In the \"Libet experiment\" the onset of movement-related brain activity preceded the reported time of the conscious intention to move, suggesting that conscious intention may not play a role in initiating voluntary movements (Libet, Gleason, Wright, & Pearl, 1983). Dominik et al. (2017) provided evidence that the intention
reports employed in the Libet experiment, which Libet et al. (1983) found to precede movement
reports, are invalid. In the study by Dominik et al., intention
reports preceded movement
reports only when participants had prior experience making movement
reports. Individuals without such experience reported intention around the same time as movement. These findings suggest that Libet\'s intention reports do not reflect experiences of intention, but, rather, inferences based on prior experience with movement
reports. Our study replicated the core findings of Dominik et al. We argue that Libet\'s intention reports are invalid and explore the phenomenology of intention in the Libet experiment.