glycated hemoglobin A

糖化血红蛋白 A
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    FGF21是一种主要由肝脏产生的激素,具有多种代谢功能,例如感应产生热量,控制葡萄糖稳态,和调节血脂水平。由于这些行动,一些实验室已经开发出FGF21类似物,用于治疗肥胖和糖尿病等代谢紊乱患者.这里,我们对使用FGF21类似物的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,并分析了代谢结局.我们的搜索产生了236篇文章,我们在荟萃分析中纳入了8项随机临床试验.使用FGF21类似物对空腹血糖没有影响,糖化血红蛋白,HOMA指数,血液游离脂肪酸或收缩压。然而,治疗显着降低空腹胰岛素血症,体重和总胆固醇血症。所有纳入的研究都没有偏倚的高风险。证据的质量从中等到非常低,特别是由于不精确和间接的问题。这些结果表明FGF21类似物可以潜在地治疗代谢综合征。然而,需要更多的临床试验来提高证据质量,并确认迄今为止所看到的效果。
    FGF21 is a hormone produced primarily by the liver with several metabolic functions, such as induction of heat production, control of glucose homeostasis, and regulation of blood lipid levels. Due to these actions, several laboratories have developed FGF21 analogs to treat patients with metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that used FGF21 analogs and analyzed metabolic outcomes. Our search yielded 236 articles, and we included eight randomized clinical trials in the meta-analysis. The use of FGF21 analogs exhibited no effect on fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, HOMA index, blood free fatty acids or systolic blood pressure. However, the treatment significantly reduced fasting insulinemia, body weight and total cholesterolemia. None of the included studies were at high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, especially due to imprecision and indirection issues. These results indicate that FGF21 analogs can potentially treat metabolic syndrome. However, more clinical trials are needed to increase the quality of evidence and confirm the effects seen thus far.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    胰岛素Icodec是一种新型的基础胰岛素类似物,旨在每周一次给药,因此可能有助于减少注射频率,并促进治疗依从性.本研究旨在确定胰岛素Icodec的血糖控制和安全性,与甘精胰岛素U100在2型糖尿病患者中的比较。
    我们对2型糖尿病患者每周一次胰岛素Icodec和每日一次甘精胰岛素U100的随机对照试验(RCT)数据进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane数据库搜索了截至2022年5月14日发表的试验。从已发表的报告中提取数据,并根据Cochrane建议进行质量评估。
    纳入了三项研究,包括453名患者,230(50.77%)使用每周一次的胰岛素Icodec和223(49.22%)使用每日一次的甘精胰岛素U100。在池化数据中,糖化血红蛋白(MD-0.20%CI-0.33至-0.07%;P=0.002)从基线的变化表明Icodec组的降低明显更高。Icodec组的葡萄糖时间范围(MD6.60%CI3.63至9.57%;P<0.0001)和胰岛素剂量差异(MD0.97UICI0.76至1.18UI;P<0.0001)较高。空腹血糖无显著差异,体重变化,评估低血糖或任何不良事件。
    每周一次的胰岛素编码与糖化血红蛋白的少量减少有关,以及葡萄糖在范围内的更高时间,类似的低血糖不良事件,与每日一次的甘精胰岛素U100相比。
    UNASSIGNED: Insulin Icodec is a novel basal insulin analogue designed for once-weekly administration, therefore might propitiate reduction in the frequency of injections and facilitate treatment adherence. This study aimed to determine the glycemic control and safety profile of Insulin Icodec, compared with Glargine U100 in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) data comparing OnceWeekly Insulin Icodec and Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for trials published up to May 14, 2022. Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations.
    UNASSIGNED: Three studies were included comprising 453 patients, 230 (50.77%) using Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec and 223 (49.22%) using Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100. In the pooled data, Glycated Hemoglobin (MD -0.20% CI -0.33 to -0.07%; P=0.002) change from baseline demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in the Icodec group. Time with Glucose in Range (MD 6.60% CI 3.63 to 9.57%; P < 0.0001) and Insulin Dose Difference (MD 0.97UI CI 0.76 to 1.18UI; P < 0.0001) were higher in the Icodec group. There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose, body weight change, hypoglycemia or any adverse event evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: OnceWeekly Insulin Icodec was associated with a small reduction in Glycated Hemoglobin, as well as higher Time with Glucose in Range, with similar hypoglycemic adverse events, when compared with Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:1型糖尿病(T1D)是一种自身免疫性疾病,其特征是胰腺β细胞胰岛的进行性和不可逆的自身免疫性破坏,导致绝对胰岛素缺乏。迄今为止,一些流行病学和观察性研究评估了卡介苗接种对T1D发展的可能影响,但是结果是有争议的。为了阐明这个问题,我们旨在对该领域已发表的队列研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析.(2)方法:使用Pubmed/Medline对截至2022年9月20日发表的相关研究进行了系统搜索,Embase,还有Scopus.队列研究,包含有关T1D和BCG疫苗接种之间关联的原始信息,进行进一步分析。使用固定效应模型评估了与未接种疫苗相比,接种卡介苗的个体中T1D风险比的集合估计值和95%置信区间(CI)。(3)结果:在630篇潜在相关文章中,5项队列研究符合纳入标准.所有纳入研究的总人口为864,582。发现接种BCG和未接种BCG的个体中T1D发展的总体合并风险比为1.018(95%CI0.908-1.141,I2:0%)。(4)结论:我们的研究表明,在T1D开发中,先前的BCG疫苗接种没有保护或促进作用。
    (1) Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by progressive and irreversible autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cell islets, resulting in absolute insulin deficiency. To date, several epidemiologic and observational studies have evaluated the possible impact of BCG vaccination on T1D development, but the results are controversial. To elucidate this issue, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published cohort studies in this field. (2) Methods: A systematic search was performed for relevant studies published up to 20 September 2022 using Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Cohort studies, containing original information about the association between T1D and BCG vaccination, were included for further analysis. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk ratio of T1D in BCG-vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated ones were assessed using the fixed effect model. (3) Results: Out of 630 potentially relevant articles, five cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The total population of all included studies was 864,582. The overall pooled risk ratio of T1D development in BCG vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals was found to be 1.018 (95% CI 0.908-1.141, I2: 0%). (4) Conclusions: Our study revealed no protective or facilitative effect of prior BCG vaccination in T1D development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:进行系统评价,以调查青少年的后验饮食模式与糖尿病相关生物标志物(空腹血糖,空腹胰岛素血症,糖化血红蛋白和稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR))。
    结果:在PROSPERO注册,编号为CRD42020185369。包括对10-19岁青少年的研究,这些研究通过后验方法确定了饮食模式。使用的数据库包括:PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,食品科学与技术文摘,CINAHL,SPORTDiscus,丁香花/BVS,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,ProQuest论文和论文全球和Capes论文银行和巴西数字论文和论文图书馆。通过医疗保健研究和质量工具机构评估偏倚风险。纳入了8项横断面研究,评估了6438名青少年(55.5%为女性)。对于空腹血糖,结果不一致,一些研究发现与传统饮食模式无关(57%),西方(42%)和健康(28%)。对于空腹胰岛素血症和HOMA-IR结果,西方饮食模式在60%和50%的研究中显示出正相关或更高的均值,分别。没有发现评估糖化血红蛋白的研究。
    结论:空腹胰岛素血症和HOMA-IR结局与西方饮食模式呈正相关。审查的研究没有提供与西方有关的一致证据,健康和传统的饮食模式与空腹血糖,因为结果相互矛盾或没有统计学意义.
    To perform a systematic review to investigate the association between adolescents\' a posteriori dietary patterns with diabetes-related biomarkers (fasting blood glucose, fasting insulinemia, glycated hemoglobin and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR)).
    Review registered with PROSPERO under number CRD42020185369. Studies with adolescents aged 10-19 years that identified dietary patterns by a posteriori methods were included. The databases used included: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Lilacs/BVS, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ProQuest Dissertations&Theses Global and Capes Theses Bank and Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. Risk of bias was assessed via the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool. Eight cross-sectional studies that evaluated 6438 adolescents (55.5% females) were included. For fasting blood glucose, the results were inconsistent and some studies found no association for the dietary patterns called traditional (57%), Western (42%) and healthy (28%). For the fasting insulinemia and HOMA-IR outcomes, the Western dietary pattern showed a positive association or higher means in 60% and 50% of the studies, respectively. No studies that evaluated glycated hemoglobin were found.
    Fasting insulinemia and HOMA-IR outcomes were positively associated with the Western dietary patterns. The studies reviewed did not present consistent evidence of an association with western, healthy and traditional dietary patterns with fasting blood glucose, as the results were conflicting or did not show statistical significance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    对于2型糖尿病(T2D)患者,低碳水化合物(LC)饮食与低脂肪(LF)饮食相比的临床益处仍然不确定。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,以比较其在T2D患者中的疗效和安全性。从MEDLINE中确定了比较T2D参与者两种饮食的RCT,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和手动搜索参考书目。合并95%CI的平均差异和相对风险,用于血糖测量,心脏代谢参数,和使用以下时间点的不良事件:短期(3个月),中期(6个月和12个月)和长期(24个月)。包括22个RCT,包括1391名主要肥胖的T2D参与者。3个月时,LCvs.LF饮食显着降低HbA1c水平,平均差(95%CI)为-0.41%(-0.62,-0.20)。LC饮食显着降低体重,BMI,短期至中期空腹胰岛素和甘油三酯以及总胆固醇和HDL-C水平升高,随着中远期对降血糖药物的需求减少。其他参数和不良事件没有显着差异。除了降低短期至中期的HbA1c水平和肥胖参数外,在控制T2D肥胖患者的心脏代谢标志物和不良事件风险方面,LC饮食似乎与LF饮食同样有效.
    The clinical benefit of low carbohydrate (LC) diets compared with low fat (LF) diets for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare their efficacy and safety in people with T2D. RCTs comparing both diets in participants with T2D were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and manual search of bibliographies. Mean differences and relative risks with 95% CIs were pooled for measures of glycaemia, cardiometabolic parameters, and adverse events using the following time points: short-term (3 months), intermediate term (6 and 12 months) and long-term (24 months). Twenty-two RCTs comprising 1391 mostly obese participants with T2D were included. At 3 months, a LC vs. LF diet significantly reduced HbA1c levels, mean difference (95% CI) of -0.41% (-0.62, -0.20). LC diet significantly reduced body weight, BMI, fasting insulin and triglycerides and increased total cholesterol and HDL-C levels at the short-to-intermediate term, with a decrease in the requirement for antiglycaemic medications at intermediate-to-long term. There were no significant differences in other parameters and adverse events. Except for reducing HbA1c levels and adiposity parameters at short-to-intermediate terms, a LC diet appears to be equally effective as a LF diet in terms of control of cardiometabolic markers and the risk of adverse events in obese patients with T2D.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    尽管现有常规降糖药治疗糖尿病,它们在低收入国家的不可用和成本以及相关的副作用仍然是一个主要问题。因此,探索糖尿病的替代治疗方法一直是当务之急.NigellasativaL.(NS)(家族:Ran科)被认为是糖尿病管理中一种有价值的传统疗法,并对其生物学特性进行了广泛研究。本系统综述对疗效的临床研究进行了全面而关键的分析,安全,NS及其复方百里香醌(TQ)在糖尿病管理中的作用机制。被仔细检查的主要科学数据库是Scopus,PubMed,谷歌学者,和WebofScience。数据搜索从开始到2022年1月进行。共获得17项临床研究;16项关于黑麦草的研究和1项关于其化合物TQ的研究。根据包括空腹血糖(FBG)在内的参数的改善,与安慰剂相比,苜蓿在其降血糖活性方面具有很强的效力。餐后血糖(PPBG),血红蛋白A1C(HbA1c),胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR),和稳态模型评估,用于评估β细胞功能(HOMA-β)。与单独的二甲双胍相比,化合物TQ与每日剂量的二甲双胍组合显示HbA1c和血糖水平的更大降低。TQ的生物利用度可以通过使用纳米颗粒药物递送系统来增强。考虑到临床研究的结果以及可忽略的副作用,NS在治疗糖尿病的生物制品开发中具有很强的潜在应用价值。进一步的研究应探索TQ发挥其治疗性抗糖尿病作用的详细作用机制,以提供更多有关其在糖尿病管理中的临床应用的见解。
    Despite existing conventional hypoglycemic drugs to manage diabetes, their non-availability and cost in low-income countries coupled with the associated side effects remain a major concern. Consequently, exploring for alternative treatments to manage diabetes has been a continuous priority. Nigella sativa L. (NS) (Family: Ranunculaceae) is regarded as a valuable traditional remedy in diabetes management and extensively studied for its biological properties. This systematic review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of clinical studies on the efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action of NS and its compound thymoquinone (TQ) in diabetes management. The main scientific databases which were scrutinised were Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Data search was conducted from inception to January 2022. A total of 17 clinical studies were obtained; 16 studies on Nigella sativa L. and 1 study on its compound TQ. N. sativa was found to be highly potent in terms of its hypoglycemic activity when compared to placebo based on improvement in parameters including fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and homeostatic model assessment for assessment of beta-cell functionality (HOMA-β). The compound TQ in combination with a daily dose of metformin demonstrated a greater reduction in the levels of HbA1c and blood glucose compared to metformin alone. The bioavailability of TQ can be enhanced by using nanoparticulate drug delivery systems. Considering the findings of the clinical studies along with negligible adverse effects, NS has strong potential application in bioproduct development for the management of diabetes. Further investigations should explore the detailed mechanism of actions by which TQ exerts its therapeutic antidiabetic effects to provide more insights into its clinical use in the management of diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病肾病(DN)是全球终末期肾病的主要原因,给医疗系统带来巨大压力,造成沉重的社会经济负担。全面研究糖尿病患者DN的流行病学特征,分析其发病的相关因素,以实施有效的预防控制措施已成为当务之急。
    方法:计算机辅助搜索MEDLINE,EMBASE,WebofScience,PsycINFO,和CINAHL数据库将用于前瞻性队列研究,报告糖尿病人群中DN的患病率.研究将使用广义线性混合模型进行汇总,并将计算纳入研究的单个比例,以得出糖尿病人群中DN的总体发病率,并分析不同因素对DN发病率的影响。将使用漏斗图结合Begg测试来评估发布偏差。灵敏度分析将使用分离方法进行,排除低质量的研究,以及修剪和填充方法。
    结果:主要结局将是糖尿病人群中DN的患病率;次要结局将是年龄等因素的影响,性别,区域,种族,糖尿病的持续时间,糖尿病的类型,基线体重指数,基线糖化血红蛋白水平,基线血压,纳入研究的质量,糖尿病患者DN患病率的随访时间。
    结论:通过本系统综述和荟萃分析,这项研究将更全面地获得糖尿病人群中DN的患病率,并更深入地了解不同特征的糖尿病人群中DN患病率的差异,从而为糖尿病的管理和DN的预防提供依据。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide, placing enormous pressure on healthcare systems and creating a heavy socioeconomic burden. It is urgent to comprehensively study the epidemiological characteristics of DN in diabetic patients and to analyze the related factors to its incidence in order to implement effective prevention and control measures.
    METHODS: Computer-aided searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases will be performed for prospective cohort studies reporting the prevalence of DN in diabetic populations. Studies will be pooled using a generalized linear mixed model, and a single proportion of included studies will be calculated to derive the overall incidence of DN in the diabetic population, and to analyze the effect of different factors on the incidence of DN. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot combined with Begg test. Sensitivity analyses will be performed using the separation method, the exclusion of low-quality studies, and the trim and fill method.
    RESULTS: The primary outcome will be the prevalence of DN in the diabetic population; secondary outcomes will be the influence of factors such as age, gender, region, ethnicity, duration of diabetes, type of diabetes, baseline body mass index, baseline glycated hemoglobin level, baseline blood pressure, quality of included studies, and follow-up time on the prevalence of DN in diabetic patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, the study will more comprehensively obtain the prevalence of DN in diabetic populations worldwide, and gain a deeper understanding of the differences in the prevalence of DN in diabetic populations with different characteristics, so as to provide evidence for the management of diabetes and the prevention of DN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:本研究旨在探讨替拉肽对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的疗效和安全性。
    方法:使用特定的关键字,我们全面浏览了欧洲PMC的潜在文章,Scopus,PubMed,和ClinicalTrials.gov来源,直到7月12日,2022年。我们收集了所有临床试验,这些临床试验比较了T2D成年患者中每周一次的替瑞沙肽5、10或15mg与安慰剂或其他降糖药物。
    结果:纳入了9项临床试验。我们的汇总分析显示,在降低HbA1c方面,替拉肽具有剂量依赖性优势,与安慰剂相比,从5毫克的-1.50%到15毫克的-1.80%,与GLP-1受体激动剂相比,5mg-0.61%至15mg-0.95%,与基础胰岛素相比,5mg为-0.70%,15mg为1.09%。在所有比较者的体重减轻效果中也观察到了替利西帕肽的剂量依赖性优势。这些优势并没有伴随低血糖的几率增加,但胃肠道不良事件发生率增加。
    结论:Tirzepatide在T2D患者的血糖控制和体重降低方面具有优势,且具有良好的安全性。Tirzepatide可能成为T2D治疗的潜在药物。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
    METHODS: Using specific keywords, we comprehensively go through the potential articles on Europe PMC, Scopus, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov sources until July 12th, 2022. We collected all clinical trials that compare tirzepatide 5, 10, or 15 mg once-weekly with placebo or other glucose lowering agents in adult patients with T2D.
    RESULTS: Nine clinical trials were included. Our pooled analysis revealed the dose-dependent superiority of tirzepatide in reducing HbA1c, ranging from -1.50% with 5 mg to -1.80% with 15 mg when compared with placebo, -0.61% with 5 mg to -0.95% with 15 mg when compared with GLP-1 receptor agonist, and -0.70% with 5 mg to 1.09% with 15 mg when compared with basal insulin. The dose-dependent superiority of tirzepatide was also seen in the bodyweight reduction effect with all comparators. These superiorities were not accompanied by increased odds of hypoglycemia, but there is an increase in gastrointestinal adverse events incidence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tirzepatide has shown superiority in glycemic control and bodyweight reduction with a good safety profile in patients with T2D. Tirzepatide may become a future potential drug in the management of T2D.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    评估和分析中药方剂(CHF)和二甲双胍联合治疗改善2型糖尿病(T2DM)肠道菌群的有效性和安全性。收集了所有关于这种联合治疗对肠道微生物群和葡萄糖参数定量改变的影响的出版物.Cochrane手册中的Rob工具用于评估所有纳入研究的方法学质量。在ReviewManager5.4中提取和综合相关信息和统计数据,以评估联合治疗的疗效。敏感性分析和亚组分析用于分析异质性的来源。通过Stata软件进行发表偏倚分析,以评估结果的稳健性和质量。因此,共纳入了来自7个电子数据库的12个符合条件的RCTs和1307名T2DM参与者.CHF与二甲双胍联合治疗在调节肠道菌群结构方面比二甲双胍单药治疗表现出更好的疗效。以双歧杆菌增加为特征,乳酸菌和拟杆菌和减少的肠杆菌科,肠球菌,和酵母菌以及糖化血红蛋白的更好减少,空腹血糖,餐后2小时血糖,空腹胰岛素和稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗。亚组分析进一步分析了二甲双胍剂量和CHF分类对控制高血糖和改变肠道微生物群的影响。总之,我们的荟萃分析提示,CHF与二甲双胍联合治疗有望调节2型糖尿病患者的肠道菌群,并改善高血糖.重要的是,需要更精心设计的RCT来验证结局,并验证临床治疗价值.
    https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021291524,标识符CRD42021291524。
    To assess and analyse the effectiveness and safety of combined Chinese herbal formula (CHF) and metformin treatment in the modulation of the gut microbiota in the amelioration of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM), all publications addressing the effect of this combination treatment on the quantitative alterations in the gut microbiota and glucose parameters were collected. Rob tool in the Cochrane handbook was performed to evaluate the methodological quality of all included studies. Relevant information and statistics were abstracted and synthesized in Review Manager 5.4 to evaluate the efficacy of combination treatment. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were used to analyse the sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias analyses were performed by Stata software to assess the robustness and quality of the outcomes. As a result, a total of 12 eligible RCTs with 1307 T2DM participants from 7 electronic databases were included. Combined CHF with metformin treatment showed better efficacies than metformin monotherapy in regulating the structure of the gut microbiota, characterized by increased Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Bacteroidetes and decreased Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and Saccharomyces along with better decreases in glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose, fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Subgroup analyses further analysed the effect of metformin doses and CHF classifications on controlling hyperglycaemia and altering the gut microbiota. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggested that combined CHF with metformin treatment is promising for the modulation of the gut microbiota along with ameliorating hyperglycemia in T2DM patients. Importantly, more well-designed RCTs are needed to validate the outcomes and verify the treatment value for clinical purposes.
    https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021291524, identifier CRD42021291524.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号