OBJECTIVE: Previous studies assessing factors associated with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) were constrained by their amalgamation of all epilepsy syndromes in their analyses and the absence of uniform criteria for defining DRE. Our objective was to identify predictors of DRE among the four primary childhood epilepsy syndrome groups within a cohort of children with new onset seizures, using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition of DRE and the recent classification of epilepsies.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of 676 children with new onset seizures initiated on antiseizure medication. Patients were monitored for the occurrence of DRE according to the ILAE criteria and were categorized into one of four epilepsy groups: self-limited focal epilepsies (SeLFEs), genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs), developmental epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs), and focal epilepsies. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of DRE within each epilepsy group.
RESULTS: Overall, 29.3% of children were classified as having DRE, with the highest incidence observed among children diagnosed with DEEs (77.7%), followed by focal epilepsies (31.5%). Across the entire cohort, predictors of DRE included the presence of an epileptogenic lesion, a higher pretreatment number of seizures, experiencing multiple seizure types, presence and severity of intellectual and developmental delay, myoclonus, and younger age at epilepsy onset. Within the GGEs, only a younger age at seizure onset and experiencing multiple seizure types predicted DRE. Among focal epilepsies, predictors of DRE included the presence of an epileptogenic lesion, experiencing multiple seizure types, and having a greater number of pretreatment seizures. Within the DEEs, predictors of DRE were the occurrence of tonic seizures. Predictors of DRE within SeLFEs could not be identified.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that different epilepsy syndromes are associated with distinct predictors of drug resistance. Anticipation of drug resistance within various groups is feasible using accessible clinical variables throughout the disease course.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is a well-documented adverse effect of oxcarbazepine treatment, but no clinical trial has yet been conducted to explore any intervention for reducing the incidence of hyponatremia.
METHODS: This open-label trial evaluated the efficacy of add-on daily oral sodium chloride supplementation of 1-2 g/day for 12 weeks in reducing the incidence of hyponatremia in children receiving oxcarbazepine monotherapy aged 1-18 years. Apart from comparing the incidence of symptomatic and severe hyponatremia, serum and urine sodium levels, serum and urine osmolality, changes in behavior and cognition, and the number of participants with recurrence of seizures and requiring additional antiseizure medication (ASM) were also compared.
RESULTS: A total of 120 children (60 in each group) were enrolled. The serum sodium level at 12 weeks in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (136.5 ± 2.6 vs 135.4 ± 2.5 mEq/L, p = 0.01). The number of patients with hyponatremia was significantly lower in the intervention group (4/60vs14/60, p = 0.01). However, the incidence of symptomatic and severe hyponatremia (0/60vs1/60, p = 0.67 for both), changes in social quotient and child behavior checklist total score (0.6 ± 0.8 vs 0.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.41 and 0.9 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.9, p = 0.30 respectively), the number of patients with breakthrough seizures (9/60vs10/60, p = 0.89), and the number of patients requiring additional ASMs (8/60vs10/60, p = 0.79) were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral sodium chloride supplementation is safe and efficacious in reducing the incidence of hyponatremia in children with epilepsy receiving oxcarbazepine monotherapy. However, sodium chloride supplementation does not significantly reduce more clinically meaningful outcome measures like symptomatic and severe hyponatremia. Trial registry No. CTRI/2021/12/038388.

UNASSIGNED: Although previous studies have reported a bidirectional relationship between ischemic stroke (IS) and epilepsy, the existence of a causal nexus and its directionality remains a topic of controversy.
UNASSIGNED: The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with IS were extracted from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) database. Pooled genetic data encompassing all epilepsy cases, as well as generalized and focal epilepsy subtypes, were acquired from the International League Against Epilepsy\'s GWAS study. In this study, the primary analysis approach utilized the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method as the main analytical technique. To enhance the robustness of the findings against potential pleiotropy, additional sensitivity analyses were conducted.
UNASSIGNED: In the forward analysis, the IVW method demonstrated that IS was associated with an increased risk of all epilepsy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.127, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.038-1.224, P = 0.004) and generalized epilepsy (IVW: OR = 1.340, 95 % CI = 1.162-1.546, P = 5.70 × 10-5). There was no substantial causal relationship observed between IS and focal epilepsy (P > 0.05). Furthermore, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, and all epilepsy did not show a causal relationship with IS.
UNASSIGNED: This Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis demonstrates that IS increases the risk of developing epilepsy, especially generalized epilepsy. Conversely, no clear causal association was found between epilepsy and the onset of stroke. Therefore, the possible mechanisms of the effect of epilepsy on the pathogenesis of IS still need to be further investigated.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the impact of co-antiseizure medication (co-ASM) optimization on the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a real-world setting.
METHODS: This unicentric, retrospective, observational study included adults with focal-onset seizures who had received ≥2 previous ASMs. The main effectiveness endpoints included responder rates and seizure frequency reduction at 3, 6, and 12-month visits. The number of co-ASMs and defined daily dose (DDD) were analyzed at every visit. Safety endpoints included adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with a median epilepsy duration of 22 years and a median of 15.5 seizures/month were analyzed. The median number of prior ASMs was 12, and the mean number of co-ASMs was 2.9 (SD 1). There was a reduction in seizure frequency/month from baseline to the last visit (p < 0.0001). Between baseline and the end of the study, the mean number of co-ASMs in the per-protocol (PP) population was reduced from 2.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), and DDD was reduced from 3.6 to 1.4 (p < 0.0001). Sodium channel blockers (carbamazepine and lacosamide) and GABAergic drugs (clobazam) were the agents with the most significant reductions in DDD after 12 months. The percentage of patients in the PP population with ≥3 co-ASMs was reduced from 61.8% at baseline to 14.3% at 12 months; 1 patient was receiving CNB as monotherapy at the last visit. At the last visit, 85.7% of the PP population were ≥50% responders, and 33.3% were seizure-free. The percentage of patients with ADRs in the PP population was 71.9% at 3 months and 52.3% at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Following rational polytherapy, optimization of co-ASM management during CNB treatment allowed high seizure freedom rates despite meaningful reductions in co-medication, while also achieving both good tolerability and patient satisfaction scores in a highly drug-resistant population.
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with epilepsy still have seizures, even after being treated with several different epilepsy drugs. In this study of 34 patients from a Spanish clinic, we show that the epilepsy drug cenobamate can reduce the number of seizures in these patients, even after many other epilepsy drugs have failed. We also show that patients treated with cenobamate can reduce the dose or even stop taking certain other epilepsy drugs. This allows them to simplify their treatment and reduce adverse effects while still keeping control of their epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Adjunctive cenobamate was effective and safe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal onset seizures in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (YKP3089C017; NCT01866111). This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in the treatment of patients with different epileptic etiologies during the study.
METHODS: Adult patients with uncontrolled focal seizures who previously received 1 to 3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or cenobamate 100, 200 or 400 mg/day. Patients were further stratified based on their etiologic causes as genetic/presumed genetic, unknown cause, structural cause, and not reported (NR) groups. The frequency per 28 days for an 18-week double-blind treatment period, responder rates (≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 %) during the maintenance phase (12 weeks), and safety were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 394 patients were categorized into the genetic/presumed genetic (n = 9; 2.28 %), unknown cause (n = 199; 50.51 %), structural cause (n = 177; 44.92 %), and NR (n = 13; 3.30 %) groups, with 4 patients were classified into either of the two etiological causes each. The baseline characteristics were comparable. The percentage of reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days was significantly higher in the cenobamate-treated structural (p = 0.01) and unknown cause (p = 0.0003) groups compared with the placebo group. Responder rates of ≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 % were also higher with cenobamate therapy. Notably, no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in the genetic/presumed genetic group treated with cenobamate. The most common TEAEs (≥10 %) occurring in patients treated with cenobamate were nervous system disorders by system organ class, and somnolence was the most commonly reported TEAE.
CONCLUSIONS: Cenobamate reduces seizures in adult patients previously treated with ASMs, with high responder rates and acceptable safety, regardless of underlying causes.

Due to the limited number of studies in children with focal epilepsy and the importance of choosing the most suitable drug to control seizures in children, the administration of the most effective medication with the most negligible adverse events is vital. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of carbamazepine vs. levetiracetam monotherapy in children with focal seizures. A monocentric, randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was designed. This study was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number: IRCT20170216032603N2) on June 19, 2020, and conducted at the neurology department of Imam Ali Hospital, Karaj, Iran, from February 2020 to March 2021. This study assessed 120 patients with recently diagnosed focal seizures aged 2 to 14. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, who received carbamazepine (CBZ) 15 to 20 mg/kg and levetiracetam (LEV) 20 to 40 mg/kg daily, respectively. Patients were evaluated for improvement and complications at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Out of 120 patients included in the study, six patients were excluded due to various complications of CBZ. The mean number of seizures at the end of the fourth, twelfth, and twenty-fourth weeks were 1.09 ± 0.75, 0.62 ± 0.27, and 0.39 ± 0.12 in the carbamazepine group and 1.11 ± 0.63, 0.52 ± 0.21, and 0.37 ± 0.11 in the LEV group, respectively (P > 0.05). Similarly, the number of seizure-free patients was 34, 44, and 48 in the CBZ group compared to 41, 50, and 54 in the LEV group, respectively (P > 0.05). On the other hand, the frequency of somnolence, dermatologic complications, and agitation was considerably higher in the CBZ group (P < 0.05). Although both medicines were equally effective in seizure control, CBZ was associated with considerably more adverse events and less patient compliance. Physicians should be aware of this difference to prevent unwanted consequences.

Cryogenic magnetoencephalography (MEG) enhances the presurgical assessment of refractory focal epilepsy (RFE). Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are cryogen-free sensors that enable on-scalp MEG recordings. Here, we investigate the application of tri-axial OPMs [87Rb (Rb-OPM) and 4He gas (He-OPM)] for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). IEDs were recorded simultaneously with 4 tri-axial Rb- and 4 tri-axial He-OPMs in a child with RFE. IEDs were identified visually, isolated from magnetic background noise using independent component analysis (ICA) and were studied following their optimal magnetic field orientation thanks to virtual sensors. Most IEDs (>1,000) were detectable by both He- and Rb-OPM recordings. IEDs were isolated by ICA and the resulting magnetic field oriented mostly tangential to the scalp in Rb-OPMs and radial in He-OPMs. Likely due to differences in sensor locations, the IED amplitude was higher with Rb-OPMs. This case study shows comparable ability of Rb-OPMs and He-OPMs to detect IEDs and the substantial benefits of triaxial OPMs to detect IEDs from different sensor locations. Tri-axial OPMs allow to maximize spatial brain sampling for IEDs detection with a limited number of sensors.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of epilepsy are worse in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where most people with epilepsy live, and where most are untreated. Correct treatment depends on determining whether focal or generalised epilepsy is present. EEG and MRI are usually not available to help so an entirely clinical method is required. We applied an eight-variable algorithm, which had been derived from 503 patients from India using naïve-Bayesian methods, to an adult Sudanese cohort with epilepsy.
METHODS: There were 150 consecutive adult patients with known epilepsy type as defined by two neurologists who had access to clinical information, EEG and neuroimaging (\"the gold standard\"). We used seven of the eight variables, together with their likelihood ratios, to calculate the probability of focal as opposed to generalised epilepsy in each patient and compared that to the \"gold standard\". Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Cohen\'s kappa statistic were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean age was 28 years (range 17-49) and 53% were female. The accuracy of an algorithm comprising seven of the eight variables was 92%, with sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 72% for focal epilepsy. Cohen\'s kappa was 0.773, indicating substantial agreement. Ninety-four percent of patients had probability scores either less than 0.1 (generalised) or greater than 0.9 (focal).
CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the high accuracy of this algorithm in determining epilepsy type in Sudan. They suggest that, in a clinical condition like epilepsy, where a history is crucial, results in one continent can be applied to another. This is especially important as untreated epilepsy and the epilepsy treatment gap are so widespread. The algorithm can be applied to patients giving an individual probability score which can help determine the appropriate anti-seizure medication. It should give epilepsy-inexperienced doctors confidence in managing patients with epilepsy.

UNASSIGNED: Antiseizure medications can have negative effects on plasma lipid levels.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate plasma lipid changes in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy treated with eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) or controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) monotherapy during a phase III, randomized, double-blind (DB) trial and 2 years of ESL treatment in an open-label extension (OLE).
UNASSIGNED: Post hoc analysis of a phase III trial and OLE study.
UNASSIGNED: Proportions of patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were assessed at DB baseline, OLE baseline (last visit of DB trial), and end of OLE.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 184 patients received ESL monotherapy during the OLE: 96 received ESL monotherapy in the DB trial and 88 patients received CBZ-CR monotherapy. The proportions of patients with elevated total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol increased significantly during the DB trial in those treated with CBZ-CR monotherapy [total cholesterol, +14.9% (p < 0.001); LDL cholesterol, +11.5% (p = 0.012)] but decreased significantly after switching to ESL monotherapy in the OLE [total cholesterol, -15.3% (p = 0.008); LDL cholesterol, -11.1% (p = 0.021)]. No significant changes were observed in those treated with ESL monotherapy during the DB trial and OLE. At the end of the DB trial, between-group differences (ESL-CBZ-CR) in the proportions of patients with elevated total and LDL cholesterol were -13.6% (p = 0.037) and -12.3% (p = 0.061), respectively; at the end of the OLE, these between-group differences were -6.0% (p = 0.360) and -0.6% (p = 1.000), respectively.
UNASSIGNED: A lower proportion of patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy had increased levels of total and LDL cholesterol, compared to baseline, following monotherapy with ESL versus CBZ-CR; after switching from CBZ-CR to ESL, the proportions of patients with increased levels decreased significantly.
UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01162460/NCT02484001; EudraCT 2009-011135-13/2015-001243-36.
The impact of treatment with either eslicarbazepine acetate or controlled-release carbamazepine on cholesterol levels in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy Patients with epilepsy have an increased risk of having cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction and stroke). Treatment with antiseizure medications can have a negative effect on blood cholesterol levels [such as total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol], which can further increase the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. We examined the impact of monotherapy treatment (i.e., treatment with only one antiseizure medication) using either eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) or a controlled-release formulation of carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) in 184 patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy (ESL, 96 patients; CBZ-CR, 88 patients). Patients received monotherapy with ESL or CBZ-CR for approximately 1 year in a phase III clinical trial. After this, the patients could continue into a 2-year extension study during which they all received monotherapy with ESL. We assessed the proportions of patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol at the beginning and end of the phase III trial, and at the end of the extension study. At the beginning of the phase III trial, the proportions of patients with elevated total cholesterol and elevated LDL cholesterol were similar between treatment groups. During the phase III trial, the proportions of patients with elevated total cholesterol and elevated LDL cholesterol increased in those treated with CBZ-CR monotherapy (total cholesterol, +14.9%; LDL cholesterol, +11.5%) but decreased after switching to ESL monotherapy in the extension study (total cholesterol, −15.3%; LDL cholesterol, −11.1%). By contrast, the proportions of patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol remained relatively stable in those treated with ESL monotherapy during the phase III trial and extension study. These findings indicate that ESL monotherapy may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy who either already have, or who are at risk of developing, high levels of cholesterol, since this may reduce their likelihood of having cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.

There is a complex, bidirectional relationship between Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and epilepsy. However, the causality of this association is unclear, as confounders play a role in this association.
We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to clarify the causal relationship and direction of epilepsy on AD risk. We used publicly available summary statistics to obtain all genetic datasets for the MR analyses. AD and AD-by-proxy and late-onset AD (LOAD) cohorts were included in our study. The epilepsy cohort comprised all epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, and its subtypes, as well as some epilepsy syndromes. Next, we conducted validation using another AD cohort.
Two correlations between AD and epilepsy using the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method are as follows: LOAD and focal epilepsy (ORIVW  = 1.079, pIVW  = .013), focal epilepsy-documented hippocampal sclerosis (HS) and AD (ORIVW  = 1.152, pIVW  = .017). The causal relationship between epilepsy-documented HS and AD has been validated (ORIVW  = 3.994, pIVW  = .027).
Our MR study provides evidence for a causal relationship between focal epilepsy-documented HS and AD.