COVID-19大流行与睡眠质量受损和心理困扰有关,公众以各种方式应对大流行和检疫要求。我们的目的是调查在短期(电路中断)隔离限制期间睡眠质量是否较低,使用经过验证的量表,以及睡眠质量是否与受访者对大流行的总体态度相关。
2020年11月在英国进行的在线横断面研究。
该研究包括502名18岁以上的受访者。
使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量,使用牛津大流行态度量表-COVID-19(OPAS-C)评估大流行态度,一个经过验证的20个项目,评估大流行相关压力的7域量表,恐惧,孤独,社区意识,夸张的担忧感,非药物干预措施,和疫苗犹豫。在睡眠质量差(PSQI>5)的因变量与危险因素之间评估了未调整和多变量逻辑回归的关联优势比,包括OPAS-C评分,年龄,性别,教育状况,和收入。
平均(SD)PSQI评分为7.62(3.49)。总的来说,68.9%的受访者使用PSQI>5的截止值满足不良睡眠质量的标准。平均(SD)OPAS-C评分为60.3(9.1)。在最高的vs.中,睡眠质量差的可能性显着增加最低的OPAS-C四分位数(OR4.94,95%CI[2.67,9.13],p<0.0001)。年龄,性别,收入,政治倾向,就业状况,受教育程度与睡眠质量差无关。
超过三分之二的受访者符合睡眠质量差的标准。在剂量-反应关系中,睡眠质量差的几率与大流行态度(例如与大流行相关的压力水平更高,恐惧,或孤独)。睡眠质量差与大流行态度之间的关联表明公共卫生和睡眠医学干预的机会。并强调需要进一步研究。
UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with sleep quality impairment and psychological distress, and the general public has responded to the pandemic and quarantine requirements in a variety of ways. We aimed to investigate whether sleep quality is low during a short-term (circuit break) quarantine restriction, and whether sleep quality is associated with respondents\' overall attitudes to the pandemic using a validated scale.
UNASSIGNED: Online cross-sectional
study in England in November 2020.
UNASSIGNED: The
study included 502 respondents over the age of 18.
UNASSIGNED: Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and pandemic attitudes were assessed using the Oxford Pandemic Attitudes Scale-COVID-19 (OPAS-C), a validated 20-item, 7-domain scale that assesses pandemic-related stress, fear, loneliness, sense of community, sense of exaggerated concern, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and vaccine hesitancy. Unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression odds ratios of association were assessed between the dependent variable of poor sleep quality (PSQI>5) and risk factors, including OPAS-C score, age, sex, educational status, and income.
UNASSIGNED: The mean (SD) PSQI score was 7.62 (3.49). Overall, 68.9% of respondents met criteria for poor sleep quality using the PSQI cutoff of >5. The mean (SD) OPAS-C score was 60.3 (9.1). There was a significantly increased odds of poor sleep quality in the highest vs. lowest OPAS-C quartiles (OR 4.94, 95% CI [2.67, 9.13], p < 0.0001). Age, sex, income, political leaning, employment status, and education attainment were not associated with poor sleep quality.
UNASSIGNED: More than two-thirds of respondents met criteria for poor sleep quality. The odds of poor sleep quality increased in a dose-response relationship with pandemic attitudes (such as higher levels of pandemic-related stress, fear, or loneliness). The association between poor sleep quality and pandemic attitudes suggests opportunities for public health and sleep medicine interventions, and highlights the need for further research.