暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 receptor antibodies have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, there is a growing concern about immune-related adverse events. A case of a patient with gastric adenocarcinoma who developed toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) induced by sintilimab and subsequently developed lichenoid dermatitis is reported. TEN was diagnosed according to a history of sintilimab use, clinical symptoms and physical examination. During hospitalization, the patient developed recurrent fever caused by bacteremia and recovered from TEN after anti-infection and anti-inflammatory treatments. However, when TEN was controlled, the patient developed the lesional manifestations of lichenoid dermatitis. To date, no cases of lichenoid dermatitis after TEN have been reported following the use of PD-1 inhibitors.
PD-1 inhibitors are drugs that help fight stomach cancer but can sometimes cause skin problems. Most skin problems are minor and do not have a serious impact on the patient\'s health. However, life-threatening skin problems such as toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) can sometimes happen. This case report describes a patient with stomach cancer who had lichenoid dermatitis (another skin problem) after TEN, following the treatment of his cancer with PD-1 inhibitors. To the best of our knowledge, it is very rare to experience both skin problems after treating cancer with PD-1 inhibitors. This rare phenomenon is reported to bring more attention to it. More research is needed to determine how to treat this problem better.

Lichenoid dermatitis can be a perplexing entity encompassing an array of cutaneous disorders. Two hundred forty-three (243) cases of otherwise unclassifiable lichenoid dermatitis were examined histologically employing a special cytokeratin stain. Occult squamous cell carcinoma was detected in three of the 243 cases, uncovered by special immunohistochemistry staining within histologic specimens of lichenoid dermatitis. We recommend staining for cutaneous cancer becoming a routine practice in evaluating cutaneous lichenoid dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib Mesylate (IM), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been reported to cause several adverse reactions, most of them with cutaneous involvement. Non- Lichenoid IM associated skin reactions have been sufficiently- recorded. To our knowledge, Lichenoid Drug Eruption (LDE) is recorded in a minority of registries.
METHODS: To describe an LDE induced case by IM treatment.
RESULTS: Histological Confirmation and promptly dermatological consultation relieved successfully the cutaneous adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing expansion of IM usage in a wide spectrum of new indications is more likely to make physicians experience such LDE cutaneous side effects more often. Hence, they should be highly suspicious to early detect these distinct histologic entities, handle these undesired complications and guarantee satisfactory immediate outcomes, avoiding frivolous IM dosage modifications.

Antineoplastic agents that use the immune system have revolutionized cancer treatment. Specifically, implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies that block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, programmed cell death protein 1, or programmed cell death ligand 1 show improved and sustained responses in patients with cancer. However, these agents are associated with a plethora of adverse events, many manifesting in the skin. As the clinical application of cancer immunotherapies expands, understanding the clinical and histopathologic features of associated cutaneous toxicities becomes increasingly important to dermatologists, oncologists, and pathologists to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate care. This review discusses cutaneous reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors, focusing on histopathologic features.

BACKGROUND: Lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis (LGD) is an uncommon reaction pattern for which clinical correlates can be difficult to establish. LGD combines vacuolar degeneration with variable types of granulomas.
OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical correlates of LGD.
METHODS: The laboratory information systems at the University of Florida, the Medical College of Wisconsin, and Inform Diagnostics Research Institute were queried to identify 56 cases of LGD. Cases were reviewed for information regarding eosinophils, plasma cells, deep perivascular infiltrates, granuloma subtype, parakeratosis, epidermal atrophy, psoriasiform epidermal changes, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, periadnexal inflammation, vasculitis, and red blood cell extravasation.
RESULTS: The most common clinical correlates were drug eruption (39.3%, n = 22) and lichenoid keratosis (19.6%, n = 11). Tattoo reaction, postherpetic dermatitis, and scabies or postscabietic dermatitis each accounted for 7.1% (n = 4) of cases. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis and lichen striatus each accounted for 5.4% (n = 3) of cases. Dermal eosinophils (P = .005) and psoriasiform epidermal changes (P = .055) were associated with drug hypersensitivity. Perineural (P = .049) and perifollicular (P = .003) inflammation were associated with tattoo reaction and postherpetic dermatitis. Red blood cell extravasation was helpful in cases of pigmented purpuric dermatosis (P = .049).
CONCLUSIONS: This study is limited by its retrospective nature and statistical power.
CONCLUSIONS: Dermal eosinophilia, psoriasiform epidermal changes, periadnexal inflammation, and red blood cell extravasation might aid in the clinical diagnosis of patients with LGD.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a known consequence of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and may exhibit a spectrum of morphologic features both clinically and histologically. Lichenoid dermatitis associated with ICI therapy (LD-ICI) is the most frequently encountered histopathologic type of irAE biopsied by dermatologists. There is frequent clinical and histologic overlap between irAEs and several reactive and neoplastic dermatologic disorders; thus, clinical information is essential. LD-ICI with histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features typical of mycosis fungoides (MF) are unique. Here, we report a patient who developed LD-ICI with MF-like morphologic features with monoclonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement on consecutive biopsies during ICI therapy. The development of monoclonal LD-ICI is important for clinicians and pathologists to recognize in patients receiving ICI therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients receiving antibodies abrogating immune checkpoint pathways may develop a diverse array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), of which lichenoid dermatitis (LD) is the most common. The mechanism driving the emergence of these irAEs remain understudied, underscoring a critical need to determine the unique gene expression profiles and immune composition in LD-irAE.
METHODS: LD-irAE (n = 3) and benign lichenoid keratosis (BLK) control (n = 3) were profiled with NanoString nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel interrogating the mRNA levels of 770 genes. Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies (n = 14 samples) for CD14, CD16, T-Bet, Gata-3, and FoxP3 were further evaluated using Aperio digital image analysis.
RESULTS: The LD-irAE showed downregulation of 93 mRNA transcripts (P < 0.05) and upregulation of 74 mRNA transcripts (P < 0.04) including toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 (P < 0.05). CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes quantified by IHC (H-score) were higher in LD-irAE than in the BLK control (P < 0.05). The immune composition of LD-irAE exhibited higher numbers of T-Bet+ (Th1) cells compared with Gata-3+ (Th2) cells (P = 0.016) and lower numbers of FoxP3 (T regulatory) cells (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: LD-irAE exhibited activation of CD14/TLR innate immune response with increased CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes compared with BLK control. CD14/TLR signaling may drive the development of LD-irAE.

BACKGROUND: Annular lichenoid dermatitis of youth (ALDY) is a rare form of dermatitis mainly affecting children and young people. All cases reported show a consistent clinical and histological picture. This is the first case described in the French literature.
METHODS: A 5-year-old girl presented an annular isolated patch of the lower abdomen with an erythematosquamous border and central hypopigmentation for one year. Topical corticosteroids and pimecrolimus proved effective but relapse occurred after treatment withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS: Over sixty cases of ALDY are described in the English-language medical literature. The main differential diagnosis is childhood mycosis fungoides, particularly the hypopigmented variant. Biopsy is necessary for diagnosis since it can reveal typical histological features. Histopathology in all cases shows lichenoid reaction with CD4+ and CD8+ polyclonal lymphocytes. It is limited to the tips of rete ridges and associated with apoptosis of keratinocytes resulting in quadrangular-shaped rete ridges. Our case does not demonstrate either epidermotropism or atypical lymphocytes.
CONCLUSIONS: Annular lichenoid dermatitis of youth (ALDY) is a poorly known distinctive entity within the lichenoid dermatitis family. Clinical-histological correlation is essential to diagnosis. The etiology is still unknown and the course is mostly chronic.