Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an extremely rare vascular tumor, which can pose a diagnostic dilemma. It affects women more than men and is mainly found in the liver, lung, and bone. To date, there are no known predisposing factors. Limited data are available on the management of EHE at metastatic stages. The only optimal treatments to prevent metastatic dissemination are surgical resection and amputation in addition to radiotherapy at early stages. The oncologist in this rare entity plays an important role in the guided and standardized management of this disease, especially for advanced stages. In this article, we report the case of a 74-year-old patient admitted with swelling on the outer aspect of the right calf associated with pain and total functional impairment of the limb. The diagnosis favored a high-risk vascular tumor resembling EHE, confirmed by bone (tibia) and soft tissue biopsy. The patient underwent staging investigations, revealing diffuse metastases to the liver, bones, and lungs. The objective of this article is to advocate for oncological intervention in this entity, particularly in the advanced stages of the disease. Despite its rarity, the advancement of clinical trials and therapeutic recommendations remains crucial for optimal treatment.

Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Its origin is linked to intraepithelial lesions caused by high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, detected in 99.7% of cases. Early screening is essential to prevent cancer development from these lesions. Molecular methods are more specific and offer the possibility of being performed through a self-collected sample by the patient, thus contributing to increasing screening coverage for this pathology. This study aim was to map the medical-scientific literature on existing protocols for self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. A search strategy was developed using the following keywords and their synonyms: \"self-sampling,\" \"professional sampling,\" and \"HPV\", on the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library - BVS, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research NHS EED, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The search strategy was formulated to identify relevant studies and describe their main characteristics, such as patient acceptance of self-sampling, cost differences between the tests used, and the accuracy of self-sampling compared to the gold standard test. A total of 876 studies were found, and 33 of those studies were included in this review. Out of these, 10 studies were domized clinical trials involving 46,751 patients, and 23 observational studies included 142,795 patients. Regarding acceptance, most studies reported a preference for self-sampling. Sensitivity analyses from various studies also showed that the low cost of self-sampling kits generally increased cost-effectiveness. The study concluded that using HPV testing on self-collected samples is a viable strategy for monitoring women with HPV.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of salivary gland secretory carcinoma (SC) in fine-needle aspiration specimens is challenging because its low-grade nature makes it difficult to differentiate it from various benign or malignant salivary gland neoplasms. Currently, the gold standard is demonstration of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. However, the decision for ordering this costly molecular testing can be facilitated by the correct recognition of its cytomorphological features. The aim of the review was to determine the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosis of salivary gland SC. The secondary objective was to recognize varied cytomorphological patterns, characteristic features of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms.
METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane review, and PROSPERO databases were searched for studies having the following key search terms: (\"secretory carcinoma of salivary gland\" OR \"mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary gland\") AND (\"Cytology\" OR \"Cytological features\" OR \"aspirate\" OR \"cytodiagnosis\") published in the time frame of 2010 to June 2023. Studies reporting cytological features of the salivary gland tumors which were confirmed/diagnosed as SC on molecular investigation, were included in the systematic review. Finally, seventeen studies reporting a total of 45 cases were included in the metanalysis.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the FNAC in diagnosing SC in salivary gland is 27.7% (95% CI: 16.6-42.5%). The LR+ (positive likelihood ratio) was 0.654 (0.344-1.245), LR- (negative likelihood ratio) was 1.023 (0.538-1.946), and diagnostic odds ratio was 0.421 (0.129-1.374). The molecular testing and/or immunohistochemistry performed on cell block increased the diagnostic accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of subtle cytomorphological patterns, i.e., papillary formation, clusters, and singly dispersed cells along with presence of fine intracytoplasmic vacuolations were the characteristic findings in majority of cases, confirmed with diagnostic molecular profiling. This may be helpful in identification of this rare entity with limited published literature and help in increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Patients with DEL phenotype, a D variant with a low number of D antigens per red blood cell, are routinely typed as RhD-negative in serology testing and are detectable only by adsorption and elution techniques or molecular methods. DEL is of clinical importance worldwide, as indicated by its genotype-phenotype discrepancies among different populations and its potential to cause anti-D alloimmunization when DEL phenotype individuals are inadvertently managed as RhD-negative. This narrative review summarized the DEL alleles causing DEL phenotype and the underlying mechanisms. The clinical consequences and current molecular testing approach were discussed to manage the transfusion needs of patients and donors with DEL phenotype.

Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne infection caused by kinetoplastid protozoans in the genera Leishmania and Endotrypanum. The disease occurs worldwide in the tropics and subtropics and can be particularly burdensome in resource-limited settings. Diseases caused by leishmaniasis range in severity from mild cutaneous lesions to life-threatening visceral and disfiguring mucocutaneous illnesses. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is needed to ensure proper clinical management of patients afflicted with this disease. Complicating matters of diagnosis and treatment are the diversity of species within these 2 genera and the variable specificity of diagnostic assays. This mini-review provides laboratory professionals with an overview of Leishmania epidemiology, biology, pathogenesis, clinical presentations, and treatments with additional emphasis placed on the nuances involved in diagnosis.

COVID-19, a novel coronavirus disease, has provoked a variety of health and safety concerns, and socioeconomic challenges around the globe. The laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 was quickly established utilizing nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT) after the disease causing virus has been identified, and its genetic sequence has been determined. In addition to NAAT, serological tests based on antibodies testing against SARS-CoV-2 were introduced for diagnostic and epidemiologic studies. Other biochemical investigations include monitoring of peripheral blood cells count, platelets/lymphocyte ratio, coagulation profile, cardiac, and inflammatory markers such as cytokines storm are also crucial in combating COVID-19 pandemic. Further, accurate and reliable laboratory results for SARS-CoV-2 play very important role in the initiation of early treatment and timely management of COVID-19 patients, provide support in clinical decision-making process to control infection, and detection of asymptomatic cases. The Task Force on Coronavirus-19 constituted by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) has recognized informational framework for epidemiology, pathogenesis, and recommended the PCR-based analysis, serological and biochemical assays for analysis, monitoring, and management of disease. This literature review provides an overview of the currently used diagnostic techniques in clinical laboratories for the diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and management of COVID-19 patients. We concluded that each assays differ in their performance characteristics and the utilization of multiple techniques is necessary for the accurate diagnosis and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS: These recommendations apply to adult patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does testing for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 mutations provide new additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: Repeat IDH mutation testing is not necessary if the tumor is histologically similar to the primary tumor and the patient\'s clinical course is as expected.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does repeat testing for MGMT promoter methylation provide new or additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation and what methods of detection are optimal?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: Repeat MGMT promoter methylation is not recommended.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does EGFR amplification or mutation testing provide management or prognostic information beyond that provided by histologic analysis and if performed on previous tissue samples, does it need to be repeated?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: In cases that are difficult to classify as glioblastoma on histologic features EGFR amplification testing may help in classification. If a previous EGFR amplification was detected, repeat testing is not necessary. Repeat EGFR amplification or mutational testing may be recommended in patients in which target therapy is being considered.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does large panel or whole genome sequencing provide management or prognostic information beyond that derived from histologic analysis?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: Primary or repeat large panel or whole genome sequencing may be considered in patients who are eligible or interested in molecularly guided therapy or clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma should immune checkpoint biomarker testing be performed to provide management and prognostic information beyond that obtained from histologic analysis?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: The current evidence does not support making PD-L1 or mismatch repair (MMR) enzyme activity a component of standard testing.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma are there meaningful biomarkers for bevacizumab responsiveness and does their assessment provide additional information for tumor management and prognosis beyond that learned by standard histologic analysis?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: No established Bevacizumab biomarkers are currently available based upon the inclusion criteria of this guideline.

Comprehensive next-generation sequencing panels are leading to detection of rare gene fusion events. EFGR-RAD51 fusion is a rare oncogenic finding and clinical data for management of this condition is scarce. We report a widely metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in a never-smoker young male patient with sustained near-complete systemic and intracranial response to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI). We also review the available data of other TKIs in this scenario and underscore the role of comprehensive molecular testing for NSCLC.

Molecular tests are being used increasingly as an auxiliary diagnostic tool so as to avoid a diagnostic surgery approach for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). Previous test versions, Thyroseq v2 and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), have proven shortcomings in malignancy detection performance.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the established Thyroseq v3, Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC), and microRNA-based assays versus prior iterations in ITNs, in light of \"rule-in\" and \"rule-out\" concepts. It further analyzed the impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) reclassification and Bethesda cytological subtypes on the performance of molecular tests.
Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science were the databases used for the present research, a process that lasted until September 2020. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and area under the curve (AUC) for each panel. The conducted sensitivity analyses addressed different Bethesda categories and NIFTP thresholds.
A total of 40 eligible studies were included with 7,831 ITNs from 7,565 patients. Thyroseq v3 showed the best overall performance (AUC 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.97), followed by Afirma GSC (AUC 0.90; 0.87-0.92) and Thyroseq v2 (AUC 0.88; 0.85-0.90). In terms of \"rule-out\" abilities Thyroseq v3 (NLR 0.02; 95%CI: 0.0-2.69) surpassed Afirma GEC (NLR 0.18; 95%CI: 0.10-0.33). Thyroseq v2 (PLR 3.5; 95%CI: 2.2-5.5) and Thyroseq v3 (PLR 2.8; 95%CI: 1.2-6.3) achieved superior \"rule-in\" properties compared to Afirma GSC (PLR 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-2.8). Evidence for Thyroseq v3 seems to have higher quality, notwithstanding the paucity of studies. Both Afirma GEC and Thyroseq v2 performance have been affected by NIFTP reclassification. ThyGenNEXT/ThyraMIR and RosettaGX show prominent preliminary results.
The newly emerged tests, Thyroseq v3 and Afirma GSC, designed for a \"rule-in\" purpose, have been proved to outperform in abilities to rule out malignancy, thus surpassing previous tests no longer available, Thyroseq 2 and Afirma GEC. However, Thyroseq v2 still ranks as the best rule-in molecular test.
http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.