health behavior change

健康行为改变
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏身体活动与健康风险有关,导致各种疾病和全因死亡率。尽管建议定期进行体育锻炼(PA),许多成年人仍然不活跃,受社会经济和环境因素的影响。数字干预,特别是基于网络的PA程序,为在人群中推广PA提供了有希望的可能性。这些项目的有效性各不相同,反映了设计上的差异,用户参与度,以及采用的行为改变技术。
    本研究评估了为期12周的基于Web的多模态TKFitnessCoach的有效性。PA在线计划是TK-HealthCoach的一部分。这项研究调查了该计划对自我报告的PA水平的影响,实现目标,健康相关的生活质量,体重,和饮食行为,比较交互式个性化基于网络的干预和非交互式基于网络的健康信息。
    在一项随机对照试验(RCT)中,参与者被分配到干预组(IG),接收对交互式TK-FitnessCoach的访问,或对照组(CG)提供了一个静态网站,其中包含有关PA的循证信息。该研究针对对改善健康行为感兴趣的讲德语的成年人群。在T0(研究开始)评估数据,T1(干预后),T2,6个月,和T3,12个月的随访,关注T3时自我报告的PA和各种次要结局.
    我们在IG和CG中实现了平均分布的社会人口统计学,平均年龄为42.8(IG),resp.43.1年(CG),女性参与者占76.1%(IG),resp.74.7%(CG)。基线时的PA在IG中为277.9分钟/周,在CG中为273.3分钟/周。两者,IG(意向治疗(ITT)数据集n=1153)和CG(ITT数据集n=1177)显示PA随时间显著增加(IG(T3-T0)=72.92min/周;CG(T3-T0)=74.12min/周).然而,在改善PA和相关健康结局方面,本研究未发现交互式TK-FitnessCoach与非交互式对照的有效性存在显著差异.使用TK-FitnessCoach的强度与PA无关。
    这两个项目都有效地在成年人中推广PA,两个RCT组之间没有显着差异。这凸显了数字干预在解决身体活动不足方面的潜力,这表明,这些计划的有效性可能不仅取决于它们的交互性,还取决于所提供信息的质量和相关性。需要进一步的研究来探索此类干预措施的优化策略,特别是对于PA低的人,包括用户参与度,行为改变技术,以及目标PA跟踪方法的集成。
    德国临床试验注册DRKS00020249;https://drks。去/搜索/en/试用版/DRKS00020249.
    UNASSIGNED: Physical inactivity is associated with health risks, contributing to various diseases and all-cause mortality. Despite recommendations for regular physical activity (PA), many adults remain inactive, influenced by socioeconomic and environmental factors. Digital interventions, particularly web-based PA programs, offer promising possibilities to promote PA across populations. These programs vary in their effectiveness, reflecting differences in design, user engagement, and behavior change techniques employed.
    UNASSIGNED: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the 12-week multimodal web-based TKFitnessCoach. The PA online program is part of the TK-HealthCoach. This study investigates the program\'s impact on self-reported PA levels, goal attainment, healthrelated quality of life, body weight, and eating behavior, comparing an interactive personalized web-based intervention and non-interactive web-based health information.
    UNASSIGNED: In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), participants were allocated to either the intervention group (IG), receiving access to the interactive TK-FitnessCoach, or the control group (CG) that was provided a static website with evidence-based information on PA. The study targeted a German-speaking adult population interested in improving health behavior. Data was assessed at T0 (beginning of the study), T1 (postintervention), T2, 6 months, and T3, 12 months follow-ups, focusing on self-reported PA at T3 and on various secondary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We achieved equally distributed sociodemographics in both the IG and the CG with a mean age of 42.8 (IG), resp. 43.1 years (CG), and female participants of 76.1 % (IG), resp. 74.7 % (CG). PA at baseline was 277.9 min/week in the IG and 273.3 min/week in the CG. Both, the IG (n = 1153 in the Intention-to-treat (ITT) dataset) and CG (n = 1177 in the ITT dataset) exhibited significant increases in PA over time (IG(T3-T0) = 72.92 min/week; CG(T3-T0) = 74.12 min/week).However, the study did not find significant differences in the effectiveness of the interactive TK-FitnessCoach compared to the non-interactive control in terms of improving PA and related health outcomes. The intensity of using the TK-FitnessCoach was not associated with PA.
    UNASSIGNED: Both programs were effective in promoting PA among adults, with no significant differences observed between the two RCT groups. This highlights the potential of digital interventions in addressing physical inactivity, suggesting that the effectiveness of such programs may not solely depend on their interactivity but also on the quality and relevance of the information provided. Further research is needed to explore optimization strategies for such interventions, especially for persons with low PA, including user engagement, behavior change techniques, and the integration of objective PA tracking methods.
    UNASSIGNED: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00020249; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00020249.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身体活动促进代谢/减肥手术(MBS)后的健康和长寿,但大多数患者不符合推荐水平。减肥手术后获得乐观(GOALS)项目是一项积极的心理干预措施,旨在解决最近接受MBS的患者对体育锻炼的常见情绪障碍(例如,对锻炼的信心不足,内化权重偏差,害怕受伤),并使用动机性访谈和标准行为改变技术(例如,自我监测)以增加身体活动。这项单臂概念验证试验旨在完善干预措施,测试可行性和可接受性,并探索行为和心理结果的事后变化。参与者是MBS后6-12个月的12名成年人(M年龄46岁,58%为女性,67%非西班牙裔白人)。GOALS是一项为期10周的电话咨询计划,每周引入新的积极心理技能和体育锻炼主题。参与者使用Fitbit跟踪身体活动并设定每周目标。结果表明,干预措施是可行的(完成了85%的课程)和可接受的(在0-10量表上,参与者对课程缓解和实用性的平均评分高于8.0)。在身体活动和心理健康方面有中等到较大的效果大小的改善(例如,抑郁症状)。下一步,GOALS干预将在一项试点随机对照试验中进行测试,并进行长期随访,以更有力地评估其效果。
    Physical activity promotes health and longevity after metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS), but most patients do not meet recommended levels. The Gaining Optimism After weight Loss Surgery (GOALS) Project was a positive psychological intervention designed to address common emotional barriers to physical activity in patients who have recently undergone MBS (e.g., low confidence around exercise, internalized weight bias, fear of injury) and use motivational interviewing and standard behavior change techniques (e.g., self-monitoring) to increase physical activity. This single-arm proof-of-concept trial was designed to refine the intervention, test feasibility and acceptability, and explore pre-post changes in behavioral and psychological outcomes. Participants were 12 adults 6-12 months post-MBS (M age of 46, 58% female, 67% non-Hispanic white). GOALS was a 10-week telephone counseling program that introduced new positive psychological skills and physical activity topics each week. Participants tracked physical activity with a Fitbit and set weekly goals. Results showed that the intervention was feasible (85% of sessions completed) and acceptable (average participant ratings of session ease and utility above 8.0 on a 0-10 scale). There were medium-to-large effect size improvements in physical activity and psychological well-being (e.g., depressive symptoms). The GOALS intervention will next be tested in a pilot randomized controlled trial with longer-term follow-up to assess its effect more robustly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:行为激活(BA)是一种基于证据的抑郁症治疗方法,可促进参与基于价值观的活动,以增加获得积极强化的机会。抑郁情绪已被证明会阻碍戒烟。
    目的:这项研究确定了通过使用BA和整合戒烟动机信息来激励吸烟者戒烟的移动应用程序的可行性和初步功效。
    方法:从广告中招募未准备在30天内戒烟的成年吸烟者(N=56;平均年龄34.5,SD9.52岁),并随机分配到BA应用程序的8周(每周设置2次基于价值观的活动+激励信息+关于吸烟变化的反馈,心情,和基于价值观的活动)或对照组(没有应用程序;收到戒烟资源)。所有参与者都完成了基线和基于网络的治疗结束问卷。控制还完成了每周基于网络的评估,和BA应用程序参与者通过应用程序完成评估。
    结果:没有辍学,每种情况下只有2名参与者没有完成治疗结束问卷。结果表明,招募无动机戒烟的吸烟者参加戒烟诱导试验是可行的:86%(57/66)的合格参与者被随机分配(BA应用:n=27;对照:n=29)。参与者表示满意度很高:80%(20/25)的参与者表示他们会推荐BA应用程序,在移动应用程序评级量表上有中等到较高的分数,88%(22/25)的参与者将应用程序评为3星或更高(满分5)。有高水平的BA应用程序参与:96%(26/27)的参与者计划活动,67%(18/27)的参与者计划了7项或更多的活动。即使在那些持续吸烟风险最高的人中,也发现了高参与度(戒烟动机低,放弃的信心很低,和高负面影响)。结果为BA构建体之间的假设关系提供了支持:更愉快的活动完成与更大的积极影响相关(b=0.37,SE0.21;95%CI-0.05至0.79;P=.08),和更大的积极影响倾向于预测第二天吸烟减少(b=-0.19,SE0.10;95%CI-0.39至0.01;P=.06)。此外,计划的活动数量越多,负面影响越低(b=-0.26,SE0.15;95%CI-0.55~0.04;P=.09).总的来说,16%(4/25)的BA应用程序参与者设置了退出日期,而控件中的4%(1/27),并且有有希望(但不显著)的动机和信心退出趋势。
    结论:研究结果表明,可以通过专注于对他们最重要的方面来吸引没有戒烟动机的吸烟者,比如情绪管理。这种基于理论的干预已经显示出对潜在理论结构的一些初步支持,并且在完全有效的试验中需要进一步的疗效测试.
    BACKGROUND: Behavioral activation (BA) is an evidence-based treatment for depression that fosters engagement in values-based activities to increase access to positive reinforcement. Depressed mood has been shown to hinder smoking cessation.
    OBJECTIVE: This study determined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a mobile app to motivate smokers to quit by using BA and integrating motivational messages to quit smoking.
    METHODS: Adult smokers (N=56; mean age 34.5, SD 9.52 years) who were not ready to quit smoking within 30 days were recruited from advertisements and randomized to either 8 weeks of the BA app (set 2 values-based activities per week+motivational messages+feedback on changes in smoking, mood, and values-based activities) or the control group (no app; received resources for quitting smoking). All participants completed the baseline and end-of-treatment web-based questionnaires. Controls also completed weekly web-based assessments, and BA app participants completed assessments through the app.
    RESULTS: There were no dropouts and only 2 participants in each condition did not complete the end-of-treatment questionnaire. The results demonstrated that it is feasible to recruit smokers who are unmotivated to quit into a smoking cessation induction trial: 86% (57/66) of eligible participants were randomized (BA app: n=27; control: n=29). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction: 80% (20/25) of participants said they would recommend the BA app, there were moderate-to-high scores on the Mobile App Rating Scale, and 88% (22/25) of participants rated the app 3 stars or higher (out of 5). There were high levels of BA app engagement: 96% (26/27) of participants planned activities, and 67% (18/27) of participants planned 7 or more activities. High engagement was found even among those who were at the highest risk for continued smoking (low motivation to quit, low confidence to quit, and high negative affect). The results provided support for the hypothesized relationships between BA constructs: greater pleasant activity completion was associated with greater positive affect (b=0.37, SE 0.21; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.79; P=.08), and greater positive affect tended to predict fewer cigarettes smoked the next day (b=-0.19, SE 0.10; 95% CI -0.39 to 0.01; P=.06). Additionally, a greater number of activities planned was associated with lower negative affect (b=-0.26, SE 0.15; 95% CI -0.55 to 0.04; P=.09). Overall, 16% (4/25) of BA app participants set a quit date versus 4% (1/27) among controls, and there were promising (but not significant) trends for motivation and confidence to quit.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a mobile app intervention can be made appealing to smokers who are unmotivated to quit by focusing on aspects most important to them, such as mood management. This theory-based intervention has shown some initial support for the underlying theoretical constructs, and further efficacy testing is warranted in a fully powered trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估简单实施的多组分干预措施的可行性和效果,以减少办公室工作人员的久坐时间。
    方法:六组八到十名办公室工作人员参加了为期两周的LeichtBewegt干预。参与者在基线时完成问卷(T0,n=52),2周后(T1,n=46),5周后(T2,n=38),包括基于健康行动过程方法(HAPA)的主观久坐测量和社会认知变量。使用activPAL跟踪器获得客观的久坐措施。
    结果:从T0到T1,减少工作中久坐行为的意图显着增加。参与者的客观和主观坐姿时间从T0到T1显着减少,相当于每8小时工作日平均减少55分钟(d=-0.66)或74分钟(d=-1.14),分别。这种减少在T2(d=-1.08)时持续(对于主观坐着时间)。参与者对干预表示高度满意。
    结论:LeichtBewegt干预为减少工作中的久坐行为提供了可行且有效的机会。需要进行随机对照试验,包括更长的随访时间,以验证其在不同工作场所的益处。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effects of a simple-to-implement multicomponent intervention to reduce sedentary time of office workers.
    METHODS: Six groups of eight to ten office workers took part in the two-week Leicht Bewegt intervention. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (T0, n = 52), after 2 weeks (T1, n = 46), and after 5 weeks (T2, n = 38), including subjective sedentary measures and social-cognitive variables based on the health action process approach (HAPA). Objective sedentary measures were obtained using activPAL trackers.
    RESULTS: The intention to reduce sedentary behavior during work increased significantly from T0 to T1. Participants\' objective and subjective sitting time decreased significantly from T0 to T1, corresponding to an average decrease per 8-h-workday of 55 min (d = - .66) or 74 min (d = - 1.14), respectively. This reduction persisted (for subjective sitting time) at T2 (d = - 1.08). Participants indicated a high satisfaction with the intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Leicht Bewegt intervention offers a feasible and effective opportunity to reduce sedentary behavior at work. Randomized controlled trials including longer follow-up time periods are needed to validate its benefits in different workplaces.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:超重和肥胖的女性在怀孕期间发生并发症的风险更高,例如妊娠期糖尿病和长期慢性疾病。关于怀孕和产后期间健康行为改变干预措施的研究显示出有希望的效果,但是对常规服务的实施情况却很少进行调查。大多数干预措施集中在产前或产后生活阶段,不能满足女性的需求。IMPACTDIABETESBump2Baby是一个跨4个高收入国家的多中心项目,旨在测试产前和产后基于证据的移动健康(mHealth)教练干预措施的实施情况,该干预措施称为Bump2BabyandMe(B2B&Me),旨在与围产期的常规护理并驾齐驱。
    目的:我们的目的是探索B2B&Me干预的可行性和实施,并调查该干预措施对妊娠糖尿病风险妇女的有效性。
    方法:影响糖尿病Bump2Baby是一项混合2型有效性实施研究,它集成了一个基于证据的mHealth教练应用程序,其中包括由医疗保健专业人员提供的个性化健康行为改变教练,以及从第一次产前检查到产后12个月的产前护理。mHealth应用程序提供了同步调用的可能性,异步联系(包括教练-参与者的文本和视频消息交换,以适应参与者的需求),并持续访问大量定制干预材料的图书馆。参与者将通过应用程序在整个干预过程中与他们的健康教练异步互动。这项在爱尔兰4个临床地点进行的随机对照试验,联合王国,西班牙,澳大利亚将招募800名早期妊娠妇女,以评估产后体重的有效性。探索,准备工作,实施,可持续性实施框架是该研究的理论基础。实施评估将由个人进行评估,医院工作人员,以及使用Reach的更广泛的社区级别,有效性,收养,实施,维护(RE-AIM)框架。RE-AIM评估的数据源将包括应用程序和平台分析,筛查和培训记录,参与者的医疗记录,关键线人采访,参与者和合作伙伴退出面试,成本数据,研究问卷,工作人员调查,和血液样本分析.
    结果:该研究于2020年11月19日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心获得批准和注册。招聘于2021年2月9日开始,数据收集正在进行中。预计将于2024年公布结果。
    结论:这是我们所知道的第一个针对高危女性进行为期18个月的mHealth教练干预的混合有效性实施研究。随着研究旨在走向现实世界的可实施解决方案,进行混合研究至关重要。这项大型多中心研究的数据将有助于规划基于证据的围产期健康行为改变干预措施的潜在实施和扩大规模。
    背景:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册ACTRN12620001240932;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380020&isReview=true。
    DERR1-10.2196/51431。
    BACKGROUND: Women with overweight and obesity are at higher risk of developing complications in pregnancy such as gestational diabetes and longer-term chronic conditions. Research concerning health behavior change interventions during pregnancy and postpartum shows promising effects, but implementation into routine services is sparsely investigated. Most interventions focus on the antenatal or postpartum life stages, failing to meet the needs of women. IMPACT DIABETES Bump2Baby is a multicenter project across 4 high-income countries developed to test the implementation of an antenatal and postpartum evidence-based mobile health (mHealth) coaching intervention called Bump2Baby and Me (B2B&Me) designed to sit alongside usual care in the perinatal period.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to explore the feasibility and implementation of the B2B&Me intervention and investigate the effectiveness of this intervention in women at risk of gestational diabetes.
    METHODS: IMPACT DIABETES Bump2Baby is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study, which integrates an evidence-based mHealth coaching app that includes personalized health behavior change coaching provided by health care professionals alongside antenatal care from the first antenatal visit to 12 months postpartum. The mHealth app offers the possibility of synchronous calls, asynchronous contact (including coach-participant text and video messaging exchanges tailored to the participant\'s needs), and ongoing access to an extensive library of bespoke intervention materials. Participants will interact asynchronously with their health coach throughout the intervention via the app. This randomized controlled trial across 4 clinical sites within Ireland, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Australia will recruit 800 women in early pregnancy to evaluate the effectiveness on postpartum weight. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment implementation framework is the theoretical underpinning of the study. The implementation evaluation will be assessed at the individual, hospital staff, and broader community levels using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Data sources for the RE-AIM evaluation will include app and platform analytics, screening and training records, participant medical records, key informant interviews, participant and partner exit interviews, cost data, study questionnaires, staff surveys, and blood sample analyses.
    RESULTS: The study was approved and registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on November 19, 2020. Recruitment commenced on February 9, 2021, and data collection is ongoing. Publication of the results is expected in 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of an 18-month mHealth coaching intervention in at-risk women that we are aware of. As research aims to move toward real-world implementable solutions, it is critical that hybrid studies are conducted. The data from this large multicenter study will be useful in planning the potential implementation and scale-up of evidence-based perinatal health behavior change interventions.
    BACKGROUND: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001240932; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380020&isReview=true.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/51431.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:将家庭空气污染(HAP)降低到与健康益处相关的水平需要几乎完全使用清洁的烹饪燃料和放弃传统的生物质燃料。
    方法:家庭空气污染干预网络(HAPIN)试验将危地马拉的3,195名孕妇随机分组,印度,秘鲁,和卢旺达接受液化石油气(LPG)炉干预(n=1,590),控制预计将继续用生物质燃料烹饪(n=1,605)。我们使用燃料输送和修复记录评估了干预措施实施的忠诚度和参与者对干预措施的依从性,从怀孕开始到婴儿的第一个生日,调查,观察,和温度记录炉使用监视器(SUM)。
    结果:对HAPIN干预的保真度和依从性很高。重新填充LPG气瓶所需的中位时间为1天(四分位数范围0-2)。尽管26%(n=410)的干预参与者报告LPG在某个时候耗尽,次数较少(中位数:1天[Q1,Q3:1,2]),并且大多限于COVID-19大流行的前四个月。大多数维修是在报告问题的同一天完成的。仅在3%的观察访问中观察到传统的炉子使用,89%的观察结果进行了行为强化。根据SUM数据,干预家庭使用传统炉子的中位数为所有监测天数的0.4%,81%的人每月使用传统炉子<1天。传统炉子的使用在COVID-19后稍高(检测到的中位数[第一季度,第三季度]为0.0%[0.0%,3.4%]天)比COVID-19之前(0.0%[0.0%,1.6%]天)。出生前和出生后干预依从性没有显着差异。
    结论:免费炉灶和无限量供应的液化石油气燃料,并及时维修,行为信息,在HAPIN试验中,全面的炉具使用监测有助于高干预保真度和近乎独家的液化石油气使用.
    Reducing household air pollution (HAP) to levels associated with health benefits requires nearly exclusive use of clean cooking fuels and abandonment of traditional biomass fuels.
    The Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial randomized 3,195 pregnant women in Guatemala, India, Peru, and Rwanda to receive a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove intervention (n = 1,590), with controls expected to continue cooking with biomass fuels (n = 1,605). We assessed fidelity to intervention implementation and participant adherence to the intervention starting in pregnancy through the infant\'s first birthday using fuel delivery and repair records, surveys, observations, and temperature-logging stove use monitors (SUMs).
    Fidelity and adherence to the HAPIN intervention were high. Median time required to refill LPG cylinders was 1 day (interquartile range 0-2). Although 26% (n = 410) of intervention participants reported running out of LPG at some point, the number of times was low (median: 1 day [Q1, Q3: 1, 2]) and mostly limited to the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most repairs were completed on the same day as problems were reported. Traditional stove use was observed in only 3% of observation visits, and 89% of these observations were followed up with behavioral reinforcement. According to SUMs data, intervention households used their traditional stove a median of 0.4% of all monitored days, and 81% used the traditional stove < 1 day per month. Traditional stove use was slightly higher post-COVID-19 (detected on a median [Q1, Q3] of 0.0% [0.0%, 3.4%] of days) than pre-COVID-19 (0.0% [0.0%, 1.6%] of days). There was no significant difference in intervention adherence pre- and post-birth.
    Free stoves and an unlimited supply of LPG fuel delivered to participating homes combined with timely repairs, behavioral messaging, and comprehensive stove use monitoring contributed to high intervention fidelity and near-exclusive LPG use within the HAPIN trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具体对话代理(ECA)可以增加用户的参与度和参与度,并可以加强干预对通过ECA提供的健康结果的影响。然而,关于ECA对健康结果的有效性的证据仍然有限.在这篇文章中,我们报告了一项研究,该研究的目标是确定健康主题与ECA外观之间的匹配对人格特征评级的影响,说服力和使用意图。我们报道了一个在线实验,有三个不同的ECA和三个不同的健康主题,在732名老年人中进行。我们用焦点小组的定性见解对定量结果进行了三角测量。结果显示,老年人更喜欢外观与特定健康主题相匹配的ECA,导致对说服力和使用意图的评价更高。人格特征应嵌入健康主题中进行测量,但不会因为比赛而被评为更高。我们还为设计非洲经委会的内容提供指导。
    Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs) can increase user engagement and involvement and can strengthen the effect of an intervention on health outcomes that is provided via an ECA. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of ECAs on health outcomes is still limited. In this article, we report on a study that has the goal to identify the effect of a match between a health topic and the ECAs\' appearance on ratings of personality characteristics, persuasiveness and intention to use. We report on an online experiment with three different ECAs and three different health topics, conducted among 732 older adults. We triangulated the quantitative results with qualitative insights from a focus group. The results reveal that older adults prefer an ECA that has an appearance matching a certain health topic, resulting in higher ratings on persuasiveness and intention to use. Personality characteristics should be measured embedded within a health topic, but are not rated higher because of a match. We furthermore provide guidelines for designing the content of the ECA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    非传染性疾病的流行,比如糖尿病和心血管疾病,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)正在上升。健康行为改变(HBC)干预措施,如广泛使用的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)可有效降低慢性病风险,但尚未适应LMIC。利用移动健康(mHealth)技术(如短信(SMS))来增强这些干预措施的覆盖范围和参与者的参与具有巨大的前景。然而,我们缺乏以证据为依据的方法来指导SMS的整合,以支持LMIC背景下的HBC干预.为了解决这个差距,我们将mHealth文献中的指导与专业知识和第一手经验相结合,为构建和实施SMS系统以支持LMIC中的HBC编程制定了具体的开发步骤.具体来说,我们通过描述我们在设计和交付SMS系统以支持在南非交付的文化适应的DPP方面的经验,提供了每个开发步骤的真实示例。我们概述了八个关键的SMS开发步骤,包括:1)确定SMS是否合适;2)开发系统架构和编程;3)开发基于理论的消息;4)开发SMS技术;5)解决国际SMS交付;6)测试;7)系统培训和技术支持;以及8)成本考虑。我们讨论了经验教训和可提取的原则,这些原则可能对在类似LMIC环境中工作的其他mHealth和HBC研究人员有用。临床试验注册Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03342274。2017年11月10日注册
    The prevalence of non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, is rising in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health behavior change (HBC) interventions such as the widely used Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) are effective at reducing chronic disease risk, but have not been adapted for LMICs. Leveraging mobile health (mHealth) technology such as text messaging (SMS) to enhance reach and participant engagement with these interventions has great promise, yet we lack evidence-informed approaches to guide the integration of SMS specifically to support HBC interventions in LMIC contexts. To address this gap, we integrated guidance from the mHealth literature with expertise and first-hand experience to establish specific development steps for building and implementing SMS systems to support HBC programming in LMICs. Specifically, we provide real-world examples of each development step by describing our experience in designing and delivering an SMS system to support a culturally-adapted DPP designed for delivery in South Africa. We outline eight key SMS development steps, including: 1) determining if SMS is appropriate; 2) developing system architecture and programming; 3) developing theory-based messages; 4) developing SMS technology; 5) addressing international SMS delivery; 6) testing; 7) system training and technical support; and 8) cost considerations. We discuss lessons learned and extractable principles that may be of use to other mHealth and HBC researchers working in similar LMIC contexts.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03342274 . Registered 10 November 2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    将家庭空气污染(HAP)降低到与健康益处相关的水平需要几乎完全使用清洁的烹饪燃料和放弃传统的生物质燃料。
    家庭空气污染干预网络(HAPIN)试验在危地马拉随机分配了3,195名孕妇,印度,秘鲁,和卢旺达接受液化石油气(LPG)炉干预(n=1,590),控制预计将继续用生物质燃料烹饪(n=1,605)。我们使用燃料输送和修复记录评估了干预措施实施的忠诚度和参与者对干预措施的依从性,从怀孕开始到婴儿的第一个生日,调查,观察,和温度记录炉使用监视器(SUM)。
    对HAPIN干预的保真度和依从性很高。重新填充LPG气瓶所需的中位时间为1天(四分位数范围0-2)。尽管26%(n=410)的干预参与者报告LPG在某个时候耗尽,次数较少(中位数:1天[Q1,Q3:1,2]),并且大多限于COVID-19大流行的前四个月。大多数维修是在报告问题的同一天完成的。仅在3%的观察访问中观察到传统的炉子使用,89%的观察结果进行了行为强化。根据SUM数据,干预家庭使用传统炉子的中位数为所有监测天数的0.4%,81%的人每月使用传统炉子<1天。传统炉子的使用在COVID-19后稍高(检测到的中位数[第一季度,第三季度]为0.0%[0.0%,3.4%]天)比COVID-19之前(0.0%[0.0%,1.6%]天)。出生前和出生后干预依从性没有显着差异。
    免费炉灶和无限供应的液化石油气燃料输送到参与的房屋,并及时进行维修,行为信息,在HAPIN试验中,全面的炉具使用监测有助于高干预保真度和近乎独家的液化石油气使用.
    UNASSIGNED: Reducing household air pollution (HAP) to levels associated with health benefits requires nearly exclusive use of clean cooking fuels and abandonment of traditional biomass fuels.
    UNASSIGNED: The Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial randomized 3,195 pregnant women in Guatemala, India, Peru, and Rwanda to receive a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove intervention (n=1,590), with controls expected to continue cooking with biomass fuels (n=1,605). We assessed fidelity to intervention implementation and participant adherence to the intervention starting in pregnancy through the infant\'s first birthday using fuel delivery and repair records, surveys, observations, and temperature-logging stove use monitors (SUMs).
    UNASSIGNED: Fidelity and adherence to the HAPIN intervention were high. Median time required to refill LPG cylinders was 1 day (interquartile range 0-2). Although 26% (n=410) of intervention participants reported running out of LPG at some point, the number of times was low (median: 1 day [Q1, Q3: 1, 2]) and mostly limited to the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most repairs were completed on the same day as problems were reported. Traditional stove use was observed in only 3% of observation visits, and 89% of these observations were followed up with behavioral reinforcement. According to SUMs data, intervention households used their traditional stove a median of 0.4% of all monitored days, and 81% used the traditional stove <1 day per month. Traditional stove use was slightly higher post-COVID-19 (detected on a median [Q1, Q3] of 0.0% [0.0%, 3.4%] of days) than pre-COVID-19 (0.0% [0.0%, 1.6%] of days). There was no significant difference in intervention adherence pre- and post-birth.
    UNASSIGNED: Free stoves and an unlimited supply of LPG fuel delivered to participating homes combined with timely repairs, behavioral messaging, and comprehensive stove use monitoring contributed to high intervention fidelity and near-exclusive LPG use within the HAPIN trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:比较在风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病患者中,结构化目标设定和量身定制的随访康复干预与现有康复的有效性。
    方法:一项实用的阶梯式楔形整群随机试验。
    方法:二级医疗保健的八个康复中心,挪威。
    方法:总共374名患有风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病的成年人被纳入实验组(168)或对照组(206)。
    方法:一种新的康复干预措施,包括结构化的目标设定,行动计划,动机性面试,目标进度的数字自我监控,根据患者的需求和初级医疗保健的可用资源(桥梁干预),以及出院后的个人随访支持,与常规护理相比。
    方法:患者报告的结果在入院和康复出院时以电子方式收集,2、7和12个月后。主要结果是在7个月时通过患者特异性功能量表(0-10,10最佳)测量患者的目标达成情况。次要结果指标包括身体功能(30s站立测试),健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D-5L指数),和自我评估健康(EQ-VAS)。主要统计分析是使用线性混合模型在意向治疗的基础上进行的。
    结果:对于任一原发性患者均未发现BRIDGE干预措施的显着治疗效果(患者特定功能量表平均差异0.1[95%CI:-0.5,0.8],p=0.70),或次要结果7个月后康复。
    结论:对于风湿性疾病和肌肉骨骼疾病患者,桥梁干预并未显示出比现有康复更有效。仍然需要更多关于可以提高质量的因素的知识,连续性,以及康复对该患者组的长期健康影响。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a structured goal-setting and tailored follow-up rehabilitation intervention with existing rehabilitation in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.
    METHODS: A pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.
    METHODS: Eight rehabilitation centers in secondary healthcare, Norway.
    METHODS: A total of 374 adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases were included in either the experimental (168) or the control group (206).
    METHODS: A new rehabilitation intervention which comprised structured goal setting, action planning, motivational interviewing, digital self-monitoring of goal progress, and individual follow-up support after discharge according to patients\' needs and available resources in primary healthcare (the BRIDGE-intervention), was compared to usual care.
    METHODS: Patient-reported outcomes were collected electronically on admission and discharge from rehabilitation, and after 2, 7, and 12 months. The primary outcome was patients\' goal attainment measured by the Patient Specific Functional Scale (0-10, 10 best) at 7 months. Secondary outcome measures included physical function (30-s Sit-To-Stand test), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L-index), and self-assessed health (EQ-VAS). The main statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis using linear mixed models.
    RESULTS: No significant treatment effects of the BRIDGE-intervention were found for either primary (Patient Specific Functional Scale mean difference 0.1 [95% CI: -0.5, 0.8], p = 0.70), or secondary outcomes 7 months after rehabilitation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The BRIDGE-intervention was not shown to be more effective than existing rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. There is still a need for more knowledge about factors that can improve the quality, continuity, and long-term health effects of rehabilitation for this patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号