levonadifloxacin

左旋二氟沙星
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:左旋那霉素(静脉注射)和阿莱那霉素(口服前药)是基于苯并喹诺酮亚类的氟喹诺酮的新型抗生素,2019年在印度获得临床使用许可。活性部分,左旋阿霉素,是一种具有高效抗耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌的广谱抗生素。金黄色葡萄球菌,多药耐药肺炎球菌和厌氧菌。
    目的:这篇综述,第一次,严格分析抗菌药物敏感性测试方法,临床实验室和标准研究所(CLSI)-药敏试验的质量控制和左旋阿哌沙星的断点。Further,创世纪,简要描述了左旋阿替硝沙星和阿替硝沙星的发现和发展方面以及治疗概况。
    背景:为了帮助科学和临床医生社区对左旋纳地沙星和阿莱文纳地沙星的所有关键方面进行单一的全面概述,本文涵盖了CLSI批准的用于左旋阿霉素药敏试验的参考MIC和纸片扩散方法,以及CLSIM100文献中公布的质量控制菌株的参考范围.左旋阿霉素的断点与美国FDA一致,欧洲抗生素敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)和CLSI方法。Further,这篇文章简要介绍了在左旋阿伐那霉素和阿伐那霉素的发现阶段遇到的挑战,活动范围和安全利益源于结构新颖性相关的作用机制。Further,审查还涵盖体外和体内活动,注册的临床研究和患者友好的特点,左旋阿伐他汀/阿伐他汀。累计,左旋阿霉素有可能为耐药革兰氏阳性细菌感染提供期待已久的新标准治疗。
    Levonadifloxacin (intravenous) and alalevonadifloxacin (oral prodrug) are novel antibiotics based on benzoquinolizine subclass of fluoroquinolone, licensed for clinical use in India in 2019. The active moiety, levonadifloxacin, is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with a high potency against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. aureus, multi-drug resistant pneumococci and anaerobes.
    This review, for the first time, critically analyses the antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods, Clinical Laboratory & Standards Institute (CLSI)-quality control of susceptibility testing and breakpoints of levonadifloxacin. Further, the genesis, discovery and developmental aspects as well as therapeutic profile of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin are briefly described.
    In order to aid the scientific and clinician communities with a single comprehensive overview on all the key aspects of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin, the present article covers the reference MIC and disk diffusion methods for levonadifloxacin susceptibility testing that were approved by CLSI and the reference ranges for quality control strains published in the CLSI M100 document. The breakpoints of levonadifloxacin were derived in concordance to US FDA, European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and CLSI approaches. Further, the article provides a brief account of challenges encountered during the discovery stages of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin, activity spectrum and safety benefits accruing from structural novelty-linked mechanism of action. Further, the review also covers in vitro and in vivo activities, registrational clinical studies and patient-friendly features of levonadifloxacin/alalevonadifloxacin. Cumulatively, levonadifloxacin has a potential to offer a long awaited new standard-of-care treatment for the resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究比较了抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)喹诺酮类药物治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)的临床疗效和安全性。
    PubMed,Embase,从开始到2021年7月21日,对Cochrane中央受控试验登记册进行了相关文章的搜索。纳入了比较抗MRSA喹诺酮类药物与其他抗生素治疗成人ABSSSI患者的临床疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。
    包括六个RCT。共有1,264名和1,307名参与者接受了基于抗MRSA喹诺酮类药物的研究组和对照组。在接受抗MRSA喹诺酮类药物治疗的研究组中,935、246和83例患者接受了德拉氟沙星,左旋阿霉素,和阿科拉沙星,分别。研究组和对照组在治愈测试时的临床治愈率没有显着差异(OR,1.08;95%CI,0.91-1.29;I2=0%)。在MRSA相关ABSSSI的患者中,临床治愈率(OR,1.09;95%CI,0.71-1.65;I2=0%)和微生物反应率(OR,1.24;95%CI,0.48-3.21;I2=0%)的抗MRSA喹诺酮类药物与其他抗生素相似。
    基于抗MRSA喹诺酮治疗的疗效与其他抗MRSA抗生素治疗ABSSSI的疗效相当。
    UNASSIGNED: This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) quinolones for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs).
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant articles from inception to 21 July 2021. RCTs comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-MRSA quinolones with other antibiotics for treating adult patients with ABSSSIs were included.
    UNASSIGNED: Six RCTs were included. A total of 1,264 and 1,307 participants received the anti-MRSA quinolone-based study group and the control group. In the study group receiving anti-MRSA quinolone-based treatment, 935, 246, and 83 patients received delafloxacin, levonadifloxacin, and acorafloxacin, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the clinical cure rate at test of cure between the study and control groups (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.91-1.29; I2 = 0%). In patients with MRSA-associated ABSSSIs, the clinical cure rate (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.71-1.65; I2 = 0%) and microbiological response rate (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.48-3.21; I2 = 0%) of anti-MRSA quinolones were similar to those of other antibiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of anti-MRSA quinolone-based treatment is comparable to that of other anti-MRSA antibiotics for treating ABSSSIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球抗生素使用的增加导致了抗生素耐药性的威胁;这促使研究人员迫切需要发现更有效和广谱的抗生素。左旋阿霉素(LND)是印度公司Wockhardt开发的第一种抗生素。它是另一种广谱抗生素纳地沙星的S(-)异构体,局部用于皮肤,软组织细菌感染。LND属于苯并喹唑啉类,是氟喹诺酮的一个亚类,指示为ABSSIS,CABP,和其他感染,包括糖尿病足感染;配制为左旋甲氧氟沙星的L-精氨酸盐(WCK177)用于IV和1-丙氨酸酯甲磺酸盐作为阿莱酮二氟沙星(WCK2349)用于口服。它通常对革兰氏阴性,细菌感染呈阳性,特别是通过DNA促旋酶和拓扑异构酶IV的双重抑制对甲氧西林耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。生产符合监管要求的优质产品是制药行业的一大关注点。在这种情况下,用于常规质量控制的经过验证的分析方法对于定量LND作为单独的API以及与药物制剂一起是必不可少的。这篇评论建议治疗,药理学,和有关新药LND的分析方面,特别着重于讨论用于药物分析或生物分析评估的各种报道的分析方法,并建议开发一种简单且经过验证的方法,该方法也符合绿色化学。
    Increased use of antibiotics globally has led to the threat of antibiotic resistance; this drove the urge of researchers toward discovering more potent and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Levonadifloxacin (LND) is the very first antibiotic developed by an Indian company Wockhardt. It is S (-) isomer of another broad-spectrum antibiotic Nadifloxacin which is used topically for skin, soft tissue bacterial infection. LND belongs to the benzo quinolizine category which is a subclass of fluoroquinolone, indicated for ABSSIS, CABP, and other infections including diabetic foot infection; formulated as l-arginine salt of levonadifloxacin (WCK177) for IV and l-alanine ester mesylate salt as alalevonadifloxacin (WCK2349) for oral administration. It generally shows dominant antibacterial activity against Gram-negative, and positive bacterial infections, particularly toward methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by dual inhibition of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Producing quality product that complies to regulatory requirements is a big concern for pharma industries. To this context, validated analytical methods for routine quality control are essential for quantification of LND as an API alone and together with pharmaceutical formulations. This review suggests therapeutic, pharmacological, and analytical aspects regarding the novel drug LND and particularly focuses on discussing various reported analytical methods present for analytical or bioanalytical estimation of the drug and suggest to develop a simple and validated method which also complies to green chemistry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    左旋阿伐他星及其前药阿伐他汀是属于喹诺酮的苯并喹利嗪亚类的新型广谱抗MRSA药物,配制用于静脉和口服给药,分别。各种体外和体内研究已经建立了他们的抗临床显著革兰氏阳性,革兰氏阴性,非典型的,和厌氧病原体。左旋阿霉素对MRSA的有效活性,耐喹诺酮金黄色葡萄球菌,和异万古霉素中间菌株是其充分分化的作用机制的结果,涉及优先靶向DNA促旋酶。在临床相关的实验条件下,如酸性pH值,也观察到了左氟沙星的有效抗葡萄球菌活性。细胞内环境,和生物膜,提示该药物具有治疗难治疗MRSA感染的功能.左旋阿霉素还保留了临床上对耐药呼吸道病原体如大环内酯和青霉素耐药肺炎链球菌的相关活性,化脓性链球菌,流感嗜血杆菌,和卡他莫拉菌,结合临床确定的同类最佳人上皮肺液浓度,在治疗顽固性呼吸道感染方面具有很好的潜力。有吸引力的特点,比如对诺拉流出的抵抗力,金黄色葡萄球菌的不同作用机制,对高接种物培养的杀伤力,和低突变预防浓度,可能会赋予两种药物有利的抗性抑制特征。体内研究在急性细菌皮肤和皮肤结构感染模型中显示出有希望的疗效,呼吸道感染,肾盂肾炎,和人类等效小鼠剂量的腹膜炎。两种制剂在多个I期研究中均具有良好的耐受性,并且总体上显示出剂量依赖性暴露。特别是,口服阿拉沃纳沙星显示出优异的生物利用度(〜90%),几乎反映了静脉内左旋甲氧氟沙星的药代动力学特征,表明前药的无缝吸收和有效裂解以释放活性母体药物。肝功能损害研究表明,对于不同程度的肝功能损害,不需要调整左旋纳沙星/阿莱文纳帕沙星的临床剂量。随着左旋纳地沙星和阿伐纳地沙星的II期和III期研究的成功完成,它们代表了用于治疗由多重耐药革兰氏阳性生物体引起的感染的临床上有吸引力的治疗选择.在这里,我们回顾了目前关于左旋阿伐那霉素和阿伐那霉素的治疗吸引力的证据,这是基于一系列非临床的体外和体内研究和临床研究。
    Levonadifloxacin and its prodrug alalevonadifloxacin are novel broad-spectrum anti-MRSA agents belonging to the benzoquinolizine subclass of quinolone, formulated for intravenous and oral administration, respectively. Various in vitro and in vivo studies have established their antimicrobial spectrum against clinically significant Gram-positive, Gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic pathogens. The potent activity of levonadifloxacin against MRSA, quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and hetero-vancomycin-intermediate strains is an outcome of its well-differentiated mechanism of action involving preferential targeting to DNA gyrase. Potent anti-staphylococcal activity of levonadifloxacin was also observed in clinically relevant experimental conditions such as acidic pH, the intracellular environment, and biofilms, suggesting that the drug is bestowed with enabling features for the treatment of difficult-to-treat MRSA infections. Levonadifloxacin also retains clinically relevant activity against resistant respiratory pathogens such as macrolide- and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis and, in conjunction with clinically established best-in-class human epithelial lung fluid concentration, has promising potential in the management of recalcitrant respiratory infections. Attractive features, such as resistance to NorA efflux, divergent mechanism of action in S. aureus, cidality against high-inoculum cultures, and low mutant prevention concentration, are likely to confer favorable resistance-suppression features to both agents. In vivo studies have shown promising efficacy in models of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, respiratory infections, pyelonephritis, and peritonitis at human-equivalent mouse doses. Both formulations were well tolerated in multiple phase I studies and overall showed a dose-dependent exposure. In particular, oral alalevonadifloxacin showed excellent bioavailability (~90%), almost mirroring the pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous levonadifloxacin, indicating the prodrug\'s seamless absorption and efficient cleavage to release the active parent drug. Hepatic impairment studies showed that clinical doses of levonadifloxacin/alalevonadifloxacin are not required to be adjusted for various degrees of hepatic impairment. With the successful completion of phase II and phase III studies for both levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin, they represent clinically attractive therapeutic options for the treatment of infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-positive organisms. Herein, we review the current evidence on therapeutically appealing attributes of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin, which are based on a range of non-clinical in vitro and in vivo investigations and clinical studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号