organic amendments

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    土壤有机碳(SOC)由于其在调节气候,保持土壤肥力和恢复力方面的核心作用而成为研究的重点。方法上,从整个土壤C测量值转移到特定的SOC分数增加了检测巨大SOC存储中的小变化的可能性,增强了SOC稳定性的估计。然而,SOC分馏方案是众多且可变的。在这项研究中,通过将土壤分离成粗土(0.25-2毫米),比较了去离子水和六偏磷酸钠(SHMP)在土壤分散中的分布,中等(0.063-0.25毫米)和细(<0.063毫米)尺寸的部分。通过密度(1.8gcm-3)进一步分离前两个级分,以获得游离的颗粒状有机C(POC)和矿物缔合的有机C(MOC)。该方法适用于有或没有木质纤维污泥改良剂的粘土和淤泥壤土,以遵循添加的C。与水相比,SHMP增强了骨料的破坏,但是效果很小,使用SHMP降低了SOC的恢复,因此,水是首选。在这两种土壤中,5-10%的SOC发生为粗POC,1-3%作为粗MOC,5%作为培养基POC,10%作为培养基MOC,和70-85%的罚款MOC。添加的C存在于POC级分中,表明粘土土壤中的细MOC有少量积累。尽管MOC储量的饱和可能会阻碍细粒含量低的粉质壤土的积累,但需要更长的时间范围重复添加C才能增加稳定的MOC储量。
    Soil organic carbon (SOC) is in the focus of research due to its central role in regulating climate and maintaining fertility and resilience of soils. Methodologically, shifting from whole soil C measurements to specific SOC fractions increases possibility to detect small changes in the vast SOC storage, and enhances estimation of SOC stability. However, SOC fractionation schemes are numerous and variable. In this study, deionized water and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) were compared in soil dispersion by separating soils into coarse (0.25-2 mm), medium (0.063-0.25 mm) and fine (<0.063 mm) size fractions. The first two fractions were further separated by density (1.8 g cm-3) to obtain free particulate organic C (POC) and mineral associated organic C (MOC). The approach was applied to a clay and a silt loam soil with and without wood fiber sludge amendment to follow the added C. Aggregate disruption was enhanced with SHMP in comparison to water, but the effect was small and the use of SHMP decreased recovery of SOC, wherefore water was preferred. In both soils, 5-10 % of SOC occurred as coarse POC, 1-3% as coarse MOC, 5 % as medium POC, 10 % as medium MOC, and 70-85 % as fine MOC. The added C resided in the POC fractions with an indication of minor accumulation to the fine MOC in the clay soil. Longer time frame with repeated C additions would be needed to increase the stable MOC storages though saturation of the MOC reserve may hinder accumulation in the silt loam low in fines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A decline in the carbon content of agricultural soils has been reported globally. Amendments of forest industry side-streams might counteract this. We tested the effects of industrial conifer bark and its cascade process materials on the soil microbiome under barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in clay and silt soil microcosms for 10 months, simulating the seasonal temperature changes of the boreal region. Microbial gene copy numbers were higher in clay soils than in silt. All amendments except unextracted bark increased bacterial gene copies in both soils. In turn, all other amendments, but not unextracted bark from an anaerobic digestion process, increased fungal gene copy numbers in silt soil. In clay soil, fungal increase occurred only with unextracted bark and hot water extracted bark. Soil, amendment type and simulated season affected both the bacterial and fungal community composition. Amendments increased bacteria originating from the anaerobic digestion process, as well as dinitrogen fixers and decomposers of plant cells. In turn, unextracted and hot water extracted bark determined the fungal community composition in silt. As fungal abundance increase and community diversification are related to soil carbon acquisition, bark-based amendments to soils can thus contribute to sustainable agriculture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    茶园会引起强烈的土壤退化,例如酸化,基本养分减少和微生物多样性丧失,自然地通过其根系活性和几乎巨大的合成N输入来产生。有机修正剂的应用被认为是减轻上述不利后果的实用方法。然而,农艺和环境效应对有机改良剂应用的权衡仍在争论中。在这里,我们用四种治疗方法进行了长期的现场实验,包括对照(不含肥料)(CK),化学肥料处理(CF),以鸡粪处理(CM)和鸡粪结合生物炭处理(CMB)研究有机改良剂施用对土壤质量的影响,茶园的重金属污染和茶叶生产。共有16个地块以完全随机的设计随机排列。结果表明,CM和CMB处理提高了土壤养分,与CF处理相比,减轻了土壤酸化并改善了土壤孔隙度。CMB处理在连续三年的监测中显示出相对较高的茶叶产量和质量。然而,CM和CMB处理提高了重金属(HM)潜在生态风险(RI)和内梅罗综合指数(Ps)。CM治疗显着增加可用As,Pb,与CF处理相比,Cu和Zn浓度,而CMB处理显着降低了有效Cr和Cu浓度,并略微降低了有效Cd,与CM处理相比,Pb和Ni浓度。但是与CM处理相比,CMB处理中可用As和Zn的增加也表明添加生物炭的不利影响。PLS-PM模型显示HM风险对茶叶品质有直接的负面影响。此外,土壤真菌群落对茶叶产量有正向影响,对茶叶品质有负向影响。总的来说,我们的研究证明CMB处理可以改善土壤质量,降低可用的Cr和Ni浓度,保持茶叶产量,提高茶叶品质。
    Tea plantation can cause strong soil degradation, e.g. acidification, basic nutrient decrease and microbial diversity loss, naturally by its root activity and secondary by practically tremendous synthetic N input. Organic amendments application is considered a practical way to mitigate the above adverse consequence. However, the trade-off between agronomic and environmental effects on the application of the organic amendments is still under debate. Herein, we conducted a long-term field experiment with four treatments, including control (without and fertiliser) (CK), chemical fertiliser treatment (CF), chicken manure treatment (CM) and chicken manure combined with biochar treatment (CMB) to investigate the effects of organic amendments application on soil quality, heavy metal contamination and tea production in a tea plantation. Totally 16 plots were arranged randomly with a completely randomised design. The results showed that CM and CMB treatments improved soil nutrient, mitigated soil acidification and ameliorated soil porosity compared to CF treatment. CMB treatment displayed a relatively high tea yield and quality in three consecutive years of monitoring. However, CM and CMB treatments elevated the heavy metal (HM) potential ecological risk (RI) and Nemerow\'s composite index (Ps). CM treatment significantly increased available As, Pb, Cu and Zn concentrations compared to CF treatment, while CMB treatment significantly decreased available Cr and Cu concentrations and slightly decreased available Cd, Pb and Ni concentrations compared to CM treatment. But the increase of available As and Zn in CMB treatment compared to CM treatment also indicated adverse effects of biochar addition. The PLS-PM model showed HM risk had direct negative effects on tea quality. Moreover, soil fungal community revealed positive effects on tea yield and negative effects on tea quality. Overall, our study proved that CMB treatment could improve soil quality, reduce available Cr and Ni concentrations, maintain tea yield and increase tea quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在阐明有机土壤改良剂对添加和不添加矿物肥料的散装土壤中细菌共存的长期影响。以往的研究大多忽略了细菌共生结构,主要集中在参数物种多样性和物种丰度变化上。在这里,我们对两种常用的土壤改良剂进行了系统的比较,粪肥和稻草,关于它们对Speyer长期现场试验中细菌共现的影响,德国。该方法涉及16S扩增子测序与细菌网络分析相结合,比较不同的肥料制度。结果表明,与对照处理相比,用粪肥施肥的地块中细菌多样性的增加以及芽孢杆菌的细菌积累。在秸秆改良的地块中,既没有发现多样性的增加,也没有发现指示性物种。此外,网络分析显示,矿物肥料添加对细菌共生结构有明显的影响。最重要的是,无论矿物施肥制度如何,这两种有机修正案都增加了网络的复杂性。同时,粪肥和秸秆的影响表现出差异,这可以通过其营养/化学含量的差异来解释。结论是,细菌相互作用是评估有关土壤健康和可持续性的修正效果的关键参数。
    This study intended to elucidate the long-term effects of organic soil amendments on bacterial co-occurrence in bulk soil with and without addition of mineral fertiliser. Previous research mostly neglected the bacterial co-occurrence structure and focussed mainly on the parameters species diversity and abundance changes of species. Here we present a systematic comparison of two frequently used soil amendments, manure and straw, with regard to their impact on bacterial co-occurrence in a long-term field trial in Speyer, Germany. The approach involved 16S amplicon sequencing in combination with a bacterial network analysis, comparing the different fertiliser regimes. The results show an increase of bacterial diversity as well as an accumulation of bacteria of the order Bacillales in plots fertilised with manure compared to a control treatment. In the straw-amended plots neither an increase in diversity was found nor were indicative species detectable. Furthermore, network analysis revealed a clear impact of mineral fertiliser addition on bacterial co-occurrence structure. Most importantly, both organic amendments increased network complexity irrespective of mineral fertilisation regime. At the same time, the effects of manure and straw exhibited differences that might be explained by differences in their nutritional/chemical contents. It is concluded that bacterial interactions are a crucial parameter for the assessment of amendment effects regarding soil health and sustainability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A barley field trial supplemented with bulky organic soil amendments, municipal compost or bovine slurry was sampled for Escherichia coli to test the hypothesis that E. coli isolated from the soil or from barley plants were derived from bovine slurry. A qualitative analysis showed that a total of 12% of the bulk soil cores and 16% of harvested grain samples yielded E. coli. The strongest association for positive detection of E. coli from soil was with time of year and for slurry-treated plots, with irrigation. However, E. coli were detected in plots from all treatment types and not exclusively associated with bovine slurry. Phylogroup, plasmid profiling and population genetics analysis (multilocus sequence typing) revealed extensive genetic diversity. Identical sequence types for slurry and soil isolates were detected, indicative of direct transfer into the soil, although not frequently. Host interaction assays with selected isolates showed a variation in the ability to colonize barley roots, but not in interactions with bovine cells. The work has implications in appropriate use of E. coli as a faecal indicator as isolates were widespread and diverse, reinforcing the view that some are a natural part of the microflora in agricultural systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: Faecal deposition is considered to be the main process that introduces Escherichia coli into soil, giving rise to their use as a faecal indication species and the potential for cycling pathogens in agricultural systems. We found that bovine slurry was not the main source of E. coli in a barley trial and a high degree of diversity was present in the collection. The findings support the hypothesis that the population structure of E. coli in secondary habitats is shaped by the environment and highlight the drawbacks of its use as a faecal indicator species.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号