背景:公平,平等,多样性,包容性是学术文献中涉及体育的术语,运动学,体育教育,和身体活动,包括与边缘化群体一起。许多国家的大学使用各种EDI政策框架,并在EDI标题“平等”下工作,多样性和包容性“,“股权,多样性和包容性“,“多样性,公平和包容“,和类似的短语(都称为EDI)来纠正问题学生,非学术人员,和来自边缘化群体的学术人员,比如女人,土著人民,可见/种族化的少数民族,残疾人,和女同性恋,同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿或提问,和两个精神(LGBTQ2S+)的经验。哪些EDI数据,如果有的话,对大学电子数据交换工作产生了影响(研究,教育,和一般的工作场所气候)。
方法:我们的研究使用范围审查方法,并采用SCOPUS和EBSCO-Host的70个数据库,其中包括SportDiscus,作为旨在分析学术文献关注体育的程度(以及如何)的来源,运动学,体育教育,体育活动与EDI有关。
结果:我们发现只有18个相关来源,对与EDI相关的边缘化群体的覆盖率很低,甚至没有,即种族化的少数群体(12),女人(6)LGBTQ2S+(5),残疾人(2)土著人民(0)。
结论:我们的研究结果表明在学术调查和巨大的机会方面存在差距。
BACKGROUND: Equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion are terms covered in the academic literature focusing on sports,
kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity, including in conjunction with marginalized groups. Universities in many countries use various EDI policy frameworks and work under the EDI headers \"equality, diversity and inclusion\", \"equity, diversity and inclusion\", \"diversity, equity and inclusion\", and similar phrases (all referred to as EDI) to rectify problems students, non-academic staff, and academic staff from marginalized groups, such as women, Indigenous peoples, visible/racialized minorities, disabled people, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQ2S+) experience. Which EDI data, if any, are generated influences EDI efforts in universities (research, education, and general workplace climate) of all programs.
METHODS: Our study used a scoping
review approach and employed SCOPUS and the 70 databases of EBSCO-Host, which includes SportDiscus, as sources aimed to analyze the extent (and how) the academic literature focusing on sports,
kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity engages with EDI.
RESULTS: We found only 18 relevant sources and a low to no coverage of marginalized groups linked to EDI, namely racialized minorities (12), women (6), LGBTQ2S+ (5), disabled people (2), and Indigenous peoples (0).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a gap in the academic inquiry and huge opportunities.