UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of needling/microneedling as an adjunct to NB-UVB phototherapy in the treatment of stable refractory patches of acral vitiligo, based upon clinical and immunohistochemical assessment of melanocyte count and distribution in response to needling/microneedling.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients with stable acral vitiligo (≥2 patches) were enrolled. One of the two index patches was randomized to receive needling or microneedling in conjunction with NB-UVB. Patients received phototherapy sessions 3 times weekly, while needling was carried out on biweekly basis for 6 months. Assessment was done clinically using point counting method, VESTA, and global patients\' satisfaction, and immunohistochemically by quantitative assessment of melanocyte count by Melan-A.
UNASSIGNED: No statistically significant difference was observed between NB-UVB monotherapy and either of the combined therapy regimens as regards the mean percentage change in vitiligo surface area (p = .451), mean change in absolute melanocyte count from baseline (p = .589), and mean VESTA (p = .916). Patches subjected to adjuvant microneedling/needling were afflicted by koebnerization in 50% and 20% of cases, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Neither microneedling nor needling appear to confer an added therapeutic value to NB-UVB phototherapy in the treatment of stable acral vitiligo. Moreover, both carry the risk of koebnerization.

Improved repigmentation of generalized vitiligo in skin types IV-VI has been reported in clinical response to combined therapy with apremilast and narrowband (NB)-UVB; however, tissue responses to combined therapy versus NB-UVB monotherapy have not been elucidated. We compared the change from baseline in cellular and molecular markers in vitiligo skin after combined therapy versus NB-UVB monotherapy. We assessed lesional and nonlesional skin samples from enrolled subjects and evaluated for immune infiltrates, inflammatory, and melanogenesis-related markers which were compared across different treatment groups. Combined therapy resulted in significant reduction of CD8+T cells and CD11c+ dendritic cells, downregulation of PDE4B and Th17-related markers, and upregulation of melanogenesis markers. This study was limited to small sample size, skin types IV-VI, and high dropout rate. Our molecular findings support the clinical analysis that apremilast may potentiate NB-UVB in repigmentation of generalized vitiligo in skin types IV-VI.

Psoriasis is a common chronic skin condition, which is an immune-related hyperproliferative disorder. Among the different treatments for psoriasis, statins have been found to reduce the severity of the disease. Accordingly, fluvastatin and simvastatin are known to have anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting inflammatory cytokines and lymphocyte function. Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) is known as an effective and safe modality for psoriasis treatment. In this double blind, randomized controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of adding simvastatin to NB-UVB phototherapy in patients with psoriasis. Forty-eight patients with psoriasis undergoing NB-UVB phototherapy were randomly divided into placebo groups; one received oral simvastatin, and the other received a placebo for 12 weeks. Psoriasis severity was assessed with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life and Quality Index (DLQI). Both groups showed a significant decline in PASI score after 6 and 12 weeks compared to the baseline. The differences in reducing PASI score and DLQI between the two groups were not significant neither at week sixth nor 12th. In addition, DLQI decreased significantly in the placebo group at week 12th. In contrast with previous studies, we did not find any additional effects for oral simvastatin5 in treating psoriasis with NB-UVB. Also, an insignificant difference in the improvement of quality of life between both groups was ascertained.

UNASSIGNED: Narrowband UV-B (NBUVB) phototherapy is the mainstay of vitiligo treatment, but hyperpigmentation is one of the limitations. Meanwhile, topical tretinoin is effective against pigmentary disorders.
UNASSIGNED: To determine whether tretinoin 0.05% cream would prevent hyperpigmentation when patients with facial vitiligo underwent phototherapy.
UNASSIGNED: A randomized, controlled, split-face trial was conducted. Adult patients with stable, non-segmental facial vitiligo were enrolled. The left/right sides of the face were randomly allocated to receive either topical tretinoin 0.05% cream or moisturizer twice daily. The entire face was subjected to NBUVB phototherapy twice weekly for 12 weeks. The degree of hyperpigmentation was assessed as the delta L* (brightness) value of the darkest spot in each side of the face at baseline and every 4 weeks. The degree of repigmentation was assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-five patients were enrolled; 21 completed the study. The delta L* value was significantly different between the two groups: -0.5% in the tretinoin group and -8.7% in the control group at 12 weeks (p = .002). Marked repigmentation was achieved in 15 patients of both groups.
UNASSIGNED: Tretinoin 0.05% cream prevented hyperpigmentation during NBUVB phototherapy in patients with facial vitiligo, and did not compromise the overall treatment response.
UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03933774.

BACKGROUND: Narrowband UVB (NBUVB) phototherapy is the cornerstone treatment for vitiligo. Before its initiation, some experts recommend antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening out of concern for either photosensitivity to NBUVB or autoimmune disease exacerbation during treatment. As vitiligo is considered an autoimmune disorder, ANAs can be positively found in the disease without any clinical importance. The necessity for ANA investigations for pre-phototherapy vitiligo patients is therefore questioned.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to investigate vitiligo patients who had been checked for ANA before commencing NBUVB phototherapy. Demographic data-including vitiligo type and age of onset-were collected. Samples of ANA, anti-thyroglobulin, and anti-thyroid peroxidase were obtained. The phototherapy treatment protocol and cutaneous reactions to the phototherapy were also recorded.
RESULTS: Among 85 Thai vitiligo patients, the ANA prevalence was 35.3%. The speckled ANA pattern was the most common, and the large majority of patients (80%) had a titer of ≤1:100. Factors associated with positive ANA were female gender and positive anti-thyroglobulin. There were no statistical differences between the phototoxic reactions or phototoxic doses of NBUVB of the ANA-positive vitiligo and ANA-negative vitiligo groups. No cases of SLE were detected in ANA-positive group.
CONCLUSIONS: ANA positivity was not correlated with the incidence or dose of phototoxic reaction in phototherapy treated vitiligo, and it may not a predictive factor for SLE diagnosis in vitiligo. ANA might therefore not need to be routinely checked in pre-phototherapy in vitiligo, unless there are clinical suspicions of an autoimmune disease. However, ANA might be involved in part of the cutaneous photoadaptation response to phototherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Side effects of current treatments and the need for a safe treatment with higher efficiency necessitate seeking new treatment options for vitiligo. Few studies have investigated the combination of psoralen with narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB). In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of psoralen and NBUVB combination (P-NBUVB) with NBUVB alone in treatment of vitiligo.
METHODS: This randomised clinical trial was carried out during 2015-2017 in dermatology clinics of Ghaem and Imam Reza hospitals, Mashhad, Iran on 40 vitiligo patients with 5-60% body involvement. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of NBUVB alone and P-NBUVB. Both groups underwent 60 phototherapy sessions (three sessions per week), and the repigmentation rate was measured using vitiligo area severity index (VASI) score. SPSS v. 16 software and appropriate statistical tests were used to analyse the data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 33.9 ± 11.3 years. Twenty patients (50%) were females. The P-NBUVB group showed greater VASI improvement in lower extremities (P = 0.003) and overall (P = 0.026) compared with NBUVB group. Moreover, the treatment response appeared sooner in P-NUVB group.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we can conclude that adding psoralen to NBUVB phototherapy can result in increased efficacy. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects and side effects of this treatment.

UVA1 phototherapy, a new therapeutic approach, has recently been shown good efficacy in the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of UVA1 and narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) therapy in the treatment of PPP. Patients with PPP were randomly assigned to either UVA1 or NB-UVB therapy according to a left-right randomization table. Both treatments were performed three times weekly for up to 30 sessions. Clinical evaluation was based on the Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) score. Totally 64 patients completed the study. Both UVA1 and NB-UVB therapy showed a statistically significant reduction of PPPASI score compared with the baseline value at the end of the treatment period (P < 0.05). There was a significantly greater mean reduction of PPPASI score in the UVA1 treated group when compared to the NB-UVB treated patients at 30 sessions (6.0 ± 2.4 vs. 4.4 ± 1.4, P < 0.05). No phototoxic reaction or bullous changes were observed in either group. Both NB-UVB and UVA1 phototherapy of PPP resulted in significant improvement. UVA1 phototherapy was more effective than NB-UVB irradiation in the treatment of PPP.

BACKGROUND: Lichen planus is recognized as an inflammatory disease of the skin with different morphologic patterns. Different treatment modalities, including topical and systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and psoralen plus UVA (PUVA), have been suggested for lichen planus. Although the efficacy of narrowband UVB (NBUVB) for treatment of lichen planus has been shown, no randomized clinical trial has compared NBUVB versus systemic corticosteroids for treatment of the disease. In the current study, we evaluated the efficacy of NBUVB versus systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of the lichen planus.
METHODS: Forty-six patients with confirmed diagnosis of lichen planus were randomly selected. The subjects were randomized into two groups of 23 to be treated with either systemic corticosteroids or NBUVB. All of the selected cases had generalized lichen planus that involved at least 20% of the body area and their pruritus was resistant to antihistamine drugs. Patients in the systemic corticosteroids group were treated with prednisolon 0.3 mg/kg for 6 weeks. NBUVB was performed three times a week for 6 weeks. The maximum dose of NBUVB was 9 J/cm(2). Data regarding demographic characteristics of the patients was also collected. All collected data was analyzed using SPSS(15) and statistical tests including analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square, and t-test.
RESULTS: 46 patients (23 patients in systemic steroid group and 23 patients in NBUVB group) were evaluated. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the efficacy of the treatment. According to chi-square test, NBUVB was significantly more effective than systemic steroid in treatment of generalized lichen planus (p = 0.008). According to the results, patient satisfaction was also significantly higher in the group treated with NBUVB as compared with the systemic corticosteroids (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of our study and other previous studies showed that NBUVB may be regarded as an effective treatment for generalized cutaneous lichen planus. This treatment may be especially utilized when there is contraindication for systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs.