skilled trainers within health professions to meet this increasing educational demand. The role of sonographers in educating other health professionals in point-of-care ultrasound has not yet been well defined. Sonographers can provide ultrasound education interprofessionally, if equipped with appropriate clinical knowledge and educational skills.
    METHODS: A Delphi consensus study was conducted to define the knowledge, skills and attributes required of sonographers teaching point-of-care ultrasound to other health professionals in Australia and New Zealand. Health professionals with subject matter expertise in the leadership, facilitation, and delivery of ultrasound education by sonographers were invited to participate.
    RESULTS: There were 72 expert participants in survey round one, and 49 in round two. Participants included physicians, sonographers, and other health professionals. Consensus was reached on 31 competency items for sonographers teaching ultrasound interprofessionally, with agreement of greater than 94% reached by participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: This consensus study has defined the knowledge, skills and attitudes required for sonographer competence in point-of-care ultrasound education. This is an important step to developing a training pathway for sonographers engaging in this emerging area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管由于政府的资助,匈牙利初级保健实践中可用的即时护理超声设备的数量正在增加,它们在日常患者护理中的使用有限且不受监管。我们的研究旨在评估匈牙利全科医生(GP)和患者在初级保健实践中引入床旁超声检查的态度和需求。
    方法:作为横断面研究的一部分,一个匿名的,在社交媒体平台上向全科医生和患者分发了自我管理问卷.数据收集于2023年8月至2023年10月进行。卡方检验用于确定分类变量之间的关联。
    结果:调查由415名全科医生完成(平均年龄53.8±11.1岁,54.9%女性,平均实践19.5±11.9年)和693例患者(平均年龄45.5±12.3岁,95.2%为女性)。青年和中年全科医生对PoCUS的兴趣有统计学上的显着增加(年龄28-59;p=0.02)。此外,与年长的同事相比,该人群的全科医生更有可能接受PoCUS培训(p<0.0001).实践持续时间与培训意愿之间呈负相关(p=0.0011)。即使有政府的财政支持,目前只有8.2%的全科医生每天使用PoCUS,59.5%的全科医生不熟悉适应症和使用方法。患者甚至会付费在初级保健环境中进行检查,即使只有45.9%的患者会支付未通过PoCUS认证的全科医生,但那些接受过正规培训的人的支付意愿增加到99.4%(p=0.024)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在全科医生和患者的初级保健中,对采用PoCUS有极大的兴趣。基于很大一部分匈牙利全科医生不知道PoCUS及其适应症的事实,发展教育框架尤为重要,以及在匈牙利有效纳入PoCUS的实用准则。
    BACKGROUND: Although the number of point-of-care ultrasound devices available in Hungarian primary care practices are increasing due to government funding, their use in day-to-day patient care is limited and unregulated. Our study aimed to evaluate the attitudes and needs of general practitioners (GPs) and patients in Hungary regarding the introduction of bedside ultrasonography in primary care practices.
    METHODS: As a part of a cross-sectional study, an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to GPs and patients on a social media platform. Data collection was carried out from August 2023 to October 2023. Chi-square test was used to determine the associations between categorical variables.
    RESULTS: The survey was completed by 415 GPs (mean age 53.8 ± 11.1 years, 54.9% female, mean 19.5 ± 11.9 years of practice) and 693 patients (mean age 45.5 ± 12.3 years, 95.2% female). There was a statistically significant increase in interest in PoCUS among young and middle-aged GPs (age 28-59; p = 0.02). In addition, this population of GPs was also more likely to undertake training in PoCUS than their older colleagues (p < 0.0001). An inverse relationship was found between the duration of practice and training willingness (p = 0.0011). Even with the government\'s financial support, only 8.2% of GPs currently use PoCUS in a daily basis, and 59.5% of GPs are unfamiliar with the indications and the ways of using it. Patients would even pay to have the examination done in a primary care setting, even though only 45.9% of patients would pay a GP who is not certified in PoCUS, but the willingness to pay increased to 99.4% for those with formal training (p = 0.024).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a significant interest in adapting PoCUS in primary care from both GPs and patients. Based on the fact that a significant proportion of Hungarian GPs are unaware of PoCUS and its indications, it is particularly important to develop educational frameworks, and practical guidelines for the effective incorporation of PoCUS in Hungary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在急性失代偿性心力衰竭(HF)中,全身静脉淤血会导致患者出现症状和住院。我们研究的目的是确定静脉充血,使用静脉超声检查(VExUS)评分,预测急诊(ED)急性失代偿性HF患者与HF相关的住院和死亡率。
    在最初的24和72小时内,根据VExUS评分对50名因急性心力衰竭入院的患者进行了超声(US)评估。所有患者在出院后30和60天进行了电话随访。一入场,56%的VExUS得分为3。72小时后,32%在多普勒VExUS检查中没有更多的充血迹象(下腔静脉<2cm,VExUS评分为0);尽管进行了治疗,但相似的百分比仍显示VExUS评分为3。80%的病人在入院后住院,6人(15%)在医院死亡;所有患者的首次评估VExUS得分为3分。在研究期间没有VExUS评分<3的患者死亡。在短期随访中,18例患者因急性失代偿性HF再次入院。94%的再入院患者在首次ED入院时的多普勒评估中VExUS得分为3。
    严重的静脉充血,定义为急性失代偿性HF患者的初始评估时VExUS评分为3分,预测住院患者死亡率,HF相关的死亡,和早期重新接纳。
    UNASSIGNED: In acute decompensated heart failure (HF), systemic venous congestion contributes to patients\' symptoms and hospital admissions. The purpose of our study is to determine if venous congestion, examined using the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, predicts HF-related hospitalization and mortality in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with acute decompensated HF.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty patients admitted for acute HF in ED underwent ultrasound (US) assessment according to the VExUS score within the first 24 and 72 h. All patients were followed up with a telephone call at 30 and 60 days after hospital discharge. On admission, 56% had a VExUS score of 3. After 72 h, 32% had no more signs of congestion at the Doppler VExUS examination (inferior vena cava < 2 cm, VExUS score of 0); a similar percentage still exhibited a VExUS score of 3 despite therapy. Eighty per cent of patients were hospitalized after admission to the ED, while six (15%) died in-hospital; all exhibited a first-assessment VExUS score of 3. No patient with a VExUS score < 3 died during the study. During short-term follow-up, 18 patients were readmitted to the ED for acute decompensated HF. Ninety-four per cent of the readmitted patients had a VExUS score of 3 at the Doppler assessment at the first ED admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Severe venous congestion, defined as a VExUS score of 3 at the initial assessment of patients with acute decompensated HF, predicts inpatient mortality, HF-related death, and early readmission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在心肺复苏期间早期评估心脏骤停患者的预后非常具有挑战性。这项研究旨在评估早期护理点超声(POCUS)在院外环境中的预测结果价值。
    方法:这种观察,prospective,多中心研究的主要终点是在确定无自主循环恢复(ROSC)的晚期生命支持(ALS)开始的前12分钟内POCUS心脏停顿的阳性预测值(PPV)。构建多变量逻辑回归模型,并对通常用于终止复苏(TOR)规则的已知预测变量进行调整。
    结果:共对293例患者进行了分析,平均年龄66.6±14.6岁,大多数是男性(75.8%)。ALS开始后平均7.9±2.6分钟进行POCUS。在心脏静止的患者中(72.4%),16.0%的人达到了ROSC,而可见心脏运动的人达到了48.2%。缺乏ROSC的早期POCUS心脏静止的PPV为84.0%,95%CI[78.3-88.6]。在多变量分析中,仅POCUS心脏停息(校正比值比[aOR]3.89,95%CI[1.86~8.17])和潮气末CO2(ETCO2)值≤37mmHg(aOR4.27,95%CI[2.21~8.25])与ROSC缺失相关.
    结论:院外心脏骤停患者在心肺复苏期间的早期POCUS心脏停顿是ROSC缺失的可靠预测指标。然而,仅靠它的存在不足以确定复苏工作的终止.
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03494153。2018年3月29日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Early assessment of the prognosis of a patient in cardiac arrest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is highly challenging. This study aims to evaluate the predictive outcome value of early point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in out-of-hospital settings.
    METHODS: This observational, prospective, multicentre study\'s primary endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) of POCUS cardiac standstill within the first 12 min of advanced life support (ALS) initiation in determining the absence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed with adjustments for known predictive variables typically used in termination of resuscitation (TOR) rules.
    RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were analysed, with a mean age of 66.6 ± 14.6 years, and a majority were men (75.8%). POCUS was performed on average 7.9 ± 2.6 min after ALS initiation. Among patients with cardiac standstill (72.4%), 16.0% achieved ROSC compared with 48.2% in those with visible cardiac motions. The PPV of early POCUS cardiac standstill for the absence of ROSC was 84.0%, 95% CI [78.3-88.6]. In multivariable analysis, only POCUS cardiac standstill (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.89, 95% CI [1.86-8.17]) and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) value ≤37 mmHg (aOR 4.27, 95% CI [2.21-8.25]) were associated with the absence of ROSC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early POCUS cardiac standstill during CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was a reliable predictor of the absence of ROSC. However, its presence alone was not sufficient to determine the termination of resuscitation efforts.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03494153. Registered March 29, 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估在有或没有外展应激的情况下,US是否可以检测到Lisfranc损伤。
    方法:获得8只尸体足。在未受伤的脚中获得以下测量值:C1M2和C1C2间隔以及TMT1和TMT2背侧步离距离。使用超声波在有和没有外展应力的情况下都获得了测量结果。损伤模型是通过切断Lisfranc韧带复合体创建的,之后,观察者再次进行测量。统计分析用于确定完整模型和损伤模型之间的差异,为了确定用于识别Lisfranc伤害的诊断临界值,并评估观察者间/观察者内的可靠性。
    结果:平均C1M2间隔有显著差异,有和没有绑架压力,在完整和撕裂的Lisfranc韧带之间(p<0.001)。应力>2.03mm的C1M2间隔对Lisfranc破坏产生81%的灵敏度和72%的特异性。撕裂韧带与无应力完整Lisfranc韧带的平均C1C2间隔没有显着差异(p=0.10);然而,距离与施加应力有显著差异(p<0.001)。>1.78mm的C1C2间隔对压力下的Lisfranc损伤产生了72%的敏感性和69%的特异性。完整和撕裂的Lisfranc韧带之间的平均TMT1或TMT2背侧步离测量值没有显着差异。所有观察者都表现出良好的观察者内部ICC。所有测量的观察者间ICC均良好或优秀,除了TMT1,这是中度。
    结论:在外展应力下测量C1M2和C1C2距离时,超声检查是检测Lisfranc韧带损伤的一种有前景的即时成像工具。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess if Lisfranc injury can be detected by US with and without abduction stress.
    METHODS: Eight cadaveric feet were obtained. The following measurements were obtained in the uninjured feet: C1M2 and C1C2 intervals and TMT1 and TMT2 dorsal step-off distances. Measurements were obtained both with and without abduction stress using ultrasound. The injury model was created by transecting the Lisfranc ligament complex, after which the observers performed the measurements again. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences between intact and injured models, to determine diagnostic cut-off values for identifying Lisfranc injuries, and to assess interobserver/intraobserver reliability.
    RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the mean C1M2 interval, both with and without abduction stress, between the intact and torn Lisfranc ligament (p < 0.001). A C1M2 interval with stress of > 2.03 mm yielded 81% sensitivity and 72% specificity for Lisfranc disruption. There was no significant difference in the mean C1C2 interval of the torn versus intact Lisfranc ligament without stress (p = 0.10); however, the distance was significantly different with the application of stress (p < 0.001). The C1C2 interval of > 1.78 mm yielded 72% sensitivity and 69% specificity for Lisfranc injury under stress. There were no significant differences in the mean TMT1 or TMT2 dorsal step-off measurements between the intact and torn Lisfranc ligaments. All observers showed good intraobserver ICCs. The interobserver ICCs for all measurements were good or excellent, except for TMT1, which was moderate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography is a promising point-of-care imaging tool to detect Lisfranc ligamentous injuries when measuring C1M2 and C1C2 distances under abduction stress.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过测量直肠横径(TRD)和经腹部直肠超声(TRU)评估粪便负荷,评估结直肠病理患儿的肠道管理。
    方法:对2023年4月至2024年4月接受肠道管理(BM)的儿童进行了前瞻性病例对照研究。纳入了先天性巨结肠(HD)患者,肛门直肠畸形(ARM)和功能性便秘(FC)。排除患有其他先天性或神经系统疾病的患者。对照组由无腹部不适的住院患者和门诊患者组成。根据ROM-IV标准诊断FC。对于HD和ARM,我们追踪了一系列症状.为了评估粪便负荷,我们使用Klijn可视化了TRD(Klijn等人。JUrol172:1986-1988,2004)方法。膀胱中度充满。从直肠逆行评估粪便负荷。随访时间为1/3/6个月。从医疗记录中收集次要数据。样本量通过新收集的数据计算先验和随访组。
    结果:所有组的TRD的p值具有统计学意义,p<0.05和分组随访。
    结论:超声是评估粪便负荷的有用工具,有助于诊断便秘和监测BM。不管结直肠病理学,3厘米的截断线似乎可以区分没有便秘/超负荷症状的儿童和无症状的患者。我们提出了一种无辐射的方法来监测肠道管理。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bowel management for children with colorectal pathology by measuring transverse rectal diameter (TRD) and assessing fecal load with transabdominal rectal ultrasound (TRU).
    METHODS: Prospective case-control study of children receiving bowel management (BM) between 04/2023 and 04/2024 was done. There was inclusion of patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD), anorectal malformation (ARM) and functional constipation (FC). Patients with other congenital or neurological conditions were excluded. Control group consisted of inpatients and outpatients without abdominal complaints. FC was diagnosed according to ROM-IV-criteria. For HD and ARM, we followed a list of symptoms. To assess fecal load, we visualized the TRD using the Klijn (Klijn et al. in J Urol 172:1986-1988, 2004) method. The bladder was moderately full. The fecal load was assessed retrograde from the rectum. Follow-up was at 1/3/6 months. Secondary data were collected from medical records. Sample size calculated a priori and follow-up group with new gathered data.
    RESULTS: p value for TRD in all groups significant with p < 0.05 and in grouped follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing fecal load and helps diagnose constipation and monitor BM. Irrespective of colorectal pathology, a cut-off of 3 cm seems to discriminate between children without constipation/overload symptoms and asymptomatic patients. We present a radiation-free method for monitoring bowel management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们试图通过自动评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)的人工智能程序(AI-POCUS)来验证新型手持式超声设备的能力。AI-POCUS用于前瞻性扫描两家日本医院的200名患者。将AI-POCUS的自动LVEF与使用高端超声机的标准双平面磁盘方法进行了比较。由于AI-POCUS图像不可行而排除18例患者后,182例(63±15岁,21%的女性)进行了分析。AI-POCUS的LVEF与标准方法之间的组内相关系数(ICC)良好(0.81,p<0.001),没有临床意义的系统偏差(平均偏差-1.5%,p=0.008,一致性限度±15.0%)。检测到LVEF<50%,敏感性为85%(95%置信区间76%-91%),特异性为81%(71%-89%)。尽管通过标准回波和通过AI-POCUS的LV体积之间的相关性很好(ICC>0.80),AI-POCUS倾向于低估较大LV的LV体积(舒张末期体积的总体偏差为42.1mL)。通过使用涉及更大LV的更多数据调整的较新版本的软件来缓解这些趋势,显示相似的相关性(ICC>0.85)。在这个现实世界的多中心研究中,AI-POCUS显示准确的LVEF评估,但是对于数量评估可能需要仔细注意。较新的版本,用更大、更异构的数据训练,展示了改进的性能,强调了大数据积累在该领域的重要性。
    We sought to validate the ability of a novel handheld ultrasound device with an artificial intelligence program (AI-POCUS) that automatically assesses left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). AI-POCUS was used to prospectively scan 200 patients in two Japanese hospitals. Automatic LVEF by AI-POCUS was compared to the standard biplane disk method using high-end ultrasound machines. After excluding 18 patients due to infeasible images for AI-POCUS, 182 patients (63 ± 15 years old, 21% female) were analyzed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the LVEF by AI-POCUS and the standard methods was good (0.81, p < 0.001) without clinically meaningful systematic bias (mean bias -1.5%, p = 0.008, limits of agreement ± 15.0%). Reduced LVEF < 50% was detected with a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval 76%-91%) and specificity of 81% (71%-89%). Although the correlations between LV volumes by standard-echo and those by AI-POCUS were good (ICC > 0.80), AI-POCUS tended to underestimate LV volumes for larger LV (overall bias 42.1 mL for end-diastolic volume). These trends were mitigated with a newer version of the software tuned using increased data involving larger LVs, showing similar correlations (ICC > 0.85). In this real-world multicenter study, AI-POCUS showed accurate LVEF assessment, but careful attention might be necessary for volume assessment. The newer version, trained with larger and more heterogeneous data, demonstrated improved performance, underscoring the importance of big data accumulation in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估初级卫生保健机构中由新手使用者/全科医生(GP)进行肺部超声检查(LUS)诊断下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)的可行性。
    一项前瞻性介入多中心研究(2019年12月至2020年3月)。
    年龄>3个月的患者,涉嫌在三种不同的一般做法(GP)(农村,半乡村和城市)在法国。
    通过(1)未进行LUS的患者比例来评估全科医生对LUS的可行性,(2)技术故障,(3)GP对图像的可解释性,(4)检查持续时间和(5)患者的感知和可接受性。
    共招募了151名患者,全科医生对111例(73.5%)患者进行了LUS(LUS组)。在99.1%(n=110)的病例中,GP表示他们能够解释图像。中位[IQR]检查持续时间为4[3-5]分钟。LRTI在LUS和非LUS组中诊断为70.3%和60%的患者,分别(p=0.43)。在LUS之后,全科医生在6例中将诊断从“其他”更改为“LRTI”(+5.4%,p<.001),为五名患者开抗生素(+4.5%,p=.164)和10例患者的补充胸部成像(+9%,p<.001)。1.8%的病例报告患者压力,81.7%的患者宣称他们更好地理解诊断,82%的患者认为LUS后GP诊断更可靠。
    全科医生使用手持设备的LUS是初级卫生保健中针对LRTI症状的可行诊断工具,证明了有效性和积极的病人接待。
    临床试验.gov:NCT04602234,2020年10月20日。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users\' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France.
    UNASSIGNED: Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from \'other\' to \'LRTI\' in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS.
    UNASSIGNED: LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究以下内容:(a)肋间肌收缩对超声评估肺滑动的影响,(b)评估者和观察者之间对超声检测肺滑动和肺脉搏的一致性。
    方法:我们使用Valsalva和Muller动作作为实验模型,其中闭合的声门和夹住的鼻子可以防止空气进入肺部,尽管肋间肌持续收缩。21名健康志愿者在潮气呼吸期间接受了双侧肺部超声检查,呼吸暂停,换气过度,穆勒和瓦尔萨尔瓦演习。同一位专家录制了420张B模式剪辑和420张M模式图像,由3名不了解与每个成像对应的呼吸活动的评估者独立评估是否存在肺滑动和肺脉搏。
    结果:在穆勒和瓦尔萨尔瓦演习中,肺滑动在高达73.0%和高达68.7%的成像中被确认,分别,穆勒机动的评分者之间有轻微到公平的协议,瓦尔萨尔瓦的评分者之间有轻微到中等的协议。在高达42.0%的潮气呼吸成像中无法识别肺滑动,高达12.5%的过度换气成像,双方都有轻微到公平的评级者间协议。在呼吸暂停期间,滑动的解释错误是无关紧要的,评分者之间的一致性是中等到完美的。即使观察者内部的协议在评估者之间和整个呼吸模式中有所不同,我们发现它高于评级者间的可靠性。
    结论:肋间肌收缩会产生可能模拟肺滑动的超声图像伪影。临床研究需要证实这一假设。我们发现,对于肺滑动和肺脉搏,评分者之间的协议略有到中等,而观察者内部的协议则在全球范围内达到中等到几乎完美。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov注册号。NCT02386696。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the following: (a) effects of intercostal muscle contraction on sonographic assessment of lung sliding and (b) inter-rater and intra-observer agreement on sonographic detection of lung sliding and lung pulse.
    METHODS: We used Valsalva and Muller maneuvers as experimental models in which closed glottis and clipped nose prevent air from entering the lungs, despite sustained intercostal muscles contraction. Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent bilateral lung ultrasound during tidal breathing, apnea, hyperventilation, and Muller and Valsalva maneuvers. The same expert recorded 420 B-mode clips and 420 M-mode images, independently evaluated for the presence or absence of lung sliding and lung pulse by three raters unaware of the respiratory activity corresponding to each imaging.
    RESULTS: During Muller and Valsalva maneuvers, lung sliding was certainly recognized in up to 73.0% and up to 68.7% of imaging, respectively, with a slight to fair inter-rater agreement for Muller maneuver and slight to moderate for Valsalva. Lung sliding was unrecognized in up to 42.0% of tidal breathing imaging, and up to 12.5% of hyperventilation imaging, with a slight to fair inter-rater agreement for both. During apnea, interpretation errors for sliding were irrelevant and inter-rater agreement moderate to perfect. Even if intra-observer agreement varied among raters and throughout respiratory patterns, we found it to be higher than inter-rater reliability.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intercostal muscles contraction produces sonographic artifacts that may simulate lung sliding. Clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We found slight to moderate inter-rater agreement and globally moderate to almost perfect intra-observer agreement for lung sliding and lung pulse.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number. NCT02386696.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    点照护超声(POCUS)可直接在床边进行心脏成像,但受到简短采集的限制,采集质量的变化,缺乏先进的协议。
    为了开发和验证用于检测心脏POCUS上未诊断的心肌病的深度学习模型,利用一种新颖的收购质量适应性建模策略。
    要开发模型,我们确定了美国一家大型卫生系统中五家医院的患者的经胸超声心动图(TTE),这些患者患有转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样心肌病(ATTR-CM,通过Tc99m-焦磷酸盐成像证实),肥厚型心肌病(HCM,经心脏磁共振证实),和对照丰富了严重AS的存在。在290,245个TTE视频样本中,我们使用新颖的增强方法和定制的损失函数来衡量图像和视图质量,以训练多标签,查看不可知的基于视频的卷积神经网络(CNN)来区分ATTR-CM的存在,HCM,和/或AS。从2011年到2023年,在1,330名独立急诊科(ED)患者的1,879项研究中,对3,758个现实世界的POCUS视频进行了测试。
    我们的多标签,在标准TTE研究中,视图不可知分类器在区分ATTR-CM(AUROC0.98[95CI:0.96-0.99])和HCM(AUROC0.95[95%CI:0.94-0.96])方面表现出最先进的性能.解剖视图正确性的自动化指标证实了POCUS与TTE视频的质量显着降低(中位视图分类器置信度为0.63[IQR:0.44-0.88]vs0.93[IQR:0.69-1.00],p<0.001)。部署到POCUS视频时,我们的算法有效区分ATTR-CM和HCM,AUROC高达0.94(胸骨旁长轴(PLAX)),和0.85(根尖4腔),对应的阳性诊断比值比分别为46.7和25.5。总的来说,POCUS队列中18/35(51.4%)的ATTR-CM和32/57(41.1%)的HCM患者在最终确认成像前一年出现AI阳性筛查。
    我们定义并验证了一个AI框架,该框架可以实现可扩展,使用POCUS对诊断不足的心肌病进行机会性筛查。
    UNASSIGNED: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) enables cardiac imaging at the bedside and in communities but is limited by abbreviated protocols and variation in quality. We developed and tested artificial intelligence (AI) models to automate the detection of underdiagnosed cardiomyopathies from cardiac POCUS.
    UNASSIGNED: In a development set of 290,245 transthoracic echocardiographic videos across the Yale-New Haven Health System (YNHHS), we used augmentation approaches and a customized loss function weighted for view quality to derive a POCUS-adapted, multi-label, video-based convolutional neural network (CNN) that discriminates HCM (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) and ATTR-CM (transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy) from controls without known disease. We evaluated the final model across independent, internal and external, retrospective cohorts of individuals who underwent cardiac POCUS across YNHHS and Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) emergency departments (EDs) (2011-2024) to prioritize key views and validate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of single-view screening protocols.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 33,127 patients (median age 61 [IQR: 45-75] years, n=17,276 [52·2%] female) at YNHHS and 5,624 (57 [IQR: 39-71] years, n=1,953 [34·7%] female) at MSHS with 78,054 and 13,796 eligible cardiac POCUS videos, respectively. An AI-enabled single-view screening approach successfully discriminated HCM (AUROC of 0·90 [YNHHS] & 0·89 [MSHS]) and ATTR-CM (YNHHS: AUROC of 0·92 [YNHHS] & 0·99 [MSHS]). In YNHHS, 40 (58·0%) HCM and 23 (47·9%) ATTR-CM cases had a positive screen at median of 2·1 [IQR: 0·9-4·5] and 1·9 [IQR: 1·0-3·4] years before clinical diagnosis. Moreover, among 24,448 participants without known cardiomyopathy followed over 2·2 [IQR: 1·1-5·8] years, AI-POCUS probabilities in the highest (vs lowest) quintile for HCM and ATTR-CM conferred a 15% (adj.HR 1·15 [95%CI: 1·02-1·29]) and 39% (adj.HR 1·39 [95%CI: 1·22-1·59]) higher age- and sex-adjusted mortality risk, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed and validated an AI framework that enables scalable, opportunistic screening of treatable cardiomyopathies wherever POCUS is used.
    UNASSIGNED: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, BridgeBio.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号