UNASSIGNED: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) infiltrating the hilar bifurcation is rarely described. We investigated the outcome of partial hepatectomy combined with resection of the hilar bifurcation.
UNASSIGNED: Data collection for patients who underwent resection for CRLM at our institution was performed prospectively from January 2008 to August 2021. Follow-up ended in August 2023. Patients with and without bile duct infiltration of CRLM were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoints were overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,156 liver resections were screened. Out of those, 18 were combined resections of the liver and the hilar bifurcation. Bile duct infiltration of CRLM was histologically proven in 5 of 18 cases. Preoperative mild obstructive jaundice occurred in 6 of 18 patients and was treated by drainage. Out of those, only 2 had a confirmed infiltration of the hilar bifurcation by CRLM. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 10 months in those patients with bile duct infiltration compared to 9 months in those with no infiltration (p = 0.503).
UNASSIGNED: While CRLM is common, infiltration into the central biliary tract is rare. Tumor invasion of the biliary tree can cause jaundice, but jaundice does not necessarily mean tumor invasion. We have shown that combined resection of the liver and hilar bifurcation for CRLM is safe and infiltration of the bile duct by CRLM did not seem to have a significant effect on RFS or OS.

UNASSIGNED: Tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are highly effective and well-tolerated nucleos(t)ide analogs commonly prescribed for hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment. Yet, it is unclear whether survival outcomes differ for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ETV and TDF. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognostic effectiveness of ETV and TDF in HBV-related HCC patients.
UNASSIGNED: We comprehensively searched four databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify pertinent studies utilizing keywords \"entecavir,\" \"tenofovir,\" \"hepatocellular carcinoma,\" and \"liver resection.\" Our primary outcomes of interest encompassed overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), early recurrence, and late recurrence. The statistical effect size for these measures was expressed in terms of hazard ratios (HRs).
UNASSIGNED: Our search yielded 10 studies encompassing 11 datasets involving 7,400 patients. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients treated with TDF achieved better OS (HR = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.70, p < 0.0001), RFS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.57-0.80; p < 0.0001), early recurrence (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.67-0.94; p < 0.0077), and late recurrence (HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.43-0.97; p = 0.0368). We detected publication bias potentially affecting OS but not RFS.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings demonstrated that TDF outperformed ETV regarding RFS for HBV-related HCC patients. However, to bolster the evidence and establish more conclusive conclusions, further validation via extensive and high-quality randomized controlled trials is essential.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD 42024542579.

BACKGROUND: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is a recognized antioxidative agent that facilitates the conjugation of toxic metabolites. In recent years, NAC has been routinely used to limit ischaemia-reperfusion injury in liver transplantation. There remains, however, contradictory evidence on its effectiveness in liver resection. This meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of NAC in improving outcomes following hepatectomy.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since database inception until November 2023. The outcomes of Day 1 biochemical markers (lactate, ALT, bilirubin, and INR), length of stay, transfusion rates, and morbidity were extracted. Quantitative pooling of data was based on a random-effects model. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration no: CRD42023442429).
RESULTS: Five RCTs reporting on 388 patients undergoing hepatectomy were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between groups. Post-operative lactate was lower in patients receiving NAC (WMD -0.61, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.04, I2 = 67%). There were, however, no differences in the post-operative INR (WMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.12, I2 = 96%) and ALT (WMD -94.94, 95% CI -228.46 to 40.38; I2 = 67%). More importantly, there were no statistically significant differences in length of stay, transfusion rates, and morbidity between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of NAC in liver resection did not alter important biochemical parameters suggesting any real effectiveness in reducing hepatic dysfunction. There were no improvements in the clinical outcomes of length of stay, transfusion rates, and overall morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the 2 principal minimally invasive surgical approaches and the first line of treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is not clear which one has greater safety and efficacy. In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare the safety and effectiveness of LH versus RFA for patients with HCC, especially where perioperative and postoperative outcomes differrent.
METHODS: In PROSPERO, a meta-analysis with registration number CRD42021257575 was registered. Using an established search strategy, we systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase to identify eligible studies before June 2023. Data on operative times, blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were subjected to meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, the present meta-analysis included 8 retrospective and 6 PSM studies comprising 1,848 patients (810 and 1,038 patients underwent LH and RFA). In this meta-analysis, neither LH nor RFA showed significant differences in 1-year and 3-year OS rate and 5-year RFS rate. Despite this, in comparison to the RFA group, LH resulted in significantly higher 1-year(p<0.0001) and 3-year RFS rate (p = 0.005), higher 5-year OS rate (p = 0.008), lower local recurrence rate (p<0.00001), longer length of stay(LOS) (p<0.0001), longer operative time(p<0.0001), more blood loss (p<0.0001), and higher rate of complications (p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparative studies indicate that LH seemed to provide better OS and lower local recurrence rate, but higher complication rate and longer hospitalization.

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and 20-30% of patients will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their lifetime. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is also one of the most common cancers worldwide with increasing incidence. Hepatic resection represents the most effective treatment approach for both CRLM and HCC. Recently, sarcopenia has gained popularity as a prognostic index in order to assess the perioperative risk of hepatectomies. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of sarcopenia on the overall survival (OS), complication rates and mortality of patients undergoing liver resections for HCC or CRLM. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed for studies including patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC or CRLM, and a meta-analysis of the data was performed. Results: Sarcopenic patients had a significantly lower 5-year OS compared to non-sarcopenic patients (43.8% vs. 63.6%, respectively; p < 0.01) and a significantly higher complication rate (35.4% vs. 23.1%, respectively; p = 0.002). Finally, no statistical correlation was found in mortality between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients (p > 0.1). Conclusions: Sarcopenia was significantly associated with decreased 5-year OS and increased morbidity, but no difference was found with regard to postoperative mortality.

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver resection is potentially curative. Nevertheless, post-operative recurrence is common, occurring in up to 70% of patients. Factors traditionally recognized to predict recurrence and survival after liver resection for HCC include pathologic factors (i.e., microvascular and capsular invasion) and an increase in alpha-fetoprotein level. During the past decade, many new markers have been reported to correlate with prognosis after resection of HCC: liquid biopsy markers, gene signatures, inflammation markers, and other biomarkers, including PIVKA-II, immune checkpoint molecules, and proteins in urinary exosomes. However, not all of these new markers are readily available in clinical practice, and their reproducibility is unclear. Liquid biopsy is a powerful and established tool for predicting long-term outcomes after resection of HCC; the main limitation of liquid biopsy is represented by the cost related to its technical implementation. Numerous patterns of genetic expression capable of predicting survival after curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC have been identified, but published findings regarding these markers are heterogenous. Inflammation markers in the form of prognostic nutritional index and different blood cell ratios seem more easily reproducible and more affordable on a large scale than other emerging markers. To select the most effective treatment for patients with HCC, it is crucial that the scientific community validate new predictive markers for recurrence and survival after resection that are reliable and widely reproducible. More reports from Western countries are necessary to corroborate the evidence.

UNASSIGNED: Administering adjuvant therapy following liver resection is crucial for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibiting high-risk recurrence factors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective against unresectable HCC; however, their effectiveness and safety for this specific patient group remain uncertain.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted an extensive literature search across four scholarly databases to identify relevant studies. Our primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and adverse events (AEs). OS and RFS were quantified using hazard ratios (HRs), whereas the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS and RFS rates were expressed as risk ratios (RRs). Additionally, the incidence of AEs was calculated.
UNASSIGNED: Our meta-analysis included 11 studies (N = 3,219 patients), comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine retrospective studies. Among these, eight studies reported HRs for OS, showing a statistically significant improvement in OS among patients receiving adjuvant ICIs (HR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.80; p < 0.0001). All included studies reported HRs for RFS, indicating a favorable impact of adjuvant ICIs (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.73; p < 0.0001). Moreover, aggregated data demonstrated improved 1- and 2-year OS and RFS rates with adjuvant ICIs. The incidence rate of AEs of any grade was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.49-0.91), with grade 3 or above AEs occurring at a rate of 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.20).
UNASSIGNED: Adjuvant ICI therapy can enhance both OS and RFS rates in patients with HCC exhibiting high-risk recurrence factors, with manageable AEs.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023488250.

UNASSIGNED: Giant hepatic haemangioma (GHH) is defined as a hepatic haemangioma (HH) of >10 cm in diameter. Its association with thrombocytopenia and consumption coagulopathy is quite rare.
METHODS: Here, we present a case of a 39-year-old man with a rapidly enlarging 25-cm GHH arising from the entire left hemiliver. Laboratory findings suggested pancytopenia but normal liver and renal functions. He was diagnosed with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS). After three units of aphaeretic platelet transfusion, the patient underwent left hepatectomy. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and his regular follow-up revealed no recurrence even after two years.
UNASSIGNED: HH predominantly affects females, but males can also be affected, as seen in this case. With observation, it can grow over time, particularly in patients under 50 years of age. Surgical management should be considered when HH causes symptoms or is larger than 10 cm. The evolving understanding of GHH and the critical role of surgery are important, particularly when they complicate haematological or coagulation profiles and lead to thrombocytopenia.
CONCLUSIONS: Our case report highlights the significance of surgical intervention in GHH, and a disease-free outcome can be expected for patients with this condition in the future. To our knowledge, this is the first such case report from Bangladesh.

UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (N-TACE) in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains open to debate. While N-TACE may reduce tumor size, its impact on long-term outcomes is inconclusive.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis reviewed studies on N-TACE before surgical resection vs. liver resection (LR) single large hepatocellular carcinoma (SLHCC) up to March 2023 from four online databases.
UNASSIGNED: Five studies with 1,556 patients were analyzed. No significant differences between N-TACE and LR groups were observed in 1-, 3-, or 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). No significant differences were noted in intraoperative blood loss between groups. Subgroup analysis showed favorable 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS with combination chemotherapy N-TACE (combination group), and better 1-year OS in the LR group with single-agent chemotherapy N-TACE (single-agent group). Five-year DFS favored LR in the single-agent group, and N-TACE in the combination group.
UNASSIGNED: Managing SLHCC requires intricate considerations, and the treatment strategies for this challenging subgroup of HCC need to be improved. The influence of N-TACE on long-term survival depends on the specific chemotherapy regimen employed, and its impact on intraoperative blood loss in SLHCC appears limited.

UNASSIGNED: Local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC) has been proven to be a protective strategy against hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) during hepatectomy. Growing evidence suggests remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has the potential to reduce liver injury in hepatectomy. Few studies have directly compared the protective effects of these two mechanical preconditioning strategies. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of LIPC and RIPC for hepatic injury during liver resection.
UNASSIGNED: We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from the database inception to January 2023. We included studies directly comparing the effectiveness of LIPC and RIPC and those comparing LIPC or RIPC with no-preconditioning in liver resection. Postoperative liver function and surgical events were analyzed. Data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or odds ratios (ORs) and analyzed using network meta-analysis with random effects model.
UNASSIGNED: Following the screening of 268 citations, we identified 26 eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 1,476 participants (LIPC arm: 789, RIPC arm: 859, no-preconditioning arm: 1,072). LIPC and RIPC were superior to no-preconditioning in reducing postoperative serum transaminase levels [aspartate aminotransferase (AST): SMD RIPC versus no-preconditioning: -2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.39, -0.71; SMD LIPC versus no-preconditioning: -1.10, 95% CI: -2.07, -0.12; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): SMD RIPC versus no-preconditioning: -2.24, 95% CI: -4.15, -0.32; SMD LIPC versus no-preconditioning: -1.32, 95% CI: -2.63, -0.01]. No significant difference was observed between RIPC and LIPC in postoperative liver function and surgical outcomes (AST: SMD RIPC versus LIPC: -0.95, 95% CI: -2.52, 0.62; ALT: SMD RIPC versus LIPC: -0.91, 95% CI: -3.11, 1.28). In addition, the subgroup analysis revealed the potential benefits of RIPC in improving liver function, especially in patients who diagnosed with cirrhosis or underwent major resection.
UNASSIGNED: RIPC and LIPC could serve as effective strategies in relieving HIRI during hepatectomy. No significant differences were observed between LIPC and RIPC, however, RIPC may be an easily applicable strategy to relieve liver injury in hepatectomy.