OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of consensus among a multidisciplinary expert panel on the transition of adolescents with severe asthma from pediatric to adult care.
METHODS: A 61-item survey was developed based on guidelines for other chronic diseases, covering transition planning, preparation, effective transfer, and follow-up. A 2-round Delphi process assessed the degree of consensus among 98 experts (49 pediatricians, 24 allergists, and 25 pulmonologists). Consensus was established with ≥70% agreement.
RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 42 items (70%). Panelists were unable to agree on an age range for initiation of transition. The main goal during the transition identified by the experts is for adolescents to gain autonomy in managing severe asthma and prescribed treatments. The panelists agreed on the importance of developing an individualized plan, promoting patient autonomy, and identifying factors associated with the home environment. They agreed that the adult health care team should have expertise in severe asthma, biologics, and management of adolescent patients. Pediatric and adult health care teams should share clinical information, agree on the criteria for maintaining biological therapy, and have an on-site joint visit with the patient before the effective transfer. Adult health care professionals should closely follow the patient after the effective transfer to ensure correct inhaler technique, adherence, and attendance at health care appointments.
CONCLUSIONS: This consensus document provides the first roadmap for Spanish pediatric and adult teams to ensure that key aspects of the transition process in severe asthma are covered. The implementation of these recommendations will improve the quality of care offered to the patient.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to answer the following question: Are antibiotic-impregnated shunts (AISs) superior to standard shunts (SSs) at reducing the risk of shunt infection in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus?
METHODS: Both the US National Library of Medicine PubMed/MEDLINE database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried using MeSH headings and key words relevant to AIS use in children. Abstracts were reviewed, after which studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. An evidentiary table was assembled summarizing the studies and the quality of their evidence (Classes I-III). A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to calculate a cumulative estimate of treatment effect using risk ratio (RR). Heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-square and I(2) statistics. Based on the quality of the literature and the result of the meta-analysis, a recommendation was rendered (Level I, II, or III).
RESULTS: Six studies, all Class III, met our inclusion criteria. All but one study focused on a retrospective cohort and all but one were conducted at a single institution. Four of the studies failed to demonstrate a lowered infection rate with the use of an AIS. However, when the data from individual studies were pooled together, the infection rate in the AIS group was 5.5% compared with 8.6% in the SS group. Using a random-effects model, the cumulative RR was 0.51 (95% CI 0.29-0.89, p < 0.001), indicating that a shunt infection was 1.96 times more likely in patients who received an SS.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend AIS tubing because of the associated lower risk of shunt infection compared to the use of conventional silicone hardware (quality of evidence: Class III; strength of recommendation: Level III).
CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-impregnated shunt (AIS) tubing may be associated with a lower risk of shunt infection compared with conventional silicone hardware and thus is an option for children who require placement of a shunt.
METHODS: Level III, unclear degree of clinical certainty.