monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio

单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    新的标识,易于测量的生物标志物可能有助于临床医生诊断和治疗系统性硬化症(SSc).尽管在SSc的评估中常规评估全血计数,特定细胞源性炎症指标的诊断效用,即,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR),在该患者组中尚未得到严格评估。
    我们对调查NLR的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,PLR,还有MLR,SSc患者和健康对照者以及有和没有相关并发症的SSc患者。PubMed,Scopus,和WebofScience从开始到2024年2月23日进行了搜索。使用经过验证的工具评估偏倚和证据确定性的风险。
    在10项符合条件的研究中,与对照组相比,SSc患者的NLR显著较高(标准平均差,SMD=0.68,95%CI0.46至0.91,p<0.001;I2=74.5%,p<0.001),和PLR值(SMD=0.52,95%CI0.21至0.83,p=0.001;I2=77.0%,p=0.005),和更高的MLR值的趋势(SMD=0.60,95%CI-0.04至1.23,p=0.066;I2=94.1%,p<0.001)。与无并发症的SSc患者相比,在患有间质性肺病的SSc中,NLR显著更高(ILD,SMD=0.31,95%CI0.15至0.46,p<0.001;I2=43.9%,p=0.11),肺动脉高压(PAH,SMD=1.59,95%CI0.04至3.1,p=0.045;I2=87.6%,p<0.001),和数字溃疡(DU,SMD=0.43,95%CI0.13至0.74,p=0.006;I2=0.0%,p=0.49)。SSc合并ILD患者的PLR显着升高(SMD=0.42,95%CI0.25至0.59,p<0.001;I2=24.8%,p=0.26)。SSc合并PAH患者的MLR显着升高(SMD=0.63,95%CI0.17至1.08,p=0.007;I2=66.0%,p=0.086),SSc合并ILD患者有较高的MLR趋势(SMD=0.60,95%CI-0.04至1.23,p=0.066;I2=94.1%,p<0.001)。
    在适当设计的前瞻性研究的结果之前,这项系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,血细胞衍生的炎症指标,特别是NLR和PLR,可能对SSc和特定并发症的诊断有用。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024520040。
    UNASSIGNED: The identification of new, easily measurable biomarkers might assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although the full blood count is routinely assessed in the evaluation of SSc, the diagnostic utility of specific cell-derived inflammatory indices, i.e., neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), has not been critically appraised in this patient group.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the NLR, PLR, and MLR, in SSc patients and healthy controls and in SSc patients with and without relevant complications. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 23 February 2024. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using validated tools.
    UNASSIGNED: In 10 eligible studies, compared to controls, patients with SSc had significantly higher NLR (standard mean difference, SMD=0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91, p<0.001; I2 = 74.5%, p<0.001), and PLR values (SMD=0.52, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83, p=0.001; I2 = 77.0%, p=0.005), and a trend towards higher MLR values (SMD=0.60, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.23, p=0.066; I2 = 94.1%, p<0.001). When compared to SSc patients without complications, the NLR was significantly higher in SSc with interstitial lung disease (ILD, SMD=0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.46, p<0.001; I2 = 43.9%, p=0.11), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, SMD=1.59, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.1, p=0.045; I2 = 87.6%, p<0.001), and digital ulcers (DU, SMD=0.43, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.74, p=0.006; I2 = 0.0%, p=0.49). The PLR was significantly higher in SSc patients with ILD (SMD=0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.59, p<0.001; I2 = 24.8%, p=0.26). The MLR was significantly higher in SSc patients with PAH (SMD=0.63, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.08, p=0.007; I2 = 66.0%, p=0.086), and there was a trend towards a higher MLR in SSc patients with ILD (SMD=0.60, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.23, p=0.066; I2 = 94.1%, p<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Pending the results of appropriately designed prospective studies, the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that blood cell-derived indices of inflammation, particularly the NLR and PLR, may be useful in the diagnosis of SSc and specific complications.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024520040.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    牛皮癣是一种免疫介导的疾病,主要影响皮肤并涉及全身性炎症。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),全身免疫炎症指数(SII),单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)是新的全血细胞计数(CBC)来源的标志物,可以反映全身性炎症。本研究旨在系统地调查NLR的关联,PLR,SII,和MLR与牛皮癣。本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行。全面搜索Pubmed,Embase,Scopus,谷歌学者进行了相关研究。评估NLR相关性的观察性研究,PLR,SII,或MLR与牛皮癣包括在内。主要结果是这些炎症标志物与银屑病的存在和严重程度的关联。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。36项研究包括4794名银屑病患者和55,121名个体,纳入荟萃分析。与健康对照组相比,银屑病组的所有炎症标志物均显着增加(NLR:MD=0.59,95%CI:0.47-0.7;PLR:MD=15.53,95%CI:8.48-22.58;SII:MD=111.58,95%CI:61.49-161.68;MLR:MD=0.034,95%CI:0.021-0.048;所有p<0.001)。NLR和PLR的组间平均差异与银屑病面积严重程度指数的平均得分呈正相关(NLR:p=0.041;PLR:p=0.021)。NLR,PLR,SII,和MLR与银屑病的存在有关。NLR和PLR作为银屑病严重程度的重要指标。这些新的CBC来源的标记物构成了牛皮癣筛查和监测的潜在目标。
    Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disorder which primarily affects skin and has systemic inflammatory involvement. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are novel complete blood count (CBC)-derived markers which can reflect systemic inflammation. This study aimed to systematically investigate the associations of NLR, PLR, SII, and MLR with psoriasis. This study was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A comprehensive search of Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted for relevant studies. Observational studies evaluating the correlations of NLR, PLR, SII, or MLR with psoriasis were included. The primary outcomes were the associations of these inflammatory markers with the presence and severity of psoriasis. The random-effect model was applied for meta-analysis. 36 studies comprising 4794 psoriasis patients and 55,121 individuals in total were included in the meta-analysis. All inflammatory markers were significantly increased in psoriasis groups compared to healthy controls (NLR: MD = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.7; PLR: MD = 15.53, 95% CI: 8.48-22.58; SII: MD = 111.58, 95% CI: 61.49-161.68; MLR: MD = 0.034, 95% CI: 0.021-0.048; all p < 0.001). Between-group mean differences in NLR and PLR were positively correlated with the mean scores of Psoriasis Area Severity Index (NLR: p = 0.041; PLR: p = 0.021). NLR, PLR, SII, and MLR are associated with the presence of psoriasis. NLR and PLR serve as significant indicators of psoriasis severity. These novel CBC-derived markers constitute potential targets in the screening and monitoring of psoriasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:炎症生物标志物是评估不同心血管疾病预后的新工具。我们评估了单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)对冠心病(CHD)患者临床结局的影响。
    方法:我们系统地筛选了PubMed中的英文文章,Scopus,和WebofScience至2022年8月31日。相关文章报道了MLR及其与临床结果的关联(主要不良心血管事件(MACE),冠状动脉疾病(CAD)严重程度,死亡率,心脏破裂,亚临床CAD,急性冠脉综合征(ACS)预测,薄帽纤维粥样瘤,无回流现象,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的MLR相关差异,心力衰竭住院,收集冠心病患者的抑郁)进行进一步分析。
    结果:选择了19篇文章。平均MLR为0.34。在CHD患者中,较高的MLR与MACE风险增加显著相关。MLR是ACS患者MACE的独立预测因子。没有发现CAD严重程度的显著关联。没有进行补充分析,因为很少有研究关注其他预定义的终点。
    结论:MLR是预测冠心病患者MACE的简单且广泛可用的工具。该生物标志物可用于紧急情况,以优先考虑高风险患者并优化治疗干预。
    OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory biomarkers are novel tools to assess the prognosis of different cardiovascular diseases. We evaluated the impact of the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).
    METHODS: We systematically screened English-language articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to 31 August 2022. Relevant articles reporting the MLR and its association with clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, mortality, cardiac rupture, subclinical CAD, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) prediction, thin-cap fibroatheroma, no-reflow phenomenon, MLR-related differences in percutaneous coronary intervention, heart failure hospitalization, and depression) in patients with CHD were collected for further analysis.
    RESULTS: Nineteen articles were selected. The mean MLR was 0.34. A higher MLR was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE among patients with CHD. The MLR was an independent predictor of MACE in patients with ACS. No significant association was found for CAD severity. A complementary analysis was not performed because of few studies focusing on the other predefined endpoints.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MLR is a simple and widely available tool to predict MACE in patients with CHD. This biomarker can be utilized in emergency settings to prioritize high-risk patients and optimize therapeutic interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)的研究,血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)在抑郁症中仍在出现,并且自首次荟萃分析以来已经增加了3倍.具有足够研究的更新的荟萃分析可以为NLR之间的潜在关系提供更多证据,PLR,MLR,和抑郁症。
    我们确定了来自PubMed的18项研究,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库。进行荟萃分析,以生成抑郁症患者和对照组之间的汇总标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。敏感性分析,亚组分析,元回归,并进行了发表偏倚。
    共纳入18项研究,包括2,264名抑郁症患者和2,415名对照。与对照组相比,抑郁患者的NLR和PLR明显更高(SMD=0.33,95%CI:0.15-0.52,p<0.001,SMD=0.24,95%CI:0.02-0.46,p<0.05)。与对照组相比,抑郁个体的MLR略高(SMD=0.15,95%CI:-0.26至0.55,p>0.05),尽管没有意义。敏感性分析删除了一项导致异质性的研究,显示了MLR的更高且显着的影响(SMD=0.32,95%CI:0.20-0.44)。NLR的三个亚组分析,PLR,MLR,和抑郁症显示,中国抑郁症患者和对照组以及匹配的年龄和性别亚组之间的炎症比率存在明显差异。与非PSD患者相比,卒中后抑郁(PSD)患者的NLR和MLR值较高(SMD=0.51,95%CI:0.36-0.67,p<0.001,SMD=0.46,95%CI:0.12-0.79,p<0.01,分别)。Meta回归分析显示,病例组中男性比例影响了测量NLR值的研究之间的异质性(p<0.05)。
    较高的炎症比率,尤其是NLR,与抑郁症风险增加显著相关。在中国亚组中,年龄和性别相匹配,NLR,PLR,与抑郁症患者相比,MLR均升高controls.与非PSD患者相比,PSD患者的NLR和MLR值较高。性别差异可能对抑郁症患者的NLR值产生影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Research on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in depression is still emerging and has increased 3-fold since the first meta-analysis. An updated meta-analysis with sufficient studies can provide more evidence for a potential relationship between NLR, PLR, MLR, and depression.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 18 studies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases. Meta-analyses were performed to generate pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between patients with depression and controls. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias were conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 18 studies including 2,264 depressed patients and 2,415 controls were included. Depressed patients had significantly higher NLR and PLR compared with controls (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.52, p < 0.001 and SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.02-0.46, p < 0.05, respectively). MLR was slightly higher in depressed individuals compared to controls (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.55, p > 0.05), despite the absence of significance. Sensitivity analysis removing one study responsible for heterogeneity showed a higher and significant effect (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.44) of MLR. Three subgroup analyses of NLR, PLR, MLR, and depression revealed obvious differences in the inflammatory ratios between depressed patients and controls in China and the matched age and gender subgroup. Individuals with post-stroke depression (PSD) had higher NLR and MLR values as compared to non-PSD patients (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.67, p < 0.001 and SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.12-0.79, p < 0.01, respectively). Meta-regression analyses showed that male proportion in the case group influenced the heterogeneity among studies that measured NLR values (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Higher inflammatory ratios, especially NLR, were significantly associated with an increased risk of depression. In the subgroup of China and matched age and gender, NLR, PLR, and MLR were all elevated in depressed patients vs. controls. Individuals with PSD had higher NLR and MLR values as compared to non-PSD patients. Gender differences may have an effect on NLR values in patients with depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR),血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR),或单核细胞-淋巴细胞比率(MLR)已被证明与宫颈癌的不良预后有关,卵巢癌,乳腺癌,和其他恶性肿瘤,但它们在预测子宫内膜癌预后中的作用仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以更准确地评估NLR的有效性,PLR,或MLR预测子宫内膜癌(EC)的预后。
    这篇综述系统地搜索了Cochrane图书馆数据库中的相关出版物,PubMed,EMBASE,CNKI,万方,VIP,和CBM。确定了具有95%置信区间(95%CI)的汇总风险比(HR),并用于探索炎症生物标志物之间的关联(NLR,PLR,和MLR)和总生存率(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),和随机效应模型中的无病生存期(DFS)。在这项荟萃分析中,我们还进行了亚组分析和发表偏倚。采用Stata12.0进行统计分析。
    这项荟萃分析包含14项符合条件的研究,包括5,274名患者。我们的结果表明,NLR或PLR与OS[NLR:HR,2.51;95%CI,1.70-3.71;单变量分析(Ua)p<0.001;HR,1.87;95%CI,1.34-2.60;多变量分析(Ma)p<0.001;PLR:HR,2.50;95%CI,1.82-3.43;Uap<0.001;HR,1.86;95%CI,1.22-2.83;p=0.004,以马为单位],但MLR与操作系统(HR,1.44;95%CI,0.70-2.95;p=0.325,单位为Ua;HR,1.01;95%CI,0.39-2.60;p=0.987,以Ma为单位)。进一步的亚组分析发现,相关性不受种族影响,截止值,样本量,或治疗。我们的荟萃分析显示NLR或PLR与DFS相关(NLR:HR,2.50;95%CI,1.38-4.56;p=0.003,单位为Ua;HR,2.06;95%CI,1.26-3.37,马氏P=0.004;PLR:HR,1.91;95%CI,1.30-2.81;p=0.001,单位为Ua),NLR仅在单因素分析中与PFS相关(HR,1.71;95%CI,1.04-2.81;p=0.035,单位为Ua;HR,1.79;95%CI,0.65-4.89;P=0.257,以马为单位),但MLR与DFS(HR,0.36;95%CI,0.03-4.13;Ua中p=0.409)。
    我们的结果表明,治疗前NLR和PLR是子宫内膜癌患者预后不良的生物标志物。结果表明,NLR或PLR与OS和无病生存DFS相关,NLR仅在单变量分析中与PFS相关,但MLR与OS或DFS无关。
    UNASSIGNED: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), or monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) has been shown to be related to the poor prognosis of cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and other malignant tumors, but their role in predicting the prognosis of endometrial cancer is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of NLR more accurately, PLR, or MLR in predicting the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC).
    UNASSIGNED: This review systematically searched for relevant publications in databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined and used to explore the association between inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, and MLR) and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in a random-effects model. We also conducted subgroup analysis and publication bias in this meta-analysis. Stata 12.0 was used for statistical analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis contained 14 eligible studies including 5,274 patients. Our results showed that NLR or PLR was associated with OS [NLR: HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.70-3.71; p <0.001 in univariate analysis (Ua); HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.34-2.60; p <0.001 in multivariate analysis (Ma); PLR: HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.82-3.43; p <0.001 in Ua; HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.22-2.83; p = 0.004 in Ma], but MLR was not associated with OS (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.70-2.95; p = 0.325 in Ua; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.39-2.60; p =0.987 in Ma). A further subgroup analysis found that the correlations were not affected by race, cutoff value, sample size, or treatment. Our meta-analysis showed that NLR or PLR was associated with DFS (NLR: HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.38-4.56; p =0.003 in Ua; HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.26-3.37, P =0.004 in Ma; PLR: HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.30-2.81; p = 0.001 in Ua), and NLR was associated with PFS only in the univariate analysis (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04-2.81; p =0.035 in Ua; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.65-4.89; P =0.257 in Ma), but MLR was not associated with DFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.03-4.13; p =0.409 in Ua).
    UNASSIGNED: Our results indicated that pretreatment NLR and PLR were biomarkers of poor prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer. The results indicated that NLR or PLR was associated with OS and disease-free survival DFS, and NLR was associated with PFS only in univariate analysis, but MLR was not associated with OS or DFS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Growing evidence shows that the preoperative lymphocyte-related systemic inflammatory biomarkers are associated with the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). These markers include neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). However, these findings are inconsistent, and the prognostic significance of these biomarkers is unclear. Moreover, the currently available prognostic indicators do not precisely predict the outcome of UTUC patients. This motivated us to investigate the prognostic values of NLR, PLR, and MLR in UTUC patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
    METHODS: We prospectively registered this in PROSPERO (CRD42020186531). We performed a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify the eligible studies evaluating the prognostic values of preoperative NLR, PLR, and MLR. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals of overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from the multivariate analyses and analyzed with fixed or random effects models when applicable. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using Cochran\'s Q test and I2 statistic. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the origin of heterogeneity. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to assess the quality of each enrolled study. Publication bias was determined using funnel plots together with Egger\'s tests. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence.
    RESULTS: Overall, we included 10,339 UTUC patients from twenty-five retrospective studies. The results indicated that elevated preoperative NLR, PLR, and MLR were significantly associated with worse OS, CSS, DFS/RFS/MFS, and PFS in the UTUC patients undergoing RNU. Furthermore, the results of sensitivity and subgroup analyses demonstrated the rationality and reliability of the results.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between elevated preoperative NLR, PLR, and MLR and poor prognosis in patients with surgically treated UTUC. Hence, lymphocyte-related systemic inflammatory biomarkers, in conjunction with clinicopathological factors, molecular markers, and other prognostic indicators, could be helpful to determine the primary treatment strategies and to design individualized follow-up plans for UTUC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号