OBJECTIVE: The debate about the safest birth mode for breech presentation at term remains unresolved. The comparison of a vaginal breech birth (VBB) with an elective caesarean section (CS) regarding fetal outcomes favors the CS. However, the question of whether attempting a VBB is associated with poorer fetal outcomes is examined in this study. Additionally, the study evaluates factors contributing to a successful VBB and illustrates possible errors in VBB management.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of term breech births over 15 years in a Perinatal Center Level I regarding fetal, maternal, and obstetric outcomes by comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempt and all attempted VBB vs. CS including a multivariate analysis of predictors for a successful VBB. A root cause analysis of severe adverse events (SAE) was conducted to evaluate factors leading to poorer fetal outcomes in VBB.
RESULTS: Of 863 breech cases, in 78 % a CS was performed and in 22 % a VBB was attempted, with 57 % succeeding. Comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempts, successful VBB showed significantly lower maternal blood loss (p < 0.001) but poorer umbilical arterial pH (UApH) (p < 0.001), while other fetal outcome parameters showed no significant differences. Predictive factors for a successful VBB attempt were a body mass index (BMI) below 30.0 kg/m2 (p = 0.010) and multiparity (p = 0.003). Comparing all attempted VBB to CS, maternal blood loss was significantly higher in CS (p < 0.001), while fetal outcomes were significantly worse in VBB attempts, included poorer Apgar scores (p < 0.001), poorer UApH values (p < 0.001), higher transfer rate to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (p < 0.001) and higher rate of respiratory support in the first 24 h (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The failed attempt of VBB indicates significantly worse UApH without lower Apgar scores or higher transfer rate to the NICU. The likelihood of a successful VBB is 9% lower with obesity and 2.5 times higher in multiparous women. Attempting a VBB should include detailed pre-labor counseling, regarding predictive success factors, an experienced team, and consistent management during birth.

UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 is an infectious pathology that shows vascular changes during pregnancy, as well as in the placentas. The main objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence and the risk factors for preeclampsia in hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-19. As well as comparing maternal and perinatal outcomes in hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-19 and preeclampsia with those without preeclampsia.
UNASSIGNED: Prospective cohort study of 100 hospitalized pregnant women from two tertiary hospitals, diagnosed with COVID-19, and divided into two groups: PE+ group (pregnant women with COVID-19 and preeclampsia) and PE- group (pregnant women with COVID-19 without preeclampsia). These pregnant women had prevalence, risk factors, maternal and perinatal data analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of preeclampsia was 11%. Severe COVID-19 was the main risk factor for preeclampsia (OR = 8.18 [CI 1.53-43.52]), as well as fetal growth restriction was the main perinatal outcome (OR = 8.90 [CI 1.52-38.4]). Comorbidities were more frequent in the PE+ group (63.6% vs 31.5%, p = 0.03), as well as prematurity (81.8% vs 41.6%, p = 0.02), low birth weight (63.6% vs 24.7%, p = 0.01), and the need for neonatal intensive care admission of the newborn (63.6% vs 27.0%, p = 0.03). Pregnant women with PE had twice as long a length of stay in the intensive care unit (RR = 2.35 [CI 1.34-4.14]). Although maternal mortality was more frequent among pregnant women with PE, it was not statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: Prevalence of preeclampsia in hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-19 was 11%. Severe COVID-19 was the main risk factor for preeclampsia and associated comorbidities increased the risk for developing preeclampsia. Long length of stay in the intensive care unit was the main maternal outcome and fetal growth restriction was the main perinatal outcome of preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: When acute kidney damage occurs during pregnancy, it poses a difficult clinical problem. One of the main causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and death is pregnancy-related acute kidney injury (AKI), a significant obstetric complication characterized by a fast deterioration in renal function and several subsequent clinical problems. The objective of the study is to analyze the etiological factors, clinical manifestations, and maternal and fetal outcomes of AKI during pregnancy.
METHODS: This prospective observational research involved patients hospitalized in the General Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology departments at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, for a year (October 2021 to September 2022) due to obstetric difficulties resulting in acute renal damage.
RESULTS: The study included 62 patients with a mean age of 25.08±4.25 years. The majority of patients in our study were aged 18-25 years (38, 61.3%), followed by 26-30 years (19, 30.6%) and >30 years (5, 8.1%). The majority of patients in our study were non-booked (52, 83.9%) and presented as emergency cases, whereas 10 (16.1%) patients had booked. In addition, 34 (54.8%) patients were primigravida, while 28 (45.1%) were multigravida. There were 25 patients in their third trimester (40.3%), 19 who were postpartum (30.6%), 10 who were post-abortion (16.1%), and eight in their second trimester (12.9%). Upon admission, the majority of the patients showed signs of oliguria, accounting for 45 cases (72.6%). This was followed by nine cases of abnormal kidney function (14.5%) and eight cases of anuria (12.9%). Among the other symptoms, fever was observed in 25 cases (40.32%), whereas breathlessness increased to 15 cases (24.19%), edema was present in 14 cases (22.58%), vomiting and altered sensorium were observed in four cases (6.45%), abdominal pain was observed in three cases (4.83%), and burning micturition was observed in two cases (3.22%). The most common causes of AKI in pregnancy in the present study were puerperal sepsis (18 cases, 29.0%), followed by preeclampsia/eclampsia (14 cases, 22.6%), hemorrhagic shock (10 cases, 16.1%), septic abortion (six cases, 9.7%), hyperemesis gravidarum (four cases, 6.5%), acute fatty liver of pregnancy (three cases, 4.8%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (three cases, 4.8%), drug-induced sepsis (two cases, 3.2%), and urosepsis (two cases, 3.2%). Modes of delivery in this study were normal vaginal delivery (32 cases, 51.6%), lower segment cesarean section (21 cases, 33.9%), dilation and evacuation (seven cases, 11.3%), and total hysterectomy (two cases, 3.2%). Hemodialysis was performed in 39 patients (62.9%), and 51 (82.3%) received blood transfusions. The mean systolic and diastolic BP (mmHg) were 111.37±22.60 and 71.40±18.88, respectively. Maternal outcome data revealed that 48 (77.4%) women had fully recovered, eight (12.9%) had not recovered, 43 (69.4%) were lost to follow-up, and two (3.2%) had died. Neonatal outcomes in the present study were as follows: live birth, 43 (69.4%); abortion, eight (12.9%); intrauterine death of the fetus, five (8.1%); and neonatal mortality, six (9.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis and treatment of AKI during pregnancy is a significant challenge for the treating physician because of the pathophysiological changes that occur during pregnancy, the variability of symptoms, and the fact that clinical and laboratory features may occasionally overlap.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal outcomes and perinatal mortality are directly and significantly impacted by the use of appropriate antenatal care (ANC) during pregnancy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between the use of prenatal services and maternal and newborn outcomes in both public and private healthcare settings.
METHODS: This study was carried out in two tertiary healthcare setups in Mangaluru, Karnataka: Government Lady Goschen Hospital (LGH) and Kasturba Medical College Hospital (KMCH) Attavar. Data were collected from 150 women who were a part of the study. Microsoft Excel was used to compile the data, and SPSS version 25 was used to analyze it.
RESULTS: We found that 58 out of 90 women admitted to LGH went for ANC check-ups at least four times during their gestation period and the rest of them went eight times or more, compared to just 3 out of the 60 women admitted at KMCH who went at least four times, whereas the rest went eight or more. The number of checks the mother takes appears to affect the term of the gestation with fewer preterm seen in patients who have come for a minimum of eight ANC visits, a higher risk of abnormal weight gain during pregnancy, and a lower risk of giving birth to preterm babies.
CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that private healthcare setups offer more antenatal services, including hospital visits, routine testing, supplements, and doctor advice. The number of antenatal visits is a significant difference between public and private healthcare setups. The public setup requires a minimum of four antenatal care visits, while the updated 2016 version requires eight. The number of antenatal visits affects both mother\'s and neonatal outcomes. A higher number of visits leads to fewer preterm births and a higher risk of abnormal weight gain. Education also influences the frequency of antenatal visits. The study suggests increasing the frequency of prenatal care visits and improving public education on this matter.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) require proper evaluation and timely management to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVE: The present study was done with the objective of determining feto-maternal outcomes in antenatal women with abnormal LFTs and comparing them with antenatal women having normal liver function. The prevalence and possible causes of derangements in LFT were also identified.
METHODS: Pregnant women referred to an antenatal clinic for several reasons pertaining to abnormal liver functions, and those admitted to the labor room for delivery with abnormal LFTs were included in the study. The pregnant women with abnormal LFT were studied prospectively, and they were compared with pregnant women having normal LFT. The fetal and maternal outcomes were also noted.
RESULTS:  The pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic with a history of pruritus, abdominal pain, jaundice, nausea/vomiting, hypertension ascites, etc. and delivered at our facility were evaluated. One hundred and eight women had abnormal LFT defined by criteria laid down in material and methods. Eighty-seven women with normal LFT were taken for comparison. In the abnormal LFT, the main cause was intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (IHCP). There were 6 (5.5%) maternal deaths in this group and none in the normal LFTs. There were 6 (5.6%) fetal deaths and 4 (4.6%) in the other group (p-value=1). The prevalence of abnormal LFT was 9.11% throughout pregnancy. Increased bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were significantly correlated with maternal mortality, while gestational age at birth, presence of meconium, appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score, maternal mortality, and raised alkaline phosphatase level were found to be significantly associated with fetal mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abnormal LFT were significantly associated with maternal morbidity and mortality. However, fetal outcomes in patients with abnormal and normal LFT were similar. Hyperbilirubinemia and raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were significant predictors of maternal mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with puerperal genital hematoma (PGHA) and analyze the management strategies employed and the resulting maternal outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined the pregnant women delivering vaginally with PGHA in Peking University Third Hospital during January 2002 to December 2021. Exploratory data analysis was performed to assess mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, percentage and percentiles. Independent-samples t-test was performed for continuous variables. Chi-squared test was performed to compare categorical data.
RESULTS: A total of 47 women with PGHA were included, and 94 matched controls were enrolled during the same study period. Compared with the control group, labor induction (34.0% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.000) and episiotomy (66.0% vs. 31.9%, P = 0.000) were more frequently performed in PGHA cases. There was a significantly higher incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (53.2% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.000) in PGHA patients than in controls. Compared with the patients with <5 cm hematoma, the proportion of prenatal anemia (25.8% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.027) and the incidence of PPH (67.7% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.005) were significantly higher in patients with ≥5 cm hematoma. In comparison, the active period was significantly shorter (3.1 ± 1.9 vs. 5.1 ± 3.0, P = 0.031) in patients with ≥5 cm hematoma. There were significant differences in perineal pain and swelling (31.3% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.017), vulva hematoma (93.8% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.002) and surgical treatment (62.5% vs. 96.8%, P = 0.002). Nearly half of the patients in the ≥5 cm group underwent secondary suture (41.9% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.011). In patients with PGHA detected after more than 2 h, the body mass index was substantially higher (24.5 ± 4.3 vs. 21.4 ± 2.7, P = 0.011), and the weight gain during pregnancy (14.1 ± 4.3 vs. 11.4 ± 3.5, P = 0.021) was significantly lower. Compared with the patients in PGHA without PPH, age (31.7 ± 4.4 vs. 29.4 ± 2.6, P = 0.033) and newborn birth weight (3367 ± 390 g vs. 3110 ± 419 g, P = 0.045) were considerably higher in PGHA cases with PPH, and the platelet count ([182 ± 44] × 109/L vs. [219 ± 51] × 109/L, P = 0.015) was significantly lower.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women who underwent labor induction and episiotomy had a higher incidence of PGHA. The PGHA-related PPH rate is significantly increased. Active surgical treatment is recommended for patients with ≥5 cm hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of adenomyosis at pathologic examination, and its association with obstetric complications, peripartum maternal clinical characteristics and neonatal birth weight in patients undergoing postpartum hysterectomy due to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).
METHODS: A multicenter, observational, retrospective, cohort study was carried out including all women who underwent postpartum hysterectomy due to PPH at gestational week 23+0 or later, between January 2010 and May 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence of adenomyosis at pathologic examination, and were compared for obstetric complications, peripartum maternal clinical characteristics, and neonatal birth weight.
RESULTS: The histologically-based prevalence of adenomyosis in patients undergoing postpartum hysterectomy due to PPH was 39.4%. Adenomyosis was associated with a longer hospitalization time (regression coefficient: 4.43 days, 95% CI: 0.34-8.52, P = 0.034) and a higher risk of hypertensive disorders (OR: 5.82, 95% CI: 1.38-24.46, P = 0.016), threatened preterm labor (OR: 3.34, 95% CI: 1.08-10.31, P = 0.036), urgent/emergency C-section (OR: 24.15, 95% CI: 2.60-223.96, P = 0.005), postpartum maternal complications (OR: 4.96, 95% CI: 1.48-16.67, P = 0.012), maternal intensive care unit admission (OR: 3.56, 95% CI: 1.05-12.05, P = 0.041), and low birth weight neonates (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.32-11.02, P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing postpartum hysterectomy due to PPH, adenomyosis is a highly prevalent condition among, and is associated with adverse obstetric, maternal, and neonatal outcomes.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to assess the effects of participating in CenteringPregnancy (CP) on maternal, birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands.
METHODS: A total of 2124 pregnant women in primary care were included in the study. Data were derived from the Dutch national database, Perined, complemented with data from questionnaires completed by pregnant women. A stepwise-wedge design was employed; multilevel intention-to-treat analyses and propensity score matching were the main analytic approaches. Propensity score matching resulted in sample sizes of 305 nulliparous women in both the individual care (IC) and the matched control group (control-IC) and 267 in the CP and control-CP groups. For multiparous women, 354 matches were found for IC and control-IC groups and 152 for CP and control-CP groups. Main outcome measures were maternal, birth, and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: Compared with the control-CP group receiving standard antenatal care, nulliparous women participating in CP had a lower risk of maternal hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93) and for the composite adverse maternal outcome (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82). Breastfeeding initiation rates were higher amongst nulliparous (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 134-3.69) and multiparous women (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.00-2.62) participating in CP compared with women in the control-CP group.
CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women in CP were at lower risk of developing hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and, consequently, at lower risk of having adverse maternal outcomes. The results confirmed our hypothesis that both nulliparous and multiparous women who participated in CP would have higher breastfeeding rates compared with women receiving standard antenatal care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the labor duration and other maternal and neonatal outcomes between hospitalized women with uncomplicated pregnancies receiving amniotomy at 5 cm cervical dilatation and those not receiving amniotomy.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital between June 2020 and October 2021. The study included low-risk pregnant women with spontaneous onset of labor at term, carrying a single fetus in cephalic presentation and with intact amniotic membranes. When the cervical dilatation reached 5 cm, participants were randomly assigned to receive or not receive amniotomy. Maternal demographics, labor and delivery data, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The amniotomy group had a significantly shorter duration of labor compared with the control group (mean difference 49.4 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-81.9, P = 0.003). The following outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups: (1) the need for oxytocin to augment labor; (2) cesarean section rates; (3) the incidence rates of suspected fetal distress and instrumental delivery; and (4) neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with expectant management, amniotomy during the active phase of labor (as newly defined by WHO) can shorten the labor duration without an increased risk of cesarean delivery or other negative consequences. THAI CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY (TCTR) (TCTR20200522001): https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20200522001.