We carried out a meta-analysis on the effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on cardiopulmonary function after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Four databases were searched for studies comparing CR with control. A random-effects model was used to pool mean difference (MD). The meta-analysis showed an increase in peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) (MD = 1.93 mL/kg/min, p = 0.0006), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) (MD = 59.21 m, p < 0.00001), and a decrease in resting heart rate (resting HR) (MD = 5.68 bpm, p < 0.0001) in the CR group. The subgroup analysis revealed aerobic exercise could further improve resting HR and peak HR, and physical/combination with aerobic exercise could further increase 6MWD. The improvement of peak VO2, workload, resting HR, peak HR, and 6MWD regarding CR performed within one week after CABG is greater than that one week after CABG. CR after CABG can improve the cardiopulmonary function, which is reflected by the improvement of peak VO2, 6MWD, and resting HR.

BACKGROUND: The issues of replication and scientific transparency have been raised in exercise and sports science research. A potential means to address the replication crisis and enhance research reliability is to improve reporting quality and transparency. This study aims to formulate a reporting checklist as a supplement to the existing reporting guidelines, specifically for resistance exercise studies.
METHODS: PubMed (which covers Medline) and Scopus (which covers Medline, EMBASE, Ei Compendex, World Textile Index, Fluidex, Geobase, Biobase, and most journals in Web of Science) were searched for systematic reviews that comprised the primary studies directly comparing different resistance training methods. Basic data on the selected reviews, including on authors, publication years, and objectives, were summarized. The reporting items for the checklist were identified based on the objective of the reviews. Additional items from an existing checklist, namely the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template, a National Strength and Conditioning Association handbook, and an article from the EQUATOR library were incorporated into the final reporting checklist.
RESULTS: Our database search retrieved 3595 relevant records. After automatic duplicate removal, the titles and abstracts of the remaining 2254 records were screened. The full texts of 137 records were then reviewed, and 88 systematic reviews that met the criteria were included in the umbrella review.
CONCLUSIONS: Developed primarily by an umbrella review method, this checklist covers the research questions which have been systematically studied and is expected to improve the reporting completeness of future resistance exercise studies. The PRIRES checklist comprises 26 reporting items (39 subitems) that cover four major topics in resistance exercise intervention: 1) exercise selection, performance, and training parameters, 2) training program and progression, 3) exercise setting, and 4) planned vs actual training. The PRIRES checklist was designed specifically for reporting resistance exercise intervention. It is expected to be used with other reporting guidelines such as Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials. This article presents only the development process and resulting items of the checklist. An accompanying article detailing the rationale for, the importance of, and examples of each item is being prepared.
BACKGROUND: This study is registered with the EQUATOR Network under the title \"Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES).\" PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021235259.

Background: Kinesiology contributions to research and implementation of programs for cardiovascular disease have not been documented. This scoping review assesses kinesiology affiliates participation in exercise interventional research. Methods: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Eligible studies included individuals diagnosed with coronary artery (CAD) or heart disease (CHD) or stroke participating in exercise interventions supervised or designed by a kinesiologist affiliate (exercise physiologist, kinesiologist, exercise trainer, exercise therapist). Results: The search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL yielded 219 studies, including 13,874 participants (5,242 CAD, 4,526 CHD, and 4,106 post-stroke). Randomized controlled trials were the most common study design (52%). Kinesiologists were involved in 70% of the studies and supervised 23%. Forty percent did not specify the supervisor. Kinesiologists are involved in prevention and rehabilitation exercise studies that look to improve feasibility of practice, aerobic fitness, muscle and body composition, functional capacity, gait, neurological, psychosocial, and cardiovascular outcomes. Conclusions: Documentation of kinesiology contributions to research for patients with cardiovascular disease may enhance their acceptance in research and care for people with impaired cardiovascular health.
Kinesiology affiliates frequently implement and supervise clinical exercise interventions in stroke, CAD, and CHD populationsKinesiology affiliates make contributions to high-quality evidence generating research and patient careClinical exercise intervention supervisors are often kinesiology affiliates but are not identified in 40% of research reports.

The cross-education of strength is moderated by exercise design and prescription in clinical and non-clinical populations. This review synthesizes the available evidence regarding exercise design strategies for unilateral resistance training and provides evidence-based recommendations for the prescription of unilateral training to maximize the cross-education of strength. Greater insights regarding the timing and effectiveness of cross-education interventions in clinical scenarios will strengthen the use of unilateral resistance training for individuals who may benefit from its use.

To systematically review studies assessing (1) psychometric properties of the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) test in PD, (2) VO2max levels in persons with PD (pwPD) compared to healthy controls (HCs), and (3) reported VO2max associations in PD.
Six databases were searched. Descriptive data synthesis was used to summarize psychometric properties and reported VO2max associations. The VO2max means and test end-criteria were calculated using linear mixed models. Simple linear regression was used for associations.
The review included 25 studies. Psychometric properties of the VO2max test, reported in one study, showed intraclass correlations of 0.90-0.94 for VO2max. Thirteen studies reported test end-criteria, with only mean respiratory exchange ratio (on medication) and percentage of predicted maximal heart rate (off medication) fulfilling standardized minimum values for the VO2max test. The VO2max was comparable between pwPD and HC as well as between different PD-medication states. Associations between VO2max and age, sex, and fatigue were reported.
In mildly to moderately affected pwPD, limited evidence exists on the psychometric properties of the VO2max test and end-criteria were sparsely reported. Surprisingly, VO2max was comparable between pwPD and HC as well as between different PD-medication states, and only age, sex, and fatigue were associated with VO2max. Implications for rehabilitationIn mildly to moderately affected persons with PD (pwPD), only one study has examined psychometric properties of the VO2max test, reporting excellent test-retest reliability.A general lack of consistency on how to measure and report VO2max end-criteria was observed, but when reported, the end-criteria were most often not met.No difference was found in VO2max between mildly to moderately affected pwPD and HC, or between pwPD across different medication states.The identified negative association between VO2max and fatigue suggests aerobic exercise as a potential symptomatic treatment of fatigue when rehabilitation professionals are treating pwPD.

BACKGROUND: Equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion are terms covered in the academic literature focusing on sports, kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity, including in conjunction with marginalized groups. Universities in many countries use various EDI policy frameworks and work under the EDI headers \"equality, diversity and inclusion\", \"equity, diversity and inclusion\", \"diversity, equity and inclusion\", and similar phrases (all referred to as EDI) to rectify problems students, non-academic staff, and academic staff from marginalized groups, such as women, Indigenous peoples, visible/racialized minorities, disabled people, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQ2S+) experience. Which EDI data, if any, are generated influences EDI efforts in universities (research, education, and general workplace climate) of all programs.
METHODS: Our study used a scoping review approach and employed SCOPUS and the 70 databases of EBSCO-Host, which includes SportDiscus, as sources aimed to analyze the extent (and how) the academic literature focusing on sports, kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity engages with EDI.
RESULTS: We found only 18 relevant sources and a low to no coverage of marginalized groups linked to EDI, namely racialized minorities (12), women (6), LGBTQ2S+ (5), disabled people (2), and Indigenous peoples (0).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a gap in the academic inquiry and huge opportunities.

Since its inception, the mission of the International Journal of Exercise Science (IJES) has been to engage student researchers, to provide an outlet for peer-review and possible publication of their work, and to grant an opportunity for them to gain experience as peer-reviewers. The Editors of IJES take pride in providing these opportunities for student involvement, and we are constantly seeking new and innovative ways to enhance students\' professional development. As our readership has expanded across the globe and our scope has broadened to cross many Kinesiology related disciplines, we believe it is timely to revisit the purpose of peer-review, give advice on best practices, and provide a template for reviews. Presenting these guiding principles should simplify and streamline both the review and the revision processes for students and professionals alike.

There is an abundance of evidence that suggests elastic tendons can enhance both animal and human muscle performance. However, in many terrestrial animals, including humans, a large proportion of the elastic tissue within the muscle-tendon unit is located within the muscle. This continuous elastic sheet, which provides muscle fibre attachment, is known as the aponeurosis. The aponeurosis has a much more complicated shape than the free tendon and it undergoes a more complicated loading regime during contraction, due to its relationship with the bulging muscle fibres, which remain isovolumetric during force production. Muscle contraction may dynamically modulate the stiffness of the aponeurosis at the same active versus passive force, by increasing the intramuscular pressure and transverse forces within the muscle, which may stretch the aponeurosis in width and subsequently reduce its longitudinal strain. Some evidence also suggests that the aponeurosis mechanical properties may be affected by muscle length, which appears to reduce the fascicle strains for a given muscle force at longer muscle lengths. This narrative review outlines the animal and human studies that have investigated aponeurosis behaviour during contraction and discusses how an elastic sheet with a variable stiffness under activation might be beneficial for muscle performance. While it is clear that our understanding of the role of aponeurosis is lacking, it is hoped that further work will attempt to determine how this tissue contributes to power amplification and elastic energy savings during locomotion and potentially uncover how aponeurosis behaviour contributes to injury risk.

Although the effects of short versus long inter-set rest intervals in resistance training on measures of muscle hypertrophy have been investigated in several studies, the findings are equivocal and the practical implications remain unclear. In an attempt to provide clarity on the topic, we performed a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) electronic databases. Six studies were found to have met the inclusion criteria: (a) an experimental trial published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal; (b) the study compared the use of short (≤60 s) to long (>60 s) inter-set rest intervals in a traditional dynamic resistance exercise using both concentric and eccentric muscle actions, with the only difference in resistance training among groups being the inter-set rest interval duration; (c) at least one method of measuring changes in muscle mass was used in the study; (d) the study lasted for a minimum of four weeks, employed a training frequency of ≥2 resistance training days per week, and (e) used human participants without known chronic disease or injury. Current evidence indicates that both short and long inter-set rest intervals may be useful when training for achieving gains in muscle hypertrophy. Novel findings involving trained participants using measures sensitive to detect changes in muscle hypertrophy suggest a possible advantage for the use of long rest intervals to elicit hypertrophic effects. However, due to the paucity of studies with similar designs, further research is needed to provide a clear differentiation between these two approaches.