Spine surgery is essential for restoring alignment, stability, and function in patients with cervical spine injuries, especially when instability, pain, deformity, or progressive nerve damage is present. Effective wound closure is vital in these procedures, aiming to promote rapid healing, reduce infection risks, enable early mobilization, and ensure satisfactory cosmetic results. However, there is limited evidence on the optimal wound closure technique for posterior spine surgery, highlighting the need for innovative approaches. A study by Glener et al. evaluated the effectiveness of STRATAFIX™ Symmetric barbed sutures compared to traditional braided absorbable sutures in spinal surgery. In a randomized trial involving 20 patients, the STRATAFIX™ group demonstrated a shorter mean closure time and significantly fewer sutures used, though without a statistically significant reduction in closure time. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications between the groups during a six-month follow-up. While the findings suggest potential cost savings and efficiency improvements with STRATAFIX™, the study\'s small sample size and short follow-up period limit its generalizability. Furthermore, AI-based models, such as the Xception deep learning model, show promise in improving suture training accuracy for medical students, which could enhance surgical outcomes and reduce complications. Despite the promising results, further research with larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and multi-center trials is necessary to validate the effectiveness of barbed sutures like STRATAFIX™ in neurosurgery. The integration of AI in surgical training and continued exploration of innovative techniques are essential to advancing the field and optimizing patient care in spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To explore and understand the conflict in decision-making of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms.
METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study of 16 patients with hematologic neoplasms in the hematology department was conducted between February 2022 and May 2022. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. Face-to-face in-depth personal interviews were performed. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. This descriptive qualitative study adhered to the COREQ checklist.
RESULTS: All patients indicated difficulties in making decisions regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Five themes were identified: (1) weighing the pros and cons of HSCT, (2) financial burden versus desire for rebirth, (3) treatment urgency versus being unprepared, (4) saving oneself versus damaging loved ones, and (5) family companionship versus emotional isolation. These themes reflect the contradictions, entanglements, and realistic conflicts in decision-making regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with hematological neoplasms.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified multiple conflicts of decision-making in patients with hematologic neoplasms regarding decisions on hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Healthcare workers should provide patients with disease knowledge, doctor-patient and intra-family communication, and access to financial support in order to resolve their conflicts and ultimately help them make the decision that is most optimum for them.

To work with a psychological therapies service to implement a recovery plan, as required by a government body, aimed at improving patient outcomes (effectiveness) and decreasing practitioner variability (equity). A case-study utilizing components of a learning health system, including nationally mandated patient outcome data, comprising three 18-month phases: (1) retrospective baseline; (2) improving patient outcomes (management-led); and (3) reducing practitioner variability (clinician-led). Primary analyses focused on 35 practitioners (NPR = 35) who were constant across the three phases and their patients in each phase (NPA = 930, 1226, 1217, respectively). Reliable improvement rates determined patient outcomes and multilevel modeling yielded practitioner effects. To test generalizability, results were compared to the whole practitioner sample for each phase: (1) NPR = 81, NPA = 1982; (2) NPR = 80, NPA = 2227; (3) NPR = 74, NPA = 2267. Ethical approval was granted by the Health Research Authority. Patient outcomes improved in successive phases for both the core and whole practitioner samples with the largest impact occurring in the management-led intervention. Practitioner variability decreased in successive phases in both the core and whole practitioner samples except in the management-led intervention of the whole sample. Compared with the management-led intervention, the practitioner-led intervention yielded a decrease in practitioner effect exceeding 60% in the core sample and approaching 50% in the whole sample. The implementation of multiple components of a learning health system can lead to improvements in both the effectiveness and equity of a psychological therapy service.

Urban-rural disparities in medical care, including in home healthcare, persist globally. With aging populations and medical advancements, demand for home health services rises, warranting investigation into home healthcare disparities. Our study aimed to (i) investigate the impact of rurality on home healthcare quality, and (ii) assess the temporal disparities and the changes in disparities in home healthcare quality between urban and rural home health agencies (HHAs), incorporating an analysis of geospatial distribution to visualize the underlying patterns. This study analyzed data from HHAs listed on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website, covering the period from 2010 to 2022. Data were classified into urban and rural categories for each HHA. We employed panel data analysis to examine the impact of rurality on home healthcare quality, specifically focusing on hospital admission and emergency room (ER) visit rates. Disparities between urban and rural HHAs were assessed using the Wilcoxon test, with results visualized through line and dot plots and heat maps to illustrate trends and differences comprehensively. Rurality is demonstrated as the most significant variable in hospital admission and ER visit rates in the panel data analysis. Urban HHAs consistently exhibit significantly lower hospital admission rates and ER visit rates compared to rural HHAs from 2010 to 2022. Longitudinally, the gap in hospital admission rates between urban and rural HHAs is shrinking, while there is an increasing gap in ER visit rates. In 2022, HHAs in Mountain areas, which are characterized by a higher proportion of rural regions, exhibited higher hospital admission and ER visit rates than other areas. This study underscores the persistent urban-rural disparities in home healthcare quality. The analysis emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted interventions to address disparities in home healthcare delivery and ensure equitable access to quality care across urban and rural regions. Our findings have the potential to inform policy and practice, promoting equity and efficiency in the long-term care system, for better health outcomes throughout the USA.

UNASSIGNED: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a common procedure to improve blood flow to the heart muscles, but patients often face challenges during the recovery period. Self-efficacy and depression play crucial roles in patient outcomes. Telephone follow-up and social network follow-up have been introduced as interventions to enhance self-efficacy. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of telephone follow-up and social network follow-up on self-efficacy and depression in CABG patients.
UNASSIGNED: The study is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted at Shahid Rajaee Heart Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The sample size was determined to be 99 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, Sullivan\'s cardiac self-efficacy questionnaire, and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Participants were assigned to three groups: control, telephone follow-up, and WhatsApp follow-up using randomization. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).
UNASSIGNED: The results revealed significant improvements in self-efficacy and reductions in depression scores for both the telephone and WhatsApp follow-up groups compared to the control group following the intervention (p < 0.001). Additionally, the mean self-efficacy score was higher and the mean depression score was lower in the WhatsApp follow-up group than in the telephone follow-up group after the intervention (p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: The findings provide valuable insights for healthcare professionals in choosing appropriate interventions to enhance patients\' self-efficacy levels and improve mental health outcomes. Both telephone follow-up and social network follow-up interventions have their own advantages and can be effective in supporting patients\' recovery after CABG surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative anxiety is considered a common part of the surgerical experience and can be associated with serious postoperative side effects. This study aims to determine the relationship between preoperative anxiety level and postoperative pain outcomes in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR).
METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional and correlational research method.
METHODS: The study was conducted with a total of 104 participants, who underwent 17 THR and 87 TKR, at the Orthopedic Clinic of a state hospital in southern Turkey between June 2021 and June 2022. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to determine preoperative anxiety level, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) were used to assess postoperative pain level.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative STAI-I and STAI-II scores of the participants who underwent THR and TKR were 53.95 ± 10.51 and 44.20 ± 10.55, respectively. There was a moderate positive correlation between STAI-I scores and VAS pain scores at preoperative and postoperative 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th hours. There was a moderate positive correlation between STAI-I scores and affective subdimension scores, a moderate positive correlation with pain severity and sleep interference and activity interference, and a weak positive correlation between STAI-II scores and pain severity and sleep interference, activity interference and affective. The factors independently affecting the 6th-hour VAS pain score were determined as male gender, THR procedure, and increasing STAI score.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that high preoperative state anxiety was associated with early postoperative pain outcomes. State anxiety was associated with pain in the 6th postoperative hour. Considering the multidimensional nature of anxiety, further research is recommended to understand the anxiety domain in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Improving outcomes after surgery is a major public health research priority for patients, clinicians and the NHS. The greatest burden of perioperative complications, mortality and healthcare costs lies amongst the population of patients aged over 50 years who undergo major non-cardiac surgery. The Volatile vs Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for major non-cardiac surgery (VITAL) trial specifically examines the effect of anaesthetic technique on key patient outcomes: quality of recovery after surgery (quality of recovery after anaesthesia, patient satisfaction and major post-operative complications), survival and patient safety.
METHODS: A multi-centre pragmatic efficient randomised trial with health economic evaluation comparing total intravenous anaesthesia with volatile-based anaesthesia in adults (aged 50 and over) undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the very large number of patients exposed to general anaesthesia every year, even small differences in outcome between the two techniques could result in substantial excess harm. Results from the VITAL trial will ensure patients can benefit from the very safest anaesthesia care, promoting an early return home, reducing healthcare costs and maximising the health benefits of surgical treatments.
BACKGROUND: ISRCTN62903453. September 09, 2021.

OBJECTIVE: Taiwan, which has a rate of high vehicle ownership, faces significant challenges in managing trauma caused by traffic collisions. In Taiwan, traffic collisions contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality, with a high incidence of severe bleeding trauma. The shock index (SI) and the modified shock index (MSI) have been proposed as early indicators of hemodynamic instability. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of SI and MSI in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with trauma following traffic collisions.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chi Mei Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020. The comprehensive analysis included 662 patients, with data collected on vital signs and outcomes such as mortality, blood transfusion, emergent surgical intervention (ESI), transarterial embolization (TAE), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Optimal cutoff points for SI and MSI were identified by calculating the Youden index. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess outcomes, adjusting for demographic and injury severity variables.
RESULTS: An SI threshold of 1.11 was associated with an increased risk of mortality, while an SI of 0.84 predicted the need for blood transfusion in the context of traffic collisions. Both SI and MSI demonstrated high predictive power for mortality and blood transfusion, with acceptable accuracy for TAE, ESI, and ICU admission. Logistic regression analyses confirmed the independence of SI and MSI as risk factors for adverse outcomes, thus, providing valuable insights into their clinical utility.
CONCLUSIONS: SI and MSI are valuable tools for predicting mortality and blood transfusion needs in patients with trauma due to traffic collisions. These findings advance the quality of care for patients with trauma during their transition from the emergency room to the ICU, facilitating prompt and reliable decision-making processes and improving the care of patients with trauma.

This study aimed to evaluate a new service model, Specialists Together In the Community (STIC), in terms of patient outcomes. This model integrates Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)-principles with expertise of specialized teams that offer diagnosis-related outpatient treatment. In a pre-post design, symptoms and quality of life of 930 former FACT-patients were measured repeatedly pre- and post-STIC. Regarding patients in former specialized teams, pre- and post-treatment social functioning and symptoms were measured for the pre- (n = 944) and post-STIC (n = 544) groups. Against expectation, symptoms of former FACT-patients remained stable post-STIC compared to a slight decrease pre-STIC. According to expectation, pre- and post-STIC groups had an equal symptom reduction. Unexpectedly, the post-STIC group did not improve more on social functioning than the pre-STIC group. Explorative analysis showed less treatment contacts in the post-STIC group. The highly similar patient outcomes post-STIC could be improved by monitoring process outcomes and prolonging study duration.

BACKGROUND: Injury is a global health concern, and injury-related mortality disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Compelling evidence from observational studies in high-income countries shows that trauma education programs, such as the Rural Trauma Team Development Course (RTTDC), increase clinician knowledge of injury care. There is a dearth of such evidence from controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the effect of the RTTDC on process and patient outcomes in LMICs.
OBJECTIVE: This multicenter cluster randomized controlled clinical trial aims to examine the impact of the RTTDC on process and patient outcomes associated with motorcycle accident-related injuries in an African low-resource setting.
METHODS: This is a 2-arm, parallel, multi-period, cluster randomized, controlled, clinical trial in Uganda, where rural trauma team development training is not routinely conducted. We will recruit regional referral hospitals and include patients with motorcycle accident-related injuries, interns, medical trainees, and road traffic law enforcement professionals. The intervention group (RTTDC) and control group (standard care) will include 3 hospitals each. The primary outcomes will be the interval from the accident to hospital admission and the interval from the referral decision to hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and morbidity associated with neurological and orthopedic injuries at 90 days after injury. All outcomes will be measured as final values. We will compare baseline characteristics and outcomes at both individual and cluster levels between the intervention and control groups. We will use mixed effects regression models to report any absolute or relative differences along with 95% CIs. We will perform subgroup analyses to evaluate and control confounding due to injury mechanisms and injury severity. We will establish a motorcycle trauma outcome (MOTOR) registry in consultation with community traffic police.
RESULTS: The trial was approved on August 27, 2019. The actual recruitment of the first patient participant began on September 01, 2019. The last follow-up was on August 27, 2023. Posttrial care, including linkage to clinical, social support, and referral services, is to be completed by November 27, 2023. Data analyses will be performed in Spring 2024, and the results are expected to be published in Autumn 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial will unveil how a locally contextualized rural trauma team development program impacts organizational efficiency in a continent challenged with limited infrastructure and human resources. Moreover, this trial will uncover how rural trauma team coordination impacts clinical outcomes, such as mortality and morbidity associated with neurological and orthopedic injuries, which are the key targets for strengthening trauma systems in LMICs where prehospital care is in the early stage. Our results could inform the design, implementation, and scalability of future rural trauma teams and trauma education programs in LMICs.
BACKGROUND: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202308851460352); https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=25763.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/55297.