A new individualized, cost-effective, modified semi-computer-assisted surgery (MSCAS) concept for free fibular flap mandibular reconstruction is reported and compared with the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) concept. Patients were divided into two groups and retrospectively reviewed. In the MSCAS and CAS groups, intraoperative guides were created using computer-aided design with manual fabrication and computer-aided design and manufacturing, respectively. Differences in specific linear and angular parameters on pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans were calculated for morphometric comparison, and clinical parameters and efficiency were analysed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (CAS, 7; MSCAS, 11), were included. The morphometric comparison showed no significant differences between the groups. The mean deviation of the mandibular ramus length, body length, width 1 and width 2 was 0.82 ± 0.29 mm, 1.84 ± 0.43 mm, 1.89 ± 0.61 mm and 1.45 ± 0.61 mm in the CAS group versus 1.56 ± 0.54 mm, 1.72 ± 0.33 mm, 2.24 ± 0.55 mm and 2.36 ± 0.50 mm in the MSCAS group (p = 0.7804, p = 0.9997, p = 0.9814 and p = 0.6334). The mean deviation of the sagittal, axial and coronal mandibular angles was 1.56 ± 0.48°, 1.93 ± 0.50° and 2.15 ± 0.72° in the CAS group versus 2.19 ± 0.35°, 1.86 ± 0.35° and 1.94 ± 0.55° in the MSCAS group (p = 0.7594, p = 0.9996 and p = 0.9871). There were no significant differences in clinical parameters, efficiency or postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: The accuracy and operative efficiency of the MSCAS concept are comparable to those of the more expensive CAS concept. Therefore, in times of increasing clinical costs, this concept might be an adequate and inexpensive alternative to preoperative CAS.

BACKGROUND: Successful outcome of any vascularised free flap basically depends upon the successful restoration of circulation in the flap after anastomosis. As the flap ischemic time is the significant factor which determines the outcome of any free flaps, due consideration is given to reduce the time for anastomosis for reperfusion. The present study compares and evaluates whether the usage of microvascular couplers with the conventional suturing reduce the ischemic time of the free flaps.
METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups (each group consisting of 15 patients) for mandibular reconstruction using free fibular microvascular flap. In group 1, microanastomosis was done with conventional suturing whereas microvascular couplers were used in group 2. Intraoperatively, patency, leakage and tissue perfusion were assessed. The time taken for anastomosis (time taken for suturing and applying couplers) and flap ischemic time (from the time of flap division from the donor site till the flap is reperfused after anastomosis) were calculated for both the groups.
RESULTS: Significant decrease in time for anastomosis was observed in group 2, which resulted in decrease in flap ischemic time and in overall operating time.