Linezolid treatment has a high risk of toxicity and adverse drug reactions (ADR) are frequent. Few studies have investigated risk factors of major ADRs separately, therefore, we aimed to evaluate major ADRs including peripheral neuropathy in relation to risk factors and drug concentration levels of linezolid in a high-resource setting for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We conducted a retrospective cohort study including participants treated with a linezolid-containing MDR-TB regimen in Sweden 1992-2018. Data was collected from medical records. ADRs were classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). Of all participants (n=132), 43.2% were female and the median age 28 years. The median linezolid treatment was 6.5 months (IQR 3.0-12.7) with a median daily dose of 9.6 mg/kg/day. Any ADR was seen in 58.3% (n=77) of participants, with 35.6% having peripheral neuropathy (n=47), 27.3% anaemia (n=36), 22.0% leukopenia (n=36) while 6.1% (n=8) had optic neuritis. The median time for peripheral neuropathy was 3.6 months (IQR 2.1-5.9) and 8.3 months (6.2-10.7) for optic neuritis. A >2.0 mg/L trough concentration (n=40) was associated with anaemia (p=0.0038) and thrombocytopenia (p=0.009) but not with peripheral neuropathy. In multivariable analysis, a dose ≥12 mg/kg/day was associated with time to peripheral neuropathy (HR 2.89, 95%CI 1.08-7.74, p=0.035), anaemia (HR 6.62, 95%CI 2.22-19.8, p=0.001) and leukopenia (HR 5.23, 95% CI 1.48-18.5, p=0.010). Linezolid ADRs were frequent in a high-resource setting. Structured, regular follow-up for ADRs and adjusting dosing according to body weight followed-up by monitoring of drug concentrations early may reduce toxicity.

A model for accelerated aging in mice was developed: CB6F2 mice aged 39-45 days were exposed to fractionated 4-fold relatively uniform γ-radiation (137Cs, 0.98 Gy/min) at a total dose of 6.8 Gy. Radiation exposure led to delayed active growth, leukopenia, and lymphopenia for over 1 year during the post-radiation period. The death of irradiated males and females occurred significantly earlier than in control group animals. Median lifespans in the experimental group were 35-38% lower than in the control group (p<0.001). Ionizing radiation exposure led to the early development of hair depigmentation, cachexia, and the development of aging-associated diseases. In irradiated mice, oncological pathology constituted 30-35% in the mortality structure, which is twice as often as in the control group. The developed model can be used to study the pathogenesis of accelerated aging under radiation exposure and the search for means of its prevention and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA) is a widely used immunosuppressant drug. Leukopenia is a serious adverse effect of the drug which often necessitates dose reduction or drug withdrawal. Predictors of leukopenia include genetic and nongenetic factors. Genetic polymorphism of AZA-metabolizing enzyme, thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is well established. There is inconclusive evidence about the role of Nudix hydrolase (NUDT15) gene polymorphism. This case-control study assessed the association of genetic polymorphisms of NUDT15 and TPMT with leukopenia induced by AZA.
METHODS: Cases were patients on AZA who developed leukopenia (white blood cell count <4000/μl) within 1 year of treatment initiation that necessitated dose reduction or drug withdrawal. Age and gender-matched patients without leukopenia within 1 year of treatment with AZA served as controls. TPMT (3 loci: c238G to C, c460G to A, c719A to G) and NUDT15 (c 415C to T, rs116855232) genotyping were done using TPMT strip assay and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, respectively. Genotype frequencies were noted, and the odds ratio was calculated to determine the association between genotypes and leukopenia.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects (15 cases and 14 controls) were enrolled. Statistically significant differences were not observed in the TPMT genotype (*1/*1 and *1/*3C) (P = 0.23) between cases and controls. NUDT15 genotypes (*1/*1 and *1/*3) (P = 0.65) also showed no statistically significant difference between cases and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The above genotypes do not appear to be associated with AZA-induced leukopenia in an eastern Indian population.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has triggered a pandemic and contributes to long-lasting morbidity. Several studies have investigated immediate cellular and humoral immune responses during acute infection. However, little is known about long-term effects of COVID-19 on the immune system.
METHODS: We performed a longitudinal investigation of cellular and humoral immune parameters in 106 non-vaccinated subjects ten weeks (10 w) and ten months (10 m) after their first SARS-CoV-2 infection. Peripheral blood immune cells were analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry, serum cytokines were examined by multiplex technology. Antibodies specific for the Spike protein (S), the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the nucleocapsid protein (NC) were determined. All parameters measured 10 w and 10 m after infection were compared with those of a matched, noninfected control group (n = 98).
RESULTS: Whole blood flow cytometric analyses revealed that 10 m after COVID-19, convalescent patients compared to controls had reduced absolute granulocyte, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts, involving T, B, and NK cells, in particular CD3+CD45RA+CD62L+CD31+ recent thymic emigrant T cells and non-class-switched CD19+IgD+CD27+ memory B cells. Cellular changes were associated with a reversal from Th1- to Th2-dominated serum cytokine patterns. Strong declines of NC- and S-specific antibody levels were associated with younger age (by 10.3 years, p < .01) and fewer CD3-CD56+ NK and CD19+CD27+ B memory cells. Changes of T-cell subsets at 10 m such as normalization of effector and Treg numbers, decline of RTE, and increase of central memory T cell numbers were independent of antibody decline pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 causes long-term reduction of innate and adaptive immune cells which is associated with a Th2 serum cytokine profile. This may provide an immunological mechanism for long-term sequelae after COVID-19.

177Lu-DOTATATE therapy is an effective treatment for advanced neuroendocrine tumors, despite its dose-limiting hematotoxicity. Herein, the significance of off-target splenic irradiation is unknown. Our study aims to identify predictive markers of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy-induced leukopenia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed blood counts and imaging data of 88 patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable metastatic neuroendocrine tumors who received 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment at our institution from February 2009 to July 2021. Inclusion criterium was a tumor uptake equivalent to or greater than that in the liver on baseline receptor imaging. We excluded patients with less than 24 mo of follow-up and those patients who received fewer than 4 treatment cycles, additional therapies, or blood transfusions during follow-up. Results: Our study revealed absolute and relative white blood cell counts and relative spleen volume reduction as independent predictors of radiation-induced leukopenia at 24 mo. However, a 30% decline in spleen volume 12 mo after treatment most accurately predicted patients proceeding to leukopenia at 24 mo (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.93, and specificity of 0.90), outperforming all other parameters by far. Conclusion: Automated splenic volume assessments demonstrated superior predictive capabilities for the development of leukopenia in patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment compared with conventional laboratory parameters. The reduction in spleen size proves to be a valuable, routinely available, and quantitative imaging-based biomarker for predicting radiation-induced leukopenia. This suggests potential clinical applications for risk assessment and management.

BACKGROUND: To explore the correlation between effective dose to immune cells (EDIC) and vertebral bone marrow dose and hematologic toxicity (HT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).
METHODS: The study included 106 ESCC patients treated with nCRT. We collected dosimetric parameters, including vertebral body volumes receiving 10-40 Gy (V10, V20, V30, V40) and EDIC and complete blood counts. Associations of the cell nadir and dosimetric parameters were examined by linear and logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the cutoff values for the dosimetric parameters.
RESULTS: During nCRT, the incidence of grade 3-4 lymphopenia, leukopenia, and neutropenia was 76.4%, 37.3%, and 37.3%, respectively. Patients with EDIC ≤ 4.63 Gy plus V10 ≤ 140.3 ml were strongly associated with lower risk of grade 3-4 lymphopenia (OR, 0.050; P < 0.001), and patients with EDIC ≤ 4.53 Gy plus V10 ≤ 100.9 ml were strongly associated with lower risk of grade 3-4 leukopenia (OR, 0.177; P = 0.011), and patients with EDIC ≤ 5.79 Gy were strongly associated with lower risk of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR, 0.401; P = 0.031). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was a significant difference among all groups for grade 3-4 lymphopenia, leukopenia, and neutropenia (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The dose of vertebral bone marrow irradiation and EDIC were significantly correlated with grade 3-4 leukopenia and lymphopenia, and EDIC was significantly correlated with grade 3-4 neutropenia. Reducing vertebral bone marrow irradiation and EDIC effectively reduce the incidence of HT.

Sysmex DI-60 enumerates and classifies leukocytes. Limited research has evaluated the performance of Sysmex DI-60 in abnormal samples, and most focused on leukopenic samples. We evaluate the efficacy of DI-60 in determining white blood cell (WBC) differentials in normal and abnormal samples in different WBC count. Peripheral blood smears (n = 166) were categorised into normal control and disease groups, and further divided into moderate and severe leucocytosis, mild leucocytosis, normal, mild leukopenia, and moderate and severe leukopenia groups based on WBC count. DI-60 preclassification and verification and manual counting results were assessed using Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok regression analyses. The Kappa test compared the concordance in the abnormal cell detection between DI-60 and manual counting. DI-60 exhibited notable overall sensitivity and specificity for all cells, except basophils. The correlation between the DI-60 preclassification and manual counting was high for segmented neutrophils, band neutrophils, lymphocytes, and blasts, and improved for all cell classes after verification. The mean difference between DI-60 and manual counting for all cell classes was significantly high in moderate and severe leucocytosis (WBC > 30.0 × 109/L) and moderate and severe leukopenia (WBC < 1.5 × 109/L) groups. For blast cells, immature granulocytes, and atypical lymphocytes, the DI-60 verification results were similar to the manual counting results. Plasma cells showed poor agreement. In conclusion, DI-60 demonstrates consistent and reliable analysis of WBC differentials within the range of 1.5-30.0 × 109. Manual counting was indispensable in examining moderate and severe leucocytosis samples, moderate and severe leukopenia samples, and in enumerating of monocytes and plasma cells.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect of intradermal needling and acupuncture in prevention and treatment of leukopenia after chemotherapy with spleen-kidney deficiency.
METHODS: A total of 90 patients with malignant tumor who received chemotherapy were randomly divided into a intradermal needling group (30 cases, 1 case dropped out), an acupuncture group (30 cases, 2 cases dropped out, 1 case was eliminated) and a control group (30 cases). The control group received conventional symptomatic treatment after chemotherapy. On the basis of the treatment in the control group, the intradermal needling group received intradermal needling at Guanyuan (CV 4), Dazhui (GV 14) and bilateral Geshu (BL 17), Zusanli (ST 36)，Shenshu (BL 23), the needles were retained for 48 h, once every other day. On the basis of the treatment in the control group, the acupuncture group received conventional acupuncture at the same acupoints as the intradermal needling group, once every other day. The treatment started from the first day of chemotherapy, for a total of 2 weeks in the three groups. The white blood cell count, neutrophil count, hemoglobin content, platelet count and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score before treatment and on 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 21st days after treatment were compared among the three groups. The incidence and grading of leukopenia and the usage of leukocyte-boosting drug during chemotherapy cycle was recorded.
RESULTS: On 7th day after treatment, the white blood cell count in the intradermal needling group and the acupuncture group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.01, P<0.05). On the 14th day after treatment, the hemoglobin content in the intradermal needling group and the acupuncture group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.01). On the 7th, 14th, and 21st days after treatment, the platelet count in the acupuncture group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.01), on the 14th and 21st days after treatment, the platelet count in the intradermal needling group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups after treatment in terms of neutrophil count, KPS score, incidence and grading of leukopenia, and the usage of leukocyte-boosting drug (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both intradermal needling and acupuncture can effectively increase peripheral blood white blood cell count, hemoglobin content and platelet count during chemotherapy cycle, reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy drug to bone marrow hematopoietic function, and alleviate bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy. The two treatments are equally effective.
目的：比较揿针和针刺防治脾肾两虚型化疗后白细胞减少症的临床疗效。方法：将90例接受化疗的恶性肿瘤患者随机分为揿针组（30例，脱落1例）、针刺组（30例，脱落2例，剔除1例）和对照组（30例）。对照组在化疗的基础上予常规对症治疗；在对照组治疗基础上，揿针组于关元、大椎及双侧膈俞、足三里、肾俞行揿针治疗，留针48 h，隔日1次；在对照组治疗基础上，针刺组于揿针组相同穴位行常规针刺治疗，隔日1次。均从化疗第1天开始，共治疗2周。比较各组患者治疗前及治疗第3、7、14、21天白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、血红蛋白含量、血小板计数、Karnofsky功能状态（KPS）评分；于治疗第21天评定白细胞减少症的分度、发生率，记录化疗周期中升白细胞药物使用情况。结果：治疗第7天，揿针组和针刺组白细胞计数高于对照组（P<0.01，P<0.05）。治疗第14天，揿针组和针刺组血红蛋白含量高于对照组（P<0.01）。治疗第7、14、21天，针刺组血小板计数高于对照组（P<0.01），治疗第14、21天，揿针组血小板计数高于对照组（P<0.01）。各组治疗后各时间点中性粒细胞计数、KPS评分及白细胞减少症分度、白细胞减少症发生率、升白细胞药物使用情况比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：揿针和常规针刺在化疗周期中均可升高外周血白细胞计数、血红蛋白含量、血小板计数，减少化疗药物对骨髓造血功能的影响，减轻化疗后骨髓抑制，两种治疗方法疗效相当。.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the extent of cytopenias and systemic immune inflammation index of hospitalised coronavirus disease-2019 patients during the first and second/third waves of the pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: The retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2021 at Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data of hospitalised coronavirus disease-2019 patients regardless of age and gender from May 2020 to June 2021. Data was segregated into first wave that lasted from May to July 2020, second wave that lasted from early November to mid-December 2020, and third wave that ranged from mid-March to June 2021. For comparison purposes, the data of first wave was in group A, while data of second and third waves was pooled into group B. Age, gender, comorbidities, requirement of ventilator support and outcome of the patients was noted. Inflammatory markers were compared on the basis of complete blood count and systemic immune-inflammation index data. Data was analysed using SPSS 25.
RESULTS: Of the 202 patients, 90(44.5%) were in group A and 112(55.4%) were in group B. There were 108(53.5%) males and 94(46.5%) females. The median age in males was 58 years (interquartile range: 21 years) and it was 56 years (interquartile range: 21 years) in females. Neutrophilia (p<0.001), leukocytosis (p<0.001) and lymphocytopenia (p<0.001) had direct association with increased systemic immune-inflammation. Raised systemic immune-inflammation also had an association with increased requirement of ventilator support (p=0.2) and increased mortality (p=0.001). There were more females, more critical patients, more patients with anaemia, leukopenia, lymphocytopenia and thrombocytopenia in group B compared to group A (p<0.05). Need for ventilator support and mortality were also higher in group B compared to group A (p<0.05).
UNASSIGNED: All the indicators analysed were worse during the second and third waves of coronavirus disease-2019 compared to the first wave of the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk for severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Off-label use of letermovir (LET) may avert myelotoxicity associated with valganciclovir (VGCV), but data in lung transplantation are limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of LET prophylaxis among lung transplant recipients.
METHODS: This retrospective, matched cohort study included lung transplant recipients who received LET for primary CMV prophylaxis following VGCV intolerance. Patients were matched 1:1 to historical VGCV controls based on age, serostatus group, and time from transplant. The primary outcome was CMV breakthrough within 1 year post-LET initiation; secondary outcomes included hematologic changes.
RESULTS: A total of 124 lung transplant recipients were included per group (32% CMV mismatch, D+R-), with LET initiated a median of 9.6 months post-transplantation. One CMV breakthrough event (0.8%) was observed in the LET group versus four (3.2%) in the VGCV group (p = .370). The median (interquartile range) white blood cell (WBC) count was 3.1 (2.1-5.6) at LET initiation which increased to 5.1 (3.9-7.2) at the end of follow-up (p <.001). For VGCV controls, WBC was 4.8 (3.4-7.2) at baseline and 5.4 (3.6-7.2) at the end of follow-up; this difference was not statistically significant (p = .395). Additionally, 98.4% of LET patients experienced ≥1 leukopenia episode in the year prior to LET compared to 71.8% the year after initiation (p <.001). Similar results were observed for neutropenia (48.4% and 17.7%, p <.001).
CONCLUSIONS: LET prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of CMV reactivation and leukopenia recovery. LET may represent a reasonable prophylaxis option for lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate VGCV.