listening effort

倾听努力
  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    越来越多的证据表明,听力损失是认知障碍的重要且潜在可改变的风险因素。尽管认知能力下降和听力损失之间的关联机制尚不清楚,听力努力被认为是老年人认知能力下降的机制之一。迄今为止,缺乏调查这种关联的研究,特别是在患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的成年人中。
    将招募15-25名认知健康的参与者和15-25名MCI患者(年龄40-85岁)参加一项探索性研究,调查认知功能与听力之间的关系。将调查倾听努力的行为和客观衡量标准。句子最终单词识别和回忆(SWIR)测试将与单个说话者不可理解的语音背景噪声一起进行,同时监测瞳孔扩张。认知功能的评估将在临床环境中使用一系列神经心理学测试进行。这项研究被认为是探索性和概念证明,提供信息以帮助确定大规模试验的有效性。
    丹麦中部地区(DeVidenskabsetiskeKomiteeriRegionHovedstaden)的科学伦理委员会获得了书面批准豁免,参考19042404,该项目在clinicaltrials.gov上注册了预结果,参考NCT04593290,协议ID19042404。研究结果将在同行评审的期刊和会议上传播。
    A growing body of evidence suggests that hearing loss is a significant and potentially modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment. Although the mechanisms underlying the associations between cognitive decline and hearing loss are unclear, listening effort has been posited as one of the mechanisms involved with cognitive decline in older age. To date, there has been a lack of research investigating this association, particularly among adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
    15-25 cognitively healthy participants and 15-25 patients with MCI (age 40-85 years) will be recruited to participate in an exploratory study investigating the association between cognitive functioning and listening effort. Both behavioural and objective measures of listening effort will be investigated. The sentence-final word identification and recall (SWIR) test will be administered with single talker non-intelligible speech background noise while monitoring pupil dilation. Evaluation of cognitive function will be carried out in a clinical setting using a battery of neuropsychological tests. This study is considered exploratory and proof of concept, with information taken to help decide the validity of larger-scale trials.
    Written approval exemption was obtained by the Scientific Ethics Committee in the central region of Denmark (De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer i Region Hovedstaden), reference 19042404, and the project is registered pre-results at clinicaltrials.gov, reference NCT04593290, Protocol ID 19042404. Study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该项目的目的是研究改变动机对听力努力的主观评分以及听众选择控制或回避应对策略的可能性的影响。
    方法:进行了两个实验,一个只有听觉(AO),一个有听觉-视觉(AV)刺激,两者都在噪声材料中使用相同的语音识别。使用了四个信噪比(SNR),每个实验两个。两个SNR的目标是80%和50%正确的性能。动机是通过让参与者仔细听演讲(低动机)来操纵的,或仔细听演讲,然后回答有关演讲的测验问题(高动机)。
    方法:16名听力正常的参与者参加了每个实验。八名随机选择的参与者参加了这两个。
    结果:使用AO和AV刺激,动机通常会增加听力努力和疲劳的主观评分。此外,使用听觉-视觉刺激,动机通常会增加听众为改善情况而做某事的意愿,并降低了他们避免这种情况的意愿。
    结论:这些结果表明,听者的精神状态可能会影响倾听的努力和应对策略的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to examine the effect of changing motivation on subjective ratings of listening effort and on the likelihood that a listener chooses either a controlling or an avoidance coping strategy.
    METHODS: Two experiments were conducted, one with auditory-only (AO) and one with auditory-visual (AV) stimuli, both using the same speech recognition in noise materials. Four signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were used, two in each experiment. The two SNRs targeted 80% and 50% correct performance. Motivation was manipulated by either having participants listen carefully to the speech (low motivation), or listen carefully to the speech and then answer quiz questions about the speech (high motivation).
    METHODS: Sixteen participants with normal hearing participated in each experiment. Eight randomly selected participants participated in both.
    RESULTS: Using AO and AV stimuli, motivation generally increased subjective ratings of listening effort and tiredness. In addition, using auditory-visual stimuli, motivation generally increased listeners\' willingness to do something to improve the situation, and decreased their willingness to avoid the situation.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a listener\'s mental state may influence listening effort and choice of coping strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号