intercostal nerve block

肋间神经阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在本研究中,我们比较了肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)的镇痛效果,超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞(PVB),单孔胸腔镜肺手术后硬膜外阻滞(EB)。
    方法:将120例单孔胸腔镜肺手术患者随机均分为3组:ICNB组,PVB组,EB集团。ICNB组于手术结束前在直接胸腔镜下进行,而PVB和EB组在全身麻醉后进行PVB和EB,分别。所有组术后均使用患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。记录以下指标:术中舒芬太尼用量,麻醉苏醒时间,术后插管时间,神经阻滞手术时间,术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分在休息和咳嗽期间定期0、2、4、8、24和48h,直到第一次PCIA,术后24小时内有效按压次数,抢救镇痛干预措施的数量,和副作用。
    结果:与ICNB组相比,PVB和EB组术中舒芬太尼剂量较低,麻醉苏醒时间明显缩短,术后插管时间,但是神经阻滞手术时间更长,术后24h内休息和咳嗽时,VAS评分较低(所有p值小于0.05)。相反,24h后休息和咳嗽期间的VAS评分无统计学差异(所有p值大于0.05).第一次PCIA的时间,PVB组和EB组术后24小时有效按压次数和抢救镇痛次数明显优于ICNB组(P<0.05)。然而,EB组的副作用发生率较高(P<0.05)。
    结论:单孔胸腔镜肺手术后PVB和EB的镇痛效果优于ICNB。PVB引起的副作用和并发症较少,并且更安全,更有效。
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compared the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block (ICNB), ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block (PVB), and epidural block (EB) following single-port thoracoscopic lung surgery.
    METHODS: A total of 120 patients who underwent single-hole thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomly and equally divided into three groups: ICNB group, the PVB group, and the EB group. ICNB was performed under direct thoracoscopic visualization before the conclusion of the surgery in the ICNB group, while PVB and EB were performed after general anesthesia in the PVB and EB groups, respectively. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used following the surgery in all the groups. The following indicators were recorded: Intraoperative sufentanil dosage, anesthesia awakening time, postoperative intubation time, nerve block operation time, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during resting and coughing at regular intervals of 0, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h, the time until first PCIA, number of effective compressions within 24 h postoperatively, number of rescue analgesia interventions, and the side effects.
    RESULTS: In comparison to the ICNB group, the PVB and EB groups had a lower intraoperative sufentanil dosage, significantly shorter anesthesia awakening time, and postoperative intubation time, but longer nerve block operation time, lower VAS scores when resting and coughing within 24 h postoperatively (all p-values less than 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS scores during resting and coughing after 24 h (all p-values greater than 0.05). Time to first PCIA, number of effective compressions and number of rescue analgesia at the 24-hour mark postoperatively were significantly better in the PVB and EB groups than that in the ICNB group (P < 0.05). However, there was a higher incidence of side effects observed in the EB group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The analgesic effect of PVB and EB following single-port thoracoscopic lung surgery is better than that of ICNB. PVB causes fewer side effects and complications and is safer and more effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)后麻醉师给予的竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和外科医生给予的肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)的镇痛效果。
    方法:随机化,控制,双盲研究。
    方法:手术室,两个中心的术后恢复室和病房。
    方法:一百名患者,ASAI-III,并计划选修VATS。
    方法:在VATS期间,随机提供超声引导下麻醉师给予的ESPB或电视胸腔镜下外科医生给予的ICNB。术后常规口服非阿片类镇痛药联合静脉抢救吗啡用于多模式镇痛。
    方法:主要结果是术后48小时的疼痛评分和吗啡消耗量。术后1h采用10cm视觉模拟量表评估疼痛强度,24h,术后48小时。比较两个研究组在这些时间点的吗啡消耗。此外,手术后24h还提供口服弱阿片类药物抢救镇痛药。术后24小时恢复质量也使用QoR-15问卷进行评估,作为次要结局,比较了胸管引流时间和住院时间.
    结果:两个研究组的患者具有相当的基线特征,手术类型也相似。术后1hVAS变化,24h,和术后48小时也是两个研究组之间的可比性。两组在所有时间点的中位评分均较低(<4.0)(均p>0.05)。ESPB组患者需要48小时吗啡消耗[3(0-6)与ESPB组和ICNB组分别为0(0-6)mg;p=0.135],口服挽救镇痛药的数量较低(0.4±1.2vs.ESPB组和ICNB组分别为1.0±1.8;p=0.059)。此外,两组患者的QoR15评分和住院时间相似.
    结论:麻醉师管理的超声引导的ESPB和外科医生管理的VATSICNB对于接受VATS切除肿瘤的患者都是有效的镇痛技术。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
    METHODS: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.
    METHODS: Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers.
    METHODS: One hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS.
    METHODS: The anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery.
    METHODS: The primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes.
    RESULTS: Patients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0-6) vs. 0 (0-6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:观察罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞联合PCIA用于假体(腋路)隆胸术后早期镇痛的效果。将其随机分为对照组和观察组,每个都有40个案例。在放置假体之前,对照组给予0.9%生理盐水肋间神经阻滞;观察组给予0.75%罗哌卡因+1‰肾上腺素肋间神经阻滞。术后使用患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。观察指标为4h静息和运动状态的视觉模拟量表(VAS),24h,术后48h和72h不良反应。
    结果:观察组患者休息、运动时的VAS评分及不良反应均低于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞联合PCIA能有效缓解腋下切口胸大肌假体隆胸术后疼痛。帮助患者更舒适地度过围手术期,加速术后恢复,减少全身阿片类药物的用量,有效减少副作用。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: To observe the effect of ropivacaine intercostal nerve block combined with PCIA as early postoperative analgesia following breast augmentation surgery with prosthesis (axillary approach) METHODS: A total of 80 women with breast augmentation surgery were selected in the plastic surgery department of Chongqing Huamei Plastic Surgery Hospital from December 2021 to May 2022. They were equally randomized into control group and observation group, with 40 cases in each one. Before placing the prosthesis, the control group was given 0.9% normal saline for intercostal nerve block; the observation group was given 0.75% ropivacaine + 1‰ adrenaline for intercostal nerve block. Patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used after operation. Observation indexes the visual analog scale (VAS) of resting and motor state at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after operation and the adverse reactions.
    RESULTS: The VAS scores of patients at rest and exercise and adverse reactions in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine intercostal nerve block combined with PCIA can effectively alleviate the pain after breast augmentation with pectoralis major prosthesis through axillary incision, help patients more comfortably through the perioperative period, accelerate postoperative recovery, reduce the dosage of systemic opioids and effectively reduce side effects.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在通过回顾性分析比较经胸肋间神经阻滞(TINB)和经皮肋间神经阻滞(PINB)在胸腔镜手术(VATS)中的镇痛效果。
    方法:回顾性分析了在2021年1月至2022年6月期间接受VATS的336例患者。在参与者中,194人接受TINB,并被分配到T组,而142例患者接受了PINB并被分配到P组。手术结束时,两组均通过TINB或TINB接受25ml罗哌卡因。这项研究测量了阿片类药物的消费量,疼痛评分,镇痛满意度,和安全。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,以最大程度地减少由于非随机分配导致的选择偏差。
    结果:在倾向得分匹配后,每组86例患者进行分析。P组累积阿片类药物消耗量显著低于T组(p<0.01)。术后6、12h,P组视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分低于T组(p<0.01);在3、24和48h,两组之间的得分没有显着差异(p>0.05)。P组镇痛满意度高于T组(p<0.05)。背痛的发生率,恶心或呕吐,瘙痒,头晕,两组皮肤麻木无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    结论:研究表明,与TINB相比,PINB为胸外科手术患者提供了更好的镇痛效果,没有任何额外的不良反应。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of transthoracic intercostal nerve block (TINB) and percutaneous intercostal nerve block (PINB) for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) using a retrospective analysis.
    METHODS: A total of 336 patients who underwent VATS between January 2021 and June 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Of the participants, 194 received TINB and were assigned to the T group, while 142 patients received PINB and were assigned to the P group. Both groups received 25 ml of ropivacaine via TINB or PINB at the end of the surgery. The study measured opioid consumption, pain scores, analgesic satisfaction, and safety. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize selection bias due to nonrandom assignment.
    RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 86 patients from each group were selected for analysis. The P group had significantly lower cumulative opioid consumption than the T group (p < 0.01). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were lower for the P group than the T group at 6 and 12 h post-surgery (p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in the scores between the two groups at 3, 24, and 48 h (p > 0.05). The analgesic satisfaction in the P group was higher than in the T group (p < 0.05). The incidence of back pain, nausea or vomiting, pruritus, dizziness, and skin numbness between the two groups was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that PINB provides superior analgesia for patients undergoing thoracic surgery compared to TINB without any extra adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胸部手术后强化恢复方案的实施和持续优化可显著改善术后结局。随着时间的推移,我们观察到机器人胸腔镜解剖切除后,术后第1天(POD)1次放电的发生率增加了10倍。我们旨在确定与安全POD1排放相关的因素。
    我们对2012年7月1日至2022年6月30日之间的机器人解剖肺切除术的前瞻性维护数据库进行了回顾性分析,最后2.5年的患者构成了本研究的基础。收集的数据包括人口统计,保险类型,面积剥夺指数(贫困指标),以及手术和术后变量,包括住院时间,阿片类药物的使用,每日疼痛水平,再入院,和门诊干预。使用逻辑回归模块分析与POD1相关的因素。
    总共,279名患者符合纳入标准(91名POD1出院,32.6%;无胸膜导管排出)。在早期出院患者中,胸膜并发症的出院后干预措施和再入院均未增加。经相关因素调整后,年龄较小,右中叶切除术,POD1使用阿片类药物较低,下午4点前完成手术室,低面积剥夺指数与POD1排放显著相关。对49名患者的亚分析,谁可以在POD1上出院,确定低氧血症需要家庭氧气,心房颤动,疼痛控制不佳是延迟POD1放电的常见缓解因素。
    机器人胸腔镜解剖切除后,32%的病例实现了安全的POD1出院。确定影响早期放电的积极因素和消极因素,为进一步修改以增加POD1放电数量提供了指导。
    UNASSIGNED: Implementation and continuing optimization of enhanced recovery protocol after thoracic surgery results in significant improvement of postoperative outcomes. We observed a 10-fold increase in the rate of postoperative day (POD) 1 discharges following robotic thoracoscopic anatomic resections over time. We aimed to determine factors associated with safe POD1 discharges.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of robotic anatomic pulmonary resections between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2022, with patients of the last 2.5 years forming the basis of this study. Data collected included demographics, insurance types, Area Deprivation Index (indicator of poverty), and operative and postoperative variables including length of stay, opioid use, daily pain levels, readmissions, and outpatient interventions. Factors associated with POD1 were analyzed using a logistic regression module.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 279 patients met inclusion criteria (91 POD1 discharges, 32.6%; none discharged with a pleural catheter). There was neither an increase of postdischarge interventions for pleural complications nor readmission in early discharge patients. After adjusting for relevant factors, younger age, right middle lobectomy, lower opioid use on POD1, operating room finish before 4 PM, and low Area Deprivation Index were significantly associated with POD1 discharge. A subanalysis of 49 patients, who could have been discharged on POD1, identified hypoxemia requiring home oxygen, atrial fibrillation, and poorly controlled pain being common mitigatable clinical factors delaying POD1 discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: Safe POD1 discharge following robotic thoracoscopic anatomic resection was achieved in 32% of cases. Identification of positive and negative factors affecting early discharge provides guidance for further modifications to increase the number of POD1 discharges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胸外科手术(ERATS)方案使用镇痛药的组合来控制疼痛,并与阿片类药物需求减少有关。我们调查了持续ERATS细化对无阿片类药物排放发生率的影响。
    我们回顾性分析了我们前瞻性维护的机构数据库,用于选修,阿片类药物幼稚机器人胸腔镜手术。人口统计,手术结果,术后分配阿片类药物(吗啡毫克当量),并收集阿片类药物的释放状态。我们感兴趣的主要结果是与无阿片类药物排放相关的因素;我们的次要目标是确定新的持续阿片类药物使用者的发生率。
    总共,纳入了我们优化的ERATS方案中的466名患者;309名(66%)在没有阿片类药物的情况下出院。然而,34(11%)没有阿片类药物的患者出院后需要处方。相反,157名患者中有7名(11%),从未填写出院时服用的阿片类药物处方。与无阿片类药物放电相关的因素是非解剖切除,纵隔手术,轻微的疼痛,出院当天缺乏阿片类药物的使用。更重要的是,3.2%的无阿片类药物出院患者成为新的持续阿片类药物使用者,而10.8%的患者在出院后服用阿片类药物处方(P=.0013)。最后,在整个队列中,仅2.3%的非阿片类药物治疗患者成为慢性阿片类药物使用者;不同阿片类药物排出状态的慢性使用发生率无差异.
    优化的阿片类药物保留ERATS方案在减少出院当天的阿片类药物处方方面非常有效。我们观察到,在我们的队列中,新的持续或慢性阿片类药物使用率非常低,进一步强调了ERATS协议在抗击阿片类药物流行中的作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) protocols use a combination of analgesics for pain control and have been associated with decreased opioid requirements. We investigated the impact of continual ERATS refinement on the incidence of opioid-free discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively maintained institutional database for elective, opioid-naive robotic thoracoscopic procedures. Demographics, operative outcomes, postoperative opioid dispensed (morphine milligram equivalent), and opioid discharge status were collected. Our primary outcome of interest was factors associated with opioid-free discharge; our secondary objective was to determine the incidence of new persistent opioid users.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 466 patients from our optimized ERATS protocol were included; 309 (66%) were discharged without opioids. However, 34 (11%) of patients discharged without opioids required a prescription postdischarge. Conversely, 7 of 157 patients (11%), never filled their opioid prescriptions given at discharge. Factors associated with opioid-free discharges were nonanatomic resections, mediastinal procedures, minimal pain, and lack of opioid usage on the day of discharge. More importantly, 3.2% of opioid-free discharge patients became new persistent opioid users versus 10.8% of patients filling opioid prescriptions after discharges (P = .0013). Finally, only 2.3% of opioid-naive patients of the entire cohort became chronic opioid users; there was no difference in the incidence of chronic use by opioid discharge status.
    UNASSIGNED: Optimized opioid-sparing ERATS protocols are highly effective in reducing opioid prescription on the day of discharge. We observed a very low rate of new persistent or chronic opioid use in our cohort, further highlighting the role ERATS protocols in combating the opioid epidemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:自体肋软骨收获由于其稳定性,是颅面重建中的常用程序,可靠性,和多样性。然而,这种手术与术后严重的供体部位疼痛有关.因此,我们的目的是通过这项研究来比较肋间神经阻滞在治疗颅面重建肋软骨手术患者术后疼痛中的疗效。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目报告本系统评价。该研究系统地回顾了MEDLINE,科克伦,和EMBASE数据库没有时间限制。
    结果:由于回顾了文献,全文筛选了33篇文章,共14篇文章符合我们的纳入/排除标准。然而,只有4篇高质量RCT文章被纳入定量合成(荟萃分析).这项研究的结果表明,ICNB和对照组在术后12、24和48h的疼痛评分没有显着差异。在休息和咳嗽。因此,这两种技术都被认为是安全有效的。
    结论:我们的结果表明,在多项研究中,ICNB预防性供区镇痛用于采集自体肋软骨的良好结果。然而,两个武器之间的总体结果微不足道。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每个提交的证据分配一个级别,该级别的证据适用于循证医学排名。这不包括评论文章,书评,和有关基础科学的手稿,动物研究,尸体研究,和实验研究。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: Autologous costal cartilage harvest is a common procedure in craniofacial reconstruction due to its stability, dependability, and diversity. However, such a procedure is associated with severe donor-site pain postoperatively. Therefore, we aim through this study to compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve block in the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing costal cartilage harvest for craniofacial reconstruction.
    METHODS: This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The study systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases without time-limitation.
    RESULTS: As a result of reviewing the literature, 33 articles were screened by full-text resulting in 14 articles which met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. However, only four high-quality RCT articles were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The findings of this study suggest that there is no significant difference in pain scores between ICNB and control groups at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, both at rest and with coughing. Therefore, both techniques are considered safe and effective.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results show evidence of favorable outcome of preventive donor-site analgesia with ICNB for harvesting autologous costal cartilage in multiple studies. However, the overall outcomes were insignificant between the two arms.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:肺癌手术术后镇痛的最新趋势依赖于局部神经阻滞和减少阿片类药物的给药。我们的研究旨在严格评估我们机构的连续超声引导的竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB),并将其与标准的区域麻醉技术进行比较,肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)。
    方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,以比较患者的结局。计划用于电视胸腔镜(VATS)肺癌切除术,分配给ESPB或ICNB组。主要结果是阿片类药物的总消耗和术后48小时休息和咳嗽时的主观疼痛评分。次要结果是呼吸肌力量,通过24小时和48小时后的最大吸气和呼气压力(MIP/MEP)测量。
    结果:60例患者符合纳入标准,半个ESPB.前48小时的阿片类药物总消费量为21。ESPB组64±14.22mg,ICNB组38.34±29.91mg(p=0.035)。ESPB组患者在休息时的数字评分低于ICNB组(1.19±0.73vs.1.77±1.01,p=0.039)。24h(MIPp=0.088,MEPp=0.182)或48h(MIPp=0.110,MEPp=0.645)后,MIP/MEP从基线降低没有显着差异,两组之间的胸管拔除或出院时间。
    结论:在手术后的最初48小时,与ICNB患者相比,持续ESPB患者需要更少的阿片类药物,并且报告的疼痛也更少.呼吸肌力量没有差异,术后并发症,还有出院时间.此外,持续的ESPB比ICNB需要更多的监测。
    A recent trend in postoperative analgesia for lung cancer surgery relies on regional nerve blocks with decreased opioid administration. Our study aims to critically assess the continuous ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at our institution and compare it to a standard regional anesthetic technique, the intercostal nerve block (ICNB).
    A prospective randomized-control study was performed to compare outcomes of patients, scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lung cancer resection, allocated to the ESPB or ICNB group. Primary outcomes were total opioid consumption and subjective pain scores at rest and cough each hour in 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcome was respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP) after 24 h and 48 h.
    60 patients met the inclusion criteria, half ESPB. Total opioid consumption in the first 48 h was 21. 64 ± 14.22 mg in the ESPB group and 38.34 ± 29.91 mg in the ICNB group (p = 0.035). The patients in the ESPB group had lower numerical rating scores at rest than in the ICNB group (1.19 ± 0.73 vs. 1.77 ± 1.01, p = 0.039). There were no significant differences in MIP/MEP decrease from baseline after 24 h (MIP p = 0.088, MEP p = 0.182) or 48 h (MIP p = 0.110, MEP p = 0.645), time to chest tube removal or hospital discharge between the two groups.
    In the first 48 h after surgery, patients with continuous ESPB required fewer opioids and reported less pain than patients with ICNB. There were no differences regarding respiratory muscle strength, postoperative complications, and time to hospital discharge. In addition, continuous ESPB demanded more surveillance than ICNB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    地塞米松棕榈酸酯在延长局部麻醉阻滞持续时间方面的疗效尚不确定。在一个随机的,电视胸腔镜手术患者的双盲研究,我们测试了肋间神经阻滞后静脉或神经周地塞米松棕榈酸酯是否导致长时间镇痛。
    在2022年5月至12月期间接受电视胸腔镜手术的90例患者被随机分配到三个肋间神经阻滞研究臂中的一个(每个n=30),需要添加0.5%罗哌卡因(23毫升)如下:对照组(C组),生理盐水2ml;IV-DXP组,2ml生理盐水+2ml(8mg)静脉注射地塞米松棕榈酸酯;PN-DXP组,2毫升(8毫克)神经周地塞米松棕榈酸酯。术后首次补救镇痛的时间是主要结果指标。次要终点包括术后阿片类药物消耗,视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,镇痛满意度,以及相关的不良影响。
    与对照组或IV-DXP组相比,PN-DXP组首次术后补救镇痛的时间更长,术后用于抢救镇痛的阿片类药物用量更低(p<0.01)。同样,术后8、12、18和24h患者的视觉模拟量表评分在PN-DXP组低于对照组和IV-DXP组(p<0.01)。PN-DXP组患者满意度在统计学上较低,与对照组或IV-DXP组相比(p<0.05)。临床上,在术后48h监测期间,三组的不良反应发生率没有显着差异(p>0.05)。
    通过延长镇痛几乎没有相关不良反应,神经周地塞米松棕榈酸酯是罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞的有希望的辅助手段。
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of dexamethasone palmitate in extending durations of local anesthetic blocks is uncertain. In a randomized, double-blind study of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, we tested whether intravenous or perineural dexamethasone palmitate caused prolonged analgesia after intercostal nerve block.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 90 patients subjected to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between May and December 2022 were randomly assigned to one of three intercostal nerve blocks study arms (n = 30 each), requiring the addition of 0.5% ropivacaine (23 ml) as follows: controls (C group), 2 ml saline; IV-DXP group, 2 ml saline + 2 ml (8 mg) intravenous dexamethasone palmitate; and PN-DXP group, 2 ml (8 mg) perineural dexamethasone palmitate. Time to first postoperative remedial analgesia served as primary outcome measure. Secondary endpoints included postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores by Visual Analog Scale, analgesia satisfaction, and related adverse effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with controls or the IV-DXP group, time to first postoperative remedial analgesia was longer and postoperative opioid consumption for rescue analgesia was lower in the PN-DXP group (p < 0.01). Similarly, the Visual Analog Scale scores in patients at 8, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively were lower in the PN-DXP group than in controls and the IV-DXP group (p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction was statistically lower in the PN-DXP group, compared with either the control or IV-DXP group (p < 0.05). Clinically, the three groups did not differ significantly in occurrences of adverse effects during the 48-h postoperative monitoring period (p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Perineural dexamethasone palmitate is a promising adjunct to ropivacaine intercostal nerve block by prolonging analgesia with almost no related adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了多级肋间神经阻滞(ML-ICB)的分割方法是否可以减少胸腔镜肺切除术中所需的罗哌卡因剂量。同时保持静息术后疼痛评分。
    方法:本回顾性研究,单队列研究纳入了2020年10月至2022年3月期间在日本一家肿瘤医院接受胸腔镜下恶性肿瘤肺切除术的241例患者.ML-ICB由外科医生在直视下进行。A组手术开始和结束时的术中麻醉药使用和术后疼痛相关变量的差异(单次注射ML-ICB;0.75%罗哌卡因,手术结束时20mL)和B组(分为ML-ICB,在手术开始和结束时进行;0.25%罗哌卡因,总共30mL)进行评估。使用数字评定量表(NRS)评估术后1h和24h的疼痛。
    结果:术中瑞芬太尼用量B组(14.4±6.4μg/kg/h)明显低于A组(16.7±8.4μg/kg/h)(P=0.02)。B组24hNRS评分为0~3分的患者比例明显高于B组(85.4%,106/124)比A组(73.5%,86/117)(P=0.02)。B组术后不需要静脉抢救药物的患者比例明显高于B组(78.2%,97/124)比A组(61.5%,72/117)(P<0.01)。
    结论:ML-ICB的分割方法可以减少术中瑞芬太尼的剂量,降低术后24h疼痛评分,减少术后静脉抢救药物的使用,尽管术中使用了罗哌卡因总量的一半。
    This study investigated whether the divided method of multi-level intercostal nerve block (ML-ICB) could reduce the ropivacaine dose required during thoracoscopic pulmonary resection, while maintaining the resting postoperative pain scores.
    This retrospective, single-cohort study enrolled 241 patients who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary resection for malignant tumors between October 2020 and March 2022 at a cancer hospital in Japan. ML-ICB was performed by surgeons under direct vision. The differences in intraoperative anesthetic use and postoperative pain-related variables at the beginning and end of surgery between group A (single-shot ML-ICB; 0.75% ropivacaine, 20 mL at the end of the surgery) and group B (divided ML-ICB, performed at the beginning and end of surgery; 0.25% ropivacaine, 30 mL total) were assessed. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate pain 1 h and 24 h postoperatively.
    Intraoperative remifentanil use was significantly lower in group B (14.4 ± 6.4 μg/kg/h) than in group A (16.7 ± 8.4 μg/kg/h) (P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with NRS scores of 0 to 3 at 24 h was significantly higher in group B (85.4%, 106/124) than in group A (73.5%, 86/117) (P = 0.02). The proportion of patients not requiring postoperative intravenous rescue drugs was significantly higher in group B (78.2%, 97/124) than in group A (61.5%, 72/117) (P < 0.01).
    The divided method of ML-ICB could reduce the intraoperative remifentanil dose, decrease the postoperative pain score at 24 h, and curtail postoperative intravenous rescue drug use, despite using half the total ropivacaine dose intraoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号