monoclonal antibody

单克隆抗体
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于日本生物仿制药指南的“问答(Q&A)”文件阐明,在日本,生物仿制药的上市许可申请(MAA)需要日本参与者参加至少一项比较临床研究。
    为了讨论日本临床研究数据对生物仿制药开发的要求,分析了对已批准的单克隆抗体和融合蛋白生物仿制药进行的比较临床研究的趋势,并根据公开信息审查了总体人群和日本人群之间的结果一致性。
    招募日本参与者的比较临床研究数量为25例,比较药代动力学研究和比较疗效研究的类型和百分比分别为13例(52%)和12例(48%),分别。在所有比较临床研究中,显示了总体人口和日本人口之间的一致结果。
    我们的研究表明,在满足某些条件的情况下,日本参与者参加比较临床研究并不总是生物仿制药开发所必需的。卫生部发布的修订后的问答文件中对此进行了描述,2024年1月劳动和福利。
    UNASSIGNED: The \'Questions and Answers (Q&A)\' document regarding Japanese biosimilar guideline elucidated that Japanese participant enrollment in at least one comparative clinical study was required for the marketing authorization application (MAA) of biosimilars in Japan.
    UNASSIGNED: To discuss the requirement of Japanese clinical study data for biosimilar development, the trend in comparative clinical studies conducted for approved biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins was analyzed, and the consistency of the results between the overall population and the Japanese population according to the publicly available information was reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: The number of comparative clinical studies enrolling Japanese participants was 25 cases, and the type and percentage were 13 (52%) and 12 (48%) cases of comparative pharmacokinetic study and comparative efficacy study, respectively. In all comparative clinical studies, consistent results between the overall population and the Japanese population were shown.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study indicated that Japanese participant enrollment in comparative clinical studies may not always be necessary for biosimilar development when certain conditions are satisfied. This has been described in the revised Q&A document published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in January 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)治疗新的循环变异的临床益处尚不清楚。我们试图描述苏格兰接受早期COVID-19治疗的高危COVID-19患者的特征和临床结果。
    方法:使用苏格兰行政卫生数据,对2021年12月1日至2022年10月25日诊断为COVID-19的非住院患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了符合国家卫生服务最高风险标准≥1的早期COVID-19治疗的成年患者,并接受了sotrovimab门诊治疗,nirmatrelvir/ritonavir或molnupiravir,或没有早期COVID-19治疗。指标日期定义为COVID-19诊断最早或COVID-19早期治疗。报告了基线特征和28天后的急性临床结果。≤5的值被抑制。
    结果:总计,包括2548例患者(492例:sotrovimab,276:尼马特雷韦/利托那韦,71:莫努普拉韦,和1709:符合条件的最高风险未治疗)。年龄≥75岁的患者占6.9%(n=34/492),21.0%(n=58/276),16.9%(n=12/71)和13.2%(n=225/1709)的队列,分别。据报道,在接受sotrovimab治疗的患者中有6.7%(n=33/492)和未治疗的患者中有4.7%(n=81/1709)的晚期肾脏疾病。和≤5nirmatrelvir/ritonavir治疗和molnupiravir治疗的患者。5.3%(n=25/476)接受sotrovimab治疗的患者经历了全因住院,6.9%(n=12/175)的尼马特雷韦/利托那韦治疗的患者,≤5(抑制数量)的莫努比拉韦治疗的患者和13.3%(n=216/1622)的未经治疗的患者。在接受治疗的队列中没有死亡;在未经治疗的患者中,死亡率为4.3%(n=70/1622)。
    结论:Sotrovimab通常用于年龄<75岁的患者。在接受早期COVID-19治疗的患者中,28日全因住院和死亡的比例较低.
    BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments against new circulating variants remains unclear. We sought to describe characteristics and clinical outcomes of highest risk patients with COVID-19 receiving early COVID-19 treatments in Scotland.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of non-hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from December 1, 2021-October 25, 2022, using Scottish administrative health data. We included adult patients who met ≥ 1 of the National Health Service highest risk criteria for early COVID-19 treatment and received outpatient treatment with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or no early COVID-19 treatment. Index date was defined as the earliest of COVID-19 diagnosis or early COVID-19 treatment. Baseline characteristics and acute clinical outcomes in the 28 days following index were reported. Values of ≤ 5 were suppressed.
    RESULTS: In total, 2548 patients were included (492: sotrovimab, 276: nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 71: molnupiravir, and 1709: eligible highest risk untreated). Patients aged ≥ 75 years accounted for 6.9% (n = 34/492), 21.0% (n = 58/276), 16.9% (n = 12/71) and 13.2% (n = 225/1709) of the cohorts, respectively. Advanced renal disease was reported in 6.7% (n = 33/492) of sotrovimab-treated and 4.7% (n = 81/1709) of untreated patients, and ≤ 5 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-treated and molnupiravir-treated patients. All-cause hospitalizations were experienced by 5.3% (n = 25/476) of sotrovimab-treated patients, 6.9% (n = 12/175) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-treated patients, ≤ 5 (suppressed number) molnupiravir-treated patients and 13.3% (n = 216/1622) of untreated patients. There were no deaths in the treated cohorts; mortality was 4.3% (n = 70/1622) among untreated patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sotrovimab was often used by patients who were aged < 75 years. Among patients receiving early COVID-19 treatment, proportions of 28-day all-cause hospitalization and death were low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:在无牙区域的脂肪变性骨坏死牙槽骨腔(FDOJ)和下颌无菌性缺血性骨质溶解(AIOJ)中发现了极高水平的趋化因子CCL5/RANTES。因为CCL5/RANTES似乎在制造COVID-19“细胞因子风暴”中发挥了重要作用,一些研究人员使用单克隆抗体Leronlimab阻断炎症细胞上的CCR5。目标:先前存在的FDOJ/AIOJ颌骨病理学是否会影响某些COVID-19感染的“隐性”合并症?先前存在的FDOJ/AIOJ区域的慢性CCL5/RANTES表达在多大程度上促进了COVID-19患者的急性细胞因子风暴的进展方法:作者报告了通过靶向Lronb和CCmab的L05受体(CCma6)阻断感染的患者来减少CO从而失调病毒血症的炎症阶段。从患有炎性疾病的患者手术切除具有高CCL5/RANTES的FDOJ/AIOJ病变可被归类为共病。结果:249个FDOJ/AIOJ骨组织样本的多重分析以及CCL5/RANTES的血清水平在两个样本中均显示出极高的水平。讨论:根据结果,作者假设来自FDOJ/AIOJ区域的慢性CCL5/RANTES诱导可能会使整个免疫系统中的CCR5敏感,因此,使它在面对病毒时能够放大反应。由于传统的口内射线照相对评估牙槽骨的质量几乎没有作用,超声检查单位可帮助牙医在办公室环境中定位FDOJ/AIOJ病变。结论:作者提出了一种新的方法,通过预防未来与病毒相关的大流行来遏制COVID-19细胞因子风暴,这可能是FDOJ/AIOJ地区CCL5/RANTES表达源的早期手术清理,从而减少CCR5可能的预敏化。更完整的牙科检查包括用于隐藏的FDOJ/AIOJ病变的经肺泡超声造影(TAU)。
    Introduction: Exceedingly high levels of the chemokine CCL5/RANTES have been found in fatty degenerated osteonecrotic alveolar bone cavities (FDOJ) and aseptic ischemic osteolysis of the jaw (AIOJ) from toothless regions. Because CCL5/RANTES seems to have a prominent role in creating the COVID-19 \"cytokine storm\", some researchers have used the monoclonal antibody Leronlimab to block the CCR5 on inflammatory cells.Objective: Is preexisting FDOJ/AIOJ jaw marrow pathology a \"hidden\" co-morbidity affecting some COVID-19 infections? To what extent does the chronic CCL5/RANTES expression from preexisting FDOJ/AIOJ areas contribute to the progression of the acute cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients?Methods: Authors report on reducing the COVID-19 \"cytokine storm\" by treating infected patients through targeting the chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) with Leronlimab and interrupting the activation of CCR5 by high CCL5/RANTES signaling, thus dysregulating the inflammatory phase of the viremia. Surgical removal of FDOJ/AIOJ lesions with high CCL5/RANTES from patients with inflammatory diseases may be classified as a co-morbid disease.Results: Both multiplex analysis of 249 FDOJ/AIOJ bone tissue samples as well as serum levels of CCL5/RANTES displayed exceedingly high levels in both specimens.Discussion: By the results the authors hypothesize that chronic CCL5/RANTES induction from FDOJ/AIOJ areas may sensitize CCR5 throughout the immune system, thus, enabling it to amplify its response when confronted with the virus. As conventional intraoral radiography does little to assess the quality of the alveolar bone, ultrasonography units are available to help dentists locate the FDOJ/AIOJ lesions in an office setting.Conclusion: The authors propose a new approach to containment of the COVID-19 cytokine storm by a prophylactic focus for future viral-related pandemics, which may be early surgical clean-up of CCL5/RANTES expression sources in the FDOJ/AIOJ areas, thus diminishing a possible pre-sensitization of CCR5. A more complete dental examination includes trans-alveolar ultrasono-graphy (TAU) for hidden FDOJ/AIOJ lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫检查点抑制剂是肿瘤免疫治疗的主要方法。该研究的目的是建立推荐的2期剂量(RP2Ds)的静脉注射西特瑞马,检查点抑制剂,单独和口服erdafitinib治疗日本晚期实体瘤患者。这个开放标签,非随机化,剂量递增1/1b期研究纳入了不符合标准治疗条件的晚期实体瘤成人.研究分两个部分进行:1a期评估西特瑞马在三个剂量水平(80毫克每2周[Q2W],240毫克Q2W,和480mgQ4W);1b期评估了两种给药水平(240mgQ2W+6mg每日一次[QD]和240mgQ2W+8mgQD)的西曲瑞马+厄达替尼。主要终点是西特瑞马±erdafitinib的剂量限制性毒性(DLTs)的频率和严重程度。总共22名患者(第1a期,n=9;阶段1b,n=13)。1a期的中位随访时间为8.64个月,1b期为2.33个月。在阶段1a,在1b阶段没有报告DLT,1例接受240mg西特瑞马+6mgerdafitinib的患者报告了Stevens-Johnson综合征(3级,免疫相关)。总的来说,在1a期(≥3级:44.4%)和1b期(≥3级:53.8%)分别有88.9%和100.0%的患者经历了≥1次治疗相关不良事件(TEAEs);1a期有33.3%和1b期有38.5%的患者报告了严重的TEAEs。其中11.1%的1a期患者和15.4%的1b期患者出现TEAE,导致治疗中止。在日本晚期实体瘤患者中,西特瑞马单独和与erdafitinib联合使用显示出可控的安全性。RP2Ds被确定为480mg西特雷单抗Q4W用于单一疗法,西特瑞马240mgQ2W+erdafitinib8mgQD用于联合治疗。
    Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the leading approaches in tumor immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to establish recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of intravenous cetrelimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, alone and with oral erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation phase 1/1b study enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors who were ineligible for standard therapy. Study was conducted in two parts: phase 1a assessed cetrelimab at three dosing levels (80 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 240 mg Q2W, and 480 mg Q4W); phase 1b assessed cetrelimab+erdafitinib at two dosing levels (240 mg Q2W + 6 mg once daily [QD] and 240 mg Q2W + 8 mg QD). Primary endpoint was frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cetrelimab ± erdafitinib. In total 22 patients (phase 1a, n = 9; phase 1b, n = 13) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 8.64 months in phase 1a and 2.33 months in phase 1b. In phase 1a, DLTs weren\'t reported while in phase 1b, 1 patient who received 240 mg cetrelimab + 6 mg erdafitinib reported Stevens-Johnson syndrome (grade 3, immune-related). Overall, 88.9% patients in phase 1a (grade ≥ 3: 44.4%) and 100.0% in phase 1b (grade ≥ 3: 53.8%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs); 33.3% in phase 1a and 38.5% in phase 1b reported serious TEAEs, of which 11.1% patients in phase 1a and 15.4% in phase 1b had TEAEs which led to treatment discontinuation. Cetrelimab alone and in combination with erdafitinib showed manageable safety in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. RP2Ds were determined as 480 mg cetrelimab Q4W for monotherapy, and cetrelimab 240 mg Q2W + erdafitinib 8 mg QD for combination therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    囊性棘球蚴病(CE)是一种人畜共患疾病,由tape虫细粒棘球蚴(s.l.)的幼虫期引起。这项研究旨在通过免疫组织化学(IHC)研究使用两种单克隆抗体(mAbEmG3和mAbEm2G11)来确认人类患者的CE诊断,特别是在其他技术无法提供正确或决定性诊断的情况下。为此,对13例患者进行了调查。这些受试者从2017年至2022年被转诊到撒丁岛医院(意大利),并被怀疑受到CE的影响。我们从这13例患者的发现显示通过IHC在13个棘球囊囊肿中的12个中检测到严格的细粒E。因为一个样本是非寄生虫学来源的。结果证实IHC,通过mAbEmG3和mAbEm2G11,是一种可靠的诊断工具,当测试来自撒丁岛的E.granulosuss.l.菌株时,显示出非常高的性能。
    Cystic Echinococcosis (CE) is a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.). This study aims to investigate the use of two monoclonal antibodies (mAbEmG3 and mAbEm2G11) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to confirm the diagnosis of CE in human patients, in particular in those cases in which other techniques fail to provide a correct or conclusive diagnosis. For this purpose, a survey on 13 patients was performed. These subjects were referred to Sardinian hospitals (Italy) from 2017 to 2022 and were suspected to be affected by CE. Our findings from these 13 patients showed the detection of E. granulosus sensu stricto by IHC in 12 of 13 echinococcal cysts, as one sample was of a non-parasitological origin. The results confirmed that IHC, by means of the mAbEmG3 and mAbEm2G11, is a reliable diagnostic tool that showed a very high performances when tested on strain of E. granulosus s.l. from Sardinia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    IMpower210(NCT02813785)探讨了阿特珠单抗与单药的疗效和安全性。多西他赛作为东亚晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的二线治疗。
    第三阶段的关键资格标准,开放标签,随机研究包括年龄≥18岁;根据国际癌症控制联盟/美国癌症分期联合委员会(第7版),组织学记录的晚期NSCLC;东部肿瘤协作组的表现状态为0或1;晚期或转移性NSCLC的铂类化疗后疾病进展.患者以2:1的比例随机分配接受阿特珠单抗(1,200mg)或多西他赛(75mg/m2)。主要研究终点是具有野生型表皮生长因子受体表达(ITTEGFR-WT)的意向治疗(ITT)人群和整体ITT人群的总生存期(OS)。
    ITTEGFR-WT人群中的中位OS(n=467)为12.3[95%置信区间(95%CI),阿特珠单抗组(n=312)的10.3-13.8个月和多西他赛组的9.9(95%CI,7.8-13.9)个月[n=155;分层风险比(HR),0.82;95%CI,0.66-1.03]。使用阿特珠单抗治疗的整个ITT人群的中位OS为12.5(95%CI,10.8-13.8)个月,使用多西他赛治疗的11.1(95%CI,8.4-14.2)个月(n=377)(n=188);0.87;95%CI,0.71-1.08)。3/4级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)发生在阿特珠单抗组的18.4%患者和多西他赛组的50.0%患者中。
    IMpower210在ITTEGFR-WT或整体ITT人群中未达到OS的主要疗效终点。阿替珠单抗的耐受性高于多西他赛,3/4级TRAE的发生率较低。
    UNASSIGNED: IMpower210 (NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs. docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Key eligibility criteria for this phase III, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years; histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab (1,200 mg) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2). The primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression (ITT EGFR-WT) and in the overall ITT population.
    UNASSIGNED: Median OS in the ITT EGFR-WT population (n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm (n=312) and 9.9 (95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm [n=155; stratified hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5 (95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1 (95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months (n=377) with docetaxel treatment (n=188; stratified HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm.
    UNASSIGNED: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT EGFR-WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade 3/4 TRAEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多年来,维多珠单抗(VDZ)已成为炎症性肠病更有效的靶向治疗方法。这项工作的目的是分析一组炎症性肠病患者,评估从开始治疗6个月时的VDZ血药浓度与治疗一年内的临床和生化指标之间的关系,将药物水平与反应和临床缓解相关联。纳入40例接受VDZ治疗的患者。通过ELISA方法定量药物浓度。VDZ水平与治疗12个月时的血红蛋白水平相关(p=0.03),与治疗12个月时的临床缓解相关(p=0.03);达到临床缓解的患者显示出更高的VDZ浓度。建议VDZ临界值为43.1μg/mL,预测治疗12个月时的临床缓解。发现T6的VDZ水平与T12的钙卫蛋白<250μg/g之间存在统计学上的显着关联(p=0.04)。此外,确定了T6时VDZ水平与T12时钙卫蛋白<250μg/g相关的最佳阈值:通过高于45.2µg/mL的水平,我们能够预测治疗后一年的缓解。在最终的回归多变量模型中,在治疗1年时,未保留任何因子作为临床缓解的预测因子.总之,这是第一个试点研究报告可能的VDZ血清临界值,不仅能够预测治疗12个月时的临床缓解,而且还可以预测钙卫蛋白水平,这很重要,因为它是粘膜愈合的替代标记。
    Over the years, vedolizumab (VDZ) has emerged as a more effective target therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this work was to analyze a cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients, evaluating the association between VDZ serum concentrations at 6 months from starting therapy and their clinical and biochemical indexes within one year of treatment, correlating drug levels with response and clinical remission. Forty patients treated with VDZ were enrolled. Drug concentrations were quantified through ELISA methods. VDZ levels correlated with hemoglobin levels at twelve months of therapy (p = 0.03) and with clinical remission at twelve months of therapy (p = 0.03); patients who reached clinical remission showed higher VDZ concentrations. A VDZ cut-off value of 43.1 μg/mL was suggested, predicting clinical remission at twelve months of therapy. A statistically significant association between VDZ levels at T6 and calprotectin <250 μg/g at T12 was found (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the optimal threshold value of VDZ levels at T6 associated with calprotectin <250 μg/g at T12 was identified: through levels higher than 45.2 µg/mL, we were able to predict remission one year after therapy. In the final regression multivariate model, no factor was retained as a predictor of clinical remission at one year of treatment. In conclusion, this is the first pilot study reporting a possible VDZ serum cut-off value able to predict not only the clinical remission at twelve months of therapy but also the calprotectin level, which is very important, as it is a surrogate marker of mucosal healing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:转化生长因子β(TGFβ)细胞因子(TGFβ1、TGFβ2和TGFβ3)在组织纤维化中起关键作用。然而,用全身性泛TGFβ抑制剂治疗已显示出不可接受的毒性。在这项研究中,我们评估了安全性,耐受性,药代动力学,和RO7303509的药效学,高亲和力,TGFβ3特异性,人源化免疫球蛋白G1单克隆抗体,在健康的成人志愿者(HVs)。
    方法:此阶段1a,随机化,双盲试验包括六个队列进行评估,每个队列接受单剂量的安慰剂或RO7303509,静脉内给药(IV;50mg,150毫克,240毫克)或皮下(SC;240毫克,675毫克,1200毫克)。在整个研究中监测不良事件(AE)的频率和严重程度以及RO7303509血清浓度。我们还通过免疫测定法测量了血清骨膜素和软骨寡聚基质蛋白(COMP),并开发了群体药代动力学模型来表征RO7303509血清浓度。
    结果:该研究招募了49辆HV,年龄中位数为39岁(18-73岁)。10名(27.8%)接受RO7303509治疗的受试者报告了24例不良事件,6名(30.8%)安慰剂治疗的受试者报告了6例AE。与研究药物相关的最常见的AE是注射部位反应和输注相关反应。RO7303509的最大血清浓度(Cmax)和从时间0到无穷大的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-inf)值似乎在所有测试剂量中剂量成比例地增加。队列中的血清浓度最好通过两室模型加上具有一级SC吸收动力学的储库室来表征。没有受试者在基线测试为阳性的抗药物抗体(ADAs);一名受试者(2.8%;50mgIV)在单个时间点(第15天)测试为阳性的ADAs。在TGFβ3抑制后,骨膜素或COMP未观察到明显的药效学作用。
    结论:RO7303509在单SC剂量高达1200mg的HV中具有良好的耐受性,具有良好的药代动力学数据,似乎剂量成比例增加。TGFβ3特异性抑制可能适合发展为慢性抗纤维化疗法。
    背景:ISRCTN13175485。
    BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) cytokines (TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3) play critical roles in tissue fibrosis. However, treatment with systemic pan-TGFβ inhibitors have demonstrated unacceptable toxicities. In this study, we evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RO7303509, a high-affinity, TGFβ3-specific, humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, in healthy adult volunteers (HVs).
    METHODS: This phase 1a, randomized, double-blind trial included six cohorts for evaluation, with each cohort receiving single doses of placebo or RO7303509, administered intravenously (IV; 50 mg, 150 mg, 240 mg) or subcutaneously (SC; 240 mg, 675 mg, 1200 mg). The frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) and RO7303509 serum concentrations were monitored throughout the study. We also measured serum periostin and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) by immunoassay and developed a population pharmacokinetics model to characterize RO7303509 serum concentrations.
    RESULTS: The study enrolled 49 HVs, with a median age of 39 (range 18-73) years. Ten (27.8%) RO7303509-treated subjects reported 24 AEs, and six (30.8%) placebo-treated subjects reported six AEs. The most frequent AEs related to the study drug were injection site reactions and infusion-related reactions. Maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) values for RO7303509 appeared to increase dose-proportionally across all doses tested. Serum concentrations across cohorts were best characterized by a two-compartment model plus a depot compartment with first-order SC absorption kinetics. No subjects tested positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) at baseline; one subject (2.8%; 50 mg IV) tested positive for ADAs at a single time point (day 15). No clear pharmacodynamic effects were observed for periostin or COMP upon TGFβ3 inhibition.
    CONCLUSIONS: RO7303509 was well tolerated at single SC doses up to 1200 mg in HVs with favorable pharmacokinetic data that appeared to increase dose-proportionally. TGFβ3-specific inhibition may be suitable for development as a chronic antifibrotic therapy.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN13175485.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Regdanvimab,一种单克隆抗体药物,是韩国第一种批准用于治疗2019年冠状病毒病的药物(COVID-19)。我们分析了regdanvimab对COVID-19δ变异体感染患者的治疗效果。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2021年5月26日至2022年1月30日在韩国两家三级COVID-19医院住院的COVID-19三角洲变异型感染患者的电子病历。分析regdanvimab的治疗效果,将患者分为regdanvimab和非regdanvimab组,并在年龄上进行1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配,入院时的严重程度,和COVID-19疫苗接种史。
    结果:在492名患者中,regdanvimab和非regdanvimab组262例(53.3%)和230例(46.7%),分别。PS匹配年龄组之后,入院时的严重程度,和COVID-19疫苗接种史,每组189名患者.30天住院死亡率(0.0%vs.1.6%,p=0.030),病情恶化的患者占严重/危重/死亡的比例(9.5%vs.16.4%,p=0.047),因肺炎加重而接受氧疗的比例(7.4%vs.16.4%,p=0.007),在regdanvimab组中,从住院第2天开始每日国家早期预警评分≥5分的比例显著降低.
    结论:我们发现regdanvimab降低了COVID-19δ变异体感染患者的病情加重率和死亡率。因此,建议在新变种病毒流行期间简化药物审批系统,以改善患者治疗方法的可用性和使用。为了促进这一点,需要相关的机构支持。
    BACKGROUND: Regdanvimab, a monoclonal antibody pharmaceutical, is the first Korean drug approved for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We analyzed the therapeutic efficacy of regdanvimab in patients with the COVID-19 delta variant infection.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients hospitalized at two Korean tertiary COVID-19 hospitals with COVID-19 delta variant infection between May 26, 2021, and January 30, 2022. To analyze the therapeutic efficacy of regdanvimab, the patients were divided into regdanvimab and non-regdanvimab groups and were 1:1 propensity-score (PS)-matched on age, severity at admission, and COVID-19 vaccination history.
    RESULTS: Of 492 patients, 262 (53.3%) and 230 (46.7%) were in the regdanvimab and non-regdanvimab groups, respectively. After PS matching the groups on age, severity at admission, and COVID-19 vaccination history, each group comprised 189 patients. The 30-day hospital mortality rates (0.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.030), proportions of patients with exacerbated conditions to severe/critical/died (9.5% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.047), proportions who received oxygen therapy because of pneumonia exacerbation (7.4% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.007), and proportions with a daily National Early Warning Score ≥ 5 from hospital day 2 were significantly lower in the regdanvimab group.
    CONCLUSIONS: We showed that regdanvimab reduced the exacerbation rates of conditions and mortality in patients with the COVID-19 delta variant infection. Thus, it is recommended to streamline the drug approval system during epidemics of new variant viruses to improve the availability and usage of therapeutics for patients. To facilitate this, relevant institutional support is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:QL1604是一种高度选择性的,针对程序性死亡蛋白1的人源化单克隆抗体.我们评估了QL1604联合化疗作为晚期宫颈癌患者一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
    方法:这是一个多中心,开放标签,单臂,第二阶段研究。在每个21天周期的第1天,招募未接受过全身化疗的晚期宫颈癌患者,接受QL1604联合紫杉醇和顺铂/卡铂,为期6个周期。其次是QL1604维持治疗。
    结果:纳入46例患者,中位随访时间为16.5个月。84.8%的患者患有复发性疾病,13.0%的患者患有IVB期疾病。根据晚期实体瘤(RECIST)v1.1的疗效评估标准,客观缓解率(ORR)为58.7%(27/46)。每个免疫RECIST的免疫ORR为60.9%(28/46)。中位反应持续时间为9.6个月(95%置信区间[CI]=5.5-不可估计)。中位无进展生存期为8.1个月(95%CI=5.7-14.0)。45例(97.8%)患者出现治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。最常见的≥3级TRAEs(>30%)为中性粒细胞计数减少(50.0%),贫血(32.6%),白细胞计数下降(30.4%)。
    结论:QL1604联合紫杉醇-顺铂/卡铂在晚期宫颈癌患者的一线治疗中显示出良好的抗肿瘤活性和可控的安全性。对于有禁忌症或不能耐受贝伐单抗的患者群体,程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂加化疗可能是一种潜在的治疗选择。这需要在III期验证性研究中进一步验证。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04864782。
    OBJECTIVE: QL1604 is a highly selective, humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the efficacy and safety of QL1604 plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer.
    METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Patients with advanced cervical cancer and not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy were enrolled to receive QL1604 plus paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles, followed by QL1604 maintenance treatment.
    RESULTS: Forty-six patients were enrolled and the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. An 84.8% of patients had recurrent disease and 13.0% had stage IVB disease. The objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Advanced Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was 58.7% (27/46). The immune ORR per immune RECIST was 60.9% (28/46). The median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=5.5-not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI=5.7-14.0). Forty-five (97.8%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs (>30%) were neutrophil count decrease (50.0%), anemia (32.6%), and white blood cell count decrease (30.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: QL1604 plus paclitaxel-cisplatin/carboplatin showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile as first-line treatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy may be a potential treatment option for the patient population who have contraindications or can\'t tolerate bevacizumab, which needs to be further verified in phase III confirmatory study. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04864782.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号