Background: Soft tissue defects of the lower limbs pose significant challenges in reconstructive surgery, accounting for approximately 10% of all reconstructive free flaps performed. These reconstructions often encounter higher complication rates due to various factors such as inflammation, infection, impaired blood flow, and nerve injuries. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, reviewing literature from 2017 to 2024. Eligible studies included those on free flap reconstruction of lower limb defects in living human subjects, with more than three cases and reported rates of flap failure and return to the operating room. Systematic reviews and metanalysis were excluded. Results: A total of 17 studies comprising 5061 patients and 5133 free flap reconstructions were included. The most common defects were in the lower leg (52.19%) due to trauma (79.40%). The total flap necrosis rate was 7.78%, the partial necrosis rate was 9.15%, and the rate of return to the operating room for suspected vascular compromise was 13.79%. Discussion: Lower limb reconstruction presents challenges due to diverse etiologies and variable tissue requirements. Factors such as recipient vessel availability, flap selection, and multidisciplinary approaches influence outcomes. Muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps remain common choices, each with advantages and limitations. This systematic review underscores the importance of individualized treatment planning. Conclusions: Microsurgical reconstruction of lower limb defects demonstrates safety and reliability, with overall favorable outcomes. Flap selection should be tailored to specific patient needs and defect characteristics, emphasizing meticulous surgical techniques and multidisciplinary collaboration. This systematic review provides valuable insights into current standards and encourages adherence to best practices in lower limb reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively assess the clinical efficacy of the anterolateral thigh flap in lower limb reconstruction (LLR) surgeries and explore its application value via a meta-analysis.
METHODS: Published articles on the efficacy of anterolateral thigh flap in LLR were retrieved in English databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library, which were searched from their inception to November 2023. The search terms included \"anterolateral thigh flaps\", \"lower extremity\", \"free muscle\" and \"reconstruction\". Subsequently, data extraction of eligible studies was carried out, and data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS: The final selection comprised 12 appropriate studies, encompassing a total of 577 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated that negligible differences existed in the length of hospital stay among patients treated with different types of flaps (mean difference (MD) =-0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) =-0.400.20, P>0.05). Additionally, the occurrence of complications differed slightly (Risk difference (RD) =-0.02, 95% CI=-0.090.05, P>0.05). The incidence of secondary surgeries also demonstrated non-significant differences (RD=-0.04, 95% CI=-0.11-0.04, P>0.05). Nevertheless, patients who underwent anterolateral thigh flap transplantation exhibited a drastic decrease in donor site morbidity (Odds ratio (OR) =0.22, 95% CI=0.10-0.49, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy of the anterolateral thigh flap in LLR surgeries shows no significant differences in hospital stay, complication rates, or the need for secondary surgeries compared to other flaps. However, using anterolateral thigh flap in LLR significantly reduces donor site morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Different factors can affect the quality of life of patients treated for head and neck cancer undergoing major surgical intervention. However, it remains unclear which specific factors and what possible interventions could have the greatest influence on quality of life postoperatively for patients undergoing surgical resection with free flap reconstruction. The objective of our systematic review was to identify which factors, at the time of surgical treatment, are associated with a worse postoperative quality of life for patients undergoing surgical resection with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from their inception through November 2021. We included peer reviewed studies that evaluated the impact of specific factors on quality of life for adult patients who underwent surgery with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias of each study was evaluated using the New-Castle Ottawa Scale. Vote counting and qualitative review were used to synthesize results. All relevant findings were reported.
RESULTS: We initially identified 1971 articles. We included 22 articles in our systematic review, totaling 1398 patients. There was a high level of variability for factors evaluated throughout studies and many studies presented small sample sizes. However, some factors were associated with worse long-term quality of life, including older age, radiotherapy, higher tumor stage, dysphagia, anxiety as well as depressive symptoms. Very few articles analyzed their data for specific tumor subsites and the impact of psychosocial factors was rarely evaluated throughout studies.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with head and neck cancer requiring free flap reconstruction, some specific factors may correlate with changes in quality of life. However, these findings are based on very few and mostly underpowered studies. A better understanding of factors affecting quality of life could allow a more personalized and overall better quality of care for patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative complications of the fibular free flap (FFF), scapula free flap (SFF), and osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) following osseous reconstruction in the head and neck.
METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane.
METHODS: A literature search and systematic review were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a random effects model to compare operative time and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The systematic review identified 26 studies comparing at least 1 variable of interest. The odds ratio estimates favored reduced rates of flap failure with the OCRFFF when compared to FFF (0.7, confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-1.11, P < .001), while FFF and SFF were similar. The mean difference estimates for operative time significantly favored FFF over SFF (-51.04 minutes, CI: -92.73 to -9.35, P = .016) and OCRFFF over FFF (66.77 minutes, CI: 52.74-80.8, P < .001). The FFF was more prone to hardware exposure, longer hospital stays, and donor site complications. Recipient wound complications and fistula rates were similar for all flap types.
CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the clinical context, the OCRFFF, FFF, and SFF are all robust options for reconstruction in the head and neck. The OCRFFF is associated with a reduced rate of flap failure and shorter operative times. The SFF requires longer operative times, although significant variation was observed between institutions. The FFF has broad reconstructive indications but is associated with more perioperative and long-term complications.

Recalcitrant clavicular nonunion is an uncommon but challenging problem. Vascularized bone reconstruction is not first-line therapy due to complexity and donor morbidity, though it has utility in select cases. A systematic review of Embase and Medline databases was undertaken for cases of medial femoral condyle reconstruction for clavicle nonunion. Ten studies met inclusion, encompassing 26 patients. Mean age was 38.9 years. Ten patients were male and 16 female. Mean time of nonunion was 37.79 months prior to intervention; mean time to union following medial femoral condyle flap was 7.60 months. Two patients did not achieve union. Of the 11 patients who previously had at least one failed fixation with bone graft, considered the current \"gold standard\", 9 patients (81.81%) went on to achieve union, while 2 patients (18.19%) did not. There were six reported complications in five patients. Medial femoral condyle flap is a valuable option in recalcitrant clavicle nonunion.

This study aims to evaluate the functional and prognostic outcomes associated with the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap in various head and neck defect repairs, given the current lack of clarity on its effectiveness. We performed a systematic review of various databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect using keywords such as \"Internal mammary artery perforator flap\" and \"IMAP.\" Screening and data extractions were performed by two individual reviewers. Articles were considered eligible if they included sufficient information on IMAP flap features, their applications in the head and neck, and outcomes. From 264 articles analyzed, 24 studies were included for qualitative analysis. Out of which, 125 patients who received internal mammary artery perforator flaps were included. Most of the patients, 103 (88%), received pedicled IMAP flaps, and 22 (12%) received IMAP free flaps. The second internal mammary artery (IMA) was favored as the single perforator (81.5%), with the combination of the first and second IMA being the primary choice for dual perforators (92.5%). IMAP flaps were predominantly single perforator flaps (65%), with 35% being dual perforator flaps. Among various applications, IMAP flaps are commonly employed in the reconstruction of neck defects (25.5%), pharyngocutaneous fistula repair (20.8%), and burn scar contracture restoration (8%). Only seven (5.6%) patients had flap complications, including venous congestion (1.6%), partial necrosis (1.6%), complete necrosis (1.6%), and incision dehiscence (0.8%). Donor sites were predominantly closed by the primary closure (92%). 3.2% of donor sites had minor complications. The average follow-up was 12.6 (IQR: 6-18) months. This systematic review highlights the effectiveness and safety of IMAP flaps in head and neck reconstruction, with positive outcomes and minimal complications.

Background: Nowadays, multimodal cancer therapy results in very high survival rates of early-stage breast cancer and microsurgical flap-based breast reconstruction has become safe and reliable, with gradually increasing demand because of its durable and aesthetically pleasing results. This study aimed to explore the impact of different flap shaping and inset techniques on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with regard to the aesthetic result in abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review was performed screening Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for original articles reporting flap inset strategies, concomitantly providing PROMs on the aesthetic result. Results: Of 319 studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. The studies described different flap rotation options according to the patient\'s morphology, different inset planes, and avoidance of the monitoring skin paddle, and suggested that a higher flap-to-mastectomy mass ratio was associated with better aesthetic results. In two comparative studies, according to the PROMs (BREAST-Q, Likert scale) and independent observer judgement, both higher patient satisfaction and superior aesthetic results were observed with the newly described techniques. Conclusions: Emphasis on the aesthetic outcome in terms of breast shape and symmetry, providing an individualized approach of flap inset, considering the contralateral breast\'s shape and volume, results in higher satisfaction scores.

OBJECTIVE: The popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) in head and neck cancer (HNC) management is increasing, but postoperative complications remain prevalent and are the main factor that impact prognosis after surgery. Hence, recent studies aim to assess new AI models to evaluate their ability to predict free flap complications more effectively than traditional algorithms. This systematic review aims to summarize current evidence on the utilization of AI models to predict complications following reconstructive surgery for HNC.
METHODS: A combination of MeSH terms and keywords was used to cover the following three subjects: \"HNC,\" \"artificial intelligence,\" and \"free flap or reconstructive surgery.\" The electronic literature search was performed in three relevant databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane. Quality appraisal of the included study was conducted using the TRIPOD Statement.
RESULTS: The review included a total of 5 manuscripts (n = 5) for a total of 7524 patients. Across studies, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) value achieved was 0.824 by the Auto-WEKA model. However, only 20% of reported AUROCs exceeded 0.70. One study concluded that most AI models were comparable or inferior in performance to conventional logistic regression. The highest predictors of complications were flap type, smoking status, tumour location, and age.
CONCLUSIONS: Some models showed promising results. Predictors identified across studies were different than those found in existing literature, showing the added value of AI models. However, the algorithms showed inconsistent results, underlying the need for better-powered studies with larger databases before clinical implementation.

BACKGROUND: The medial arm flap (MAF) has been used as a pedicle flap and free flap to reconstruct various deformities, including those of the head and neck, axilla, elbow, chest, and hand. This study reviews the anatomy of the flap, the technique of flap harvest, its clinical applications, and a systematic review of the current published literature.
METHODS: An online systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 30, 2023, was completed. Studies that investigate the anatomy, technique or clinical outcomes of medial arm flaps were included. Clinical data extracted includes patient, defect, flap characteristics, complications, and take-back procedures. Anatomic data extracted includes anatomical variations, and vascular characteristics and patterns.
RESULTS: Between 1980 and 2023, 50 papers were published outlining the medial arm flap. Anatomic studies detail the anatomy of 384 medial arms, and outcomes are reported for 283 MAFs (75 free flaps and 208 pedicle flaps). The superior ulnar collateral artery is most commonly cited as the dominant arterial supply to the middle third of the medial arm. The majority of patients required reconstruction post-burn (39.2%), trauma (17.7%), and tumor excision (12.4%). MAFs were mostly used to reconstruct defects of the head and neck (41.7%), the hand and wrist (21.9%), and the elbow (16.3%). Eleven flaps (4.1%) suffered partial flap failure, and two flaps (0.7%) suffered total flap failure.
CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript demonstrates that the MAF is a reliable and underutilized flap option with a well-hidden donor scar and a low complication rate.

UNASSIGNED: Thermography can be used in pre-operative planning of free perforator flap surgeries. Thermography assesses skin temperature by measuring the quantity of infrared radiation observed. In this meta-analysis, authors assess the sensitivity of smartphone-based thermal imaging (SBTI) in the detection of perforators and analyze the difference between static and dynamic imaging.
UNASSIGNED: Authors followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The meta package in R was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The \"metaprop\" function was used to calculate the overall sensitivity estimate and 95% confidence interval. The \"metaprop.one\" function was used to calculate subgroup estimates for static and dynamic study types. The \"metareg\" function was used to conduct meta-regression analyses to explore sources of heterogeneity.
UNASSIGNED: This study includes seven articles with 1429 perforators being evaluated. The overall proportion of the sensitivities was estimated to be 0.8754 (95% CI: 0.7542; 0.9414) using a random effects model. The heterogeneity of the studies was high, as indicated by the tau^2 value of 1.2500 (95% CI: 0.4497; 8.4060) and the I^2 value of 92.6% (95% CI: 88.1%; 95.4%). The pooled sensitivity for static imaging was 0.8636 (95%CI: 0.6238-0.9603) with a tau^2 of 2.0661 and a tau of 1.4374, while the pooled sensitivity for dynamic imaging was slightly higher (p = 0.7016) at 0.8993 (95%CI: 0.7412-0.9653) with a smaller tau^2 of 0.8403 and a tau of 0.9167.
UNASSIGNED: Further studies need to confirm that SBTI is a reliable and convenient technique for detecting perforators for the pre-operative planning of free perforator flap surgeries.