背景:患有局限性前列腺癌的男性通常使用局部治疗(LT)进行治疗。然而,这些患者中有一部分最终会出现复发和进展,需要进行全身治疗.原发性LT是否会影响对随后的全身治疗的反应尚不清楚。
目的:我们研究了在多西他赛初治转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中,接受前列腺定向LT治疗是否会影响一线全身治疗的反应和生存率。
方法:这是对COU-AA-302试验的探索性分析,一项多中心双盲3期随机对照试验,其中无至轻度症状的mCRPC患者随机接受阿比特龙联合泼尼松治疗或安慰剂联合泼尼松治疗.
方法:我们使用Cox比例风险模型比较了一线阿比特龙在有和没有先前LT的患者中的时变效应。切点是使用网格搜索选择的,放射学无进展生存期(rPFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为6个月和36个月,分别。我们还调查了在不同患者报告的结果(通过癌症治疗-前列腺[FACT-P]的功能评估来测量)中,根据之前接受的LT,对评分变化(相对于基线)的治疗效果是否存在任何差异。使用加权Cox回归模型确定先前LT与生存的校正关联。
结论:在1053名符合条件的患者中,64%(n=669)接受了先前的LT。我们没有发现阿比特龙的时间依赖性治疗效应对rPFS的任何统计学上显著的异质性,患者有(≤6个月时风险比[HR]:0.36[95%置信区间:0.27-0.49];>6个月时0.64[0.49-0.83])或无(≤6个月时HR:0.37[0.26-0.55];>6个月时0.72[0.50-1.03])同样,时间依赖性治疗对OS的影响无显著异质性(≤36mo时HR:0.88[0.71-1.10];>36mo时HR:0.76[0.52-1.11])或不存在(≤36mo时0.78[0.60-1.01];>36mo时0.55[0.30-0.99]).我们没有找到足够的证据表明,在前列腺癌分量表(交互作用p=0.4)中,阿比曲酮对随时间变化的治疗效果存在差异。试验结果指数(相互作用p=0.8),和FACT-P总分(相互作用p=0.6)取决于先前LT的接收。接受先前的LT与OS的显着改善相关(平均HR:0.72[0.59-0.89])。
结论:这项研究表明,一线阿比特龙和泼尼松在多西他赛初治mCRPC中的疗效根据先前接受前列腺定向LT的情况没有显着变化。需要进一步的研究来探索先前LT与优越OS关联的合理机制。
结果:对COU-AA-302试验的二级分析表明,接受多西他赛初治mCRPC的一线阿比特龙的生存获益和生活质量的时间变化在接受与未接受前列腺定向局部治疗的患者中没有显着差异。
Men with localized prostate cancer are often treated with local therapy (LT). However, a proportion of these patients will eventually develop recurrence and progression requiring systemic therapy. Whether primary LT affects the response to this subsequent systemic treatment is unclear.
We investigated whether the receipt of prior prostate-directed LT influenced the response to first-line systemic therapy and survival in docetaxel-naïve metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
This is an exploratory analysis of the COU-AA-302
trial, a multicentric double-blinded phase 3 randomized controlled
trial in which mCRPC patients with no to mild symptoms were randomized to receive abiraterone plus prednisone or placebo plus prednisone.
We compared the time-varying effects of first-line abiraterone in patients with and without prior LT using a Cox proportional hazard model. The cut points were chosen using grid search, and were 6 and 36 mo for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. We also investigated whether there was any difference in treatment effect on score change (relative to baseline) in various patient-reported outcomes (measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P]) over time depending on the receipt of prior LT. The adjusted association of prior LT with survival was determined using weighted Cox regression models.
Among 1053 eligible patients, 64% (n = 669) received prior LT. We did not find any statistically significant heterogeneity of time-dependent treatment effect from abiraterone on rPFS in patients with (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36 [95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.49] at ≤6 mo; 0.64 [0.49-0.83] at >6 mo) or without (HR: 0.37 [0.26-0.55] at ≤6 mo; 0.72 [0.50-1.03] at >6 mo) prior LT. Similarly, there was no significant heterogeneity in time-dependent treatment effect on OS with (HR: 0.88 [0.71-1.10] at ≤36 mo; 0.76 [0.52-1.11] at >36 mo) or without (0.78 [0.60-1.01] at ≤36 mo; 0.55 [0.30-0.99] at >36 mo) prior LT. We did not find sufficient evidence of a difference in treatment effect from abiraterone on score change over time in prostate cancer subscale (interaction p = 0.4),
trial outcome index (interaction p = 0.8), and FACT-P total score (interaction p = 0.6) depending on the receipt of prior LT. Receipt of prior LT was associated with a significant improvement in OS (average HR: 0.72 [0.59-0.89]).
This
study demonstrates that the efficacy of first-line abiraterone and prednisone in docetaxel-naïve mCRPC do not vary significantly based on the receipt of prior prostate-directed LT. Further studies are needed to explore the plausible mechanisms of the association of prior LT with superior OS.
This secondary analysis of the COU-AA-302
trial suggests that survival benefits and temporal changes in quality of life with first-line abiraterone in docetaxel-naïve mCRPC do not differ significantly among patients who received versus those who did not receive prior prostate-directed local therapy.