UNASSIGNED: When a child with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms presents to a primary care physician or general paediatrician, the clinician is challenged with differentiating between functional or organic disease. When there is a high suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rapid referral to a paediatric gastroenterologist for assessment and treatment will help protect against the sequelae of a delayed diagnosis for a child. However, this must be balanced against the need for ensuring appropriate referrals and avoiding invasive diagnostic testing for those with non-organic aetiology. The objective of this narrative review was to present evidence on specific presenting symptoms, testing, and risk factors of paediatric IBD that may aid the identification of children requiring timely referral for specialist care, thereby reducing the chance of a delayed diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: Literature databases (Medline, Embase) were searched using terms specific to the population studied, and topic specific terms relating to each section of the review. Year limits were set for 2010-2022. Included papers were limited to original research, with meta-analyses considered where of benefit.
UNASSIGNED: Children often present with non-specific GI symptoms that may be associated with a delayed diagnosis for those with subsequent IBD. Symptoms such as rectal bleeding or weight loss may indicate the need for rapid referral. However, non-specific symptoms necessitate testing strategies to differentiate between those with possible IBD and non-organic conditions. Definitive laboratory testing for IBD is not yet available. This review outlines those metrics that should be considered and monitored, then utilised to make a comprehensive referral to tertiary care for specialist paediatric gastroenterology review. Summaries are provided relating to presenting symptoms, extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs), and alarm symptoms in order to highlight those reported most frequently. The diagnostic accuracy and importance of interpreting faecal calprotectin (FC) levels, in conjunction with additional measures, are also outlined.
UNASSIGNED: Diagnostic testing to effectively identify children with IBD without the need for endoscopy is not yet available. Primary care physicians and general paediatricians must, therefore, rely on interpreting a combination of symptoms, laboratory parameters, and risk factors to assess the need for specialist referral and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory parameters and the associated clinical outcomes have been an area of focus in COVID-19 research globally.
OBJECTIVE: We performed a scoping review to synthesize laboratory values described in the literature and their associations with mortality and disease severity.
METHODS: We identified all primary studies involving laboratory values with clinical outcomes as a primary endpoint by performing data searches in various systematic review databases until 10th August, 2020. Two reviewers independently reviewed all abstracts (13,568 articles) and full text (1126 articles) data. A total of 529 studies involving 165,020 patients from 28 different countries were included. Investigation of the number of studies and patients from a geographical perspective showed that the majority of published literature from January-March 2020 to April-June 2020 was from Asia, though there was a temporal shift in published studies to Europe and the Americas. For each laboratory value, the proportion of studies that noted a statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlation with adverse clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, disease severity) was tabulated.
CONCLUSIONS: Among frequently reported laboratory values, blood urea nitrogen was the most often reported predictor of mortality (91%); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was the most frequent statistically significant laboratory parameter in predicting disease severity (96%). This review highlights the temporal progression of laboratory value frequencies, as well as potentially distinct utilities of different markers for clinical outcomes of COVID-19. Future research pathways include using this collected data for focused quantitative meta-analyses of particular laboratory values correlated with clinical outcomes of mortality and disease severity.

OBJECTIVE: Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been an extremely difficult pandemic to contain and it has affected more than 148 countries worldwide. The main aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive summary of clinical and laboratory parameters that are associated with and indicative of increased severity among COVID-19 patients.
METHODS: All the available data from high-quality research articles relevant to the epidemiology, demographics, trends in hospitalization and outcomes, clinical signs and symptoms, diagnostic methods and treatment methods of COVID-19 were retrieved and evaluated for inclusion.
RESULTS: As per our review, the mean age of patients in the severe group was 59.3 years compared to 46.5 years in non severe group. COVID-19 was more severe among men than women. Clinical presentation was variable among different studies. and dyspnea was the factor indicating severe disease. Laboratory parameters associated with increased severity were lymphopenia <0.8 × 109/L, thrombocytopenia 100 × 109/L, leucocytosis TC > 11 × 109/L, procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL, d dimer >2 mcg/mL, aspartate transaminase elevation >150U/L, LDH >250U/L.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that COVID-19 is a disease with varied clinical presentation and laboratory parameters. The commonest clinical symptoms were fever, cough and dyspnea. The laboratory parameters associated with severe disease were lymphopenia, elevated LDH, D dimer and Procalcitonin.