mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

轻度认知障碍 (MCI)
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:轻度认知障碍(MCI)是痴呆发展的已知危险因素。非药理学措施(如基于艺术的干预)对认知的潜在益处越来越受到关注。本系统综述研究了一种基于艺术的干预形式的影响的证据,视觉艺术治疗(增值税),MCI老年人的认知和心理健康。
    方法:纳入了评估VAT在60岁以上MCI老年人中疗效的随机对照和准实验性试验。对电子数据库进行了搜索:MEDLINE,CINAHL,Embase和PsycINFO。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的关键评估和提取工具被用于偏见风险评估和数据提取,分别。使用叙述性描述性方法来概述调查结果。
    结果:从筛选的4311篇文章中确定了7项研究。五项研究报告了认知能力的改善,其中两个报告在6-9个月内持续改善,而其余3项研究仅在干预后即刻显示改善.在六项研究中,有四项研究了增值税对参与者心理健康的影响。研究的总体方法学质量从五个随机对照试验中的四个中等,在准实验研究和一项RCT中名列前茅。然而,在小样本量的背景下,低研究能力限制了这些研究对感兴趣人群的适用性.
    结论:VAT可能是一种有效的非药物干预措施,可以增强认知功能并为MCI老年人的心理健康提供益处。鉴于现有的研究有限,随着大多数人在过去5年里出现,需要进一步的研究来确认这些报告的好处,以及确定增值税是否影响MCI认知能力下降的进展。
    BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a known risk factor for the development of dementia. The potential benefits on cognition from non-pharmacological measures such as art-based interventions are of increasing interest. This systematic review examines the evidence for the impact of one form of art-based intervention, visual art therapy (VAT), on the cognition and psychological wellbeing of older people with MCI.
    METHODS: Randomised controlled and quasi-experimental trials evaluating the efficacy of VAT in older persons aged over 60 years with MCI were included. A search was performed on electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal and extraction tools were utilised for risk of bias assessment and data extraction, respectively. A narrative descriptive approach was used to outline the findings.
    RESULTS: Seven studies were identified from 4311 articles screened. Improvement in cognition was reported in five studies, with two of these reporting sustained improvement at 6-9 months, while the remaining three studies showed improvement only at the immediate post-intervention period. A positive impact was reported in four of six studies that examined the effect of VAT on participant psychological wellbeing. The overall methodological quality of the studies ranged from moderate in four of five RCTs, to high in the quasi-experimental studies and one RCT. However, the low study power in the context of small sample sizes limits the applicability of these studies to the population of interest.
    CONCLUSIONS: VAT is potentially an effective non-pharmacological intervention that may enhance cognition and provide benefits for psychological wellbeing in older persons with MCI. Given the limited studies available, with the majority emerging over the last 5 years, further research is required to confirm these reported benefits, as well as to determine whether VAT impacts on the progression of cognitive decline in MCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:综合证据并总结与舞蹈运动干预(DMA)在轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人中的有效性和可行性相关的研究结果,阿尔茨海默病(AD),和痴呆症;系统地绘制现有研究差距和未来实践的研究方向。
    方法:使用六个电子数据库进行了系统搜索:WebofScience,PubMed,PsycINFO,MEDLINE,ScienceDirect,和Cochrane中央控制试验登记册。纳入研究的方法学质量使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具进行随机试验(RoB2)和非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)进行评估。
    结果:范围审查中包括了29项舞蹈干预研究(13项RCT研究):MCI的62%,AD的10%,和28%的痴呆症;总共1708名参与者(女性=1247;男性=461),年龄从63.8(±5.24)到85.8(±5.27)岁。8项RCT研究纳入荟萃分析;结果表明,舞蹈干预对全球认知有显著影响,记忆,balance,并显著减少抑郁症。对执行功能没有显著影响。
    结论:舞蹈是一种非药物,有效,负担得起的,并参与干预,可用作MCI,AD老年人的补充治疗,和痴呆症。
    To synthesize evidence and summarize research findings related to the effectiveness and feasibility of dance movement intervention (DMI) in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer\'s disease (AD), and dementia; to systemically map existing research gaps and research directions for future practice.
    A systematic search was conducted using six electronic databases: Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2) and The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).
    29 dance intervention studies (13 RCT studies) were included in the scoping review: 62% of MCI, 10% of AD, and 28% of dementia; a total of 1708 participants (Female=1247; Male=461) aged from 63.8 ( ± 5.24) to 85.8 ( ± 5.27) years old. Eight RCT studies were included in the meta-analysis; results indicated that dance interventions had a significant effect on global cognition, memory, balance, and significantly decreased depression. No significant effects were found for executive function.
    Dance is a non-pharmacological, effective, affordable, and engaging intervention that can be used as a complementary treatment for older adults with MCI, AD, and dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:痴呆与认知和功能下降相关,显著影响生活质量。目前还没有治疗痴呆症的方法,因此,重要的是在早期阶段管理痴呆症并延迟恶化。以前的研究已经记录了太极拳对早期痴呆症患者的一系列健康益处,然而,没有人系统地将这些影响与其潜在机制相结合。本研究的目的是(1)确定神经认知,心理,太极拳早期痴呆症患者的身体健康益处,(2)探索这些影响的潜在机制。
    方法:我们在MEDLINE中搜索了50岁及以上患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)或早期痴呆的成人太极拳的系统评价(SRs)和随机对照试验(RCTs)。PubMed,科克伦图书馆,EMBASE,和主要的中文数据库。未应用语言或出版物限制。评估偏倚风险。
    结果:8个SR的荟萃分析和6个其他已发表的随机对照试验显示,太极拳在改善整体认知功能方面的发现不一致,注意力和执行功能,记忆和语言,和感知运动功能。抑郁症状的组间差异无统计学意义。RCT结果表明,太极拳可以减轻关节炎疼痛并减缓痴呆的进展。尚未发现有关MCI或早期痴呆的研究,以调查太极拳的潜在机制。相反,纳入了9项关于健康成人的机制研究.这些表明太极拳可能通过增加区域大脑活动来改善记忆和认知,大规模网络功能连接,和区域灰质量。
    结论:太极拳对MCI和早期痴呆患者神经认知结果的影响仍无定论。需要进一步的高质量临床试验和机制研究,以了解太极拳是否以及如何作为一种成功的干预措施来延缓认知能力下降风险增加的人的恶化和生活质量。
    Dementia is associated with cognitive and functional decline that significantly impacts quality of life. There is currently no cure for dementia, thus, it is important to manage dementia in the early stages and delay deterioration. Previous studies have documented a range of health benefits of Tai Chi in people with early-stage dementia, however, none have systematically integrated these effects with their underlying mechanisms. The aims of this study were to (1) identify the neurocognitive, psychological, and physical health benefits of Tai Chi oi people with early-stage dementia, and (2) explore the underlying mechanisms of these effects.
    We searched systematic reviews (SRs) and randomised control trials (RCTs) on Tai Chi for adults aged 50 years and older with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early-stage dementia in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and major Chinese databases. No language or publication restrictions were applied. Risk of bias was assessed.
    Eight SRs with meta-analyses and 6 additional published RCTs revealed inconsistent findings of Tai Chi on improving global cognitive function, attention and executive function, memory and language, and perceptual-motor function. There was no significant between-group difference in depressive symptoms. The results from the RCTs showed that Tai Chi can reduce arthritis pain and slow the progress of dementia. No studies on MCI or early-stage dementia investigating the underlying mechanisms of Tai Chi were identified. Instead, nine mechanistic studies on healthy adults were included. These suggested that Tai Chi may improve memory and cognition via increased regional brain activity, large-scale network functional connectivity, and regional grey matter volume.
    The effects of Tai Chi on neurocognitive outcomes in people with MCI and early-stage dementia are still inconclusive. Further high-quality clinical trials and mechanistic studies are needed to understand if and how Tai Chi may be applied as a successful intervention to delay deterioration and improve the quality of life in people with an increased risk of cognitive decline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:主观认知障碍(SCI)会大大增加痴呆的风险,并且通常被概念化为认知衰退连续性的临床前无症状阶段。由于缺乏可用于治疗SCI和降低痴呆风险的药物干预措施,以及草药和营养药物的普及,本综述的主要目的是研究中草药和营养药物(相对于对照)对有或无SCI的老年人的认知功能和安全性的疗效.次要目的是描述研究特征并评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
    方法:五个数据库(Cochrane,MEDLINE,CINAHL,PsycInfo,和EMBASE)从数据库开始进行搜索,每周建立警报,直到2022年9月18日审查完成。如果文章包括以下内容,则符合资格:有和没有SCI的老年人的研究人群,草药和营养药物作为干预措施,评估认知结局,并进行随机对照试验。
    结果:数据摘自21/7666合格的全文文章,并评估了方法学偏倚的风险(SCI=9/21;无SCI=12/21).大多数研究(20/21)采用平行,随机化,安慰剂对照设计,长度为12周。草药补充剂被广泛使用(17/21),即银杏(8/21)或Bacopamonnieri(6/21)的一种形式。认知的测量因研究而异,14/21报告随着时间的推移,至少一个认知功能领域有所改善,干预组(与对照组相比)。共有14/21项研究被认为具有总体上较高的方法学偏倚风险,6/21有一些担忧,只有一项研究(使用SCI人群)被评估为方法学偏倚风险较低.
    结论:总体而言,这篇综述发现,对于有SCI和无SCI的老年人,草药和营养药物的认知功能疗效和安全性方面的证据质量较低,因为研究中偏倚的风险较高.此外,在未来的研究能够更准确地确定干预措施对该人群的疗效之前,还需要在SCI的分类和理解以及选择适当的试验主要结局方面做进一步的工作.
    Subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) substantially increases dementia risk and is often conceptualised as the preclinical asymptomatic phase of the cognitive decline continuum. Due to the lack of pharmacological interventions available to treat SCI and reduce dementia risk, and the popularity of herbal and nutritional medicines, the primary aim of this review was to investigate the efficacy on cognitive function and safety of herbal and nutritional medicines (relative to a control) for older adults with and without SCI. The secondary aims were to describe the study characteristics and assess the methodological quality of included studies.
    Five databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE) were searched from database inception with weekly alerts established until review finalisation on 18 September 2022. Articles were eligible if they included the following: study population of older adults with and without SCI, herbal and nutritional medicines as an intervention, evaluated cognitive outcomes and were randomised control trials.
    Data were extracted from 21/7666 eligible full-text articles, and the risk of methodological bias was assessed (with SCI = 9/21; without SCI = 12/21). Most studies (20/21) employed parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled designs and were 12 weeks in length. Herbal supplements were widely used (17/21), namely a form of Ginkgo biloba (8/21) or Bacopa monnieri (6/21). Measures of cognition varied across studies, with 14/21 reporting improvements in at least one domain of cognitive functioning over time, in the intervention group (compared to control). A total of 14/21 studies were deemed as having an overall high methodological risk of bias, 6/21 had some concerns, and only one study (using an SCI population) was assessed as having a low risk of methodological bias.
    Overall, this review found that there is a low quality of evidence regarding the efficacy of cognitive function and safety of herbal and nutritional medicines for older adults with and without SCI, due to a high risk of bias across studies. Additionally, further work needs to be done in classifying and understanding SCI and selecting appropriate trial primary outcomes before future studies can more accurately determine the efficacy of interventions for this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:评估老年MCI患者的最佳截止MoCA评分。
    方法:系统综述和荟萃分析。
    方法:文章来自PubMed,奥维德,Embase,科克伦图书馆,PsycINFO,CBM,CNKI,使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)对万方和CQVIP进行评估。使用ReviewManager5.3进行评估,并通过Stata14.0使用双变量随机效应荟萃分析(BRMA)对数据进行荟萃分析。
    结果:从数据库中检索到17篇文章,当截止时间为24/25和25/26时,它们代表相同的诊断值;此外,AUC为0.96,对轻度认知障碍筛查具有较高的预测效度.然而,灵敏度较高,为25/26(se=0.95,sp=0.80),而24/25的特异性更高(se=0.92,sp=0.89)。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal cut-off MoCA score for elderly individuals with MCI.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Ovid, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and CQVIP and were assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Figures of the assessment were made by using Review Manager 5.3, and a meta-analysis of the data was conducted by using Bivariate Random-effects Meta-Analysis (BRMA) via Stata 14.0.
    RESULTS: Seventeen articles were retrieved from the database, and when the cut-offs were 24/25 and 25/26, they represented the same diagnostic value; in addition, the AUC was 0.96, which demonstrated high predictive validity for mild cognitive impairment screening. However, the sensitivity was higher with 25/26 (se=0.95, sp=0.80), whereas the specificity was higher with 24/25 (se=0.92, sp=0.89).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估认知评估在多导睡眠图证实的特发性或孤立性快速眼动睡眠行为障碍中预测表型转换的作用,通过对特发性REM睡眠行为障碍患者进行纵向综合神经心理学评估的范围审查。文献检索(2006-2022)产生了1034条记录,选择20例进行分析。样本包括来自八个不同队列和五个国家的899名患者。我们提取了临床进化的数据,轻度认知障碍诊断,使用神经心理学测试,和认知领域的分类。测试,认知领域,轻度认知障碍的定义在整个研究中是不同的,排除荟萃分析。10项研究(50%)评估了轻度认知障碍的存在;14项研究(70%)将神经心理学测试分为3项(6项研究,21.4%)和七个(1项研究,7.1%)认知领域。最常用的测试是语义流畅度,Stroop颜色词测试,跟踪测试A和B,数字跨度,雷伊听觉语言学习测试,还有Rey-Osterrieth的身影.除数字跨度外,所有数字跨度均在预测表型转换中发挥作用。作者并没有一致地将测试分配给特定的认知领域。总之,我们讨论了研究之间的方法论差异,并强调了神经心理学数据获取和呈现的标准化框架的必要性,基于涵盖测试选择的多层次方法,域分配,和轻度认知障碍的诊断标准。
    The objective of this study was to assess the role of cognitive evaluation in the prediction of phenoconversion in polysomnography-confirmed idiopathic or isolated rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, through a scoping review focussing on a longitudinal comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of patients with idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder. A literature search (2006-2022) yielded 1034 records, and 20 were selected for analysis. The sample included 899 patients from eight different cohorts and five countries. We extracted data on clinical evolution, mild cognitive impairment diagnosis, neuropsychological tests used, and classification of cognitive domains. Tests, cognitive domains, and mild cognitive impairment definitions were heterogeneous across the studies, precluding a meta-analysis. Ten studies (50%) evaluated the presence of mild cognitive impairment; 14 studies (70%) grouped neuropsychological tests into between three (6 studies, 21.4%) and seven (1 study, 7.1%) cognitive domains. The most frequently used tests were semantic fluency, Stroop colour word test, trail making test A and B, digit span, Rey auditory verbal learning test, and Rey-Osterrieth figure. All except digit span showed a role in predicting phenoconversion. The authors did not consistently assign tests to specific cognitive domains. In conclusion, we discuss methodological differences between the studies and highlight the need for a standardised framework for neuropsychological data acquisition and presentation, based on a multilevel approach covering test selection, domain assignment, and mild cognitive impairment diagnostic criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    Sarcopenia is a progressive skeletal muscle disorder involving the loss of muscle mass and function, associated with an increased risk of disability and frailty. Though its prevalence in dementia has been studied, its occurrence in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has not been well established. As MCI is often a prelude to dementia, our study aims to investigate the prevalence of MCI among individuals with sarcopenia and to also ascertain whether sarcopenia is independently associated with MCI. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles on MCI and/or sarcopenia published from inception to 1 February 2022. We reviewed the available literature on the number of individuals with MCI and/or sarcopenia and calculated odds ratios (ORs) of sarcopenia in MCI and MCI in sarcopenia, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using the meta package in Stata, Version 12.0. A total of 13 studies and 27 428 patients were included in our analysis. The pooled prevalence of MCI in participants with sarcopenia was 20.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.140-0.269) in a total sample of 2923 cases with a high level of heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2  = 95.4%). The overall prevalence of sarcopenia with MCI was 9.1% (95% CI: 0.047-0.134, P < 0.001; I2  = 93.0%). For overall ORs, there were 23 364 subjects with a mean age of 73 years; the overall adjusted OR between MCI and sarcopenia was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.31-1.62). Slight heterogeneity in both adjusted ORs (P = 0.46; I2  = 0%) was noted across the studies. The prevalence of MCI is relatively high in patients with sarcopenia, and sarcopenia may be a risk factor for MCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    轻度认知障碍(MCI)是一种综合征,其特征是认知能力的下降大于个人年龄和教育水平的预期,但这并不影响日常生活活动。建立MCI的患病率对于临床和研究领域都非常重要。事实上,在一定比例的情况下,MCI代表痴呆发展的前驱状态。因此,重要的是要确定MCI的特征,使我们能够预测痴呆的发展。此外,最初发现认知能力下降可以允许早期实施旨在抵消或减缓认知能力下降的预防计划。为此,重要的是要清楚了解MCI的患病率,因此,使用的诊断标准。根据这些问题,本系统综述旨在分析MCI患病率,探索确定MCI患病率的诊断方法。审查过程是根据PRISMA声明进行的。筛选了三千一百一十一篇国际文章,保留了六十六人。在这些研究中,其中涉及157,035名受试者,MCI的患病率为1.2%~87%.综述结果显示,由于受试者招募的差异,研究之间存在很大的异质性,诊断标准,评估的认知领域,和其他方法学方面解释了更高范围的MCI患病率。这种巨大的异质性阻碍了对MCI的患病率得出任何确切的结论。
    Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive performance greater than expected for an individual\'s age and education level, but that does not interfere much with daily life activities. Establishing the prevalence of MCI is very important for both clinical and research fields. In fact, in a certain percentage of cases, MCI represents a prodromal condition for the development of dementia. Accordingly, it is important to identify the characteristics of MCI that allow us to predict the development of dementia. Also, initial detection of cognitive decline can allow the early implementation of prevention programs aimed at counteracting or slowing it down. To this end, it is important to have a clear picture of the prevalence of MCI and, consequently, of the diagnostic criteria used. According to these issues, this systematic review aims to analyze MCI prevalence, exploring the methods for diagnosing MCI that determine its prevalence. The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Three thousand one hundred twenty-one international articles were screened, and sixty-six were retained. In these studies, which involved 157,035 subjects, the prevalence of MCI ranged from 1.2 to 87%. The review results showed a large heterogeneity among studies due to differences in the subjects\' recruitment, the diagnostic criteria, the assessed cognitive domains, and other methodological aspects that account for a higher range of MCI prevalence. This large heterogeneity prevents drawing any firm conclusion about the prevalence of MCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    检测血浆tau生物标志物是不可能的,因为它们在血液样品中的浓度很低。目前,新的高灵敏度检测使它成为现实。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以测试血浆tau蛋白在诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)或轻度认知障碍(MCI)中的准确性。
    我们搜索了PubMed,科克伦,Embase和WebofScience数据库,并进行了相关亚组分析,使用R编程语言进行敏感性分析和出版偏差分析。
    共纳入56项研究。血液t-tau和p-tau水平从对照组到MCI再到AD患者增加,并在AD的成对比较中显示出显着变化,MCI与正常认知。在不同认知时期,P-tau217比p-tau181和p-tau231更敏感。此外,超灵敏的分析平台,免疫磁性减少(IMR),增加了tau蛋白的诊断价值,尤其是t-tau的诊断价值。
    t-tau和p-tau都是合适的AD血液生物标志物,和p-tau217比其他tau生物标志物更敏感,以区分MCI和AD。检测技术也对生物标志物的结果有影响。IMR的新的超灵敏分析平台增加了t-tau和p-tau生物标志物的诊断价值。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,注册号:CRD42021264701。
    UNASSIGNED: Detecting plasma tau biomarkers used to be impossible due to their low concentrations in blood samples. Currently, new high-sensitivity assays made it a reality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to test the accuracy of plasma tau protein in diagnosing Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases, and conducted correlation subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis using R Programming Language.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 56 studies were included. Blood t-tau and p-tau levels increased from controls to MCI to AD patients, and showed significant changes in pairwise comparisons of AD, MCI and normal cognition. P-tau217 was more sensitive than p-tau181 and p-tau231 in different cognition periods. In addition, ultrasensitive analytical platforms, immunomagnetic reduction (IMR), increased the diagnostic value of tau proteins, especially the diagnostic value of t-tau.
    UNASSIGNED: Both t-tau and p-tau are suitable AD blood biomarkers, and p-tau217 is more sensitive than other tau biomarkers to differentiate MCI and AD. Detection techniques also have an impact on biomarkers\' results. New ultrasensitive analytical platforms of IMR increase the diagnostic value of both t-tau and p-tau biomarkers.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, registration number: CRD42021264701.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本研究旨在探讨中药(CHM)对轻度认知障碍(MCI)的利弊。
    电子搜索在两个英文和四个中文数据库中进行,直到2021年12月。与无干预相比,CHM的随机临床试验,纳入MCI的安慰剂或其他疗法.
    确定了49项随机对照试验(48项完成试验和1项方案)。纳入试验的总体方法学质量相对较低。这篇综述发现,与没有干预或安慰剂相比,CHM可显着减少进展为痴呆的患者数量(RR0.36,95%CI0.22-0.58),并增加MMSE(MD1.96,95%CI1.41-2.50)和MoCA(MD2.44,95%CI1.57-3.31)评估的认知功能。不同CHM的亚组分析显示,通过MMSE(MD2.03,95%CI1.18-2.88)和MoCA(MD3.11,95%CI1.90-4.33)评估时,银杏叶片可以显着改善认知功能。与西医相比,CHM可显着增加MMSE(MD0.8895%CI0.46-1.30)和MoCA(MD0.87,95%CI0.33-1.41)的得分,但ADL评分差异无统计学意义(SMD-0.61,95%CI-1.49~0.27)。没有RCT报告生活质量。在22个报告不良事件的RCT中,CHM组和对照组之间无统计学差异。
    CHM,特别是银杏叶提取物,可以帮助防止进展为痴呆症和改善认知功能和日常生活活动能力。由于当前试验的质量较低,因此需要更多合格的随机对照试验来确认结论。
    唯一标识符:CRD42020157148。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to explore the benefits and harms of Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
    UNASSIGNED: Electronic searching was conducted in two English and four Chinese databases till 2021 December. Randomized clinical trials on CHM compared to no intervention, placebo or other therapies for MCI were included.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-nine RCTs (48 finished trials and 1 protocol) were identified. The overall methodological quality of included trials was relatively low. This review found that compared to no intervention or placebo, CHM can significantly decrease the number of patients who progressed to dementia (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.22-0.58) and increase the cognitive function assessed by MMSE (MD 1.96, 95% CI 1.41-2.50) and MoCA (MD 2.44, 95% CI 1.57-3.31). The subgroup analysis of different CHM showed that Ginko leaf tablets can significantly improve the cognitive function compared to no intervention or placebo when assessed by MMSE (MD 2.03, 95% CI 1.18-2.88) and MoCA (MD 3.11, 95% CI 1.90-4.33). Compared to western medicine, CHM can significantly increase the score of MMSE (MD 0.88 95% CI 0.46-1.30) and MoCA (MD 0.87, 95% CI 0.33-1.41), but there was no significant difference on the score of ADL (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -1.49 to 0.27). None of the RCTs reported on the quality of life. Of 22 RCTs that reported adverse events, there was no statistical difference between the CHM and the control group.
    UNASSIGNED: CHM, Ginko leaf extracts in particular, could help to prevent progression into dementia and to improve cognitive function and ability of daily living activities. More qualified RCTs were needed to confirm the conclusion due to the low quality of current trials.
    UNASSIGNED: Unique Identifier: CRD42020157148.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号