UNASSIGNED:先前的研究发现脑电图(EEG)信号的变化是精神分析干预的作用。然而,目前尚无研究调查脑电图功率谱中特定精神分析干预措施的神经相关性。在本案例研究中,我们对比了三种类型的干预措施(澄清,对抗,和解释)以及在记录EEG时进行的结构性精神分析访谈中的中性控制条件。
UNASSIGNED:一名27岁的男性患者被诊断为重度抑郁症和边缘性人格障碍,并伴有反复的自杀和自我伤害行为,在记录EEG的同时接受了结构性访谈。两位独立专家以协商一致方式选出了四个条件的特征事件(澄清,对抗,解释,和中立控制)在面试中,包括在脑电图分析中。将快速傅里叶变换(FFT)应用于干预类型的子段以分析EEG功率谱。中央的阿尔法和贝塔力量,额叶,在线性混合效应模型中考虑了顶叶位点,由于访谈片段的长度缺乏平衡,因此片段作为具有最大似然估计的随机因素。
UNASSIGNED:与中央电极中的对照条件相比,干预措施“解释”和“对抗”显示出明显较低的α功率。在α功率的额叶和顶叶位置以及所有β功率位置,综合检验(全模型/无干预的模型)和相对于对照条件的比较在α误差校正后没有显著的总体结果或显著性失败.
未经批准:介入干预,例如与差异的对抗和对无意识的心理冲突的解释,可能引发了暂时的情绪不稳定,导致类似于外部刺激干扰的心理处理变化。这一结论与以下发现相一致,即解释,这可能是最简洁的干预措施,对阿尔法力量的影响最强。在治疗性精神分析干预技术中使用EEG可能是在神经水平上评估对心理治疗过程的差异反应的有用工具。然而,这种单例结果必须在更大的样本中复制,并且不允许推广。
UNASSIGNED: Previous studies detected changes in the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal as an effect of psychoanalytic interventions. However, no study has investigated neural correlates of specific psychoanalytic interventions in the EEG power spectrum yet. In the present
case study, we contrasted three types of interventions (clarification, confrontation, and
interpretation) and a neutral control condition during a structural psychoanalytic interview conducted while EEG was recorded.
UNASSIGNED: A 27-year-old male patient diagnosed with major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder with recurrent suicidal and self-injurious behavior underwent a structural interview while recording EEG. Two independent experts selected by consensus the characteristic episodes of the four conditions (clarification, confrontation, interpretation, and neutral control) within the interview, which were included in the EEG analyses. Fast Fourier transformation (FFT) was applied to subsegments of the intervention type to analyze the EEG power spectra. Alpha and beta power from central, frontal, and parietal sites were considered in linear mixed-effects models with segments as a random factor with maximum-likelihood estimates due to the lack of balance in the length of the interview segments.
UNASSIGNED: The interventions \"
interpretation\" and \"confrontation\" showed a significantly lower alpha power compared with the control condition in the central electrodes. In the frontal and parietal sites of the alpha power and all beta power sites, the omnibus tests (full model/model without intervention) and comparisons relative to control conditions showed no significant overall result or failed significance after alpha error correction.
UNASSIGNED: Incisive interventions, such as confrontation with discrepancies and
interpretation of unconscious intrapsychic conflicts, may have provoked temporary emotional lability, leading to a change in psychic processing akin to interference from external stimuli. This conclusion is consistent with the finding that interpretations, which are potentially the most concise interventions, had the strongest effects on alpha power. Using EEG during therapeutic psychoanalytic intervention techniques might be a helpful tool to evaluate differential responses to the psychotherapeutic process on a neural level. However, this single-
case result has to be replicated in a larger sample and does not allow generalizations.