medical rehabilitation

医疗康复
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是开发一个问题提示列表(QPL),以支持接受与工作相关的医疗康复的患者获得相关信息,并探讨患者和医生如何评价QPL的有用性,实用性,和感知(额外)的努力。
    康复患者(N=3)在认知访谈中评估了初始项目库,由医生和其他卫生专业人员评定(N=11),然后进一步修改。患者(N=36)在住院医疗康复机构的医疗入院访谈中使用最终QPL版本(16项),然后进行评估。医师在每次与研究参与者进行访谈后评估QPL(N=6;k=39次访谈)。
    50%的患者对QPL的有用性和可理解性给予了积极评价。对信息的需求和对收到的信息的满意度都与QPL的使用无关。医生的评估表明,对信息的提供和对话的结构有积极的评价,但也有更高的感知时间支出。
    虽然在工作相关的医疗康复中对QPL作为支持患者与提供者沟通的工具进行的初步测试通常显示,使用QPL的患者和医生的评价良好,未来的研究应该关注其有效性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to develop a question prompt list (QPL) to support patients undergoing work-related medical rehabilitation in obtaining relevant information and to explore how patients and physicians rate the QPL regarding its usefulness, practicability, and perceived (additional) effort.
    UNASSIGNED: An initial item pool was assessed by rehabilitation patients (N = 3) in cognitive interviews, rated by physicians and other health professionals (N = 11), and then further modified. The final QPL version (16 items) was used by patients (N = 36) in medical admission interviews in an inpatient medical rehabilitation facility and then evaluated. Physicians evaluated the QPL after each interview with a study participant (N = 6; k = 39 interviews).
    UNASSIGNED: The QPL was used by 50% of patients who rated its usefulness and comprehensibility positively. Neither the need for information nor satisfaction with the information received was correlated with QPL use. The physicians\' assessment showed a positive evaluation regarding the provision of information and structuring of the conversation, but also a higher perceived time expenditure.
    UNASSIGNED: While initial testing of the QPL in work-related medical rehabilitation as a tool to support patient-provider communication generally showed a favorable evaluation by patients using it and physicians, future research should address its validity and effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    BACKGROUND: In order to optimize rehabilitation measures for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) it is advisable to use natural therapeutic factors in the medical rehabilitation programmes of this category of patients, which is due to the pronounced psycho-corrective effects of climatic landscape therapy and nitrogen-thermal waters.
    OBJECTIVE: To study psycho-corrective effects of a new rehabilitation technique for the patients suffering from PTSD using natural therapeutic factors of Nalchik resort.
    METHODS: Thera has been carried out a randomized controlled trial that included 74 patients with PTSD. Two groups were formed by simple randomization: in the control group (CG/n=38) the patients had standardized pharmacotherapy, physical training and individual psychocorrection in accordance with federal clinical recommendations; in the main group (MG/n=36) terrencourt in the natural park of Nalchik resort and nitrogen-thermal baths were additionally prescribed. The effectiveness of rehabilitation measures was monitored using a questionnaire to assess the therapeutic dynamics of PTSD, the Beck Hopelessness scale, as well as the Neurotech Kolibri wireless BFB complex (Russia).
    RESULTS: A comparative analysis of monitoring of psycho-emotional status indicators proved the feasibility of the developed medical rehabilitation programme for PTSD patients. A significant improvement in psychoemotional status was observed according to the questionnaire for assessing the therapeutic dynamics of PTSD (on average by 2 times, p<0.01), according to the Beck hopelessness scale, according to which the clinically assessed suicidal risk and hopelessness level were reduced by 1.7 (p<0.01) times with the patients in the MG. According to the analysis of brain biopotentials during the primary training, the patients had insufficient control over the course of mental activity (63%), and at the end of the course the indicator improved to 97% (p<0.01). In the CG positive dynamics on both scales of psychological testing and analysis of brain biopotentials was significantly lower (by 12-15%, p<0.05-p<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: After including in the standardized rehabilitation programme controlled walking in the mid-mountain Natural Park and nitrogen-thermal baths of Nalchik resort, there was a significant improvement in the psycho-emotional status of the patients suffering from PTSD, which indicates their psychocorrective effects and provides great opportunities to improve the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation.
    С целью оптимизации реабилитационных мероприятий при посттравматическом стрессовом расстройстве (ПТСР) целесообразно использование природных лечебных факторов в программах медицинской реабилитации данной категории пациентов, что обусловлено выраженными психокорригирующими эффектами климатоландшафтотерапии и азотно-термальных вод.
    UNASSIGNED: Изучить психокорригирующие эффекты новой реабилитационной методики для пациентов с ПТСР с применением природных лечебных факторов курорта «Нальчик».
    UNASSIGNED: Проведено рандомизированное контролируемое исследование, в которое было включено 74 пациента с ПТСР. Методом простой рандомизации было сформировано 2 группы: в контрольной группе (КГ, n=38) были назначены стандартизированная фармакотерапия, физические тренировки и индивидуальная психокоррекция в соответствии с федеральными клиническими рекомендациями; в основной (ОГ, n=36) — дополнительно были назначены терренкур в природном парке курорта «Нальчик» и азотно-термальные ванны. Контроль эффективности реабилитационных мероприятий осуществляли с использованием опросника для оценки терапевтической динамики ПТСР, шкалы безнадежности Бека, а также беспроводного комплекса БОС «Колибри» («Нейротех», Россия).
    UNASSIGNED: Проведенный в сравнительном аспекте анализ мониторирования показателей психоэмоционального статуса доказал целесообразность разработанной программы медицинской реабилитации для пациентов с ПТСР. Достоверно значимое улучшение психоэмоционального статуса отмечалось по опроснику для оценки терапевтической динамики ПТСР (в среднем в 2 раза, p<0,01), по шкале безнадежности Бека, по которой у пациентов ОГ отмечалось снижение клинически оцениваемого суицидального риска и уровня безнадежности в 1,7 (p<0,01) раза. По анализу биопотенциалов мозга при проведении первичного тренинга у пациентов отмечалась недостаточность функции контроля за протеканием психической деятельности (63%), а по завершению курса показатель улучшился до 97% (p<0,01). В КГ положительная динамика по обеим шкалам психологического тестирования и анализу биопотенциалов мозга была значимо ниже (на 12—15%, p<0,05 — p<0,01).
    UNASSIGNED: Значимое улучшение психоэмоционального статуса пациентов с ПТСР при включении в стандартизированную реабилитационную программу дозированной ходьбы в среднегорном природном парке и азотно-термальных ванн курорта «Нальчик» констатирует их психокорригирующие эффекты, что предоставляет большие возможности для повышения эффективности медицинской реабилитации.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高辍学率是在线研究中报道的常见问题。了解哪些风险因素与退出研究相关,可以通过制定有效的策略来防止退出研究。
    目的:本研究旨在加深对心身康复患者在线研究退出预测因素的理解。我们调查了社会人口统计学,自愿干预,身心健康,数字用于健康和康复,与COVID大流行相关的变量决定了研究退出。
    方法:患者(N=2155)从德国的四个心身康复诊所招募,并在T1时填写在线问卷,这是在他们的康复住院之前。其中大约一半(1082/2155,50.2%)在康复住院后的T2退出,在此期间,向患者提供了三项自愿数字培训。根据患者参加的培训数量,他们被定义为对照组或干预组.进行卡方检验,以检查退出患者和保留患者在社会人口统计学变量方面的差异;并比较比较组和干预组之间的退出率差异。使用Logistic回归分析来评估与调查中保留的因素有关。
    结果:对照组的辍学率最高,为68.4%(173/253),与48.0%的干预组(749/1561)相比,50.0%(96/192),和43.0%(64/149)的辍学率。诊断为焦虑和抑郁综合障碍的患者的辍学率最高,高达63.5%(47/74)。年轻患者(<50岁)和受教育程度较低的患者更有可能退出研究。与健康相关的应用程序和/或互联网使用行为较少的患者更有可能退出研究。留在工作中的病人,感染冠状病毒的患者更有可能退出研究。
    结论:这项研究调查了在线研究中辍学的预测因素。患者社会人口统计学的不同因素,身心健康,数字使用,COVID大流行相关因素,研究设计可以与辍学率相关。对于以心理健康为重点的在线研究,建议考虑这些可能的辍学预测因素,并采取适当的策略来帮助辍学风险高的患者克服困难完成研究。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04453475;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04453475。
    High dropout rates are a common problem reported in web-based studies. Understanding which risk factors interrelate with dropping out from the studies provides the option to prevent dropout by tailoring effective strategies.
    This study aims to contribute an understanding of the predictors of web-based study dropout among psychosomatic rehabilitation patients. We investigated whether sociodemographics, voluntary interventions, physical and mental health, digital use for health and rehabilitation, and COVID-19 pandemic-related variables determine study dropout.
    Patients (N=2155) recruited from 4 psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics in Germany filled in a web-based questionnaire at T1, which was before their rehabilitation stay. Approximately half of the patients (1082/2155, 50.21%) dropped out at T2, which was after the rehabilitation stay, before and during which 3 voluntary digital trainings were provided to them. According to the number of trainings that the patients participated in, they were categorized into a comparison group or 1 of 3 intervention groups. Chi-square tests were performed to examine the differences between dropout patients and retained patients in terms of sociodemographic variables and to compare the dropout rate differences between the comparison and intervention groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess what factors were related to study dropout.
    The comparison group had the highest dropout rate of 68.4% (173/253) compared with the intervention groups\' dropout rates of 47.98% (749/1561), 50% (96/192), and 42.9% (64/149). Patients with a diagnosis of combined anxiety and depressive disorder had the highest dropout rate of 64% (47/74). Younger patients (those aged <50 y) and patients who were less educated were more likely to drop out of the study. Patients who used health-related apps and the internet less were more likely to drop out of the study. Patients who remained in their jobs and patients who were infected by COVID-19 were more likely to drop out of the study.
    This study investigated the predictors of dropout in web-based studies. Different factors such as patient sociodemographics, physical and mental health, digital use, COVID-19 pandemic correlates, and study design can correlate with the dropout rate. For web-based studies with a focus on mental health, it is suggested to consider these possible dropout predictors and take appropriate steps to help patients with a high risk of dropping out overcome difficulties in completing the study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:衡量所提供医疗保健的质量存在许多挑战,特别是在医疗康复的背景下。康复是基于一个整体的生物心理社会健康模式,包括一个人的长期功能;因此,结果域非常多样化。在德国,目前通过患者和医师调查评估康复效果.健康保险索赔数据有可能简化德国当前的质量保证程序,因为它的全面收集是联邦政府从每个医疗保健提供者强制要求的。通过使用跨部门的方法,康复质量评估可以根据以前部门提供的质量和个体患者风险因素进行调整。
    方法:SEQUAR结合了两项研究:在一项前瞻性纵向研究中,在4个和2个时间点调查了600名骨科康复患者及其医生,分别,整个康复和6个月的随访期。问卷包括当前最佳实践质量保证程序中使用的经过验证的工具。在一项回顾性队列研究中,一个全国范围的索赔数据库,有超过31.2万名骨科康复患者,将用于进行探索性分析,以确定质量指标。将为我们的前瞻性研究参与者计算确定的SEQUAR索赔数据质量指标,并测试他们近似或替换当前使用的数据的能力,基于原始数据的最佳实践质量指标。
    结论:确定的SEQUAR质量指标将用于起草小说,最先进的质量保证程序,可减少当前程序的行政负担。需要进一步研究对其他康复适应症的适用性。
    背景:WHOUTN:U1111-1276-7141;DRKS-ID:DRKS00028747(DRKS注册日期:2022/08/10)。
    BACKGROUND: Measuring the quality of provided healthcare presents many challenges, especially in the context of medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation is based on a holistic biopsychosocial model of health that includes a person\'s long-term functioning; hence, outcome domains are very diverse. In Germany, rehabilitation outcomes are currently assessed via patient and physician surveys. Health insurance claims data has the potential to simplify current quality assurance procedures in Germany, since its comprehensive collection is federally mandated from every healthcare provider. By using a cross-sectoral approach, quality assessments in rehabilitation can be adjusted for the quality provided in previous sectors and individual patient risk factors.
    METHODS: SEQUAR combines two studies: In a prospective longitudinal study, 600 orthopedic rehabilitation patients and their physicians are surveyed at 4 and 2 time points, respectively, throughout rehabilitation and a follow-up period of 6 months. The questionnaires include validated instruments used in the current best-practice quality assurance procedures. In a retrospective cohort study, a nationwide claims database with more than 312,000 orthopedic rehabilitation patients will be used to perform exploratory analysis for the identification of quality indicators. The identified SEQUAR claims data quality indicators will be calculated for our prospective study participants and tested for their ability to approximate or replace the currently used, best-practice quality indicators based on primary data.
    CONCLUSIONS: The identified SEQUAR quality indicators will be used to draft a novel, state-of-the-art quality assurance procedure that reduces the administrative burden of current procedures. Further research into the applicability to other indications of rehabilitation is required.
    BACKGROUND: WHO UTN: U1111-1276-7141; DRKS-ID: DRKS00028747 (Date of Registration in DRKS: 2022/08/10).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超过40%的2019年冠状病毒病患者(COVID-19)的肌肉骨骼系统受到影响。COVID-19后对急性后康复的需求增加,特别是在有潜在健康问题的老年人中。本研究的目的是使用组合方法评估早期和以目标为导向的康复计划的益处。机器人医疗设备以及其他康复技术和疗法,急性COVID-19后的老年人。先前诊断为严重SARS-CoV-2感染的91例患者(62.64±14.21岁)被送往医学康复临床医院BaileFelix,罗马尼亚,用于医疗康复,但只有6例患者(85.33±3.07岁)符合纳入标准并参与研究.康复治疗很复杂,进行了超过4周,包括联合方法:运动疗法,机器人步态训练,职业治疗,和按摩。使用Barthel指数和日常生活活动(ADL)的功能独立性评估进行活动和参与评估。在入院和康复诊所出院时进行评估。Lokomat患者的报告显示,患者的运动控制有所改善(只有一个例外)。功能能力的测量在大多数情况下显示出改善。这项研究提供了一些关于我国COVID-19患者肌肉骨骼康复结果的初步数据。早期复杂的医疗康复改善了老年患者ADLs的功能独立性和自主性,后COVID-19。
    The musculoskeletal system is affected in over 40% of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). There is an increased need for post-acute rehabilitation after COVID-19, especially in elderly people with underlying health problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of an early and goal-orientated rehabilitation program using combined approaches, robotic medical devices together with other rehabilitation techniques and therapies, in elderly people after acute COVID-19. Ninety-one patients (62.64 ± 14.21 years) previously diagnosed with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted to the Medical Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital Baile Felix, Romania, for medical rehabilitation, but only six patients (85.33 ± 3.07 years) met the inclusion criteria and participated in the study. The rehabilitation treatment was complex, performed over 4 weeks, and included combined approaches: exercise therapy, robotic gait training, occupational therapy, and massages. Activity and participation evaluation were performed using the Barthel Index and Functional Independence Measure for activities of daily living (ADLs). Assessments were performed at admission and discharge from the rehabilitation clinic. Lokomat patients\' reports revealed that the patients had improved motor control (with one exception). The measurement of functional ability revealed an improvement in most cases. This study presents some of the first data on outcomes of COVID-19 patients\' musculoskeletal rehabilitation in our country. Early complex medical rehabilitation improved functional independence and autonomy in ADLs in very old patients, post-COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    因为COVID-19感染后持续存在的临床模式和症状是多种多样的,急性后COVID-19综合征(PACS)的诊断很难实施.因此,当前的研究项目旨在评估全面的可行性和实用性,跨学科,和跨部门治疗计划,包括低门槛在线筛查和PACS整体评估。此外,它旨在评估数字干预措施和可能有助于促进PACS恢复的所谓个人指南的使用。
    这项德国研究包括对PACS的低门槛在线筛查,其中积极筛查的参与者将得到个人飞行员的支持。私人飞行员旨在赋予患者权力,并帮助他们在研究和不同的治疗方案中导航。然后将患者随机分配到干预组(IG)或主动对照组(ACG)。IG将接受生理和心理功能的全面评估,以告知未来的治疗。ACG没有接受评估,但两组都将接受由个人数字治疗计划(数字干预平台和通过聊天机器人进行的干预)组成的治疗。这种数字干预是基于IG参与者评估期间确定的需求。相比之下,ACG将接受更常见的数字治疗计划,旨在减轻PACS症状。重要的是,将招募不接受任何治疗的第三个对照组(CompG)。将进行倾向得分匹配,确保参与者之间的可比性。研究的主要终点是症状减轻和恢复工作。次要结果包括,例如,日常生活中的社会参与和活动。此外,在线筛选工具的可行性和适用性,整体评估,数字化培训,和私人飞行员将被评估。
    这是首批通过授权改善PACS患者诊断和护理的大规模研究之一。将评估所使用的方法是否可用于德国和国际人口。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05238415;注册日期:2022年2月14日。
    Because the clinical patterns and symptoms that persist after a COVID-19 infection are diverse, a diagnosis of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is difficult to implement. The current research project therefore aims to evaluate the feasibility and the practicability of a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and cross-sectoral treatment program consisting of a low-threshold online screening and holistic assessment for PACS. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate digital interventions and the use of so-called personal guides that may help to facilitate the recovery of PACS.
    This German study consists of a low-threshold online screening for PACS where positively screened participants will be supported throughout by personal pilots. The personal pilots are aimed at empowering patients and helping them to navigate through the study and different treatment options. Patients will then be randomly assigned either to an intervention group (IG) or an active control group (ACG). The IG will receive a comprehensive assessment of physiological and psychological functioning to inform future treatment. The ACG does not receive the assessment but both groups will receive a treatment consisting of an individual digital treatment program (digital intervention platform and an intervention via a chatbot). This digital intervention is based on the needs identified during the assessment for participants in the IG. Compared to that, the ACG will receive a more common digital treatment program aiming to reduce PACS symptoms. Importantly, a third comparison group (CompG) will be recruited that does not receive any treatment. A propensity score matching will take place, ensuring comparability between the participants. Primary endpoints of the study are symptom reduction and return to work. Secondary outcomes comprise, for example, social participation and activities in daily life. Furthermore, the feasibility and applicability of the online screening tool, the holistic assessment, digital trainings, and personal pilots will be evaluated.
    This is one of the first large-scale studies to improve the diagnosis and the care of patients with PACS by means of empowerment. It is to be evaluated whether the methods utilized can be used for the German and international population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05238415; date of registration: February 14, 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:本研究考察了特质特征情绪智力问卷简表(TEIQue-SF)与学业成绩(GPA)的关系。使用沙特裔医学康复本科生(N=130)进行了分析。本研究检查了中文版特质特征情绪智力问卷简表(TEIQue-SF)的心理测量学特性。使用从中国四所大学招募的本科生样本(N=585)进行分析。
    未经评估:一百三十名医学康复学生完成了特质表现情绪智力问卷简表(TEIQue-SF)。进行描述性和推断性统计分析以阐明各种变量之间的关系(或缺乏相同的关系)。
    UNASSIGNED:全局性状EI的整个样本α系数值为0.84,而性状EI因子的范围为0.51至0.76。男性的全球特征EI高于女性(女生中位数:17±2.56VS男生中位数:18±3.67;U:1667,第0.04页)。幸福感与其他三个因素之间存在正相关且具有统计学意义(与自我控制[r(128),0.413,p0.01];具有情绪性[r(128),0.518,p0.01],具有社交性[r(128),0.490,p0.01])。发现社交能力与自我控制[r(128),0.239,p0.05]和情绪[r(128),分别为0.490,p<0.01]。此外,发现GPA与社交能力呈负相关(无统计学意义)。总的来说,没有发现性状EI和GPA之间的关联。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究是调查医疗保健相关学生的培训EI-学业成绩联系的两项研究之一。我们的发现与该主题的现有文献产生共鸣。
    UNASSIGNED: The present study examined the relationship of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire Short Form (TEIQue-SF) and academic achievement (GPA). Analyses were performed using a sample of Saudi-origin medical rehabilitation undergraduate students (N = 130). The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire Short Form (TEIQue-SF). Analyses were performed using a sample of undergraduates (N = 585) recruited from four universities across China.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred thirty medical rehabilitation students completed the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF). Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were carried out to elucidate relationships (or the lack of the same) between various variables.
    UNASSIGNED: Whole sample alpha coefficient value for global trait EI was 0.84, while the same for trait EI factors ranged from 0.51 to 0.76. Global Trait EI was found higher in males than in females (Female students median score: 17 ± 2.56 VS Male students median score: 18 ± 3.67; U: 1667, p 0.04). A positive and statistically significant relationship was found between Well-being and the three other factors (with Self-control [r(128), 0.413, p 0.01]; with Emotionality [r(128), 0.518, p 0.01], with Sociability [r(128), 0.490, p 0.01]). Sociability was found to have a similar positive relationship with Self-control [r(128), 0.239, p 0.05] and Emotionality [r(128), 0.490, p 0.01] respectively. Furthermore, GPA was found to have a negative (not statistically significant) relation with Sociability. Overall, there was no association found between trait EI and GPA.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study is one of two studies that has investigated the train EI-academic achievement link in healthcare-related students. Our findings resonate with existing literature on the subject.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:疾病缺席,残疾抚恤金,在德国,由于背痛致残而使用医疗保健是很高的经济负担。需要进行评估,以确定可能需要大量支持的员工。
    目的:队列研究检查了康复是否,残疾抚恤金和死亡可以通过简单的自我报告对德国背痛员工的工作能力进行评估来预测。
    方法:在过去3个月内报告背痛的45至59岁员工在2017年完成了工作能力评分(0-10分)。个人得分分为差(0-5分),中等(6-7)和至少良好(8-10)的工作能力。结果是从截至2018年底的行政记录中提取的。拟合比例风险模型以确定工作能力评分的预后益处。
    结果:纳入了6,917名参与者的数据(57.8%的女性)。中位随访时间为20个月。在参与者中,52.1%有一个好的或优秀的,27.7%适度,20.2%的人工作能力得分较差。随访期间,548人获得康复措施,57人残疾抚恤金,23人死亡完全调整的分析显示,在工作能力差的员工中,康复措施(风险比=2.65;95%CI2.11;3.34)和残疾抚恤金(HR=4.12;95%CI2.02;8.39)的风险增加。过早死亡与工作能力差无关。
    结论:工作能力评分是识别个人的潜在工具,报告背部疼痛,与健康相关的提前退休和工作残疾的风险增加。
    BACKGROUND: Sickness absence, disability pensions, and use of healthcare due to disabling back pain are a high economic burden in Germany. Assessment are needed to identify employees who are likely to need intensive support.
    OBJECTIVE: The cohort study examined whether rehabilitation, disability pensions and death can be predicted by a simple self-reported rating of work ability in employees with back pain in Germany.
    METHODS: Employees aged 45 to 59 years who reported back pain in the last 3 months completed the Work Ability Score in 2017 (0-10 points). Individual scores were categorized into poor (0-5 points), moderate (6-7) and at least good (8-10) work ability. Outcomes were extracted from administrative records covering the period until the end of 2018. Proportional hazard models were fitted to determine the prognostic benefit of the Work Ability Score.
    RESULTS: Data for 6,917 participants were included (57.8% women). The median follow-up time was 20 months. Of the participants, 52.1% had a good or excellent, 27.7% a moderate, and 20.2% a poor Work Ability Score. During follow-up, 548 persons were granted rehabilitation measures, 57 persons disability pensions, and 23 died. Fully adjusted analyses showed an increased risk of a rehabilitation measure (hazard ratio = 2.65; 95% CI 2.11; 3.34) and a disability pension (HR = 4.12; 95% CI 2.02; 8.39) in employees with poor work ability. A premature death was not associated with poor work ability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Work Ability Score is a potential tool to identify individuals, reporting back pain, with an increased risk of health-related early retirement and work disability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:德国养老保险的医疗康复(MR)被批准用于维持和恢复工作能力并避免残疾抚恤金。与没有迁移背景(非PMB)的人相比,有迁移背景(PMB)的人的康复利用研究显示出异质性结果,这可能部分是由于迁移状态的不同定义。本文的目的是测试使用的PMB和非PMB与自我报告的背痛之间的MR利用率是否存在差异。
    UNASSIGNED:我们使用了德国一项大型队列研究的数据,该研究分析了MR对背痛患者的有效性,该研究于2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日进行。在过去三个月中报告背部疼痛的45至59岁的员工在2017年完成了基线问卷。我们使用了四种迁移背景(MB)的定义来区分第一代和第二代迁移,通过单侧和双侧迁移背景,通过语言,或国籍。康复利用数据是从截至2018年底的行政记录中提取的。
    UNASIGNED:纳入了6,713名参与者的数据,514人在随访期间使用MR。调整后的分析显示,第一代MB患者康复利用的风险降低(HR=0.46;95%CI0.29;0.72),双侧MB患者(HR=0·47;95%CI0·31;0·72),母语不是德语的人(HR=0·52;95%CI0·30;0·91),和没有德国国籍的人(HR=0·29;95%CI0·12;0·72)与非PMB相比。
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究表明,报告背痛的MB员工使用康复服务的风险显着降低。考虑到甲基溴的不同定义,可以观察到这种利用不足。未来对PMB康复利用的研究应考虑不同定义对结果的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:该研究由德国研究基金会资助(资助编号:BE5885/2-1;MA6981/2-1)。德国研究基金会是促进德国科学和研究的自治机构。
    UNASSIGNED: Medical rehabilitation (MR) by the German Pension Insurance is approved to maintain and to restore work ability and to avoid disability pensions. Studies on the rehabilitation utilization by people with a migration background (PMB) compared to people without a migration background (non-PMB) showed heterogeneous results, which may be partly due to different definitions of migration status. The aim of this paper was to test whether there are differences in utilization of MR between employed PMB and non-PMB with self-reported back pain.
    UNASSIGNED: We used data from a large German cohort study that analyzed the effectiveness of MR for individuals with back pain and was conducted between 1st January 2017 and 31st December 2019. Employees aged 45 to 59 years who reported back pain in the last three months completed the baseline questionnaire in 2017. We used four definitions of migration background (MB) to differentiate by first- and second-generation migration, by one- and two-sided migration background, by language, or by nationality. Data on rehabilitation utilization was extracted from administrative records covering the period until the end of 2018.
    UNASSIGNED: Data of 6,713 participants were included, and 514 individuals utilized MR during follow-up. Adjusted analyses showed a decreased risk of rehabilitation utilization in people with a first-generation MB (HR = 0·46; 95% CI 0·29; 0·72), people with a two-sided MB (HR = 0·47; 95% CI 0·31; 0·72), people whose native language was not German (HR = 0·52; 95% CI 0·30; 0·91), and people without German nationality (HR = 0·29; 95% CI 0·12; 0·72) when compared to non-PMB.
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed that employees with a MB reporting back pain had a significantly reduced risk for utilization of rehabilitation services. This underutilization could be observed considering different definitions of MB. Future research on rehabilitation utilization by PMB should consider the impact of different definitions on the results.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (grant numbers: BE 5885/2-1; MA 6981/2-1). The German Research Foundation functions as a self-governing institution for the promotion of science and research in Germany.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    德国医疗康复计划对背痛的健康相关影响的证据尚无定论。这项队列研究旨在检查背痛患者的医疗康复效果(德国临床试验注册:DRKS00011554)。
    从两家养老金机构随机抽取45,000名45-59岁的人。我们使用倾向评分匹配来比较完成医疗康复计划的背痛患者与类似未经治疗的受试者。问卷数据在2017年和2019年进行了评估,并与行政数据相关联。主要结果是疼痛残疾。
    总共,6610名背痛患者被认为是匹配的,我们最终将200名接受医疗康复计划治疗的患者与200名未经治疗的受试者进行了比较。据报道,与干预组相比,无医疗康复的对照组疼痛残疾更有利(差异=4.2;95%CI-0.8-9.2),以及其他次要结果。
    乍一看,研究结果表明,医疗康复在改善健康方面无效,背痛就业人员的疼痛和工作能力,但是我们发现了合理的解释,表明对未经治疗的受试者有利的估计效果是在方法上引起的。对康复的影响倾向评分匹配可用于评估常规护理中多模式干预对背痛患者的影响。不适当的对照招募可能会低估治疗效果。当使用观察数据和倾向得分匹配来分析医疗康复的有效性时,基线调查应直接在开始康复治疗前进行,以确定可比较的对照.
    Evidence for health-related effects of German medical rehabilitation programs for back pain is inconclusive. This cohort study aimed to examine the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in residents with back pain (German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00011554).
    A sample of 45 000 people aged 45-59 years was randomly drawn from two pension agencies. We used propensity score matching to compare persons with back pain who completed a medical rehabilitation program with similar untreated subjects. Questionnaire data were assessed in 2017 and 2019, and linked with administrative data. The primary outcome was pain disability.
    In total, 6610 persons with back pain were considered for matching and we finally compared 200 persons treated in a medical rehabilitation program with 200 untreated subjects. Pain disability was reported more favorable in the control group without medical rehabilitation compared to the intervention group (difference = 4.2; 95% CI -0.8-9.2), as well as other secondary outcomes.
    At first glance, the findings suggest that medical rehabilitation was ineffective in improving health, pain and work ability among employed persons with back pain, but we found plausible explanations indicating that the estimated effects in favor of the untreated subjects are methodologically induced.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPropensity score matching can be used to assess the effects of multimodal interventions in persons with back pain in routine care.Inappropriate recruitment of controls may underestimate treatment effects.When using observational data and propensity score matching to analyze the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation, baseline survey should be conducted directly before the start of rehabilitation to identify comparable controls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号