UNASSIGNED: To report a successful case of oocyte cryopreservation and subsequent in vitro fertilization (IVF) in a transgender male receiving continued testosterone gender-affirming hormone therapy, followed by reciprocal embryo transfer (ET).
UNASSIGNED: A case report of a rare case of fertility preservation in a transgender man with concomitant use of testosterone therapy for 4 years before and during ovarian stimulation.
UNASSIGNED: Private fertility clinic with university affiliation.
UNASSIGNED: A 26-year-old transgender man undergoing oocyte cryopreservation before gender-affirming surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Fertility preservation using oocyte cryopreservation and IVF with reciprocal fresh ET into a cisfemale partner.
UNASSIGNED: Successful oocyte cryopreservation, oocyte thawing, and reciprocal IVF cycle.
UNASSIGNED: Oocyte cryopreservation of 29 mature oocytes. Sixteen mature oocytes survived the thaw, and 12 were fertilized with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A fresh ET of an advanced blastocyst resulted in a clinical pregnancy and live birth.
UNASSIGNED: Fertility preservation with oocyte cryopreservation or IVF with embryo cryopreservation is feasible for patients on continued long-term testosterone gender-affirming therapy. Future studies on egg quality and reproductive outcomes are required. Our case report demonstrates a promising outcome in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE: Is ovarian stimulation with levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in situ and co-treatment with letrozole safe and effective in patients undergoing fertility-sparing combined treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early endometrial cancer limited to the endometrium?
METHODS: Retrospective case-control study recruiting women who had undergone fertility-sparing \'combined\' treatment and ovarian stimulation with letrozole and LNG-IUS in situ. The \'three steps\' hysteroscopic technique was used. Once complete response was achieved, the ovaries were stimulated, and mature oocytes cryopreserved. The LNG-IUS was removed, and embryos transferred. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two control groups of the initial outcomes of ART (number of oocytes and MII oocytes retrieved): healthy infertile women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI (control group A); and patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation with letrozole (control group B).
RESULTS: Of the 75 patients analysed, 15 underwent oocyte cryopreservation after achieving a complete response to fertility-sparing treatment (study group); 30 patients in control group A and B, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes between the study and control groups. In the nine patients who underwent embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy (55.6%), cumulative live birth (44.4%) and miscarriage (20%) rates were reported. In three patients with AEH, recurrence occurred (12%) at 3, 6 and 16 months after removing the LNG-IUS to attempt embryo transfer, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Fertility-sparing hysteroscopic combined treatment and subsequent ovarian stimulation with letrozole and LNG-IUS in situ could be suggested to women with AEH or early endometrial cancer who ask for future fertility preservation.

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare phenomenon. Despite its rarity, there has been a notable increase in its incidence in recent decades due to the greater use of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, information about the relation between ovarian stimulation and HP is scarce. We report a case of HP after ovarian stimulation using clomiphene citrate. A 26-year-old pregnant woman presented to the emergency department with mild vaginal bleeding, and abdominal pain. She had a history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and left salpingectomy due to a previous ectopic pregnancy. She had undergone ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate three months earlier. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed an eight-week-old ruptured tubal pregnancy with an intrauterine ten-week-old gestational sac confirming superfetation HP. An urgent laparoscopic right salpingectomy was performed and the extrauterine pregnancy was successfully removed with the preservation of the intrauterine embryo. The course of the intrauterine pregnancy was uneventful and the patient gave birth to a healthy boy via cesarean section. Women receiving ovarian stimulation are at an increased risk of developing HP especially when they also have other predisposing factors for HP. Thus, close monitoring using transvaginal ultrasound with extra attention to the adnexa is required for a timely diagnosis and management of HP.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian torsion (OT) is a gynaecological emergency and requires prompt recognition and treatment in order to prevent the loss of ovarian function. Patients who are undergoing fertility treatment are at an increased risk of developing OT.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of OT in patients undergoing fertility treatment can be challenging as they often present with abdominal pain and other non-specific symptoms. We highlight the importance of early diagnosis of suspected torsion and performed a literature review on cases of bilateral OT to review its presentation, investigation, and subsequent management.
METHODS: A 32-year-old nulliparous woman who was undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation presented with lower abdominal pain and was initially managed as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Her pain did not subside following conservative management and she proceeded to have a laparoscopy which demonstrated synchronous bilateral ovarian torsion (SBOT), both ovaries were detorted. Eight months later, she was preparing for her frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, patient again presented with significant right sided abdominal pain and was found to have a recurrent torsion of the right ovary which was again detorted successfully.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should have a low-threshold to investigate and rule out OT in patients who present with lower abdominal pain, especially in those with additional risk factors for torsion. Patients with confirmed torsion can be successfully managed with detorsion of the ovaries. Further research is needed to determine the best management option for patients with recurrent torsion episodes.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the effect of unilateral salpingectomy on the number of mature follicles in the ipsilateral ovary during an assisted reproductive technology (ART) stimulation cycle, as compared to the contralateral ovary. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, case-control cohort study conducted from 2017 to 2022. Patients from 18 to 43 years old who underwent at least one ART cycle before and after a unilateral salpingectomy were included. The number of recruited follicles, including mature (≥16 mm) and intermediate follicles (13-15.5 mm), on the salpingectomy side (case) were compared to those present on the contralateral ovary (control) during an ART attempt. To take into account the inter-ovarian variability, the comparison was performed on two ART cycles, performed before then after the salpingectomy. Results: Overall, 24 patients were included in our study. While the number of mature follicles was similar in both ovaries before surgery, the mean number of mature follicles was significantly reduced after salpingectomy in the operated side, as compared to the control side, being, respectively 3.00 vs. 5.08 (p = 0.048). There was no significant difference between the intermediate and total recruited follicles. Conclusions: Our study suggests that salpingectomy may impact the follicle recruitment on the ipsilateral side by altering the vascularization during mesosalpinx coagulation. Gynecologists should be mindful of this concept and accurately set surgical indications. Beyond the indication, this emphasizes the critical role of having infertility surgeons sensitive to fertility preservation for optimal management of ART patients. Further studies with larger patient populations are required to confirm these results.

Sarcomas are relatively common in the young and their treatment can impair fertility. Fertility preservation can be achieved via the cryopreservation of gametes after controlled ovarian stimulation before cancer treatment. A reduced response to hormonal stimulation in patients suffering from certain types of malignancy is reported. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of oocyte cryopreservation in patients with sarcoma by comparing their outcomes with those of a population without cancer. Patients were matched by age with control women undergoing hormonal stimulation for isolated male factor infertility. The population included 84 women with a sarcoma and 355 controls. In the final analysis, 37 patients with sarcoma were matched in a 1:3 ratio with 109 healthy controls. Patients with sarcoma were generally younger and were stimulated with lower FSH doses. They did not perform worse than controls during stimulation, with an average retrieval of 10.6 oocytes vs. 8.1 in the controls. Linear regression on the number of retrieved mature oocytes confirmed that patients with sarcoma performed comparably to controls. In conclusion, patients with sarcoma can expect retrieval outcomes comparable to those of patients without cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate self-reported survey data provided by US oocyte donors on their experiences with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and possible correlations between OHSS severity and number of oocytes retrieved, trigger type, and prior OHSS history.
METHODS: An 85-question retrospective survey was administered online. Survey questions included demographic information, reasons for donating, immediate per-cycle experiences and outcomes, perceptions of informed consent, and perceived impact of donation on long-term health. Quantitative Data for this study was collected between February 2019 and September 2020 via QualtricsXM (January 2019), an online survey platform. Follow-up interviews were also conducted. Participants were recruited via fertility clinics, egg donation agencies, and online forum. The research was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (#14-14765).
RESULTS: Of 420 initiated US oocyte donor online surveys, 289 (68%) respondents provided detailed information on per cycle experiences with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, number of oocytes retrieved, and trigger type over a total of 801 cycles. On cycles where donors reported receiving GnRH agonist triggers (n = 337), they reported milder OHSS compared to cycles with hCG or dual triggers. Among donors undergoing multiple retrieval cycles, the severity of OHSS in second cycles was strongly associated with OHSS severity in first cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported OHSS in oocyte donors is lower in GnRH antagonist stimulation protocols combined with GnRHa trigger and in cycles where donors reported fewer than 30 oocytes retrieved. Donors who reported severe OHSS on a prior cycle were significantly more likely to experience severe OHSS on a subsequent cycle.

Approximately 50% of transmasculine people use testosterone for gender affirmation, yet very little is known about the effects of testosterone on future reproductive capacity. Moreover, there are no data to guide fertility specialists on how to manage testosterone leading up to or during ovarian stimulation. Most clinics require cessation of testosterone prior to ovarian stimulation in this setting of no data; however, the current literature does suggest a potential increase in dysphoria with cessation of testosterone and during stimulation. This divergence begs the question of whether clinicians may be doing more harm than good by enacting this requirement. Here, we present two cases of transmasculine individuals who were on testosterone prior to stimulation and maintained their testosterone dosage throughout stimulation as proof of concept, followed by a discussion of current clinical practice and providing some rationale to support continuation of testosterone throughout stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: An impact of different gonadotrophins selection for ovarian stimulation (OS) on oocyte competence has yet to be defined. In this study, we asked whether an association exists between OS protocol and euploid blastocyst rate (EBR) per metaphase-II (MII) oocytes.
METHODS: Cycles of first preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies conducted by women ≥ 35 years old with their own metaphase-II oocytes inseminated in the absence of severe male factor (years 2014-2018) were clustered based on whether recombinant FSH (rec-FSH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was used for OS, then matched for the number of fresh inseminated eggs. Four groups were outlined: rec-FSH (N = 57), rec-FSH plus rec-LH (N = 55), rec-FSH plus HMG (N = 112), and HMG-only (N = 127). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, continuous blastocyst culture, comprehensive chromosome testing to assess full-chromosome non-mosaic aneuploidies and vitrified-warmed euploid single embryo transfers (SETs) were performed. The primary outcome was the EBR per cohort of MII oocytes. The secondary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per first SETs.
RESULTS: Rec-FSH protocol was shorter and characterized by lower total gonadotrophin (Gn) dose. The linear regression model adjusted for maternal age showed no association between the Gn adopted for OS and EBR per cohort of MII oocytes. Similarly, no association was reported with the LBR per first SETs, even when adjusting for blastocyst quality and day of full blastulation.
CONCLUSIONS: In view of enhanced personalization in OS, clinicians shall focus on different endpoints or quantitative effects related to Gn action towards follicle recruitment, development, and atresia. Here, LH and/or hCG was administered exclusively to women with expected sub/poor response; therefore, we cannot exclude that specific Gn formulations may impact patient prognosis in other populations.

UNASSIGNED: Related studies have shown that it is safe for cancer patients to undergo assisted reproduction. However, studies on whether a history of cancer affects long-term reproductive outcomes in women who undergo assisted reproductive technology (ART) are scarce. In this study, we evaluated the long-term reproductive outcomes of patients with malignant tumors undergoing ART treatment and explored the impact of malignancy history on ART outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with malignant tumors undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles compared with those of age-matched healthy infertile women at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital between January 2003 and October 2020. We evaluated ovarian stimulation outcome, the pregnancy rate, the live birth rate, the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes and birth outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: This study included 59 patients in the cancer group for data analysis who had a history of malignancy. By matching, a total of 118 healthy infertile women were included in the control group. No statistically significant association was found in terms of age, duration of infertility, BMI, or insemination type between the two groups of patients. Thyroid cancer(45.8%) and gynecologic malignancies (44.07%) were the major cancer types in this study. There were statistically significant differences in the antral follicle count (AFC) (12.00 ± 7.86 vs. 14.90 ± 8.71, P=0.033), length of ovarian stimulation (9.98 ± 2.68 vs. 11.42 ± 2.43, P=0.033) and endometrial thickness on the trigger day (10.16 ± 3.11 vs. 10.84 ± 2.17, P<0.001) between the two groups. The total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, high-quality embryo rate, blastocyst rate and first-time embryo-transfer (ET) implantation rate were nonsignificantly lower in the cancer group than in the control group (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate per ET cycle (32% vs. 40.39%, P=0.156), live birth rate per ET cycle (27% vs. 35.96%, P=0.119), miscarriage rate per ET cycle (5% vs. 4.43%, P=0.779), or preterm delivery rate per ET cycle (11.11% vs. 17.80%, P=0.547) between the two groups. Additionally, regression analysis showed that a history of malignancy was not a risk factor for reproductive outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, it is feasible for women with a history of cancer to conceive using ART is feasible and their long-term reproductive outcomes are similar to these of healthy infertile women. A history of cancer does not decrease the number of retrieved oocytes, increase the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes or affect birth outcomes.