intercostal nerve block

肋间神经阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)后麻醉师给予的竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和外科医生给予的肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)的镇痛效果。
    方法:随机化,控制,双盲研究。
    方法:手术室,两个中心的术后恢复室和病房。
    方法:一百名患者,ASAI-III,并计划选修VATS。
    方法:在VATS期间,随机提供超声引导下麻醉师给予的ESPB或电视胸腔镜下外科医生给予的ICNB。术后常规口服非阿片类镇痛药联合静脉抢救吗啡用于多模式镇痛。
    方法:主要结果是术后48小时的疼痛评分和吗啡消耗量。术后1h采用10cm视觉模拟量表评估疼痛强度,24h,术后48小时。比较两个研究组在这些时间点的吗啡消耗。此外,手术后24h还提供口服弱阿片类药物抢救镇痛药。术后24小时恢复质量也使用QoR-15问卷进行评估,作为次要结局,比较了胸管引流时间和住院时间.
    结果:两个研究组的患者具有相当的基线特征,手术类型也相似。术后1hVAS变化,24h,和术后48小时也是两个研究组之间的可比性。两组在所有时间点的中位评分均较低(<4.0)(均p>0.05)。ESPB组患者需要48小时吗啡消耗[3(0-6)与ESPB组和ICNB组分别为0(0-6)mg;p=0.135],口服挽救镇痛药的数量较低(0.4±1.2vs.ESPB组和ICNB组分别为1.0±1.8;p=0.059)。此外,两组患者的QoR15评分和住院时间相似.
    结论:麻醉师管理的超声引导的ESPB和外科医生管理的VATSICNB对于接受VATS切除肿瘤的患者都是有效的镇痛技术。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
    METHODS: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.
    METHODS: Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers.
    METHODS: One hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS.
    METHODS: The anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery.
    METHODS: The primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes.
    RESULTS: Patients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0-6) vs. 0 (0-6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在通过回顾性分析比较经胸肋间神经阻滞(TINB)和经皮肋间神经阻滞(PINB)在胸腔镜手术(VATS)中的镇痛效果。
    方法:回顾性分析了在2021年1月至2022年6月期间接受VATS的336例患者。在参与者中,194人接受TINB,并被分配到T组,而142例患者接受了PINB并被分配到P组。手术结束时,两组均通过TINB或TINB接受25ml罗哌卡因。这项研究测量了阿片类药物的消费量,疼痛评分,镇痛满意度,和安全。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,以最大程度地减少由于非随机分配导致的选择偏差。
    结果:在倾向得分匹配后,每组86例患者进行分析。P组累积阿片类药物消耗量显著低于T组(p<0.01)。术后6、12h,P组视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分低于T组(p<0.01);在3、24和48h,两组之间的得分没有显着差异(p>0.05)。P组镇痛满意度高于T组(p<0.05)。背痛的发生率,恶心或呕吐,瘙痒,头晕,两组皮肤麻木无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    结论:研究表明,与TINB相比,PINB为胸外科手术患者提供了更好的镇痛效果,没有任何额外的不良反应。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of transthoracic intercostal nerve block (TINB) and percutaneous intercostal nerve block (PINB) for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) using a retrospective analysis.
    METHODS: A total of 336 patients who underwent VATS between January 2021 and June 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Of the participants, 194 received TINB and were assigned to the T group, while 142 patients received PINB and were assigned to the P group. Both groups received 25 ml of ropivacaine via TINB or PINB at the end of the surgery. The study measured opioid consumption, pain scores, analgesic satisfaction, and safety. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize selection bias due to nonrandom assignment.
    RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 86 patients from each group were selected for analysis. The P group had significantly lower cumulative opioid consumption than the T group (p < 0.01). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were lower for the P group than the T group at 6 and 12 h post-surgery (p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in the scores between the two groups at 3, 24, and 48 h (p > 0.05). The analgesic satisfaction in the P group was higher than in the T group (p < 0.05). The incidence of back pain, nausea or vomiting, pruritus, dizziness, and skin numbness between the two groups was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that PINB provides superior analgesia for patients undergoing thoracic surgery compared to TINB without any extra adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    地塞米松棕榈酸酯在延长局部麻醉阻滞持续时间方面的疗效尚不确定。在一个随机的,电视胸腔镜手术患者的双盲研究,我们测试了肋间神经阻滞后静脉或神经周地塞米松棕榈酸酯是否导致长时间镇痛。
    在2022年5月至12月期间接受电视胸腔镜手术的90例患者被随机分配到三个肋间神经阻滞研究臂中的一个(每个n=30),需要添加0.5%罗哌卡因(23毫升)如下:对照组(C组),生理盐水2ml;IV-DXP组,2ml生理盐水+2ml(8mg)静脉注射地塞米松棕榈酸酯;PN-DXP组,2毫升(8毫克)神经周地塞米松棕榈酸酯。术后首次补救镇痛的时间是主要结果指标。次要终点包括术后阿片类药物消耗,视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,镇痛满意度,以及相关的不良影响。
    与对照组或IV-DXP组相比,PN-DXP组首次术后补救镇痛的时间更长,术后用于抢救镇痛的阿片类药物用量更低(p<0.01)。同样,术后8、12、18和24h患者的视觉模拟量表评分在PN-DXP组低于对照组和IV-DXP组(p<0.01)。PN-DXP组患者满意度在统计学上较低,与对照组或IV-DXP组相比(p<0.05)。临床上,在术后48h监测期间,三组的不良反应发生率没有显着差异(p>0.05)。
    通过延长镇痛几乎没有相关不良反应,神经周地塞米松棕榈酸酯是罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞的有希望的辅助手段。
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy of dexamethasone palmitate in extending durations of local anesthetic blocks is uncertain. In a randomized, double-blind study of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, we tested whether intravenous or perineural dexamethasone palmitate caused prolonged analgesia after intercostal nerve block.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 90 patients subjected to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between May and December 2022 were randomly assigned to one of three intercostal nerve blocks study arms (n = 30 each), requiring the addition of 0.5% ropivacaine (23 ml) as follows: controls (C group), 2 ml saline; IV-DXP group, 2 ml saline + 2 ml (8 mg) intravenous dexamethasone palmitate; and PN-DXP group, 2 ml (8 mg) perineural dexamethasone palmitate. Time to first postoperative remedial analgesia served as primary outcome measure. Secondary endpoints included postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores by Visual Analog Scale, analgesia satisfaction, and related adverse effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with controls or the IV-DXP group, time to first postoperative remedial analgesia was longer and postoperative opioid consumption for rescue analgesia was lower in the PN-DXP group (p < 0.01). Similarly, the Visual Analog Scale scores in patients at 8, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively were lower in the PN-DXP group than in controls and the IV-DXP group (p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction was statistically lower in the PN-DXP group, compared with either the control or IV-DXP group (p < 0.05). Clinically, the three groups did not differ significantly in occurrences of adverse effects during the 48-h postoperative monitoring period (p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Perineural dexamethasone palmitate is a promising adjunct to ropivacaine intercostal nerve block by prolonging analgesia with almost no related adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了多级肋间神经阻滞(ML-ICB)的分割方法是否可以减少胸腔镜肺切除术中所需的罗哌卡因剂量。同时保持静息术后疼痛评分。
    方法:本回顾性研究,单队列研究纳入了2020年10月至2022年3月期间在日本一家肿瘤医院接受胸腔镜下恶性肿瘤肺切除术的241例患者.ML-ICB由外科医生在直视下进行。A组手术开始和结束时的术中麻醉药使用和术后疼痛相关变量的差异(单次注射ML-ICB;0.75%罗哌卡因,手术结束时20mL)和B组(分为ML-ICB,在手术开始和结束时进行;0.25%罗哌卡因,总共30mL)进行评估。使用数字评定量表(NRS)评估术后1h和24h的疼痛。
    结果:术中瑞芬太尼用量B组(14.4±6.4μg/kg/h)明显低于A组(16.7±8.4μg/kg/h)(P=0.02)。B组24hNRS评分为0~3分的患者比例明显高于B组(85.4%,106/124)比A组(73.5%,86/117)(P=0.02)。B组术后不需要静脉抢救药物的患者比例明显高于B组(78.2%,97/124)比A组(61.5%,72/117)(P<0.01)。
    结论:ML-ICB的分割方法可以减少术中瑞芬太尼的剂量,降低术后24h疼痛评分,减少术后静脉抢救药物的使用,尽管术中使用了罗哌卡因总量的一半。
    This study investigated whether the divided method of multi-level intercostal nerve block (ML-ICB) could reduce the ropivacaine dose required during thoracoscopic pulmonary resection, while maintaining the resting postoperative pain scores.
    This retrospective, single-cohort study enrolled 241 patients who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary resection for malignant tumors between October 2020 and March 2022 at a cancer hospital in Japan. ML-ICB was performed by surgeons under direct vision. The differences in intraoperative anesthetic use and postoperative pain-related variables at the beginning and end of surgery between group A (single-shot ML-ICB; 0.75% ropivacaine, 20 mL at the end of the surgery) and group B (divided ML-ICB, performed at the beginning and end of surgery; 0.25% ropivacaine, 30 mL total) were assessed. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate pain 1 h and 24 h postoperatively.
    Intraoperative remifentanil use was significantly lower in group B (14.4 ± 6.4 μg/kg/h) than in group A (16.7 ± 8.4 μg/kg/h) (P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with NRS scores of 0 to 3 at 24 h was significantly higher in group B (85.4%, 106/124) than in group A (73.5%, 86/117) (P = 0.02). The proportion of patients not requiring postoperative intravenous rescue drugs was significantly higher in group B (78.2%, 97/124) than in group A (61.5%, 72/117) (P < 0.01).
    The divided method of ML-ICB could reduce the intraoperative remifentanil dose, decrease the postoperative pain score at 24 h, and curtail postoperative intravenous rescue drug use, despite using half the total ropivacaine dose intraoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:心胸ICU的术后镇痛传统上依赖于静脉阿片类药物。胸神经阻滞是镇痛的有吸引力的替代品,可以减少阿片类药物的需求,但其安全性和可行性尚不清楚。
    方法:将60名儿童随机分为三组:C组接受静脉注射阿片类药物,SAPB组(深前锯肌平面阻滞)和ICNB组(肋间神经阻滞)接受阿片类药物联合超声引导区域神经阻滞(0.2%罗哌卡因2.5mg。kg-1)后患者转入ICU。主要结果是手术后最初24小时的阿片类药物需求。其他结果包括术后FLACC量表值,气管拔管时间,阻断后血浆罗哌卡因浓度。
    结果:SAPB术后24小时内给予阿片类药物的平均[sd]累积剂量(168.6[76.9]μg。kg-1)和ICNB组(170.0[86.8]μg。kg-1)显着低于C组(359.3[125.3]μg。kg-1,p=0.000)。区域阻滞组气管拔管时间短于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.177)。三组拔管后0、1、3、6、12和24h的FLACC量表值相似。SAP和ICNB组的平均血浆罗哌卡因峰值浓度分别为2.1[0.8]和1.8[0.7]mg。L-1,分别封闭后10分钟,然后缓慢下降。没有观察到与区域麻醉相关的明显并发症。
    结论:超声引导下的SAPB和ICNB提供了安全和令人满意的早期术后镇痛,同时减少了小儿胸骨切开术后阿片类药物的消耗。
    背景:中国临床试验注册ChiChiCTR2100046754。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative analgesia in the cardiothoracic ICU has traditionally relied on intravenous opioids. Thoracic nerve blocks are attractive alternatives for analgesia that reduce the requirement for opioids, but their safety and feasibility remain unclear.
    METHODS: Sixty children were allocated randomly to three groups: group C received intravenous opioids alone, while group SAPB (deep serratus anterior plane block) and group ICNB (intercostal nerve block) received opioids combined with ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks (0.2% ropivacaine 2.5 mg.kg-1) after patients were transferred to the ICU. The primary outcome was opioid requirement in the first 24 h after surgery. Other outcomes included the postoperative FLACC scale value, tracheal extubation time, and plasma ropivacaine concentrations after the block.
    RESULTS: The mean [sd] cumulative dose of opioids administered postoperatively within 24 h in the SAPB (168.6 [76.9] μg.kg-1) and ICNB groups (170.0 [86.8] μg.kg-1) were significantly lower by nearly 53% than those in group C (359.3 [125.3] μg.kg-1, p = 0.000). The tracheal extubation time was shorter in the regional block groups than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.177). The FLACC scale values at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h post-extubation were similar in the three groups. The mean peak plasma ropivacaine concentrations in the SAP and ICNB groups were 2.1 [0.8] and 1.8 [0.7] mg.L-1, respectively, 10 min post-block and then slowly decreased. No noticeable complications associated with regional anesthesia were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided SAPB and ICNB provided safe and satisfactory early postoperative analgesia while reducing opioid consumption following sternotomy in pediatric patients.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiChiCTR2100046754.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:胸腔镜肋间神经阻滞(TINBs)对电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)伤害性刺激的疗效尚不清楚。在非插管式VATS(NIVATS)和插管式VATS(IVATS)之间,TINB的功效也可能不同。我们旨在比较术中TINBs对NIVATS和IVATs的镇痛和镇静作用。
    方法:60例随机进入NIVATS或IVATS组的患者(各30例)接受靶控丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼输注,手术前脑电双频指数(BIS)维持在40-60,多水平(T3-T8)TIBs。术中监测数据,包括脉搏血氧饱和度,平均动脉压(MAP),心率,BIS,密度谱阵列(DSA),不同时间点的丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼效应点浓度(Ce)。应用具有事后分析的双向ANOVA来分析组和时间点的差异和相互作用。
    结果:在两组中,DSA监测显示,TINBs后立即出现脉冲串抑制和α丢失。在NIVATS(p<0.001)和IVATS(p=0.252)组中,丙泊酚输注的Ce必须在TINB后5分钟内降低。两组患者输注TINBs后,瑞芬太尼的Ce值显著降低(p<0.001),并且在NIVATS中显着降低(p<0.001),没有组相互作用。
    结论:外科医生进行的术中多级TIBs可以减少VATS的麻醉和镇痛需求。随着瑞芬太尼输注要求的降低,NIVATS显示TIBs后低血压的风险明显更高。DSA有利于提供便于抢先管理的实时数据,特别是对于NIVATS。
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy of thoracoscopic intercostal nerve blocks (TINBs) for noxious stimulation from video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) remains unclear. The efficacy of TINBs may also be different between nonintubated VATS (NIVATS) and intubated VATS (IVATS). We aim to compare the efficacy of TINBs on analgesia and sedation for NIVATS and IVATs intraoperatively.
    METHODS: Sixty patients randomized to the NIVATS or IVATS group (30 each) received target-controlled propofol and remifentanil infusions, with bispectral index (BIS) maintained at 40-60, and multilevel (T3-T8) TINBs before surgical manipulations. Intraoperative monitoring data, including pulse oximetry, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, BIS, density spectral arrays (DSAs), and propofol and remifentanil effect-site concentration (Ce) at different time points. A two way ANOVA with post hoc analysis was applied to analyze the differences and interactions of groups and time points.
    RESULTS: In both groups, DSA monitoring revealed burst suppression and α dropout immediately after the TINBs. The Ce of the propofol infusion had to be reduced within 5 min post-TINBs in both NIVATS (p < 0.001) and IVATS (p = 0.252) groups. The Ce of remifentanil infusion was significantly reduced after TINBs in both groups (p < 0.001), and was significantly lower in NIVATS (p < 0.001) without group interactions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon-performed intraoperative multilevel TINBs allow reduced anesthetic and analgesic requirement for VATS. With lower requirement of remifentanil infusion, NIVATS presents a significantly higher risk of hypotension after TINBs. DSA is beneficial for providing real-time data that facilitate the preemptive management, especially for NIVATS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    这是随机的,非劣效性研究旨在观察胸腔镜手术后基于改良肋间神经阻滞(MINB)的阿片类药物保留镇痛的可行性。
    60例单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者随机分为干预组和对照组。在手术结束时对两组进行MINB后,干预组术后72h接受右美托咪定0.05µg/kg/h静脉自控镇痛(PCIA),对照组接受舒芬太尼3µg/kg的常规PCIA治疗72h。主要结局是手术后24h咳嗽的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。次要结果包括第一次镇痛请求的时间,PCIA的按压次数,时间到了第一次排气,住院。
    干预组[3(2-4)]和对照组[3(2-4)]在24小时时咳嗽-VAS(中位数[四分位距])没有差异,P=0.36]。24h时咳嗽VAS的中位数差异(95%CI)为[0(0至1),P=0.36]。初次镇痛请求的时光无显著差别,PCIA的按压次数,两组住院时间比较(P>0.05)。干预组首次肛门排气时间明显缩短(P<0.01)。
    阿片类药物保留镇痛提供了安全和类似的术后镇痛,缩短了首次肛门排气的时间,比较舒芬太尼在胸腔镜手术中的镇痛效果。这可能是一种推荐用于胸腔镜手术的新方法。
    UNASSIGNED: This randomized, non-inferiority study aimed to observe the feasibility of opioid-sparing analgesia based on modified intercostal nerve block (MINB) following thoracoscopic surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: 60 patients scheduled for single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomized to the intervention group or control group. After MINB was performed in both groups at the end of the surgery, the intervention group received patient controlled-intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dexmedetomidine 0.05 µg/kg/h for 72 h after surgery, and the control group received conventional PCIA of sufentanil 3 µg/kg for 72 h. The primary outcome was a visual analog scale (VAS) on coughing 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the time to first analgesic request, pressing times of PCIA, time to first flatus, and hospital stay.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no difference in the cough-VAS at 24 h (median [interquartile range]) between the intervention group [3 (2-4)] and control group [3 (2-4), P = 0.36]. The median difference (95% CI) in the cough-VAS at 24 h was [0 (0 to 1), P = 0.36]. There was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request, pressing times of PCIA, and hospital stay between groups (P > 0.05). A significant decrease in time to first flatus was observed in the intervention group (P < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Opioid-sparing analgesia provided safe and analogous postoperative analgesia with a shortened time to first flatus, compared with sufentanil-based analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery. This might be a novel method recommended for thoracoscopic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)是一种非常有效的镇痛方法。目的探讨超声引导下肋间神经阻滞超前镇痛对胸腔镜手术术后镇痛的影响。
    方法:126例患者,18-70岁,这项研究纳入了美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状态I-II,并计划进行胸腔镜肺切除术。119例患者留待最终分析。患者随机分为ICNB组和对照组。对照组患者术后给予舒芬太尼患者自控镇痛装置。患者在手术前接受罗哌卡因ICNB,术后接受患者自控镇痛装置.主要结果是术后0、4、8、16、24、48、72和168h休息时的视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS),并进行比较。还记录了手术结果和抢救镇痛需求。
    结果:术后0、4、8、16、24和48h,ICNB组的VAS评分明显低于对照组。ICBN组胸管置入时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(4.69±2.14vs.5.67±2.86,P=0.036)。术后住院时间,ICBN组恶心呕吐发生率及术后肺部感染率均低于对照组,但没有统计学差异。两组术后48小时内抢救镇痛的频率不同(ICNBvs.对照;9.83%与31.03%,P=0.004)。
    结论:对于接受胸腔镜手术的患者,超声引导ICNB是简单的,安全,并有效地在术后早期提供急性术后疼痛管理。
    背景:中国临床试验:chictr.org.cn,ChiCTR1900021017。于2019年1月25日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Intercostal nerve block (ICNB) is a very effective analgesic method. We aimed to explore the effect of preemptive analgesia with ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery.
    METHODS: 126 patients, aged 18-70 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II and scheduled for thoracoscopic pulmonary resection were enrolled in this study. 119 patients were left for final analysis. Patients were randomly allocated to group ICNB and group CONTROL. Patients in CONTROL group were administered sufentanil with patient-controlled analgesia device after operation In group ICNB, patients received ropivacaine ICNB prior to surgery and patient-controlled analgesia device after operation. The primary outcome is visual analog scale pain score (VAS) at rest at 0,4, 8,16,24,48,72 and 168 h postoperatively and they were compared. Surgical outcomes and rescue analgesia requirement were also recorded.
    RESULTS: VAS scores were statistically significantly lower for ICNB group compared to control group at 0, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. The duration of insertion of chest tube in ICBN group was shorter than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (4.69 ± 2.14 vs. 5.67 ± 2.86, P = 0.036). The postoperative hospital stay, incidence of nausea and vomiting and postoperative pulmonary infection rate in ICBN group were all lower than those in the control group, but there were no statistical differences. The frequency of rescue analgesia during 48 postoperative hours was different between the two groups (ICNB vs. Control; 9.83% vs. 31.03%, P = 0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery, ultrasound-guided ICNB is simple, safe, and effective for providing acute postoperative pain management during the early postoperative stage.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese clinical trials: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900021017. Registred on 25/01/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的主要目的是分析机器人方法和超声引导下的椎旁神经阻滞与机器人肺叶切除术后胸腔镜肋间神经阻滞对术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用的比较。次要目标是分析和比较患者在呼吸治疗期间是否需要额外的止痛药和患者的表现,在机器人手术和两组中。连续,从2022年2月至2022年10月,52例接受机器人肺叶切除术的患者接受了基于罗哌卡因的肋间神经阻滞或椎旁阻滞。必要时,在第1天给予吗啡。对乙酰氨基酚作为额外的抗过敏药物,每天最多3g。手术结束后1小时,每天通过疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)测量疼痛。记录吗啡给药速率和每天和对乙酰氨基酚的总额外给药。手术后1个月测量疼痛和阿片类药物给药。分析了总体人群和肋间神经阻滞组VS椎旁神经阻滞组的数据。总的来说,34.6%的患者需要给予吗啡,51.7%的患者需要每天至少给予对乙酰氨基酚直至出院。术后1个月,4例患者出现慢性疼痛,1例仍在接受阿片类药物治疗.在组间分析中,椎旁阻滞组显示在固定时间点的NRS较低(p<0.0001),吗啡消耗量较低(45.7%VS11.8%;p=0.02).椎旁阻滞组固定时间点的对乙酰氨基酚救护给药更低(p<0.0001),活动性和动态疼痛导致更好的结果(p=0.03;p=0.04)。在1个月,研究组之间无差异.类似于其他微创技术,机器人肺叶切除术后可能出现术后疼痛。椎旁块可以帮助减轻术后疼痛以及吗啡和止痛药的施用,并改善早期动员。
    The primary objectives of the study were to analyse the robotic approach and ultrasound-guided paravertebral block compared to thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block after robotic pulmonary lobectomy on postoperative pain and opioids use. The secondary objectives were to analyse and compare patients\' necessity of additional antalgic drugs and patients\' performance during respiratory therapy, following robotic surgery and in the two groups. Consecutively, 52 patients undergoing robotic pulmonary lobectomies were treated either with ropivacaine-based intercostal nerve block or paravertebral block from February 2022 to October 2022. When necessary, morphine was administered at day 1. Acetaminophen was administered as an additional antalgic drug on demand up to 3 g per day. Pain was measured 1 h after the end of the surgical procedure and daily through the pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Morphine administration rate and per day and total additional administrations of acetaminophen were recorded. Pain and opioids administration was measured 1 month after the procedure. Data were analysed in the overall population and in the intercostal nerve block group VS paravertebral block group. Overall, 34.6% of the patients required morphine administration and 51.7% of the patients required at least daily acetaminophen administration up to discharge. At 1 month postoperatively, four patients presented with chronic pain and one still was under opioid medication. At intergroup analysis, the paravertebral block group demonstrated lower NRS at fixed time points (p < 0.0001) and lower morphine consumption (45.7%VS11.8%; p = 0.02). Acetaminophen rescue administration at fixed time points was lower in the paravertebral block group (p < 0.0001) and mobility and dynamic pain resulted in better results (p = 0.03; p = 0.04). At 1 month, no differences were found between study groups. Similarly to other minimally invasive techniques, postoperative pain may arise after robotic pulmonary lobectomy. Paravertebral bloc can help to reduce postoperative pain as well as morphine and antalgic drugs administration and improve early mobilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:疼痛管理在术后设置中是必不可少的,尤其是儿科患者。肋软骨收获后供体部位疼痛严重,特别是在术后早期。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下单次注射肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)作为多模式镇痛的组成部分,用于儿科自体耳廓重建的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED:§50名年龄在6-16岁之间并计划进行2次肋骨软骨收获手术的儿科患者被纳入该双盲,前瞻性和随机研究。将儿科随机分为肋间神经阻滞组(B组)和对照组(C组)。B组患者在手术结束时接受曲马多2mg/kg的曲马多2mg/kg作为对照。两组均给予曲马多为主的静脉自控镇痛和抢救镇痛。主要结果是术后早期的疼痛评分(VAS和FLACC量表,4h,和8小时)。次要结果是术后曲马多的消耗量和首次抢救镇痛需求的时间点。
    UNASSIGNED:术后4h和8h,B组的VAS评分明显低于C组[2.5(2-5)vs.4(2.5-5.5),4h时p=0.041;3(2.5-4.5)vs.4(3-5)8小时时p=0.047]。与C组相比,B组曲马多总消耗量在8h时明显减少(p<0.01)。12h,24h和48h(p分别<0.05)。阻滞组首次抢救镇痛需求和抢救次数明显低于对照组(p<0.01,p<0.05)。
    UNASSIGNED:我们的研究结果表明,超声引导ICNB轻微但显著降低了疼痛评分,与术后4h和8h未接受神经阻滞的儿童患者相比,肋软骨收获后服用曲马多。统一ICNB罗哌卡因剂量可能不利于提供出色的镇痛效果。
    UNASSIGNED: ː Pain management is essential in postoperative settings, especially with pediatric patients. Donor site pain after rib cartilage harvest is severe, particularly during the early postoperative period. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of ultrasound guided single-injection intercostal nerve block (ICNB) as a component of multimodal analgesia for pediatrics undergoing autologous auricular reconstruction.
    UNASSIGNED: ː Fifty pediatric patients aged 6-16 years and scheduled for 2 rib cartilages harvest surgery were enrolled in this double-blind, prospective and randomized study. Pediatrics were randomly assigned into two groups: the intercostal nerve block group (group B) and the control group (group C). The nerve block was performed with 2 ml 0.25% ropivacaine each intercostal nerve in group B. Patients from group C received Tramadol 2 mg/kg by the end of the surgery as control. Tramadol-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia and rescue analgesia were given in both groups. The primary outcome was pain scores at early postoperative period (VAS and FLACC scale, 4 h, and 8 h). The secondary outcome was the postoperative Tramadol consumption and time point of first rescue analgesic demand.
    UNASSIGNED: ː VAS score was significantly lower in group B than group C at 4 h and 8 h postoperatively [2.5(2-5) vs. 4(2.5-5.5), p = 0.041 at 4 h; 3(2.5-4.5) vs. 4(3-5), p = 0.047 at 8 h]. Total Tramadol consumption in group B decreased significantly in contrast with group C at 8 h (p < 0.01), 12 h, 24 h and 48 h (p < 0.05, respectively). The first rescue analgesia demand and number of rescue Tramadol in block group was considerably delayed or reduced than control group (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: ː Our findings indicated that ultrasound guided ICNB slightly but significantly reduced pain scores, and Tramadol consumption in pediatric patients after rib cartilage harvest as compared to who didn\'t receive nerve block at 4 h and 8 h postoperatively. Unified ICNB ropivacaine dosage might detrimental to providing superior analgesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号