group size

组大小
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    合作育种进化的机制选择一直是争论的焦点。虽然亲属选择理论一直是解释非再生产帮助者看似利他行为的中心范式,人们越来越认识到,直接的健身益处可能是高度相关的。群体增强假说提出,当较大的群体产生增加的存活率和/或生殖成功率时,同种父母的照顾可能会发展为增加群体规模。然而,缺乏实证检验。在这里,我们使用了合作繁殖的丽鱼科鱼,其中群体规模预测生存率和群体稳定性,通过促使两个合作任务来实验检验这一假设:防御捕食者和从繁殖庇护所中挖沙。我们控制了替代机制,如亲属选择,减重和强制。正如群体增强假说所预测的那样,与大群体相比,帮助者在小群体中增加了对卵捕食者的防御。由于特定规模的任务专业化,这种差异仅在大型助手中很明显。此外,与其他个人庇护所相比,助手在繁殖室中表现出更多的挖掘工作,表明挖掘是对主导育种者的利他主义服务。
    Mechanisms selecting for the evolution of cooperative breeding are hotly debated. While kin selection theory has been the central paradigm to explain the seemingly altruistic behaviour of non-reproducing helpers, it is increasingly recognized that direct fitness benefits may be highly relevant. The group augmentation hypothesis proposes that alloparental care may evolve to enhance group size when larger groups yield increased survival and/or reproductive success. However, there is a lack of empirical tests. Here we use the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher, in which group size predicts survival and group stability, to test this hypothesis experimentally by prompting two cooperative tasks: defence against an egg predator and digging out sand from the breeding shelter. We controlled for alternative mechanisms such as kin selection, load lightening and coercion. As predicted by the group augmentation hypothesis, helpers increased defence against an egg predator in small compared with large groups. This difference was only evident in large helpers owing to size-specific task specialization. Furthermore, helpers showed more digging effort in the breeding chamber compared with alternative personal shelters, indicating that digging is an altruistic service to the dominant breeders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前正在讨论有效的心肺复苏教学的理想小组规模。当教师在技能练习期间无法纠正参与者的错误时,达到上限。这项模拟研究旨在在心肺复苏教学中定义此限制。
    医学生作为模拟的基本生命支持课程参与者被指示做出三个不同的预定义的基本生命支持质量错误(例如,胸部按压太快)在7分钟内。基本生命支持教师被随机分为3-10名参与者。要求教师观察基本生命支持技能并纠正表现错误。主要结果是最大组大小,正确识别的参与者错误的百分比降至80%以下。
    64名教师参加了每组八个。她们的平均年龄为41±9岁,33%为女性,中位[第25百分位数;第75百分位数]教学经验为6[2;11]年。在研究前一年,讲师教授了3[1;5]个心肺复苏课程。逻辑二项回归模型显示,对于大于6的组,正确识别的参与者错误的预测平均百分比下降到80%以下。
    这项随机对照模拟试验揭示了随着小组规模的增加,教师检测基本生命支持性能错误的能力下降。使基本生命支持讲师能够纠正80%以上错误的最大组人数为6。因此,我们建议心肺复苏课程的教练与参与者的最大比例为1:6。
    The ideal group size for effective teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is currently under debate. The upper limit is reached when instructors are unable to correct participants\' errors during skills practice. This simulation study aimed to define this limit during cardiopulmonary resuscitation teaching.
    Medical students acting as simulated Basic Life Support course participants were instructed to make three different pre-defined Basic Life Support quality errors (e.g., chest compression too fast) in 7 min. Basic Life Support instructors were randomized to groups of 3-10 participants. Instructors were asked to observe the Basic Life Support skills and to correct performance errors. Primary outcome was the maximum group size at which the percentage of correctly identified participants\' errors drops below 80%.
    Sixty-four instructors participated, eight for each group size. Their average age was 41 ± 9 years and 33% were female, with a median [25th percentile; 75th percentile] teaching experience of 6 [2;11] years. Instructors had taught 3 [1;5] cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses in the year before the study. A logistic binominal regression model showed that the predicted mean percentage of correctly identified participants\' errors dropped below 80% for group sizes larger than six.
    This randomized controlled simulation trial reveals decreased ability of instructors to detect Basic Life Support performance errors with increased group size. The maximum group size enabling Basic Life Support instructors to correct more than 80% of errors is six. We therefore recommend a maximum instructor-to-participant ratio of 1:6 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是开发和评估一种新的育肥兔住房系统。在新条件(NC)或既定(常规)条件(CC)下饲养兔子的农场上收集数据。NC住房的特点是大组(Ø58只兔子,max.12只兔子/m2),板条塑料地板(11毫米板条和11毫米间隙),具有部分实心地板的高架平台,盒子和不同的浓缩材料。CC家兔分成小组(8只家兔,23只兔子/m2)在带有金属丝网地板的笼子里,一个高架平台,一个盒子和一根啃棒。524只兔子的皮肤损伤和体重增加,从断奶到屠宰,分五批调查了他们后足的清洁度以及死亡率和发病率。评估显示每日体重增加较高(46.3±6.0g与43.1±5.5g)和最终重量(2878±328gvs.2707±299g),NC在育肥期中期的累积病变评分低于CC兔。然而,在NC房屋中,后脚的清洁度被评估为较差,死亡率较高。与传统系统相比,NC系统在动物福利方面提供了一些好处,但是这个系统带来的卫生挑战使得需要进一步调整。
    The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a new housing system for fattening rabbits. Data were collected on a farm with rabbits housed either under new conditions (NC) or established (conventional) conditions (CC). NC housing was characterized by large groups (Ø 58 rabbits, max. 12 rabbits/m2), slatted plastic floor (11 mm slats and 11 mm gaps), elevated platforms with partly solid floor, boxes and different enrichment materials. CC rabbits were kept in small groups (eight rabbits, 23 rabbits/m2) in cages with wire-mesh floor, an elevated platform, a box and one gnawing stick. Skin lesions and weight gain of 524 rabbits, cleanliness of their hind feet as well as their mortality and morbidity were investigated from weaning to slaughter in five batches. The evaluations showed higher daily weight gain (46.3 ± 6.0 g vs. 43.1 ± 5.5 g) and final weight (2878 ± 328 g vs. 2707 ± 299 g), as well as a lower cumulative lesion score at the middle of the fattening period in NC than in CC rabbits. Nevertheless, cleanliness of hind feet was assessed to be worse and mortality was higher in the NC housing. The NC system provided some benefits in terms of animal welfare compared to the conventional system, but hygienic challenges posed by this system make further adjustment necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    广泛讨论了资源的时空分布与社会性模式之间的关系。虽然制定了资源分散假说(RDH)来解释为什么动物有时生活在没有明显好处的群体中,它也已成功应用于受益于群体生活的物种。一些实证检验支持RDH,但其他人没有,因此,结论仍然模棱两可,需要进一步的研究来确定RDH预测在自然系统中的适用程度。这里,我们在裂变聚变社会的背景下测试了非洲狮子种群中RDH的四个预测。我们分析了有关GPS领狮子的群体组成和猎物可用性模式的数据。我们的结果支持RDH的第一个和第二个预测:家庭范围大小(a)与群体大小无关,并且(b)随着与猎物群相遇之间的距离而增加。尽管如此,不支持第三和第四个RDH预测:(c)资源异质性的度量和(d)通过猎物群大小和体型测量的资源斑块丰富度对狮子群大小没有显着影响。然而,关于第四个预测,我们增加了一个适应因素来解释裂变聚变社会的动力学,并发现骄傲裂变的频率随着群体规模的增加而增加。我们的数据集限制了我们继续探索裂变融合动力学对组大小与斑块丰富度之间关系的影响。然而,这应该在未来的研究中进行研究,因为包括裂变聚变动力学提供了更细微的,狮子社会的现实欣赏。我们的研究强调了在资源分散框架内理解物种行为生态学复杂性的重要性。无论出现什么更大的理论框架来解释狮子社会,结合裂变聚变动力学应该可以使RDH得到完善和改进。
    The relationship between the spatiotemporal distribution of resources and patterns of sociality is widely discussed. While the resource dispersion hypothesis (RDH) was formulated to explain why animals sometimes live in groups from which they derive no obvious benefits, it has also been successfully applied to species that benefit from group living. Some empirical tests have supported the RDH, but others have not, so conclusions remain equivocal and further research is required to determine the extent to which RDH predictions hold in natural systems. Here, we test four predictions of the RDH in an African lion population in the context of their fission-fusion society. We analyzed data on group composition of GPS-collared lions and patterns of prey availability. Our results supported the first and second predictions of the RDH: Home range size (a) was independent of group size and (b) increased with distance between encounters with prey herds. Nonetheless, the third and fourth RDH predictions were not supported: (c) The measure of resource heterogeneity and (d) resource patch richness measured through prey herd size and body size had no significant effect on lion group size. However, regarding the fourth prediction, we added an adaptation to account for dynamics of fission-fusion society and found that the frequency of pride fission increased as group size increased. Our data set restricted us from going on to explore the effect of fission-fusion dynamics on the relationship between group size and patch richness. However, this should be investigated in future studies as including fission-fusion dynamics provides a more nuanced, realistic appreciation of lion society. Our study emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexity of a species\' behavioral ecology within the framework of resource dispersion. Whatever larger theoretical framework may emerge to explain lion society, incorporating fission-fusion dynamics should allow the RDH to be refined and improved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号