The exact relationship between solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) and invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) with neuroendocrine differentiation and SPC and mucinous carcinoma (MC) of the breast remains unclear. To clarify the relationship, we conducted a comparative study of morphological and neuroendocrine features between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, 72 cases) and SPC in situ (35 cases), and IBC-NST (103 cases) and invasive SPC (92 cases). We also conducted the study between MC associated with and without SPC. Synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and INSM1 were employed for the immunohistochemical study. IBC-NST had occasionally a morphological similarity with invasive SPC. While 123 of 127 cases with SPC demonstrated diffuse staining with one or more of the neuroendocrine markers, the only one case of DCIS and none of IBC-NST showed it. Type B was observed in 16 of 18 cases of MC associated with SPC and in 13 of 33 cases of MC without it. All the cases of MC with SPC and 6 of 33 cases without it showed diffuse staining for at least one of the neuroendocrine markers. In conclusion, a careful distinction between invasive SPC and IBC-NST with neuroendocrine differentiation is required. We assume that SPC in situ is a potential candidate for precursor of IBC-NST with neuroendocrine differentiation. MC of the breast is suggested to have two pathogenetic pathways through SPC in situ or non-SPC in situ. SPC in situ is thought to be less common as a precursor of MC than non-SPC in situ.

Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the tubular gastrointestinal tract (GI-NECs) are rare and associated with worse clinical outcomes. This population-based study aims to highlight key demographics, clinicopathological factors, and survival outcomes in the US population. Methods: Data from 10,387 patients with GI-NECs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020. Results: Most patients were >40 years old at the time of presentation with a median age of 63 years old, with almost equal ethnic distribution per US population data. The most common primary tumor site was the small intestine (33.6%). The metastatic spread was localized in 34.8%, regional in 27.8%, and distant in 37.3% of cases, and the liver was the most common site of metastasis (19.9%) in known cases of metastases. Most NEC patients underwent surgery, presenting the highest 5-year overall survival of 73.2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (95% CI 72.0-74.4%), while chemotherapy alone had the lowest 5-year survival of 8.0% (95% CI 6.4-10.0%). Compared to men, women had a superior 5-year survival rate of 59.0% (95% CI 57.6-60.5%). On multivariate analysis, age > 65 (HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.36-2.54%, p ≤ 0.001), distant metastasis (HR 2.57, 95% CI 2.52-2.62%, p ≤ 0.001), tumor size > 4 mm (HR 1.98, 95%, CI 1.70-2.31%, p ≤ 0.001), esophageal (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.86-2.58%, p ≤ 0.001), transverse colon (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.33%, p ≤ 0.01), descending colon (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.12, 3.97%, p = 0.02) anorectal sites, and liver or lung metastases were associated with worse survival. Surgical intervention and tumors located in the small intestine or appendix showed a better prognosis. Conclusion: GI-NECs are a group of rare malignancies associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, epidemiological studies analyzing national databases may be the best alternative to have a more comprehensive understanding of this condition, assess the impact of current practices, and generate prognosis tools.

UNASSIGNED: Laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinomas are the most common non-squamous neoplasm of the larynx. Due to the rarity of the tumor, pathological diagnosis should be confirmed by immunohistochemistry.
UNASSIGNED: Laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinomas (LNECs) are a rare cancer of the head and neck. Few case reports of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma originating in the subglottic larynx exist within the literature. In this case, we discuss a 57-year-old patient with a history of four-month hoarseness with a newly diagnosed of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma in the subglottic larynx. Treatment and prognosis of the various NEC groups differ, so precise identification requires consideration of the microscopic findings and immunostaining analysis. immunohistochemistry staining demonstrated positive result for cytokeratin 7, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD 56, with the Ki-67 index of45%. Although surgery is usually the treatment for all tumor types, chemo radiotherapy is recommended for poorly differentiated NECs because surgery is ineffective.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is recognized as one of the most malignant skin tumors. Its rarity might explain the limited exploration of digital color studies in this area. The objective of this study was to delineate color alterations in MCCs compared to benign lesions resembling MCC, such as cherry angiomas and hemangiomas, along with other non-melanoma skin cancer lesions like basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), utilizing computer-aided digital color analysis. This was a retrospective study where clinical images of the color of the lesion and adjacent normal skin from 11 patients with primary MCC, 11 patients with cherry angiomas, 12 patients with hemangiomas, and 12 patients with BCC/SCC (totaling 46 patients) were analyzed using the RGB (red, green, and blue) and the CIE Lab color system. The Lab color system aided in estimating the Individual Typology Angle (ITA) change in the skin, and these results are documented in this study. It was demonstrated that the estimation of color components can assist in the differential diagnosis of these types of lesions because there were significant differences in color parameters between MCC and other categories of skin lesions such as hemangiomas, common skin carcinomas, and cherry hemangiomas. Significant differences in values were observed in the blue color of RGB (p = 0.003) and the b* parameter of Lab color (p < 0.0001) of MCC versus cherry angiomas. Similarly, the mean a* value of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) compared to basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). Larger prospective studies are warranted to further validate the clinical application of these findings.

BACKGROUND: The programmed death 1 inhibitor toripalimab plus the angio-immuno kinase inhibitor surufatinib revealed a tolerable safety profile and preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumours in a phase I study.
METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm, multi-cohort phase II study in China. Patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) or neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) or mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) who had failed or were intolerable of standard treatment were given surufatinib (250 mg orally, once daily) plus toripalimab (240 mg intravenously, once every 3 weeks). Primary end-point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end-points included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled into two cohorts by tumour types (NET, n = 19; NEC-MiNEN, n = 21). ORRs (95% CIs) were 21.1% (6.1-45.6) and 23.8% (8.2-47.2) in the NET and NEC-MiNEN cohorts, respectively. Median DoR was 7.1 months (6.9-not evaluable [NE]) and 4.1 months (3.0-NE), respectively. Median PFS was 9.6 months (4.1-NE) and 4.1 months (1.5-5.5); median OS was 27.3 (15.3-NE) and 10.9 months (9.1-14.6), respectively. Overall, grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18 (45.0%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Surufatinib plus toripalimab showed antitumour activity and a tolerable safety profile in patients with previously treated NETs/NECs/MiNENs. Further study of this combination regimen is ongoing for advanced NECs, for which current therapeutic options remain limited.
RESULTS: gov: NCT04169672.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (GEP-NEC) in children is an exceptionally rare and aggressive form of cancer. We aimed to conduct a population-based cohort study to predict overall survival (OS) in pediatric patients with GEP-NEC.
METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was employed to identify all pediatric patients with GEP-NEC diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. To create survival curves based on various criteria, Kaplane-Meier estimations were utilized. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. The variables associated with OS were determined using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Furthermore, we developed a nomogram to predict overall survival in pediatric GEP-NEC patients.
RESULTS: A total of 103 pediatric GEP-NEC patients were identified. The tumors primarily affected females (62.2%). The majority of GEP-NEC was found in the appendix (63.1%), followed by the pancreas (23.3%) and the intestinal tract (13.6%). The highest rates of localized stage (76.9%) and surgery (98.5%) were found in the NEC of appendix origin. However, pancreatic origins had the largest proportion of distant disease (66.7%) but the lowest percentage of surgery (37.5%). Overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 94.4%, 85.4%, and 85.4%, respectively. Tumors of pancreatic origin had the worst survival compared with those of the appendix and intestinal tract. The Cox proportional hazard regression revealed that only site was an important independent predictor of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that only the primary site was found to be the most important predictor of the OS in pediatric GEP-NEC. It\'s important to work closely with a multidisciplinary team, including oncologists, surgeons, and other specialists, to determine the most appropriate treatment plan for pediatric GEP-NEC.

BACKGROUND: Claudin 18.2-targeted therapy has shown significant efficacy in treating claudin 18.2-positive cancers. However, limited systematic studies have investigated characteristics of claudin 18.2 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).
METHODS: Data and specimens from 403 cases of digestive NENs were retrospectively collected, and claudin 18.2 expression was detected using immunochemical staining.
RESULTS: Claudin 18.2 was positive in 19.6% (79/403) of the digestive NENs. The highest positive rate of claudin 18.2 was observed in gastric NENs (72/259, 27.8%), accounting for 91.1% (72/79) of all positive cases. The positivity rate was significantly higher in gastric NENs compared to pancreatic (2/78, 2.6%) or colorectal NENs (2/38, 5.3%; p < 0.05). For digestive NENs, claudin 18.2 positivity was significantly higher in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (37/144, 25.7%) than in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs; 14/160, 8.8%; p < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between gastric NECs (59/213, 27.7%) and gastric NETs (13/46, 28.3%; p > 0.05). The positivity was significantly higher in large-cell NECs (LCNECs; 28/79, 35.4%) and MiNEN (mixed neuroendocrine-non- neuroendocrine neoplasms)-LCNECs (23/66, 34.8%) compared to small-cell NECs (SCNECs; 9/65, 13.8%) and MiNEN-SCNECs (5/33, 15.2%; p < 0.05). Claudin 18.2 expression was more prevalent in gastric NENs than in pancreatic (12.5 ×; p = 0.001) and colorectal NENs (5.9 ×; p = 0.021). Claudin 18.2 staining was a useful method for identify the gastric origins of NETs, with a sensitivity of 28.3% and a specificity of 99.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The expression characteristics of claudin 18.2 in NENs were characterized, which may provide a clinicopathological reference for targeted therapies in patients with NENs.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and is generally treated with platinum and etoposide combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether carboplatin and etoposide combination therapy (CE) and cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy (PE) have comparable treatment efficacy. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of CE and PE in patients with NEC.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patient\'s clinical record from 2005 to 2022 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital. Patients who received either CE or PE were included in the study. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 16.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 73 patients assigned to the CE group and 31 patients assigned to the PE group. Statistically, the response rate, progression-free survival time and overall survival time were 42.6%, 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-6.3) and 13.6 months (95% CI: 8.9-17.4), respectively, in the CE groups and 44.4%, 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.1-7.0) and 12.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-14.6), respectively, in the PE groups. There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the CE and the PE groups. However, the number of patients with elevated creatinine (3.35 mg/dL and 3.88 mg/dL in 2 patients, respectively) was significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of CE and PE in patients with NEC is comparable. However, the incidence of renal dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group.

UNASSIGNED: In 2019, the grading and staging system for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) was significantly changed. In this study, we report the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with extrahepatic biliary NENs who underwent curative resection with or without adjuvant treatment.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed a database of 16 patients who developed NENs, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and mixed endocrine non-endocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) after curative resection. Among them, eight patients had ampulla of Vater (AoV) tumors, and eight patients had non-AoV tumors.
UNASSIGNED: G1 and G2 were more frequently observed in the AoV group than in the non-AoV group (12.5% and 62.5%, respectively). In contrast, NEC and MiNEN were more common in the non-AoV group (50.0%). High Ki-67 index (> 20%) and perineural invasion (PNI) were more frequently observed in the non-AoV group. Advanced age (> 65 years), mitotic count > 20 per 2 mm2, and Ki-67 index > 20% were strongly correlated with patient survival (p = 0.018, 0.009, and 0.044, respectively). Advanced age (> 65 years) and mitotic count > 20 per 2 mm2 were significantly correlated with disease recurrence (p = 0.033 and 0.010, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: AoV and non-AoV tumors had significant differences in the histologic grade, Ki67, and PNI. Patients with non-AoV tumors had an increased risk for survival and recurrence than those in the AoV group. For extrahepatic biliary NENs, early detection of tumors, adequate surgery, and aggressive adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients are important to achieve long-term survival and prevent disease recurrence.

This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of the neuroendocrine component in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC).
Cases with EHCC derived from the SEER database were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The clinicopathological features and long-term survival were compared between patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NECA) and those with pure adenocarcinoma (AC).
A total of 3277 patients with EHCC were included (62 patients with NECA and 3215 patients with AC). T stage (P = 0.531) and M stage (P = 0.269) were comparable between the two groups. However, lymph node metastasis was more frequently detected in NECA (P = 0.022). NECA was correlated with more advanced tumor stage than pure AC (P < 0.0001). Inconsistent differentiation status was also observed between the two groups (P = 0.001). The proportion of patients who received surgery was significantly higher in the NECA group (80.6% vs 62.0%, P = 0.003) while chemotherapy was more frequently performed among patients with pure AC (45.7% vs 25.8%, P = 0.002). Comparable incidence of radiotherapy was acquired (P = 0.117). Patients with NECA shared a better overall survival than those with pure AC (P = 0.0141), even after matching (P = 0.0366). The results of univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that the neuroendocrine component was a protective factor as well as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR < 1, P < 0.05).
Patients with EHCC with a neuroendocrine component shared a better prognosis than those with pure AC, and NECA could serve as a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival. Considering various unprovided but potentially confounding factors, future more well-conducted research is required.