long-term survival

长期生存
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以小麦为基础的食物已经成为人类食源性疾病的另一种潜在工具。最近发生的涉及小麦基食品的召回事件需要充分了解这些病原体如何在这些食品中茁壮成长,并制定潜在的干预策略来解决病原体污染。这份手稿是涵盖小麦产品食品安全状况的两部分审查的第二部分。在这份手稿中,关于肠道食源性病原体存活的现有信息,食品安全问题,并对小麦基食品中潜在的病原体减少步骤进行了综述。产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌能够在小麦粉和谷物中长时间存活(≤2年)。基于与小麦粉相关的食品安全问题,关注的主要肠道病原体是STEC(O157,O121,O26和O103)和沙门氏菌。多样化的干预措施,如回火治疗,热处理,和非热技术都有效地降低了小麦谷物和小麦粉的致病负荷(减少2至6logCFU/g)。解决小麦基食品的病原体污染是制粉行业的主要关注点。未来的研究可以集中在改善病原体减少性能,并验证其对不同产品和工艺条件的影响。
    Wheat-based foods has emerged as another potential vehicle for foodborne illness in humans. The recent occurrence of recalls involving wheat-based foods requires a full understanding of how these pathogens thrive in these food products and developing potential intervention strategies to address pathogen contamination. This manuscript is the second of a two-part review covering the status of the food safety of wheat-based products. In this manuscript, available information on the survival of enteric foodborne pathogens, food safety issues, and potential pathogen reduction steps on wheat-based foods were reviewed. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli and Salmonella are capable of surviving in wheat flours and grains for extended periods (≤ 2 years). Based on the food safety issues linked to wheat flour, the main enteric pathogens of concern are STEC (O157, O121, O26, and O103) and Salmonella. Diverse interventions such as tempering treatments, thermal treatments, and non-thermal technologies all effectively reduced the pathogenic loads of wheat grains and wheat flours (2 to 6 log CFU/g reduction). Addressing pathogen contamination of wheat-based foods is a major concern for the milling industry. Future studies could be focused on improving pathogen reduction performance and validating their effects against diverse product and process conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先天性矫正的大动脉转位(cc-TGA)是一种缺陷,其特征是动室和房室不一致。大多数患者有共存的心脏异常,需要进一步治疗。有些病人不需要手术干预,但大多数都接受生理修复或解剖手术,使他们能够成年。目的:我们旨在评估cc-TGA患者的死亡危险因素。结果:我们搜索了PubMed数据库,并纳入了10项回顾性队列研究,随访时间至少为5年,终点为手术后至少30天的心血管死亡。我们招募了532名患者,83例符合心血管死亡或同等事件的终点.作为长期死亡的危险因素,我们确定了纽约心脏协会(NYHA)≥III级/心力衰竭住院(OR=10.53;95%CI,3.17~34.98)和全身心室功能障碍(SVD;OR=4.95;95%CI,2.55~9.64).我们没有显示室上性心律失常的病史(OR=2.78;95%CI,0.94-8.24),系统性瓣膜返流≥中度(SVR;OR=4.02;95%Cl,0.84-19.18),和起搏器植入(OR=1.48;95%Cl,0.12-18.82)影响长期生存率。仅在手术患者中,SVD(OR=4.69;95%CI,2.06-10.71)和SVR(OR=3.85;95%CI,1.5-9.85)对生存率有统计学意义。结论:整个cc-TGA人群长期死亡的危险因素是NYHA≥III级/心力衰竭住院和全身心室功能障碍。在手术患者中,发现全身性心室功能障碍和至少中度的全身性瓣膜反流会影响生存率。
    Background: Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (cc-TGA) is a defect characterized by arterio-ventricular and atrioventricular disconcordance. Most patients have co-existing cardiac abnormalities that warrant further treatment. Some patients do not require surgical intervention, but most undergo physiological repair or anatomical surgery, which enables them to reach adulthood. Aims: We aimed to evaluate mortality risk factors in patients with cc-TGA. Results: We searched the PubMed database and included 10 retrospective cohort studies with at least a 5-year follow-up time with an end-point of cardiovascular death a minimum of 30 days after surgery. We enrolled 532 patients, and 83 met the end-point of cardiovascular death or equivalent event. As a risk factor for long-term mortality, we identified New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥III/heart failure hospitalization (OR = 10.53; 95% CI, 3.17-34.98) and systemic ventricle dysfunction (SVD; OR = 4.95; 95% CI, 2.55-9.64). We did not show history of supraventricular arrhythmia (OR = 2.78; 95% CI, 0.94-8.24), systemic valve regurgitation ≥moderate (SVR; OR = 4.02; 95% Cl, 0.84-19.18), and pacemaker implantation (OR = 1.48; 95% Cl, 0.12-18.82) to affect the long-term survival. In operated patients only, SVD (OR = 4.69; 95% CI, 2.06-10.71) and SVR (OR = 3.85; 95% CI, 1.5-9.85) showed a statistically significant impact on survival. Conclusions: The risk factors for long-term mortality for the entire cc-TGA population are NYHA class ≥III/heart failure hospitalization and systemic ventricle dysfunction. In operated patients, systemic ventricle dysfunction and at least moderate systemic valve regurgitation were found to affect survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于其侵袭性和不良预后,管理广泛阶段的SCLC(ES-SCLC)长期以来一直是临床医生和肿瘤学家的挑战。我们报告了一例41岁的女性ES-SCLC存活了6年,无视这种疾病的典型不良预后。通过涉及化疗的重度治疗策略,靶向治疗,和免疫疗法,患者经历了强烈的反应,避免了远处转移,包括大脑参与。SCLC的长期生存病例强调需要进一步研究个性化策略和预后生物标志物。该病例对临床医生和研究人员都具有重要价值,因为它挑战了ES-SCLC的常规策略,并为旨在延长SCLC生存期的未来循证研究奠定了基础。
    Managing extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) has long been challenging for clinicians and oncologists due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. We report a case of a 41-year-old female with ES-SCLC who survived for six years, defying the disease\'s typically poor prognosis. Through a heavy treatment strategy involving chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the patient experienced robust responses and avoided distant metastasis, including brain involvement. The long-term survival case in SCLC highlights the need for further research into personalized strategies and prognostic biomarkers. This case holds significant value for both clinicians and researchers as it challenges the conventional strategies for ES-SCLC and sets the stage for future evidence-based studies aimed at extending survival in SCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:改善的全身治疗使胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)切除术后的长期(≥5年)总生存期(LTS)越来越普遍。然而,缺乏对PDAC切除术后LTS预测因素的系统评价.
    方法:PubMed,Embase,Scopus,和CochraneCENTRAL数据库从开始到2023年3月进行了系统搜索。包括报告与LTS相关因素的实际生存数据(基于随访而非生存分析估计)的研究。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析,采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)衡量研究质量。
    结果:对27,091例接受PDAC手术切除的患者(LTS:2,132,非LTS:24,959)的25项研究进行了荟萃分析。根据20项研究,LTS患者的中位比例为18.32%(IQR12.97-21.18%)。LTS的预测因素包括性别,体重指数(BMI),术前CA19-9、CEA、和白蛋白,中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率,肿瘤分级,AJCC阶段,淋巴血管和神经周浸润,病理性T分期,结节性疾病,转移性疾病,边距状态,辅助治疗,血管切除术,手术时间,手术失血,围手术期输血。大多数文章都收到了“好”的NOS评估,表明偏见的风险是可以接受的。
    结论:我们的荟萃分析汇集了文献中的所有真实随访数据,以量化PDAC切除术后预后因素与LTS之间的关联。虽然似乎有证据表明风险之间存在复杂的相互作用,肿瘤生物学,患者特征,和管理相关因素,没有单一参数可以预测PDAC切除术后的LTS。
    BACKGROUND: Improved systemic therapy has made long term (≥ 5 years) overall survival (LTS) after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increasingly common. However, a systematic review on predictors of LTS following resection of PDAC is lacking.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until March 2023. Studies reporting actual survival data (based on follow-up and not survival analysis estimates) on factors associated with LTS were included. Meta-analyses were conducted by using a random effects model, and study quality was gauged by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
    RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with 27,091 patients (LTS: 2,132, non-LTS: 24,959) who underwent surgical resection for PDAC were meta-analyzed. The median proportion of LTS patients was 18.32% (IQR 12.97-21.18%) based on 20 studies. Predictors for LTS included sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative levels of CA19-9, CEA, and albumin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, tumor grade, AJCC stage, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, pathologic T-stage, nodal disease, metastatic disease, margin status, adjuvant therapy, vascular resection, operative time, operative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion. Most articles received a \"good\" NOS assessment, indicating an acceptable risk of bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis pools all true follow up data in the literature to quantify associations between prognostic factors and LTS after resection of PDAC. While there appears to be evidence of a complex interplay between risk, tumor biology, patient characteristics, and management related factors, no single parameter can predict LTS after the resection of PDAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是一种威胁生命的乳腺癌亚型,治疗选择有限。因此,本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评估和比较不同新辅助化疗(NCT)方案对TNBC患者长期生存的影响.
    方法:PubMed,Embase,Medline,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和主要的国际会议数据库被系统地搜索关于不同NCT方案在TNBC患者中的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT).从2000年1月至2023年6月进行了搜索。使用I2统计量评估研究异质性。使用危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CIs)评估无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。使用赔率比(OR)和95%CI来评估病理完全缓解(pCR)。主要结果是DFS。
    结果:我们对21个RCT进行了NMA检查,包括8873例TNBC患者。我们的研究将蒽环类和紫杉烷类的组合定义为首选治疗方案。在此基础上,添加以下任何一种新药都被认为是一种新的治疗选择:贝伐单抗(B),铂(P),聚ADP-核糖聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi),和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)。根据累积排名曲线(SUCRA)下的曲面值,DFS的前三个SUCRA面积值是紫杉烷,蒽环类药物,和环磷酰胺(TAC;89.23%);CT(84.53%);和B(81.06%)。OS前3位的SUCRA面积值分别为CT(83.70%),TAC(62.02%),和含B方案(60.06%)。pCR的SUCRA面积值排名前3位的是含B+P方案(82.7%),ICI+含P方案(80.2%),和含ICI的方案(61.8%)。
    结论:该NMA显示标准化疗是长期生存的良好选择。此外,就pCR而言,与含P方案相关的B可能是新辅助TNBC的最佳治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a life-threatening subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of various neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) options on the long-term survival of patients with TNBC.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and major international conference databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of various NCT options in patients with TNBC. Searches were performed from January 2000 to June 2023. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR). The primary outcome was DFS.
    RESULTS: We conducted an NMA of 21 RCTs involving 8873 patients with TNBC. Our study defined the combination of anthracyclines and taxanes as the preferred treatment option. On this basis, the addition of any of the following new drugs is considered a new treatment option: bevacizumab (B), platinum (P), poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, the top three SUCRA area values of DFS were taxanes, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide (TAC; 89.23%); CT (84.53%); and B (81.06%). The top three SUCRA area values of OS were CT (83.70%), TAC (62.02%), and B-containing regimens (60.06%). The top three SUCRA area values of pCR were B + P-containing regimens (82.7%), ICI + P-containing regimens (80.2%), and ICI-containing regimens (61.8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This NMA showed that standard chemotherapy is a good choice with respect to long-term survival. Moreover, B associated with P-containing regimens is likely to be the optimal treatment option for neoadjuvant TNBC in terms of pCR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    复发胃癌的预后普遍较差,很少进行积极的手术治疗。在这里,我们介绍了一例因胃癌切除小脑和肾上腺转移的患者。该患者在23年时接受了远端胃切除术的胃癌治疗,在48年时接受了完全性胃切除术的残余胃癌治疗。59岁,她出现眩晕和恶心,被诊断为小脑和左肾上腺肿瘤。首先,小脑肿瘤被切除并诊断为胃癌转移。一个月后,切除肾上腺肿瘤并诊断为转移。她接受了全脑放疗和随后的S-1化疗。手术一年后,患者死于癌性脑膜炎。关于脑转移瘤切除后长期生存的报道很少。在这里,我们报告我们的经验和文献综述。
    The prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer is generally poor, and aggressive surgical treatment is rarely performed. Herein, we present the case of a patient who underwent resection of cerebellar and adrenal gland metastases from gastric cancer. The patient was treated for gastric cancer with distal gastrectomy at 23 years and for remnant gastric cancer with completion gastrectomy at 48 years. At 59 years old, she experienced vertigo and nausea and was diagnosed with cerebellar and left adrenal gland tumours. First, the cerebellar tumours were resected and diagnosed as metastases of gastric cancer. After 1 month, the adrenal gland tumour was resected and diagnosed as metastatic. She underwent whole-brain radiotherapy and subsequent chemotherapy with S-1. One year after the surgery, the patient died of meningitis carcinomatosa. There are few reports on long-term survival after the resection of brain metastases. Herein, we report our experience along with a review of the literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症手术后麻醉和长期肿瘤预后之间的关系仍然存在争议。本研究旨在探讨丙泊酚麻醉和吸入麻醉对肿瘤手术长期生存的影响。
    在PubMed进行了全面的文献检索,Medline,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆,直到2023年11月15日。结果包括总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。使用随机效应模型计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
    我们纳入了42项回顾性队列研究和两项随机对照试验(RCT),共686,923例患者。与手术后吸入麻醉相比,丙泊酚麻醉改善了OS(HR=0.82,95%CI:0.76-0.88,P<0.00001)和RFS(HR=0.80,95%CI:0.73-0.88,P<0.00001)。然而,这些阳性结果仅在单中心研究中观察到(OS:HR=0.76,95%CI:0.68-0.84,P<0.00001;RFS:HR=0.76,95%CI:0.66-0.87,P<0.0001),但在多中心研究中没有(OS:HR=0.98,95%CI:0.94-1.03,P=0.51;RFS:HR=0.95,95%CI:0.87-1.04,P=0.26)。亚组分析显示,丙泊酚为基础的麻醉提供了OS和RFS优势(OS:HR=0.58,95%CI:0.40-0.86,P=0.005;RFS:HR=0.62,95%CI:0.44-0.86,P=0.005),妇科肿瘤(OS:HR=0.52,95%CI:0.33-0.81,P=0.004;RFS:HR=0.51,95%CI:0.36-0.72,P=0.0001),和骨肉瘤(OS:HR=0.30,95%CI:0.11-0.81,P=0.02;RFS:HR=0.32,95%CI:0.14-0.75,P=0.008)手术。
    在某些癌症手术中,基于丙泊酚的麻醉可能比吸入麻醉改善OS和RFS。考虑到回顾性设计的固有弱点和强烈的出版偏见,我们的研究结果应谨慎解释.精心设计的多中心RCT仍然迫切需要进一步证实这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: The association between anesthesia and long-term oncological outcome after cancer surgery remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effect of propofol-based anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on long-term survival in cancer surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until November 15, 2023. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: We included forty-two retrospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 686,923 patients. Propofol-based anesthesia was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI:0.76-0.88, P < 0.00001) and RFS (HR = 0.80, 95 % CI:0.73-0.88, P < 0.00001) than inhalation anesthesia after cancer surgery. However, these positive results were only observed in single-center studies (OS: HR = 0.76, 95 % CI:0.68-0.84, P < 0.00001; RFS: HR = 0.76, 95 % CI:0.66-0.87, P < 0.0001), but not in multicenter studies (OS: HR = 0.98, 95 % CI:0.94-1.03, P = 0.51; RFS: HR = 0.95, 95 % CI:0.87-1.04, P = 0.26). The subgroup analysis revealed that propofol-based anesthesia provided OS and RFS advantages in hepatobiliary cancer (OS: HR = 0.58, 95 % CI:0.40-0.86, P = 0.005; RFS: HR = 0.62, 95 % CI:0.44-0.86, P = 0.005), gynecological cancer (OS: HR = 0.52, 95 % CI:0.33-0.81, P = 0.004; RFS: HR = 0.51, 95 % CI:0.36-0.72, P = 0.0001), and osteosarcoma (OS: HR = 0.30, 95 % CI:0.11-0.81, P = 0.02; RFS: HR = 0.32, 95 % CI:0.14-0.75, P = 0.008) surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: Propofol-based anesthesia may be associated with improved OS and RFS than inhalation anesthesia in some cancer surgeries. Considering the inherent weaknesses of retrospective designs and the strong publication bias, our findings should be interpreted with caution. Well-designed multicenter RCTs are still urgent to further confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与术后辅助治疗相比,新辅助治疗具有更多潜在优势,比如降低肿瘤分期,杀死微转移细胞。由于这些优点,新辅助治疗被推荐用于许多类型的肿瘤,如乳房,肺癌和直肠癌.确定新辅助治疗对可切除食管癌患者的总生存期和不良反应的作用。本文综述了7种新辅助疗法的临床研究。目前,中国食管癌(EC)患者主要接受术后治疗,<30%的患者接受新辅助治疗。在中国,新辅助治疗的使用有限的一个原因是基于影像学的分期不准确,新辅助治疗可能会增加手术的困难。新辅助治疗后,可能有组织水肿,手术视野模糊,组织间隙不清,导致手术难度更大。然而,肿瘤学家对新辅助治疗感兴趣,尤其是新辅助免疫疗法来治疗EC。食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的同步放化疗是最常见的新辅助治疗方案,可提高病理完全缓解(pCR)和5年和10年生存率。术前诱导化疗和序贯同步放化疗是目前我国临床上应用最广泛的治疗方法。然而,这种治疗策略不能获得长期生存.新辅助免疫治疗的pCR率高于同步放化疗,但据我们所知,在I期和II期临床试验中没有发现长期生存获益的证据.局部晚期ESCC患者应考虑新辅助治疗。
    Compared with postoperative adjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant therapy has more potential advantages, such as decreasing tumor stage, killing micrometastatic cells. Because of these advantages, neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for numerous types of tumor, such as breast, lung and rectal cancer. To determine the role of neoadjuvant therapy on overall survival and adverse for patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma. we summarized clinical studies on 7 types of neoadjuvant therapies in this review. Currently, patients with esophageal cancer (EC) in China mainly receive postoperative treatment with <30% of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. One reason for the limited use of neoadjuvant therapy in China is inaccurate staging based on imaging and neoadjuvant treatment may increase difficulties in surgery. After neoadjuvant therapy, there may be tissue edema, blurry surgical field of view and unclear tissue gaps, resulting in greater difficulty in surgical procedures. However, oncologists are interested in neoadjuvant treatment, especially neoadjuvant immunotherapy to treat EC. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common neoadjuvant treatment regimen and increases the pathological complete response (pCR) and 5- and 10-year survival rates. Preoperative induction chemotherapy and sequential concurrent chemoradiotherapy are currently the most widely treatments used in clinical practice in China. However, this treatment strategy does not yield long-term survival. The pCR rate of neoadjuvant immunotherapy is greater than that of concurrent chemoradiotherapy but, to the best of our knowledge, no evidence of long-term survival benefit has been found in phase I and II clinical trials. Neoadjuvant treatment should be considered for patients with locally advanced ESCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 我们报告了在肿瘤科治疗的长期生存的小细胞肺癌的罕见病例,仁济医院,上海交通大学医学院。分析病理临床特点及诊治进展,和综合治疗策略,通过与以往其他研究的比较,讨论了该类型肿瘤的异质性和预后。这位62岁的患者被诊断出患有小细胞肺癌,并接受了手术,放疗和多线治疗,手术后存活了13年。应仔细评估小细胞肺癌的异质性,以改善患者的预后。
    We report a rare case of small-cell lung carcinoma with long-term survival treated in the Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The pathological-clinical features and diagnosis-treatment progress were analyzed, and the comprehensive treatment strategies, tumor heterogeneity and prognosis of this tumor type were discussed by comparing with other previous studies. The 62-year-old patient was diagnosed with small-cell lung carcinoma and received surgery, radiotherapy and multi-line treatment, and had survived for 13 years after the surgery. The heterogeneity of small cell lung carcinoma should be carefully evaluated to improve the prognosis of the patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:间歇性Pringle动作(IPM)通常用于控制肝切除术期间的出血。IPM可引起缺血再灌注损伤,这可能会影响肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的预后。本荟萃分析旨在评估IPM使用对HCC患者围手术期结局和长期生存率的影响。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,WebofScience,和CochraneLibrary数据库,以确定随机对照试验和回顾性研究,这些试验和回顾性研究比较了肝癌患者肝切除术期间IPM和无Pringle操作的效果。危险比(HR),风险比率,标准化平均差,根据变量类型计算其95%置信区间(CI)值.
    结果:本荟萃分析包括9项研究,包括1项RCT和8项回顾性研究,共涉及3268例患者。围手术期结果,包括操作时间,并发症,以及住院时间,除了失血,两组之间具有可比性。在移除导致异质性的研究后,结果表明,IPM可有效减少失血。5项研究报告了总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)数据,8项研究报告了围手术期结局。两组间OS和DFS无显著差异(OS:HR,1.01;95%CI,0.85-1.20;p=0.95;DFS:HR,1.01;95%CI,0.88-1.17;p=0.86)。
    结论:IPM是一种控制肝切除术过程中失血的有用技术,并且不影响HCC患者的长期生存。
    BACKGROUND: Intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) is commonly used to control bleeding during liver resection. IPM can cause ischemia-reperfusion injury, which may affect the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of IPM use on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in patients with HCC.
    METHODS: A systemic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies that compared the effect of IPM with no Pringle maneuver during liver resection in patients with HCC. Hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio, standardized mean difference, and their 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated based on the type of variables.
    RESULTS: This meta-analysis included nine studies comprising one RCT and eight retrospective studies and involved a total of 3268 patients. Perioperative outcomes, including operation time, complications, and length of hospital stay, except for blood loss, were comparable between the two groups. After removing the studies that led to heterogeneity, the results showed that IPM was effective in reducing blood loss. Five studies reported overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) data and eight studies reported perioperative outcomes. No significant difference in OS and DFS was observed between the two groups (OS: HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.20; p = 0.95; DFS: HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88-1.17; p = 0.86).
    CONCLUSIONS: IPM is a useful technique to control blood loss during liver resection and does not affect the long-term survival of patients with HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号