■在具有挑战性的听力情况下,人工耳蜗(CI)的语音感知仍然要求很高,需要高水平的倾听努力,这可能会导致听力相关疲劳的水平增加。随着CI用户数量的增加,有关这些主题的文献也在增加。这篇范围界定综述旨在概述现有的关于倾听努力的文献,疲劳,CI用户与听力相关的疲劳以及评估他们的测量技术。
■使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报表的首选报告项目进行范围审查。搜索是在PubMed上进行的,Scopus,和WebofScience来确定所有相关研究。
■总共,纳入了24项研究,表明与使用量表的正常听力对照相比,CI用户的听力水平更高,问卷调查和脑电图测量。然而,执行双任务范式并没有发现两组之间的听力工作有任何差异。关于单方面倾听努力的差异存在不确定性,双边,和双峰CI用户由于不明确的结果而导致双侧听力损失。只有五项研究符合疲劳和听力相关疲劳的研究条件。此外,缺乏使用客观测量方法的研究。
■本范围审查强调了对这些主题进行额外研究的必要性。此外,需要关于倾听的努力,疲劳,应测量与听力相关的疲劳,以使研究结果具有可比性并支持最佳康复策略。
UNASSIGNED: In challenging listening situations, speech perception with a cochlear implant (CI) remains demanding and requires high levels of listening effort, which can lead to increased levels of listening-related fatigue. The body of literature on these topics increases as the number of CI users rises. This scoping
review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature on listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue among CI users and the measurement techniques to evaluate them.
UNASSIGNED: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statements were used to conduct the scoping
review. The search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 24 studies were included and suggests that CI users experience higher levels of listening effort when compared to normal hearing controls using scales, questionnaires and electroencephalogram measurements. However, executing dual-task paradigms did not reveal any difference in listening effort between both groups. Uncertainty exists regarding the difference in listening effort between unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal CI users with bilateral hearing loss due to ambiguous results. Only five studies were eligible for the research on fatigue and listening-related fatigue. Additionally, studies using objective measurement methods were lacking.
UNASSIGNED: This scoping
review highlights the necessity for additional research on these topics. Moreover, there is a need for guidelines on how listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue should be measured to allow for study results that are comparable and support optimal rehabilitation strategies.