mental disease

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知和情绪状态影响个人和社会日常活动,对生活质量有很大影响,尤其是老年人。
    目的:这项横断面研究旨在调查克里特岛哈尼亚地区老年人口饮食习惯的心理情感状况,希腊。
    方法:通过简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评估了101名老年受试者的认知状态,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评估情绪。使用经过验证的食物频率问卷评估营养状况。
    结果:多变量统计分析,调整后的年龄,婚姻状况,教育,和合并症,在男性中,MMSE评分与蔬菜消费量呈正相关(RR1.18;95CI1.03~1.34),与马铃薯消费量呈负相关(RR0.83;95CI0.72~0.95).相反,在女性中,没有观察到任何食物的统计学显著关联.Further,在男性中,鸡肉对情感状态有保护作用(RR0.45;95CI0.27~0.77),鱼(RR0.41;95CI0.21~0.82),水果(RR0.70;95CI0.52-0.94),谷物(RR0.67;95CI0.53-0.87),和奶酪(RR0.78;95CI0.63-0.97)的消费量。在女性中,调整后的模型显示了蔬菜消费的显著有害影响(RR1.33;95CI1.02~1.73)。
    结论:主要以蔬菜为基础的饮食-除了水果和豆类外-与男性更好的认知状态相关,虽然不是女性。水果摄入量较高,和鱼一样,鸡肉,男性的奶酪与更好的情感状态有关,表明充足的蛋白质供应可能在维持情绪平衡方面发挥作用。
    BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood status influence both personal and social daily activities, with great impact on life quality, particularly among the elderly population.
    OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the psycho-affective status concerning eating habits within an elderly population of the Chania area in Crete, Greece.
    METHODS: Cognitive status was assessed in 101 elderly subjects through the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and mood was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Nutritional status was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire.
    RESULTS: Multivariable statistical analysis, after adjustment for age, marital status, education, and comorbidity, highlighted among males a positive association of the MMSE score with vegetable consumption (RR 1.18; 95%CI 1.03‒1.34) and a negative association with potato consumption (RR 0.83; 95%CI 0.72‒0.95). Conversely, among females, no statistically significant association was observed for any food. Further, among males, a protective effect on affective status was identified for chicken meat (RR 0.45; 95%CI 0.27‒0.77), fish (RR 0.41; 95%CI 0.21‒0.82), fruit (RR 0.70; 95%CI 0.52‒0.94), cereals (RR 0.67; 95%CI 0.53‒0.87), and cheese (RR 0.78; 95%CI 0.63‒0.97) consumption. Among females, the adjusted model showed a significant detrimental effect of vegetable consumption (RR 1.33; 95%CI 1.02‒1.73).
    CONCLUSIONS: A predominantly vegetable-based diet-with the notable exception of fruits and legumes-was associated with better cognitive status in males, albeit not in females. A higher intake of fruit, as well as fish, chicken meat, and cheese among males was associated with a better affective status, indicating that adequate protein supply may play a role in maintaining emotional balance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,聊天机器人在心理健康支持中的使用呈指数增长,研究表明它们可能有效治疗心理健康问题。最近,已经引入了称为数字人类的视觉化身的使用。数字人类有能力使用面部表情作为人机交互的另一个维度。重要的是研究基于文本的聊天机器人和数字人类与心理健康服务交互之间的情绪反应和可用性偏好的差异。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨在健康参与者进行测试时,数字人机界面和纯文本聊天机器人界面的可用性在多大程度上不同。使用BETSY(行为,情感,治疗系统,和您)使用2个不同的界面:具有拟人化特征的数字人类和纯文本用户界面。我们还着手探索聊天机器人生成的关于心理健康的对话(特定于每个界面)如何影响自我报告的感觉和生物识别技术。
    方法:我们探索了具有拟人化特征的数字人类在多大程度上不同于传统的纯文本聊天机器人,通过系统可用性量表感知可用性,通过脑电图的情绪反应,和亲密的感觉。健康参与者(n=45)被随机分为两组,使用具有拟人化特征的数字人类(n=25)或没有这种特征的纯文本聊天机器人(n=20)。各组比较采用线性回归分析和t检验。
    结果:在人口统计学特征方面,纯文本和数字人群之间没有观察到差异。纯文本聊天机器人的平均系统可用性量表评分为75.34(SD10.01;范围57-90),而数字人机界面的平均系统可用性评分为64.80(SD14.14;范围40-90)。两组都将各自的聊天机器人界面的可用性评分为平均水平或高于平均水平。女性更有可能报告对BETSY感到恼火。
    结论:人们认为纯文本聊天机器人比数字人类更人性化,尽管脑电图测量没有显着差异。男性参与者对两个界面都表现出较低的烦恼,与以前报道的发现相反。
    BACKGROUND: The use of chatbots in mental health support has increased exponentially in recent years, with studies showing that they may be effective in treating mental health problems. More recently, the use of visual avatars called digital humans has been introduced. Digital humans have the capability to use facial expressions as another dimension in human-computer interactions. It is important to study the difference in emotional response and usability preferences between text-based chatbots and digital humans for interacting with mental health services.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore to what extent a digital human interface and a text-only chatbot interface differed in usability when tested by healthy participants, using BETSY (Behavior, Emotion, Therapy System, and You) which uses 2 distinct interfaces: a digital human with anthropomorphic features and a text-only user interface. We also set out to explore how chatbot-generated conversations on mental health (specific to each interface) affected self-reported feelings and biometrics.
    METHODS: We explored to what extent a digital human with anthropomorphic features differed from a traditional text-only chatbot regarding perception of usability through the System Usability Scale, emotional reactions through electroencephalography, and feelings of closeness. Healthy participants (n=45) were randomized to 2 groups that used a digital human with anthropomorphic features (n=25) or a text-only chatbot with no such features (n=20). The groups were compared by linear regression analysis and t tests.
    RESULTS: No differences were observed between the text-only and digital human groups regarding demographic features. The mean System Usability Scale score was 75.34 (SD 10.01; range 57-90) for the text-only chatbot versus 64.80 (SD 14.14; range 40-90) for the digital human interface. Both groups scored their respective chatbot interfaces as average or above average in usability. Women were more likely to report feeling annoyed by BETSY.
    CONCLUSIONS: The text-only chatbot was perceived as significantly more user-friendly than the digital human, although there were no significant differences in electroencephalography measurements. Male participants exhibited lower levels of annoyance with both interfaces, contrary to previously reported findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大型语言模型(LLM)具有心理健康应用的潜力。然而,他们不透明的对齐过程可能会嵌入偏见,形成有问题的观点。评估嵌入在LLM中指导其决策的价值观具有道德重要性。施瓦茨的基本价值观理论(STBV)为量化文化价值取向提供了一个框架,并显示了在心理健康环境中检查价值观的效用。包括文化,诊断,和治疗师-客户动态。
    目的:这项研究旨在(1)评估STBV是否可以测量领先的LLM中的价值样构建体,以及(2)确定LLM是否表现出与人类和彼此不同的价值样模式。
    方法:总共,4名法学硕士(吟游诗人,克劳德2,生成预训练变压器[GPT]-3.5,GPT-4)被拟人化,并指示完成肖像值问卷修订(PVQ-RR)以评估类似价值的构造。对他们在10项试验中的反应进行了信度和效度分析。要对LLM值配置文件进行基准测试,将他们的结果与来自49个国家的53,472名完成PVQ-RR的不同样本的已发表数据进行比较.这使我们能够评估LLM是否与跨文化群体的既定人类价值模式有所不同。还通过统计检验比较了模型之间的值概况。
    结果:PVQ-RR显示出良好的信度和效度,用于量化LLM内的价值式基础设施。然而,LLM的价值概况和人口数据之间出现了很大的差异。这些模型缺乏共识,表现出明显的动机偏见,反映不透明的对齐过程。例如,所有模式都优先考虑普遍主义和自我导向,在不强调成就的同时,电源,和相对于人类的安全。成功的判别分析区分了4个不同的LLM值概况。进一步的检查发现,当出现心理健康困境时,有偏见的价值概况强烈预测了LLM的反应,需要在相反的价值之间进行选择。这为嵌入塑造其决策的独特动机价值样结构的模型提供了进一步的验证。
    结论:这项研究利用了STBV来映射激励领先LLM的类价值基础设施。尽管研究表明STBV可以有效地表征LLM中的类价值基础设施,与人类价值观的巨大分歧引发了人们对将这些模型与心理健康应用保持一致的道德担忧。如果在没有适当保障措施的情况下进行整合,对某些文化价值集的偏见会带来风险。例如,即使在临床上不明智的情况下,优先考虑普遍性也可以促进无条件接受。此外,LLM之间的差异强调了标准化调整过程以捕获真正的文化多样性的必要性。因此,任何负责任的将LLM整合到精神卫生保健中都必须考虑到其嵌入的偏见和动机不匹配,以确保跨不同人群的公平交付。实现这一目标将需要透明和完善对齐技术,以灌输全面的人类价值观。
    BACKGROUND: Large language models (LLMs) hold potential for mental health applications. However, their opaque alignment processes may embed biases that shape problematic perspectives. Evaluating the values embedded within LLMs that guide their decision-making have ethical importance. Schwartz\'s theory of basic values (STBV) provides a framework for quantifying cultural value orientations and has shown utility for examining values in mental health contexts, including cultural, diagnostic, and therapist-client dynamics.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) evaluate whether the STBV can measure value-like constructs within leading LLMs and (2) determine whether LLMs exhibit distinct value-like patterns from humans and each other.
    METHODS: In total, 4 LLMs (Bard, Claude 2, Generative Pretrained Transformer [GPT]-3.5, GPT-4) were anthropomorphized and instructed to complete the Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised (PVQ-RR) to assess value-like constructs. Their responses over 10 trials were analyzed for reliability and validity. To benchmark the LLMs\' value profiles, their results were compared to published data from a diverse sample of 53,472 individuals across 49 nations who had completed the PVQ-RR. This allowed us to assess whether the LLMs diverged from established human value patterns across cultural groups. Value profiles were also compared between models via statistical tests.
    RESULTS: The PVQ-RR showed good reliability and validity for quantifying value-like infrastructure within the LLMs. However, substantial divergence emerged between the LLMs\' value profiles and population data. The models lacked consensus and exhibited distinct motivational biases, reflecting opaque alignment processes. For example, all models prioritized universalism and self-direction, while de-emphasizing achievement, power, and security relative to humans. Successful discriminant analysis differentiated the 4 LLMs\' distinct value profiles. Further examination found the biased value profiles strongly predicted the LLMs\' responses when presented with mental health dilemmas requiring choosing between opposing values. This provided further validation for the models embedding distinct motivational value-like constructs that shape their decision-making.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study leveraged the STBV to map the motivational value-like infrastructure underpinning leading LLMs. Although the study demonstrated the STBV can effectively characterize value-like infrastructure within LLMs, substantial divergence from human values raises ethical concerns about aligning these models with mental health applications. The biases toward certain cultural value sets pose risks if integrated without proper safeguards. For example, prioritizing universalism could promote unconditional acceptance even when clinically unwise. Furthermore, the differences between the LLMs underscore the need to standardize alignment processes to capture true cultural diversity. Thus, any responsible integration of LLMs into mental health care must account for their embedded biases and motivation mismatches to ensure equitable delivery across diverse populations. Achieving this will require transparency and refinement of alignment techniques to instill comprehensive human values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心态,这是人类认知过程不可或缺的一部分,涉及对自己和他人精神状态的解释,包括情绪,信仰,和意图。随着人工智能(AI)的出现以及大型语言模型在心理健康应用中的突出地位,关于他们在情感理解方面的能力的问题仍然存在。来自OpenAI的大型语言模型的先前迭代,ChatGPT-3.5,展示了从文本数据中解释情绪的高级能力,超越人类基准。鉴于ChatGPT-4的引入,其增强的视觉处理能力,考虑到GoogleBard现有的视觉功能,有必要对他们的视觉思维能力进行严格评估。
    目的:研究的目的是批判性地评估ChatGPT-4和GoogleBard在辨别视觉思维指标方面的能力,并与基于文本的思维能力进行对比。
    方法:由Baron-Cohen及其同事开发的“眼睛阅读”测试用于评估模型在解释视觉情绪指标方面的熟练程度。同时,情感意识水平量表用于评估大型语言模型在文本思维中的能力。整理来自两个测试的数据提供了ChatGPT-4和Bard的思维能力的整体视图。
    结果:ChatGPT-4,表现出明显的情感识别能力,在两次不同的评估中获得了26分和27分,显著偏离随机响应范式(P<.001)。这些分数与更广泛的人类人口的既定基准一致。值得注意的是,ChatGPT-4表现出一致的反应,与模型的性别或情感的性质没有明显的偏见。相比之下,GoogleBard的性能与随机响应模式一致,确保10分和12分,并使进一步的详细分析变得多余。在文本分析领域,ChatGPT和Bard都超过了普通人群的既定基准,他们的表演非常一致。
    结论:ChatGPT-4证明了其在视觉指导领域的功效,与人类的表现标准密切相关。尽管两种模型在文本情感解释中都表现出值得称赞的敏锐度,巴德在视觉情感解释方面的能力需要进一步的审查和潜在的改进。这项研究强调了道德人工智能发展对情感识别的重要性,强调对包容性数据的需求,与患者和心理健康专家合作,和严格的政府监督,以确保透明度和保护患者隐私。
    BACKGROUND: Mentalization, which is integral to human cognitive processes, pertains to the interpretation of one\'s own and others\' mental states, including emotions, beliefs, and intentions. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and the prominence of large language models in mental health applications, questions persist about their aptitude in emotional comprehension. The prior iteration of the large language model from OpenAI, ChatGPT-3.5, demonstrated an advanced capacity to interpret emotions from textual data, surpassing human benchmarks. Given the introduction of ChatGPT-4, with its enhanced visual processing capabilities, and considering Google Bard\'s existing visual functionalities, a rigorous assessment of their proficiency in visual mentalizing is warranted.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the research was to critically evaluate the capabilities of ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard with regard to their competence in discerning visual mentalizing indicators as contrasted with their textual-based mentalizing abilities.
    METHODS: The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test developed by Baron-Cohen and colleagues was used to assess the models\' proficiency in interpreting visual emotional indicators. Simultaneously, the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale was used to evaluate the large language models\' aptitude in textual mentalizing. Collating data from both tests provided a holistic view of the mentalizing capabilities of ChatGPT-4 and Bard.
    RESULTS: ChatGPT-4, displaying a pronounced ability in emotion recognition, secured scores of 26 and 27 in 2 distinct evaluations, significantly deviating from a random response paradigm (P<.001). These scores align with established benchmarks from the broader human demographic. Notably, ChatGPT-4 exhibited consistent responses, with no discernible biases pertaining to the sex of the model or the nature of the emotion. In contrast, Google Bard\'s performance aligned with random response patterns, securing scores of 10 and 12 and rendering further detailed analysis redundant. In the domain of textual analysis, both ChatGPT and Bard surpassed established benchmarks from the general population, with their performances being remarkably congruent.
    CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4 proved its efficacy in the domain of visual mentalizing, aligning closely with human performance standards. Although both models displayed commendable acumen in textual emotion interpretation, Bard\'s capabilities in visual emotion interpretation necessitate further scrutiny and potential refinement. This study stresses the criticality of ethical AI development for emotional recognition, highlighting the need for inclusive data, collaboration with patients and mental health experts, and stringent governmental oversight to ensure transparency and protect patient privacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有精神障碍的老年人数量正在增加,但是很少有研究关注这些患者的身体状况和日常生活活动(ADL)。这项研究旨在描述来自不同年龄段的精神疾病(PMI)患者的身体状况和ADL,这为改善PMI的精神卫生服务提供了证据。
    方法:在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,将样本分为三组,年龄小于60岁(第1组),60-74岁(第2组),和75岁以上(第3组)进行比较。参与者的ADL和身体状况用Barthel指数(BI)衡量,功能活动问卷(FAQ),标准化吞咽评估(SSA)和简短的迷你营养评估(MNA-SF)。简明精神病量表(BPRS)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)用于测量心理状况。
    结果:完全,招募了392名参与者,与此同时,86%的人被诊断出至少一种身体疾病。3组受试者的BI差异有统计学意义(F=50.603,P<0.001),常见问题解答(F=40.332,P<0.001),SSA(F=28.574,P<0.001),MNA-SF(F=18.366,P<0.001)。第2组和第3组的BI和FAQ得分明显低于第1组,SSA得分明显高于第1组。在BPRS阴性症状量表中,第3组的平均评分明显高于第1组和第2组.阴性症状分量表与BI有不同程度的相关性(r=-0.537),FAQ(r=0.643),SSA(r=0.480),MNA(r=-0.325)和MMSE(r=0.607)。此外,有合并症的参与者与BI相关(r=-0.364).
    结论:躯体合并症在老年精神病患者的临床特征中起着举足轻重的作用。因此,应该为患有吞咽困难的精神疾病的老年患者付出更大的努力,营养不良,和认知能力下降。Further,老年精神障碍患者的阴性症状也值得关注。
    BACKGROUND: The number of elderly with mental disorders is increasing, but few studies have been concerned with the physical condition and activities of daily living (ADL) of these patients. This study aims to describe the physical condition and ADL of patients with mental illnesses (PMI) from different age groups, which provides evidence to improve mental health services for PMI.
    METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, the samples were divided into three groups of less than 60 years old (group 1), 60-74 years old (group 2), and over 75 years old (group 3) for comparison. Participants\' ADL and physical condition were measure by Barthel Index (BI), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Standardised swallowing assessment (SSA) and Short Form of Mini Nutrition Assessment (MNA-SF). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used to measure psychological condition.
    RESULTS: Totally, 392 participants had been recruited, meanwhile 86% of them were diagnosed with at least one physical disease. There were statistically significant differences in the three groups of participants in BI (F = 50.603, P < 0.001), FAQ (F = 40.332, P < 0.001), SSA (F = 28.574, P < 0.001), and MNA-SF (F = 18.366, P < 0.001). Group 2 and group 3 had significantly lower scores in BI and FAQ than group 1, and the SSA scores were significantly higher than the participants in group 1. In the negative symptoms subscale of BPRS, the mean score of group 3 was significantly higher than groups 1 and 2. Negative symptom subscale has different degrees of correlation with BI (r = -0.537), FAQ (r = 0.643), SSA (r = 0.480), MNA (r = -0.325) and MMSE (r = 0.607). In addition, the participants with comorbidities were related to BI (r = -0.364).
    CONCLUSIONS: Somatic comorbidities play a pivotal role in the clinical characteristics of elderly patients with mental illness, thus greater effort should be paid to elderly patients suffering from mental illness with dysphagia, malnutrition, and cognitive decline. Further, the negative symptoms of elderly patients with mental disorders also deserve attention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针刺PC6点具有镇静作用,镇静,调节气,和缓解疼痛,并已在临床上发现缓解焦虑症。探讨针刺对焦虑症患者内关穴改善的机制,我们使用fMRI观察了针刺内关穴前后即时焦虑患者脑功能的变化。
    实验遵循随机原则,单盲设计。24名焦虑志愿者(14名男性和10名女性,20-35岁)随机分为两组:内关针刺组和非穴位针刺组。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)用于测量针刺前后的大脑活动。使用低频波动(ALFF)和基于种子的功能连通性(FC)的幅度来分析大脑区域的活动和网络。使用SPSS21.0和REST1.8软件进行统计分析。
    ALFF结果显示,内关针刺后增加了左侧海马旁回的活动,梭状回,和右颞上回,减少了右额叶中回的活动,右前叶,还有Cuneus.非穴位针刺后导致丘脑和额中回ALFF明显增加。左额中回ALFF降低。左海马旁/梭形回的几个前默认模式网络(DMN)区域和小脑vermis的功能连通性增加,双侧颞上回的连通性降低。右中额回有后DMN区的FC减少,右前叶,还有Cuneus.
    我们的研究阐明了针刺内关通过激活或去激活这些与大脑焦虑相关的区域来调节焦虑,并为PC6针刺在精神疾病中的应用提供了潜在的解释。
    UNASSIGNED: Acupuncture of PC6 points has the effects of calming, tranquilizing, regulating qi, and relieving pain and has been clinically found to alleviate anxiety disorders. To explore the mechanism of improvement at the Neiguan point acupuncture in anxiety patients, we used fMRI to observe the changes in brain function in patients with immediate anxiety before and after acupuncture at the Neiguan point.
    UNASSIGNED: The experiment followed the principle of randomized, single-blind design. Twenty-four anxiety volunteers (14 males and 10 females, 20-35 years old) were divided randomly into two groups: a group of acupuncture at Neiguan and a group of acupuncture at non-acupoint. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was applied to measure brain activity pre- and post-acupuncture. The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and seed-based functional connectivity (FC) was used to analyze the activity and network of brain regions. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 21.0 and REST 1.8 software.
    UNASSIGNED: ALFF results revealed that post-acupuncture at Neiguan increased the activity of the left parahippocampal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and right superior temporal gyrus and decreased the activity of the right middle frontal gyrus, right precuneus, and cuneus. Post-acupuncture at non-acupoint led to a significant ALFF increase in the thalamus and middle frontal gyrus. The ALFF in the left middle frontal gyrus was decreased. Functional connectivity in several anterior default mode network (DMN) regions and vermis cerebelli at left parahippocampal/fusiform gyri was increased, and connectivity in bilateral superior temporal gyri was decreased. FC with posterior DMN regions decreased at the right middle frontal gyrus, right precuneus, and cuneus.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study elucidates that acupuncture at Neiguan modulates anxiety by activating or deactivating these brain anxiety-related regions and provides potential explanations for the application of PC6 acupuncture in mental diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    照顾者负责家庭照顾患有精神疾病的家庭成员,他们经常经历生活中的变化,这可能会产生压力和负担。这项研究的目的是确定与患有精神障碍的家庭成员的照顾者负担相关的因素。
    这项横断面研究是以家庭照顾者的非概率样本进行的,他的病人参加了社区服务项目,社会心理护理中心,在戈亚斯州西南部的三个城市,巴西中部。数据收集于2014年6月至2015年6月进行。参与者是281名护理人员,他们完成了社会人口统计问卷和Zarit负担访谈(ZBI)。双变量分析(t检验,方差分析,和Pearson相关性)进行,以及p<0.10值和性别的变量被纳入多元线性回归模型。p<0.05的值被认为是显著的。
    看护者大多是女性和患者的父母,结婚了,受教育程度低,和低收入。平均ZBI评分为27.66。与照顾者负担独立相关的因素是抑郁,超过60岁,没有得到照顾方面的帮助,最近的病人危机,联系日,还有其他家庭成员需要照顾.
    这项研究确定了值得社区服务关注的因素,可以指导项目,比如家庭心理教育团体,这可能有助于最小化或防止负担对负责患者家庭护理的家庭护理人员的影响。
    Caregivers are responsible for the home care of family members with mental-health disorders often experience changes in their life that can generate stress and burden. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the burden of caregivers of family members with mental disorders.
    This cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-probability sample of family caregivers, whose patients attended a community services program, the Psychosocial Care Centers, in three cities in the southwest region of Goiás State, Central Brazil. Data collection took place from June 2014 to June 2015. The participants were 281 caregivers who completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Bivariate analyses (t test, analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation) were performed, and variables with values of p < 0.10 and gender were included in a multiple-linear regression model. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.
    The caregivers were mostly female and parents of the patients, were married, with low education, and of low income. The mean ZBI score was 27.66. The factors independently associated with caregivers\' burden were depression, being over 60 years of age, receiving no help with caregiving, recent patient crisis, contact days, and having other family members needing care.
    This study identified factors that deserve the attention of community services and can guide programs, such as family psycho-education groups, which may help to minimize or prevent the effects of burden on family caregivers responsible for patients\' home care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于初级保健患者自杀风险的前兆知之甚少。这项研究旨在检查自杀风险与临床咨询模式的关系,精神药物处方,和精神病诊断。
    临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中的嵌套病例对照研究,英格兰。2002-2011年期间因自杀而死亡的16岁患者(N=2384)在性别上进行匹配,年龄和实践与多达20个生活控制患者(N=46899)。
    非咨询患者的风险增加,andincreasedsharelywithincreasingnumberofconsultationsinthepurchingyear[I.12consultationsv.1:unadjustedoddsratio(OR)6.0,95%confidenceinterval(CI)4.9-7.3].明显升高的风险还与多种精神药物类型的处方有关(5种类型v.0:OR62.6,CI44.3-88.4),并与几种精神病诊断有关(4诊断v.0:OR31.1,CI19.3-50.1)。生活在社会贫困地区的患者也增加了风险。多种精神药物类型的混杂效应在很大程度上解释了随着咨询频率的增加而观察到的风险梯度上升。
    有几种精神病诊断的患者比例更高,那些开了多种精神药物的人,那些以非常高的频率咨询的人可能会被其全科医生考虑转介给心理健康服务。非咨询者的风险也在增加,这表明,初级保健的传统模式可能无法有效地满足社区中经历重大社会心理困难的所有人的需求。
    Little is known about the precursors of suicide risk among primary-care patients. This study aimed to examine suicide risk in relation to patterns of clinical consultation, psychotropic drug prescribing, and psychiatric diagnoses.
    Nested case-control study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), England. Patients aged ⩾16 years who died by suicide during 2002-2011 (N = 2384) were matched on gender, age and practice with up to 20 living control patients (N = 46 899).
    Risk was raised among non-consulting patients, and increased sharply with rising number of consultations in the preceding year [⩾12 consultations v. 1: unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-7.3]. Markedly elevated risk was also associated with the prescribing of multiple psychotropic medication types (⩾5 types v. 0: OR 62.6, CI 44.3-88.4) and with having several psychiatric diagnoses (⩾4 diagnoses v. 0: OR 31.1, CI 19.3-50.1). Risk was also raised among patients living in more socially deprived localities. The confounding effect of multiple psychotropic drug types largely accounted for the rising risk gradient observed with increasing consultation frequency.
    A greater proportion of patients with several psychiatric diagnoses, those prescribed multiple psychotropic medication types, and those who consult at very high frequency might be considered for referral to mental health services by their general practitioners. Non-consulters are also at increased risk, which suggests that conventional models of primary care may not be effective in meeting the needs of all people in the community experiencing major psychosocial difficulties.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    适合受审是审判涉及司法人员的关键概念。进行了一项回顾性研究,以检查刑事被告的特定精神症状以及这些症状与专家对受审能力的意见的关联。审查了一百张图表:就简短精神病学评定量表(BPRS)的评分而言,将50例(认为不适合)与50例对照(认为适合)进行了比较。先验地选择0.001的显著性水平。在18个BPRS症状结构中的7个(在概念混乱和不寻常的思想内容方面差异最大)和四个BPRS高阶综合症因素中的两个(思维障碍和敌对可疑)中发现了统计学上的显着差异。与以前的报告一致,在这项研究中发现精神病症状与健身呈负相关。有效性,可靠性,以及这项研究的局限性,以及未来研究的方向,在这里讨论。
    Fitness to Stand Trial is a critical concept in the adjudication of justice-involved persons. A retrospective study was conducted to examine criminal defendants\' specific psychiatric symptoms and those symptoms\' associations with expert opinions on Competence to Stand Trial. One hundred charts were reviewed: 50 Cases (opined as Not Fit) were compared against 50 Controls (opined as Fit) with respect to ratings on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). A significance level of 0.001 was selected a priori. Statistically significant differences were found in seven of the eighteen BPRS symptom constructs (with the highest differences in Conceptual Disorganization and Unusual Thought Content) and two of the four BPRS higher-order syndrome factors (Thinking Disorder and Hostile-Suspiciousness). Consistent with previous reports, psychotic symptoms are found in this study to be inversely associated with Fitness. Validity, reliability, and limitations of this study, as well as directions for future research, are discussed herein.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号