UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在将修订后的17项糖尿病困扰量表(DDS17,2017)翻译成普通话(简体)中文,并在中国成年2型糖尿病患者中验证中文版DDS17(C-DDS17,2021)。
UNASSIGNED:进行了量表翻译和横断面验证研究。通过五个步骤将DDS17翻译成普通话(简体)中文:授权,正向翻译,合成,回译,和修正案。在本次会议期间,59名患者评估了翻译量表的可理解性和可读性。2021年6月7日至9月4日,对北京三家三级甲等综合医院的400名2型糖尿病患者进行了一项符合COSMIN检查表的横断面研究,中国。内容,construct,convergent,判别效度,评估了C-DDS17的可靠性(Cronbach'sα系数和项目总相关系数)。这项研究是在中国临床试验注册中心注册的项目的一部分(编号:ChiCTR2100047071).
未经评估:在参与者中,其中33.3%(133/400)经历了中度至高度的糖尿病困扰。C-DDS17的内容有效性指数等于1.00。该量表产生了四因素结构。提取的平均方差为0.42-0.57,低于平方相关。Cronbach的α系数在总体量表中为0.88,在子量表中为0.76至0.81。校正的项目总相关系数范围为0.42至0.61。第八项(“感觉我经常因糖尿病常规而失败”)比治疗方案更适合医生困扰,但对验证结果影响不大。
UASSIGNED:C-DDS17是评估2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰的可靠且有效的工具。在临床实践和试验中,它是早期识别和管理糖尿病困扰的有前途的工具。
UNASSIGNED: This
study aimed to translate the revised 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17, 2017) into mandarin (simplified) Chinese and validate the Chinese version of DDS17 (C-DDS17, 2021) among adult patients with type 2 diabetes in China.
UNASSIGNED: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation
study was conducted. The DDS17 was translated into mandarin (simplified) Chinese through a five-step process: authorization, forward translation, synthesis, back translation, and amendment. During this session, 59 patients assessed the understandability and readability of the translated scale. From June 7 to September 4, 2021, a cross-sectional
study that adhered to the COSMIN checklist was conducted with 400 individuals with type 2 diabetes from three Class A tertiary comprehensive hospitals in Beijing, China. The content, construct, convergent, discriminant validity, and reliability (Cronbach\'s α coefficient and item-total correlation coefficients) of the C-DDS17 were evaluated. This
study was a part of a project registered in the Chinese Clinical
Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR2100047071).
UNASSIGNED: Among the participants, 33.3% (133/400) of them experienced moderate to high diabetes distress. The content validity indices of the C-DDS17 equaled 1.00. The scale yielded a four-factor structure. The average variances extracted were 0.42-0.57, which was lower than squared correlations. Cronbach\'s α coefficient was 0.88 for the overall scale and ranged from 0.76 to 0.81 for sub-scales. Corrected item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.61. The eighth item (\"Feeling that I am often failing with my diabetes routine\") was better fit to physician distress than regimen distress but had little influence on the validation results.
UNASSIGNED: The C-DDS17 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing diabetes distress in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is a promising instrument for early identification and management of diabetes distress in clinical practice and trials.